ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/xDissertation/mc.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/xDissertation/mc.tex (file contents):
Revision 3336 by xsun, Wed Jan 30 16:01:02 2008 UTC vs.
Revision 3383 by xsun, Wed Apr 16 21:56:34 2008 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1 < \chapter{\label{chap:mc}MONTE CARLO}
1 > \chapter{\label{chap:mc}SPONTANEOUS CORRUGATION OF DIPOLAR MEMBRANES}
2 >
3 > \section{Introduction}
4 > \label{mc:sec:Int}
5 >
6 > The properties of polymeric membranes are known to depend sensitively
7 > on the details of the internal interactions between the constituent
8 > monomers.  A flexible membrane will always have a competition between
9 > the energy of curvature and the in-plane stretching energy and will be
10 > able to buckle in certain limits of surface tension and
11 > temperature.\cite{Safran94} The buckling can be non-specific and
12 > centered at dislocation~\cite{Seung1988} or grain-boundary
13 > defects,\cite{Carraro1993} or it can be directional and cause long
14 > ``roof-tile'' or tube-like structures to appear in
15 > partially-polymerized phospholipid vesicles.\cite{Mutz1991}
16 >
17 > One would expect that anisotropic local interactions could lead to
18 > interesting properties of the buckled membrane.  We report here on the
19 > buckling behavior of a membrane composed of harmonically-bound, but
20 > freely-rotating electrostatic dipoles.  The dipoles have strongly
21 > anisotropic local interactions and the membrane exhibits coupling
22 > between the buckling and the long-range ordering of the dipoles.
23 >
24 > Buckling behavior in liquid crystalline and biological membranes is a
25 > well-known phenomenon.  Relatively pure phosphatidylcholine (PC)
26 > bilayers form a corrugated or ``rippled'' phase ($P_{\beta'}$) which
27 > appears as an intermediate phase between the gel ($L_\beta$) and fluid
28 > ($L_{\alpha}$) phases.  The $P_{\beta'}$ phase has attracted
29 > substantial experimental interest over the past 30
30 > years,~\cite{Sun96,Katsaras00,Copeland80,Meyer96,Kaasgaard03} and
31 > there have been a number of theoretical
32 > approaches~\cite{Marder84,Carlson87,Goldstein88,McCullough90,Lubensky93,Misbah98,Heimburg00,Kubica02,Bannerjee02}
33 > (and some heroic
34 > simulations~\cite{Ayton02,Jiang04,Brannigan04a,deVries05,deJoannis06})
35 > undertaken to try to explain this phase, but to date, none have looked
36 > specifically at the contribution of the dipolar character of the lipid
37 > head groups towards this corrugation.  Lipid chain interdigitation
38 > certainly plays a major role, and the structures of the ripple phase
39 > are highly ordered.  The model we investigate here lacks chain
40 > interdigitation (as well as the chains themselves!) and will not be
41 > detailed enough to rule in favor of (or against) any of these
42 > explanations for the $P_{\beta'}$ phase.
43 >
44 > Membranes containing electrostatic dipoles can also exhibit the
45 > flexoelectric effect,\cite{Todorova2004,Harden2006,Petrov2006} which
46 > is the ability of mechanical deformations to result in electrostatic
47 > organization of the membrane.  This phenomenon is a curvature-induced
48 > membrane polarization which can lead to potential differences across a
49 > membrane.  Reverse flexoelectric behavior (in which applied currents
50 > effect membrane curvature) has also been observed.  Explanations of
51 > the details of these effects have typically utilized membrane
52 > polarization perpendicular to the face of the
53 > membrane,\cite{Petrov2006} and the effect has been observed in both
54 > biological,\cite{Raphael2000} bent-core liquid
55 > crystalline,\cite{Harden2006} and polymer-dispersed liquid crystalline
56 > membranes.\cite{Todorova2004}
57 >
58 > The problem with using atomistic and even coarse-grained approaches to
59 > study membrane buckling phenomena is that only a relatively small
60 > number of periods of the corrugation (i.e. one or two) can be
61 > realistically simulated given current technology.  Also, simulations
62 > of lipid bilayers are traditionally carried out with periodic boundary
63 > conditions in two or three dimensions and these have the potential to
64 > enhance the periodicity of the system at that wavelength.  To avoid
65 > this pitfall, we are using a model which allows us to have
66 > sufficiently large systems so that we are not causing artificial
67 > corrugation through the use of periodic boundary conditions.
