ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/xDissertation/mc.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/xDissertation/mc.tex (file contents):
Revision 3353 by xsun, Wed Jan 30 16:01:02 2008 UTC vs.
Revision 3354 by xsun, Sat Mar 1 22:11:41 2008 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1 < \chapter{\label{chap:mc}MONTE CARLO}
1 > \chapter{\label{chap:mc}Spontaneous Corrugation of Dipolar Membranes}
2 >
3 > \section{Introduction}
4 > \label{mc:sec:Int}
5 >
6 > The properties of polymeric membranes are known to depend sensitively
7 > on the details of the internal interactions between the constituent
8 > monomers.  A flexible membrane will always have a competition between
9 > the energy of curvature and the in-plane stretching energy and will be
10 > able to buckle in certain limits of surface tension and
11 > temperature.\cite{Safran94} The buckling can be non-specific and
12 > centered at dislocation~\cite{Seung1988} or grain-boundary
13 > defects,\cite{Carraro1993} or it can be directional and cause long
14 > ``roof-tile'' or tube-like structures to appear in
15 > partially-polymerized phospholipid vesicles.\cite{Mutz1991}
16 >
17 > One would expect that anisotropic local interactions could lead to
18 > interesting properties of the buckled membrane.  We report here on the
19 > buckling behavior of a membrane composed of harmonically-bound, but
20 > freely-rotating electrostatic dipoles.  The dipoles have strongly
21 > anisotropic local interactions and the membrane exhibits coupling
22 > between the buckling and the long-range ordering of the dipoles.
23 >
24 > Buckling behavior in liquid crystalline and biological membranes is a
25 > well-known phenomenon.  Relatively pure phosphatidylcholine (PC)
26 > bilayers form a corrugated or ``rippled'' phase ($P_{\beta'}$) which
27 > appears as an intermediate phase between the gel ($L_\beta$) and fluid
28 > ($L_{\alpha}$) phases.  The $P_{\beta'}$ phase has attracted
29 > substantial experimental interest over the past 30 years. Most
30 > structural information of the ripple phase has been obtained by the
31 > X-ray diffraction~\cite{Sun96,Katsaras00} and freeze-fracture electron
32 > microscopy (FFEM).~\cite{Copeland80,Meyer96} Recently, Kaasgaard {\it
33 > et al.} used atomic force microscopy (AFM) to observe ripple phase
34 > morphology in bilayers supported on mica.~\cite{Kaasgaard03} The
35 > experimental results provide strong support for a 2-dimensional
36 > triangular packing lattice of the lipid molecules within the ripple
37 > phase.  This is a notable change from the observed lipid packing
38 > within the gel phase.~\cite{Cevc87} There have been a number of
39 > theoretical
40 > approaches~\cite{Marder84,Goldstein88,McCullough90,Lubensky93,Misbah98,Heimburg00,Kubica02,Bannerjee02}
41 > (and some heroic
42 > simulations~\cite{Ayton02,Jiang04,Brannigan04a,deVries05,deJoannis06})
43 > undertaken to try to explain this phase, but to date, none have looked
44 > specifically at the contribution of the dipolar character of the lipid
45 > head groups towards this corrugation.  Lipid chain interdigitation
46 > certainly plays a major role, and the structures of the ripple phase
47 > are highly ordered.  The model we investigate here lacks chain
48 > interdigitation (as well as the chains themselves!) and will not be
49 > detailed enough to rule in favor of (or against) any of these
50 > explanations for the $P_{\beta'}$ phase.
51 >
52 > Membranes containing electrostatic dipoles can also exhibit the
53 > flexoelectric effect,\cite{Todorova2004,Harden2006,Petrov2006} which
54 > is the ability of mechanical deformations to result in electrostatic
55 > organization of the membrane.  This phenomenon is a curvature-induced
56 > membrane polarization which can lead to potential differences across a
57 > membrane.  Reverse flexoelectric behavior (in which applied currents
58 > effect membrane curvature) has also been observed.  Explanations of
59 > the details of these effects have typically utilized membrane
60 > polarization perpendicular to the face of the
61 > membrane,\cite{Petrov2006} and the effect has been observed in both
62 > biological,\cite{Raphael2000} bent-core liquid
63 > crystalline,\cite{Harden2006} and polymer-dispersed liquid crystalline
64 > membranes.\cite{Todorova2004}
65 >
66 > The problem with using atomistic and even coarse-grained approaches to
67 > study membrane buckling phenomena is that only a relatively small
68 > number of periods of the corrugation (i.e. one or two) can be
69 > realistically simulated given current technology.  Also, simulations
70 > of lipid bilayers are traditionally carried out with periodic boundary
71 > conditions in two or three dimensions and these have the potential to
72 > enhance the periodicity of the system at that wavelength.  To avoid
73 > this pitfall, we are using a model which allows us to have
74 > sufficiently large systems so that we are not causing artificial
75 > corrugation through the use of periodic boundary conditions.