68 >
69 > The simplest dipolar membrane is one in which the dipoles are located
70 > on fixed lattice sites. Ferroelectric states (with long-range dipolar
71 > order) can be observed in dipolar systems with non-triangular
72 > packings.  However, {\em triangularly}-packed 2-D dipolar systems are
73 > inherently frustrated and one would expect a dipolar-disordered phase
74 > to be the lowest free energy
75 > configuration.\cite{Toulouse1977,Marland1979} Dipolar lattices already
76 > have rich phase behavior, but in order to allow the membrane to
77 > buckle, a single degree of freedom (translation normal to the membrane
78 > face) must be added to each of the dipoles.  It would also be possible
79 > to allow complete translational freedom.  This approach
80 > is similar in character to a number of elastic Ising models that have
81 > been developed to explain interesting mechanical properties in
82 > magnetic alloys.\cite{Renard1966,Zhu2005,Zhu2006,Jiang2006}
83 >
84 > What we present here is an attempt to find the simplest dipolar model
85 > which will exhibit buckling behavior.  We are using a modified XYZ
86 > lattice model; details of the model can be found in section
87 > \ref{mc:sec:model}, results of Monte Carlo simulations using this model
88 > are presented in section
89 > \ref{mc:sec:results}, and section \ref{mc:sec:discussion} contains our conclusions.
90 >
91 > \section{2-D Dipolar Membrane}
92 > \label{mc:sec:model}
93 >
94 > The point of developing this model was to arrive at the simplest
95 > possible theoretical model which could exhibit spontaneous corrugation
96 > of a two-dimensional dipolar medium.  Since molecules in polymerized
97 > membranes and in the $P_{\beta'}$ ripple phase have limited
98 > translational freedom, we have chosen a lattice to support the dipoles
99 > in the x-y plane.  The lattice may be either triangular (lattice
100 > constants $a/b =
101 > \sqrt{3}$) or distorted.  However, each dipole has 3 degrees of
102 > freedom.  They may move freely {\em out} of the x-y plane (along the
103 > $z$ axis), and they have complete orientational freedom ($0 <= \theta
104 > <= \pi$, $0 <= \phi < 2
105 > \pi$).  This is essentially a modified X-Y-Z model with translational
106 > freedom along the z-axis.
107 >
108 > The potential energy of the system,
109 > \begin{equation}
110 > \begin{split}
111 > V = \sum_i  &\left( \sum_{j>i} \frac{|\mu|^2}{4\pi \epsilon_0 r_{ij}^3} \left[
112 > {\mathbf{\hat u}_i} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat u}_j} -
113 > 3({\mathbf{\hat u}_i} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat
114 > r}_{ij}})({\mathbf{\hat u}_j} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}})\right] \right. \\
115 >  & \left. + \sum_{j \in NN_i}^6 \frac{k_r}{2}\left(
116 > r_{ij}-\sigma \right)^2 \right)
117 > \end{split}
118 > \label{mceq:pot}
119 > \end{equation}
120 >
121 > In this potential, $\mathbf{\hat u}_i$ is the unit vector pointing
122 > along dipole $i$ and $\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}$ is the unit vector
123 > pointing along the inter-dipole vector $\mathbf{r}_{ij}$.  The entire
124 > potential is governed by three parameters, the dipolar strength
125 > ($\mu$), the harmonic spring constant ($k_r$) and the preferred
126 > intermolecular spacing ($\sigma$).  In practice, we set the value of
127 > $\sigma$ to the average inter-molecular spacing from the planar
128 > lattice, yielding a potential model that has only two parameters for a
129 > particular choice of lattice constants $a$ (along the $x$-axis) and
130 > $b$ (along the $y$-axis).  We also define a set of reduced parameters
131 > based on the length scale ($\sigma$) and the energy of the harmonic
132 > potential at a deformation of 2 $\sigma$ ($\epsilon = k_r \sigma^2 /
133 > 2$).  Using these two constants, we perform our calculations using
134 > reduced distances, ($r^{*} = r / \sigma$), temperatures ($T^{*} = 2
135 > k_B T / k_r \sigma^2$), densities ($\rho^{*} = N \sigma^2 / L_x L_y$),
136 > and dipole moments ($\mu^{*} = \mu / \sqrt{4 \pi \epsilon_0 \sigma^5
137 > k_r / 2}$).  It should be noted that the density ($\rho^{*}$) depends
138 > only on the mean particle spacing in the $x-y$ plane; the lattice is
139 > fully populated.