76 >
77 > The simplest dipolar membrane is one in which the dipoles are located
78 > on fixed lattice sites. Ferroelectric states (with long-range dipolar
79 > order) can be observed in dipolar systems with non-triangular
80 > packings.  However, {\em triangularly}-packed 2-D dipolar systems are
81 > inherently frustrated and one would expect a dipolar-disordered phase
82 > to be the lowest free energy
83 > configuration.\cite{Toulouse1977,Marland1979} Dipolar lattices already
84 > have rich phase behavior, but in order to allow the membrane to
85 > buckle, a single degree of freedom (translation normal to the membrane
86 > face) must be added to each of the dipoles.  It would also be possible
87 > to allow complete translational freedom.  This approach
88 > is similar in character to a number of elastic Ising models that have
89 > been developed to explain interesting mechanical properties in
90 > magnetic alloys.\cite{Renard1966,Zhu2005,Zhu2006,Jiang2006}
91 >
92 > What we present here is an attempt to find the simplest dipolar model
93 > which will exhibit buckling behavior.  We are using a modified XYZ
94 > lattice model; details of the model can be found in section
95 > \ref{mc:sec:model}, results of Monte Carlo simulations using this model
96 > are presented in section
97 > \ref{mc:sec:results}, and section \ref{mc:sec:discussion} contains our conclusions.
98 >
99 > \section{2-D Dipolar Membrane}
100 > \label{mc:sec:model}
101 >
102 > The point of developing this model was to arrive at the simplest
103 > possible theoretical model which could exhibit spontaneous corrugation
104 > of a two-dimensional dipolar medium.  Since molecules in polymerized
105 > membranes and in the $P_{\beta'}$ ripple phase have limited
106 > translational freedom, we have chosen a lattice to support the dipoles
107 > in the x-y plane.  The lattice may be either triangular (lattice
108 > constants $a/b =
109 > \sqrt{3}$) or distorted.  However, each dipole has 3 degrees of
110 > freedom.  They may move freely {\em out} of the x-y plane (along the
111 > $z$ axis), and they have complete orientational freedom ($0 <= \theta
112 > <= \pi$, $0 <= \phi < 2
113 > \pi$).  This is essentially a modified X-Y-Z model with translational
114 > freedom along the z-axis.
115 >
116 > The potential energy of the system,
117 > \begin{eqnarray}
118 > V = \sum_i & & \left( \sum_{j>i} \frac{|\mu|^2}{4\pi \epsilon_0 r_{ij}^3} \left[
119 > {\mathbf{\hat u}_i} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat u}_j} -
120 > 3({\mathbf{\hat u}_i} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat
121 > r}_{ij}})({\mathbf{\hat u}_j} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}})\right]
122 > \right. \nonumber \\
123 > & & \left. + \sum_{j \in NN_i}^6 \frac{k_r}{2}\left(
124 > r_{ij}-\sigma \right)^2 \right)
125 > \label{mceq:pot}
126 > \end{eqnarray}
127 >
128 > In this potential, $\mathbf{\hat u}_i$ is the unit vector pointing
129 > along dipole $i$ and $\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}$ is the unit vector
130 > pointing along the inter-dipole vector $\mathbf{r}_{ij}$.  The entire
131 > potential is governed by three parameters, the dipolar strength
132 > ($\mu$), the harmonic spring constant ($k_r$) and the preferred
133 > intermolecular spacing ($\sigma$).  In practice, we set the value of
134 > $\sigma$ to the average inter-molecular spacing from the planar
135 > lattice, yielding a potential model that has only two parameters for a
136 > particular choice of lattice constants $a$ (along the $x$-axis) and
137 > $b$ (along the $y$-axis).  We also define a set of reduced parameters
138 > based on the length scale ($\sigma$) and the energy of the harmonic
139 > potential at a deformation of 2 $\sigma$ ($\epsilon = k_r \sigma^2 /
140 > 2$).  Using these two constants, we perform our calculations using
141 > reduced distances, ($r^{*} = r / \sigma$), temperatures ($T^{*} = 2
142 > k_B T / k_r \sigma^2$), densities ($\rho^{*} = N \sigma^2 / L_x L_y$),
143 > and dipole moments ($\mu^{*} = \mu / \sqrt{4 \pi \epsilon_0 \sigma^5
144 > k_r / 2}$).  It should be noted that the density ($\rho^{*}$) depends
145 > only on the mean particle spacing in the $x-y$ plane; the lattice is
146 > fully populated.