140 >
141 > To investigate the phase behavior of this model, we have performed a
142 > series of Me\-trop\-o\-lis Monte Carlo simulations of moderately-sized
143 > (34.3 $\sigma$ on a side) patches of membrane hosted on both
144 > triangular ($\gamma = a/b = \sqrt{3}$) and distorted ($\gamma \neq
145 > \sqrt{3}$) lattices.  The linear extent of one edge of the monolayer
146 > was $20 a$ and the system was kept roughly square. The average
147 > distance that coplanar dipoles were positioned from their six nearest
148 > neighbors was 1 $\sigma$ (on both triangular and distorted lattices).
149 > Typical system sizes were 1360 dipoles for the triangular lattices and
150 > 840-2800 dipoles for the distorted lattices.  Two-dimensional periodic
151 > boundary conditions were used, and the cutoff for the dipole-dipole
152 > interaction was set to 4.3 $\sigma$.  This cutoff is roughly 2.5 times
153 > the typical real-space electrostatic cutoff for molecular systems.
154 > Since dipole-dipole interactions decay rapidly with distance, and
155 > since the intrinsic three-dimensional periodicity of the Ewald sum can
156 > give artifacts in 2-d systems, we have chosen not to use it in these
157 > calculations.  Although the Ewald sum has been reformulated to handle
158 > 2-D systems,\cite{Parry75,Parry76,Heyes77,deLeeuw79,Rhee89} these
159 > methods are computationally expensive,\cite{Spohr97,Yeh99} and are not
160 > necessary in this case.  All parameters ($T^{*}$, $\mu^{*}$, and
161 > $\gamma$) were varied systematically to study the effects of these
162 > parameters on the formation of ripple-like phases. The error bars in
163 > our results are one $\sigma$ on each side of the average values, where
164 > $\sigma$ is the standard deviation obtained from repeated observations
165 > of many configurations.
166 >
167 > \section{Results and Analysis}
168 > \label{mc:sec:results}
169 >
170 > \subsection{Dipolar Ordering and Coexistence Temperatures}
171 > The principal method for observing the orientational ordering
172 > transition in dipolar or liquid crystalline systems is the $P_2$ order
173 > parameter (defined as $1.5 \times \lambda_{max}$, where
174 > $\lambda_{max}$ is the largest eigenvalue of the matrix,
175 > \begin{equation}
176 > {\mathsf{S}} = \frac{1}{N} \sum_i \left(
177 > \begin{array}{ccc}
178 >        u^{x}_i u^{x}_i-\frac{1}{3} & u^{x}_i u^{y}_i & u^{x}_i u^{z}_i \\
179 >        u^{y}_i u^{x}_i  & u^{y}_i u^{y}_i -\frac{1}{3} & u^{y}_i u^{z}_i \\
180 >        u^{z}_i u^{x}_i & u^{z}_i u^{y}_i  & u^{z}_i u^{z}_i -\frac{1}{3}
181 > \end{array} \right).
182 > \label{mceq:opmatrix}
183 > \end{equation}
184 > Here $u^{\alpha}_i$ is the $\alpha=x,y,z$ component of the unit vector
185 > for dipole $i$.  $P_2$ will be $1.0$ for a perfectly-ordered system
186 > and near $0$ for a randomized system.  Note that this order parameter
187 > is {\em not} equal to the polarization of the system.  For example,
188 > the polarization of the perfect anti-ferroelectric system is $0$, but
189 > $P_2$ for an anti-ferroelectric system is $1$.  The eigenvector of
190 > $\mathsf{S}$ corresponding to the largest eigenvalue is familiar as
191 > the director axis, which can be used to determine a privileged dipolar
192 > axis for dipole-ordered systems.  The top panel in Fig. \ref{mcfig:phase}
193 > shows the values of $P_2$ as a function of temperature for both
194 > triangular ($\gamma = 1.732$) and distorted ($\gamma=1.875$)
195 > lattices.
196 >
197 > \begin{figure}
198 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcPhase.pdf}
199 > \caption[ The $P_2$ dipolar order parameter as
200 > a function of temperature and the phase diagram for the dipolar
201 > membrane model]{\label{mcfig:phase} Top panel: The $P_2$ dipolar order
202 > parameter as a function of temperature for both triangular ($\gamma =
203 > 1.732$) and distorted ($\gamma = 1.875$) lattices.  Bottom Panel: The
204 > phase diagram for the dipolar membrane model.  The line denotes the
205 > division between the dipolar ordered (anti-ferroelectric) and
206 > disordered phases.  An enlarged view near the triangular lattice is
207 > shown inset.}
208 > \end{figure}
209 >
210 > There is a clear order-disorder transition in evidence from this data.