147 >
148 > To investigate the phase behavior of this model, we have performed a
149 > series of Metropolis Monte Carlo simulations of moderately-sized (34.3
150 > $\sigma$ on a side) patches of membrane hosted on both triangular
151 > ($\gamma = a/b = \sqrt{3}$) and distorted ($\gamma \neq \sqrt{3}$)
152 > lattices.  The linear extent of one edge of the monolayer was $20 a$
153 > and the system was kept roughly square. The average distance that
154 > coplanar dipoles were positioned from their six nearest neighbors was
155 > 1 $\sigma$ (on both triangular and distorted lattices).  Typical
156 > system sizes were 1360 dipoles for the triangular lattices and
157 > 840-2800 dipoles for the distorted lattices.  Two-dimensional periodic
158 > boundary conditions were used, and the cutoff for the dipole-dipole
159 > interaction was set to 4.3 $\sigma$.  This cutoff is roughly 2.5 times
160 > the typical real-space electrostatic cutoff for molecular systems.
161 > Since dipole-dipole interactions decay rapidly with distance, and
162 > since the intrinsic three-dimensional periodicity of the Ewald sum can
163 > give artifacts in 2-d systems, we have chosen not to use it in these
164 > calculations.  Although the Ewald sum has been reformulated to handle
165 > 2-D systems,\cite{Parry75,Parry76,Heyes77,deLeeuw79,Rhee89} these
166 > methods are computationally expensive,\cite{Spohr97,Yeh99} and are not
167 > necessary in this case.  All parameters ($T^{*}$, $\mu^{*}$, and
168 > $\gamma$) were varied systematically to study the effects of these
169 > parameters on the formation of ripple-like phases.
170 >
171 > \section{Results and Analysis}
172 > \label{mc:sec:results}
173 >
174 > \subsection{Dipolar Ordering and Coexistence Temperatures}
175 > The principal method for observing the orientational ordering
176 > transition in dipolar systems is the $P_2$ order parameter (defined as
177 > $1.5 \times \lambda_{max}$, where $\lambda_{max}$ is the largest
178 > eigenvalue of the matrix,
179 > \begin{equation}
180 > {\mathsf{S}} = \frac{1}{N} \sum_i \left(
181 > \begin{array}{ccc}
182 >        u^{x}_i u^{x}_i-\frac{1}{3} & u^{x}_i u^{y}_i & u^{x}_i u^{z}_i \\
183 >        u^{y}_i u^{x}_i  & u^{y}_i u^{y}_i -\frac{1}{3} & u^{y}_i u^{z}_i \\
184 >        u^{z}_i u^{x}_i & u^{z}_i u^{y}_i  & u^{z}_i u^{z}_i -\frac{1}{3}
185 > \end{array} \right).
186 > \label{mceq:opmatrix}
187 > \end{equation}
188 > Here $u^{\alpha}_i$ is the $\alpha=x,y,z$ component of the unit vector
189 > for dipole $i$.  $P_2$ will be $1.0$ for a perfectly-ordered system
190 > and near $0$ for a randomized system.  Note that this order parameter
191 > is {\em not} equal to the polarization of the system.  For example,
192 > the polarization of the perfect anti-ferroelectric system is $0$, but
193 > $P_2$ for an anti-ferroelectric system is $1$.  The eigenvector of
194 > $\mathsf{S}$ corresponding to the largest eigenvalue is familiar as
195 > the director axis, which can be used to determine a privileged dipolar
196 > axis for dipole-ordered systems.  The top panel in Fig. \ref{mcfig:phase}
197 > shows the values of $P_2$ as a function of temperature for both
198 > triangular ($\gamma = 1.732$) and distorted ($\gamma=1.875$)
199 > lattices.
200 >
201 > \begin{figure}
202 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcPhase.pdf}
203 > \caption{\label{mcfig:phase} Top panel: The $P_2$ dipolar order parameter as
204 > a function of temperature for both triangular ($\gamma = 1.732$) and
205 > distorted ($\gamma = 1.875$) lattices.  Bottom Panel: The phase
206 > diagram for the dipolar membrane model.  The line denotes the division
207 > between the dipolar ordered (anti-ferroelectric) and disordered phases.
208 > An enlarged view near the triangular lattice is shown inset.}
209 > \end{figure}
210 >
211 > There is a clear order-disorder transition in evidence from this data.
212 > Both the triangular and distorted lattices have dipolar-ordered
213 > low-temperature phases, and orientationally-disordered high
214 > temperature phases.  The coexistence temperature for the triangular
215 > lattice is significantly lower than for the distorted lattices, and
216 > the bulk polarization is approximately $0$ for both dipolar ordered
217 > and disordered phases.  This gives strong evidence that the dipolar
218 > ordered phase is anti-ferroelectric.  We have verified that this
219 > dipolar ordering transition is not a function of system size by
220 > performing identical calculations with systems twice as large.  The
221 > transition is equally smooth at all system sizes that were studied.
222 > Additionally, we have repeated the Monte Carlo simulations over a wide
223 > range of lattice ratios ($\gamma$) to generate a dipolar
224 > order/disorder phase diagram.  The bottom panel in Fig. \ref{mcfig:phase}
225 > shows that the triangular lattice is a low-temperature cusp in the
226 > $T^{*}-\gamma$ phase diagram.
227 >
228 > This phase diagram is remarkable in that it shows an
229 > anti-ferroelectric phase near $\gamma=1.732$ where one would expect
230 > lattice frustration to result in disordered phases at all
231 > temperatures.  Observations of the configurations in this phase show
232 > clearly that the system has accomplished dipolar ordering by forming
233 > large ripple-like structures.  We have observed anti-ferroelectric
234 > ordering in all three of the equivalent directions on the triangular
235 > lattice, and the dipoles have been observed to organize perpendicular
236 > to the membrane normal (in the plane of the membrane).  It is
237 > particularly interesting to note that the ripple-like structures have
238 > also been observed to propagate in the three equivalent directions on
239 > the lattice, but the {\em direction of ripple propagation is always
240 > perpendicular to the dipole director axis}.  A snapshot of a typical
241 > anti-ferroelectric rippled structure is shown in
242 > Fig. \ref{mcfig:snapshot}.
243 >
244 > \begin{figure}
245 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcSnapshot.pdf}
246 > \caption{\label{mcfig:snapshot} Top and Side views of a representative
247 > configuration for the dipolar ordered phase supported on the
248 > triangular lattice. Note the anti-ferroelectric ordering and the long
249 > wavelength buckling of the membrane.  Dipolar ordering has been
250 > observed in all three equivalent directions on the triangular lattice,
251 > and the ripple direction is always perpendicular to the director axis
252 > for the dipoles.}
253 > \end{figure}
254 >
255 > Although the snapshot in Fig. \ref{mcfig:snapshot} gives the appearance
256 > of three-row stair-like structures, these appear to be transient.  On
257 > average, the corrugation of the membrane is a relatively smooth,
258 > long-wavelength phenomenon, with occasional steep drops between
259 > adjacent lines of anti-aligned dipoles.
260 >
261 > The height-dipole correlation function ($C_{\textrm{hd}}(r, \cos
262 > \theta)$) makes the connection between dipolar ordering and the wave
263 > vector of the ripple even more explicit.  $C_{\textrm{hd}}(r, \cos
264 > \theta)$ is an angle-dependent pair distribution function. The angle
265 > ($\theta$) is the angle between the intermolecular vector
266 > $\vec{r}_{ij}$ and direction of dipole $i$,
267 > \begin{equation}
268 > C_{\textrm{hd}} = \frac{\langle \frac{1}{n(r)} \sum_{i}\sum_{j>i}
269 > h_i \cdot h_j \delta(r - r_{ij}) \delta(\cos \theta_{ij} -
270 > \cos \theta)\rangle} {\langle h^2 \rangle}
271 > \end{equation}
272 > where $\cos \theta_{ij} = \hat{\mu}_{i} \cdot \hat{r}_{ij}$ and
273 > $\hat{r}_{ij} = \vec{r}_{ij} / r_{ij}$.  $n(r)$ is the number of
274 > dipoles found in a cylindrical shell between $r$ and $r+\delta r$ of
275 > the central particle. Fig. \ref{mcfig:CrossCorrelation} shows contours
276 > of this correlation function for both anti-ferroelectric, rippled
277 > membranes as well as for the dipole-disordered portion of the phase
278 > diagram.