211 > Both the triangular and distorted lattices have dipolar-ordered
212 > low-temperature phases, and ori\-en\-ta\-tion\-al\-ly-disordered high
213 > temperature phases.  The coexistence temperature for the triangular
214 > lattice is significantly lower than for the distorted lattices, and
215 > the bulk polarization is approximately $0$ for both dipolar ordered
216 > and disordered phases.  This gives strong evidence that the dipolar
217 > ordered phase is anti-ferroelectric.  We have verified that this
218 > dipolar ordering transition is not a function of system size by
219 > performing identical calculations with systems twice as large.  The
220 > transition is equally smooth at all system sizes that were studied.
221 > Additionally, we have repeated the Monte Carlo simulations over a wide
222 > range of lattice ratios ($\gamma$) to generate a dipolar
223 > order/disorder phase diagram.  The bottom panel in
224 > Fig. \ref{mcfig:phase} shows that the triangular lattice is a
225 > low-temperature cusp in the $T^{*}-\gamma$ phase diagram.
226 >
227 > This phase diagram is remarkable in that it shows an
228 > anti-ferroelectric phase near $\gamma=1.732$ where one would expect
229 > lattice frustration to result in disordered phases at all
230 > temperatures.  Observations of the configurations in this phase show
231 > clearly that the system has accomplished dipolar ordering by forming
232 > large ripple-like structures.  We have observed anti-ferroelectric
233 > ordering in all three of the equivalent directions on the triangular
234 > lattice, and the dipoles have been observed to organize perpendicular
235 > to the membrane normal (in the plane of the membrane).  It is
236 > particularly interesting to note that the ripple-like structures have
237 > also been observed to propagate in the three equivalent directions on
238 > the lattice, but the {\em direction of ripple propagation is always
239 > perpendicular to the dipole director axis}.  A snapshot of a typical
240 > anti-ferroelectric rippled structure is shown in
241 > Fig. \ref{mcfig:snapshot}.
242 >
243 > \begin{figure}
244 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcSnapshot.pdf}
245 > \caption[ Top and Side views of a representative
246 > configuration for the dipolar ordered phase supported on the
247 > triangular lattice]{\label{mcfig:snapshot} Top and Side views of a
248 > representative configuration for the dipolar ordered phase supported
249 > on the triangular lattice. Note the anti-ferroelectric ordering and
250 > the long wavelength buckling of the membrane.  Dipolar ordering has
251 > been observed in all three equivalent directions on the triangular
252 > lattice, and the ripple direction is always perpendicular to the
253 > director axis for the dipoles.}
254 > \end{figure}
255 >
256 > Although the snapshot in Fig. \ref{mcfig:snapshot} gives the appearance
257 > of three-row stair-like structures, these appear to be transient.  On
258 > average, the corrugation of the membrane is a relatively smooth,
259 > long-wavelength phenomenon, with occasional steep drops between
260 > adjacent lines of anti-aligned dipoles.
261 >
262 > The height-dipole correlation function ($C_{\textrm{hd}}(r, \cos
263 > \theta)$) makes the connection between dipolar ordering and the wave
264 > vector of the ripple even more explicit.  $C_{\textrm{hd}}(r, \cos
265 > \theta)$ is an angle-dependent pair distribution function. The angle
266 > ($\theta$) is the angle between the intermolecular vector
267 > $\vec{r}_{ij}$ and direction of dipole $i$,
268 > \begin{equation}
269 > C_{\textrm{hd}} = \frac{\langle \frac{1}{n(r)} \sum_{i}\sum_{j>i}
270 > h_i \cdot h_j \delta(r - r_{ij}) \delta(\cos \theta_{ij} -
271 > \cos \theta)\rangle} {\langle h^2 \rangle}
272 > \end{equation}
273 > where $\cos \theta_{ij} = \hat{\mu}_{i} \cdot \hat{r}_{ij}$ and
274 > $\hat{r}_{ij} = \vec{r}_{ij} / r_{ij}$.  $n(r)$ is the number of
275 > dipoles found in a cylindrical shell between $r$ and $r+\delta r$ of
276 > the central particle. Fig. \ref{mcfig:CrossCorrelation} shows contours
277 > of this correlation function for both anti-ferroelectric, rippled
278 > membranes as well as for the dipole-disordered portion of the phase
279 > diagram.
280 >
281 > \begin{figure}
282 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcHdc.pdf}
283 > \caption[Contours of the height-dipole
284 > correlation function]{\label{mcfig:CrossCorrelation} Contours of the
285 > height-dipole correlation function as a function of the dot product
286 > between the dipole ($\hat{\mu}$) and inter-dipole separation vector
287 > ($\hat{r}$) and the distance ($r$) between the dipoles.  Perfect
288 > height correlation (contours approaching 1) are present in the ordered
289 > phase when the two dipoles are in the same head-to-tail line.