279 >
280 > \begin{figure}
281 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcHdc.pdf}
282 > \caption{\label{mcfig:CrossCorrelation} Contours of the height-dipole
283 > correlation function as a function of the dot product between the
284 > dipole ($\hat{\mu}$) and inter-dipole separation vector ($\hat{r}$)
285 > and the distance ($r$) between the dipoles.  Perfect height
286 > correlation (contours approaching 1) are present in the ordered phase
287 > when the two dipoles are in the same head-to-tail line.
288 > Anti-correlation (contours below 0) is only seen when the inter-dipole
289 > vector is perpendicular to the dipoles.  In the dipole-disordered
290 > portion of the phase diagram, there is only weak correlation in the
291 > dipole direction and this correlation decays rapidly to zero for
292 > intermolecular vectors that are not dipole-aligned.}
293 > \end{figure}
294 >
295 > The height-dipole correlation function gives a map of how the topology
296 > of the membrane surface varies with angular deviation around a given
297 > dipole.  The upper panel of Fig. \ref{mcfig:CrossCorrelation} shows that
298 > in the anti-ferroelectric phase, the dipole heights are strongly
299 > correlated for dipoles in head-to-tail arrangements, and this
300 > correlation persists for very long distances (up to 15 $\sigma$).  For
301 > portions of the membrane located perpendicular to a given dipole, the
302 > membrane height becomes anti-correlated at distances of 10 $\sigma$.
303 > The correlation function is relatively smooth; there are no steep
304 > jumps or steps, so the stair-like structures in
305 > Fig. \ref{mcfig:snapshot} are indeed transient and disappear when
306 > averaged over many configurations.  In the dipole-disordered phase,
307 > the height-dipole correlation function is relatively flat (and hovers
308 > near zero).  The only significant height correlations are for axial
309 > dipoles at very short distances ($r \approx
310 > \sigma$).
311 >
312 > \subsection{Discriminating Ripples from Thermal Undulations}
313 >
314 > In order to be sure that the structures we have observed are actually
315 > a rippled phase and not simply thermal undulations, we have computed
316 > the undulation spectrum,
317 > \begin{equation}
318 > h(\vec{q}) = A^{-1/2} \int d\vec{r}
319 > h(\vec{r}) e^{-i \vec{q}\cdot\vec{r}}
320 > \end{equation}
321 > where $h(\vec{r})$ is the height of the membrane at location $\vec{r}
322 > = (x,y)$.~\cite{Safran94,Seifert97} In simple (and more complicated)
323 > elastic continuum models, it can shown that in the $NVT$ ensemble, the
324 > absolute value of the undulation spectrum can be written,
325 > \begin{equation}
326 > \langle | h(q) |^2 \rangle_{NVT} = \frac{k_B T}{k_c q^4 +
327 > \gamma q^2},
328 > \label{mceq:fit}
329 > \end{equation}
330 > where $k_c$ is the bending modulus for the membrane, and $\gamma$ is
331 > the mechanical surface tension.~\cite{Safran94} The systems studied in
332 > this paper have essentially zero bending moduli ($k_c$) and relatively
333 > large mechanical surface tensions ($\gamma$), so a much simpler form
334 > can be written,
335 > \begin{equation}
336 > \langle | h(q) |^2 \rangle_{NVT} = \frac{k_B T}{\gamma q^2},
337 > \label{mceq:fit2}
338 > \end{equation}
339 >
340 > The undulation spectrum is computed by superimposing a rectangular
341 > grid on top of the membrane, and by assigning height ($h(\vec{r})$)
342 > values to the grid from the average of all dipoles that fall within a
343 > given $\vec{r}+d\vec{r}$ grid area.  Empty grid pixels are assigned
344 > height values by interpolation from the nearest neighbor pixels.  A
345 > standard 2-d Fourier transform is then used to obtain $\langle |
346 > h(q)|^2 \rangle$.  Alternatively, since the dipoles sit on a Bravais
347 > lattice, one could use the heights of the lattice points themselves as
348 > the grid for the Fourier transform (without interpolating to a square
349 > grid).  However, if lateral translational freedom is added to this
350 > model (a likely extension), an interpolated grid method for computing
351 > undulation spectra will be required.
352 >
353 > As mentioned above, the best