290 > Anti-correlation (contours below 0) is only seen when the inter-dipole
291 > vector is perpendicular to the dipoles.  In the dipole-disordered
292 > portion of the phase diagram, there is only weak correlation in the
293 > dipole direction and this correlation decays rapidly to zero for
294 > intermolecular vectors that are not dipole-aligned.}
295 > \end{figure}
296 >
297 > The height-dipole correlation function gives a map of how the topology
298 > of the membrane surface varies with angular deviation around a given
299 > dipole.  The upper panel of Fig. \ref{mcfig:CrossCorrelation} shows that
300 > in the anti-ferroelectric phase, the dipole heights are strongly
301 > correlated for dipoles in head-to-tail arrangements, and this
302 > correlation persists for very long distances (up to 15 $\sigma$).  For
303 > portions of the membrane located perpendicular to a given dipole, the
304 > membrane height becomes anti-correlated at distances of 10 $\sigma$.
305 > The correlation function is relatively smooth; there are no steep
306 > jumps or steps, so the stair-like structures in
307 > Fig. \ref{mcfig:snapshot} are indeed transient and disappear when
308 > averaged over many configurations.  In the dipole-disordered phase,
309 > the height-dipole correlation function is relatively flat (and hovers
310 > near zero).  The only significant height correlations are for axial
311 > dipoles at very short distances ($r \approx
312 > \sigma$).
313 >
314 > \subsection{Discriminating Ripples from Thermal Undulations}
315 >
316 > In order to be sure that the structures we have observed are actually
317 > a rippled phase and not simply thermal undulations, we have computed
318 > the undulation spectrum,
319 > \begin{equation}
320 > h(\vec{q}) = A^{-1/2} \int d\vec{r}
321 > h(\vec{r}) e^{-i \vec{q}\cdot\vec{r}}
322 > \end{equation}
323 > where $h(\vec{r})$ is the height of the membrane at location $\vec{r}
324 > = (x,y)$.~\cite{Safran94,Seifert97} In simple (and more complicated)
325 > elastic continuum models, it can shown that in the $NVT$ ensemble, the
326 > absolute value of the undulation spectrum can be written,
327 > \begin{equation}
328 > \langle | h(q) |^2 \rangle_{NVT} = \frac{k_B T}{k_c q^4 +
329 > \gamma q^2},
330 > \label{mceq:fit}
331 > \end{equation}
332 > where $k_c$ is the bending modulus for the membrane, and $\gamma$ is
333 > the mechanical surface tension.~\cite{Safran94} The systems studied in
334 > this paper have essentially zero bending moduli ($k_c$) and relatively
335 > large mechanical surface tensions ($\gamma$), so a much simpler form
336 > can be written,
337 > \begin{equation}
338 > \langle | h(q) |^2 \rangle_{NVT} = \frac{k_B T}{\gamma q^2}.
339 > \label{mceq:fit2}
340 > \end{equation}
341 >
342 > The undulation spectrum is computed by superimposing a rectangular
343 > grid on top of the membrane, and by assigning height ($h(\vec{r})$)
344 > values to the grid from the average of all dipoles that fall within a
345 > given $\vec{r}+d\vec{r}$ grid area.  Empty grid pixels are assigned
346 > height values by interpolation from the nearest neighbor pixels.  A
347 > standard 2-d Fourier transform is then used to obtain $\langle |
348 > h(q)|^2 \rangle$.  Alternatively, since the dipoles sit on a Bravais
349 > lattice, one could use the heights of the lattice points themselves as
350 > the grid for the Fourier transform (without interpolating to a square
351 > grid).  However, if lateral translational freedom is added to this
352 > model (a likely extension), an interpolated grid method for computing
353 > undulation spectra will be required.
354 >
355 > As mentioned above, the best fits to our undulation spectra are
356 > obtained by setting the value of $k_c$ to 0.  In Fig. \ref{mcfig:fit} we
357 > show typical undulation spectra for two different regions of the phase
358 > diagram along with their fits from the Landau free energy approach
359 > (Eq. \ref{mceq:fit2}).  In the high-temperature disordered phase, the
360 > Landau fits can be nearly perfect, and from these fits we can estimate
361 > the tension in the surface.  In reduced units, typical values of
362 > $\gamma^{*} = \gamma / \epsilon = 2500$ are obtained for the
363 > disordered phase ($\gamma^{*} = 2551.7$ in the top panel of
364 > Fig. \ref{mcfig:fit}).
365 >
366 > Typical values of $\gamma^{*}$ in the dipolar-ordered phase are much
367 > higher than in the dipolar-disordered phase ($\gamma^{*} = 73,538$ in
368 > the lower panel of Fig. \ref{mcfig:fit}).  For the dipolar-ordered
369 > triangular lattice near the coexistence temperature, we also observe
370 > long wavelength undulations that are far outliers to the fits.  That
371 > is, the Landau free energy fits are well within error bars for most of
372 > the other points, but can be off by {\em orders of magnitude} for a
373 > few low frequency components.
374 >
375 > We interpret these outliers as evidence that these low frequency modes
376 > are {\em non-thermal undulations}.  We take this as evidence that we
377 > are actually seeing a rippled phase developing in this model system.
378 >
379 > \begin{figure}
380 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcLogFit.pdf}
381 > \caption[Evidence that the observed ripples are {\em not} thermal
382 > undulations]{\label{mcfig:fit} Evidence that the observed ripples are
383 > {\em not} thermal undulations is obtained from the 2-d Fourier
384 > transform $\langle |h^{*}(\vec{q})|^2 \rangle$ of the height profile
385 > ($\langle h^{*}(x,y) \rangle$). Rippled samples show low-wavelength
386 > peaks that are outliers on the Landau free energy fits by an order of
387 > magnitude.  Samples exhibiting only thermal undulations fit
388 > Eq. \ref{mceq:fit} remarkably well.}
389 > \end{figure}
390 >
391 > \subsection{Effects of Potential Parameters on Amplitude and Wavelength}
392 >
393 > We have used two different methods to estimate the amplitude and
394 > periodicity of the ripples.  The first method requires projection of
395 > the ripples onto a one dimensional rippling axis. Since the rippling
396 > is always perpendicular to the dipole director axis, we can define a
397 > ripple vector as follows.  The largest eigenvector, $s_1$, of the
398 > $\mathsf{S}$ matrix in Eq. \ref{mceq:opmatrix} is projected onto a
399 > planar director axis,
400 > \begin{equation}
401 > \vec{d} = \left(\begin{array}{c}
402 > \vec{s}_1 \cdot \hat{i} \\
403 > \vec{s}_1 \cdot \hat{j} \\
404 > 0
405 > \end{array} \right).
406 > \end{equation}
407 > ($\hat{i}$, $\hat{j}$ and $\hat{k}$ are unit vectors along the $x$,
408 > $y$, and $z$ axes, respectively.)  The rippling axis is in the plane of
409 > the membrane and is perpendicular to the planar director axis,
410 > \begin{equation}
411 > \vec{q}_{\mathrm{rip}} = \vec{d} \times \hat{k}
412 > \end{equation}
413 > We can then find the height profile of the membrane along the ripple
414 > axis by projecting heights of the dipoles to obtain a one-dimensional
415 > height profile, $h(q_{\mathrm{rip}})$. Ripple wavelengths can be
416 > estimated from the largest non-thermal low-frequency component in the
417 > Fourier transform of $h(q_{\mathrm{rip}})$.  Amplitudes can be
418 > estimated by measuring peak-to-trough distances in
419 > $h(q_{\mathrm{rip}})$ itself.
420 >
421 > A second, more accurate, and simpler method for estimating ripple
422 > shape is to extract the wavelength and height information directly
423 > from the largest non-thermal peak in the undulation spectrum.  For
424 > large-amplitude ripples, the two methods give similar results.  The
425 > one-dimensional projection method is more prone to noise (particularly
426 > in the amplitude estimates for the distorted lattices).  We report
427 > amplitudes and wavelengths taken directly from the undulation spectrum
428 > below.
429 >
430 > In the triangular lattice ($\gamma = \sqrt{3}$), the rippling is
431 > observed for temperatures ($T^{*}$) from $61-122$.  The wavelength of
432 > the ripples is remarkably stable at 21.4~$\sigma$ for all but the
433 > temperatures closest to the order-disorder transition.  At $T^{*} =
434 > 122$, the wavelength drops to 17.1~$\sigma$.
435 >
436 > The dependence of the amplitude on temperature is shown in the top
437 > panel of Fig. \ref{mcfig:Amplitude}.  The rippled structures shrink
438 > smoothly as the temperature rises towards the order-disorder
439 > transition.  The wavelengths and amplitudes we observe are
440 > surprisingly close to the $\Lambda / 2$ phase observed by Kaasgaard
441 > {\it et al.} in their work on PC-based lipids.\cite{Kaasgaard03}
442 > However, this is coincidental agreement based on a choice of 7~\AA~as
443 > the mean spacing between lipids.
444 >
445 > \begin{figure}
446 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcProperties_sq.pdf}
447 > \caption[ The amplitude $A^{*}$ of the ripples
448 > vs. temperature and dipole strength
449 > ($\mu^{*}$)]{\label{mcfig:Amplitude} a) The amplitude $A^{*}$ of the
450 > ripples vs. temperature for a triangular lattice. b) The amplitude
451 > $A^{*}$ of the ripples vs. dipole strength ($\mu^{*}$) for both the
452 > triangular lattice (circles) and distorted lattice (squares).  The
453 > reduced temperatures were kept fixed at $T^{*} = 94$ for the
454 > triangular lattice and $T^{*} = 106$ for the distorted lattice
455 > (approximately 2/3 of the order-disorder transition temperature for
456 > each lattice).}
457 > \end{figure}
458 >
459 > The ripples can be made to disappear by increasing the internal
460 > elastic tension (i.e. by increasing $k_r$ or equivalently, reducing
461 > the dipole moment).  The amplitude of the ripples depends critically
462 > on the strength of the dipole moments ($\mu^{*}$) in Eq. \ref{mceq:pot}.
463 > If the dipoles are weakened substantially (below $\mu^{*}$ = 20) at a
464 > fixed temperature of 94, the membrane loses dipolar ordering
465 > and the ripple structures. The ripples reach a peak amplitude of
466 > 3.7~$\sigma$ at a dipolar strength of 25.  We show the dependence
467 > of ripple amplitude on the dipolar strength in
468 > Fig. \ref{mcfig:Amplitude}.
469 >
470 > \subsection{Distorted lattices}
471 >
472 > We have also investigated the effect of the lattice geometry by
473 > changing the ratio of lattice constants ($\gamma$) while keeping the
474 > average nearest-neighbor spacing constant. The anti-ferroelectric state
475 > is accessible for all $\gamma$ values we have used, although the
476 > distorted triangular lattices prefer a particular director axis due to
477 > the anisotropy of the lattice.
478 >
479 > Our observation of rippling behavior was not limited to the triangular
480 > lattices.  In distorted lattices the anti-ferroelectric phase can
481 > develop nearly instantaneously in the Monte Carlo simulations, and
482 > these dipolar-ordered phases tend to be remarkably flat.  Whenever
483 > rippling has been observed in these distorted lattices
484 > (e.g. $\gamma = 1.875$), we see relatively short ripple wavelengths
485 > (14 $\sigma$) and amplitudes of 2.4~$\sigma$.  These ripples are
486 > weakly dependent on dipolar strength (see Fig. \ref{mcfig:Amplitude}),
487 > although below a dipolar strength of $\mu^{*} = 20$, the membrane
488 > loses dipolar ordering and displays only thermal undulations.
489 >
490 > The ripple phase does {\em not} appear at all values of $\gamma$.  We
491 > have only observed non-thermal undulations in the range $1.625 <
492 > \gamma < 1.875$.  Outside this range, the order-disorder transition in
493 > the dipoles remains, but the ordered dipolar phase has only thermal
494 > undulations.  This is one of our strongest pieces of evidence that
495 > rippling is a symmetry-breaking phenomenon for triangular and
496 > nearly-triangular lattices.
497 >
498 > \subsection{Effects of System Size}
499 > To evaluate the effect of finite system size, we have performed a
500 > series of simulations on the triangular lattice at a reduced
501 > temperature of 122, which is just below the order-disorder transition
502 > temperature ($T^{*} = 139$).  These conditions are in the
503 > dipole-ordered and rippled portion of the phase diagram.  These are
504 > also the conditions that should be most susceptible to system size
505 > effects.
506 >
507 > \begin{figure}
508 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcSystemSize.pdf}
509 > \caption[The ripple wavelength and amplitude as a function of system
510 > size]{\label{mcfig:systemsize} The ripple wavelength (top) and
511 > amplitude (bottom) as a function of system size for a triangular
512 > lattice ($\gamma=1.732$) at $T^{*} = 122$.}
513 > \end{figure}
514 >
515 > There is substantial dependence on system size for small (less than
516 > 29~$\sigma$) periodic boxes.  Notably, there are resonances apparent
517 > in the ripple amplitudes at box lengths of 17.3 and 29.5 $\sigma$.
518 > For larger systems, the behavior of the ripples appears to have
519 > stabilized and is on a trend to slightly smaller amplitudes (and
520 > slightly longer wavelengths) than were observed from the 34.3 $\sigma$
521 > box sizes that were used for most of the calculations.
522 >
523 > It is interesting to note that system sizes which are multiples of the
524 > default ripple wavelength can enhance the amplitude of the observed
525 > ripples, but appears to have only a minor effect on the observed
526 > wavelength.  It would, of course, be better to use system sizes that
527 > were many multiples of the ripple wavelength to be sure that the
528 > periodic box is not driving the phenomenon, but at the largest system
529 > size studied (70 $\sigma$ $\times$ 70 $\sigma$), the number of dipoles
530 > (5440) made long Monte Carlo simulations prohibitively expensive.
531 >
532 > \section{Discussion}
533 > \label{mc:sec:discussion}
534 >
535 > We have been able to show that a simple dipolar lattice model which
536 > contains only molecular packing (from the lattice), anisotropy (in the
537 > form of electrostatic dipoles) and a weak elastic tension (in the form
538 > of a nearest-neighbor harmonic potential) is capable of exhibiting
539 > stable long-wavelength non-thermal surface corrugations.  The best
540 > explanation for this behavior is that the ability of the dipoles to
541 > translate out of the plane of the membrane is enough to break the
542 > symmetry of the triangular lattice and allow the energetic benefit
543 > from the formation of a bulk anti-ferroelectric phase.  Were the weak
544 > elastic tension absent from our model, it would be possible for the
545 > entire lattice to ``tilt'' using $z$-translation.  Tilting the lattice
546 > in this way would yield an effectively non-triangular lattice which
547 > would avoid dipolar frustration altogether.  With the elastic tension
548 > in place, bulk tilt causes a large strain, and the least costly way to
549 > release this strain is between two rows of anti-aligned dipoles.
550 > These ``breaks'' will result in rippled or sawtooth patterns in the
551 > membrane, and allow small stripes of membrane to form
552 > anti-ferroelectric regions that are tilted relative to the averaged
553 > membrane normal.
554 >
555 > Although the dipole-dipole interaction is the major driving force for
556 > the long range orientational ordered state, the formation of the
557 > stable, smooth ripples is a result of the competition between the
558 > elastic tension and the dipole-dipole interactions.  This statement is
559 > supported by the variation in $\mu^{*}$.  Substantially weaker dipoles
560 > relative to the surface tension can cause the corrugated phase to
561 > disappear.
562 >
563 > The packing of the dipoles into a nearly-triangular lattice is clearly
564 > an important piece of the puzzle.  The dipolar head groups of lipid
565 > molecules are sterically (as well as electrostatically) anisotropic,
566 > and would not pack in triangular arrangements without the steric
567 > interference of adjacent molecular bodies.  Since we only see rippled
568 > phases in the neighborhood of $\gamma=\sqrt{3}$, this implies that
569 > even if this dipolar mechanism is the correct explanation for the
570 > ripple phase in realistic bilayers, there would still be a role played
571 > by the lipid chains in the in-plane organization of the triangularly
572 > ordered phases which could support ripples.  The present model is
573 > certainly not detailed enough to answer exactly what drives the
574 > formation of the $P_{\beta'}$ phase in real lipids, but suggests some
575 > avenues for further experiments.
576 >
577 > The most important prediction we can make using the results from this
578 > simple model is that if dipolar ordering is driving the surface
579 > corrugation, the wave vectors for the ripples should always found to
580 > be {\it perpendicular} to the dipole director axis.  This prediction
581 > should suggest experimental designs which test whether this is really
582 > true in the phosphatidylcholine $P_{\beta'}$ phases.  The dipole
583 > director axis should also be easily computable for the all-atom and
584 > coarse-grained simulations that have been published in the literature.
585 >
586 > Our other observation about the ripple and dipolar directionality is
587 > that the dipole director axis can be found to be parallel to any of
588 > the three equivalent lattice vectors in the triangular lattice.
589 > Defects in the ordering of the dipoles can cause the dipole director
590 > (and consequently the surface corrugation) of small regions to be
591 > rotated relative to each other by 120$^{\circ}$.  This is a similar
592 > behavior to the domain rotation seen in the AFM studies of Kaasgaard
593 > {\it et al.}\cite{Kaasgaard03}  
594 >
595 > Although our model is simple, it exhibits some rich and unexpected
596 > behaviors.  It would clearly be a closer approximation to the reality
597 > if we allowed greater translational freedom to the dipoles and
598 > replaced the somewhat artificial lattice packing and the harmonic
599 > elastic tension with more realistic molecular modeling potentials.
600 > What we have done is to present a simple model which exhibits bulk
601 > non-thermal corrugation, and our explanation of this rippling
602 > phenomenon will help us design more accurate molecular models for
603 > corrugated membranes and experiments to test whether rippling is
604 > dipole-driven or not.

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines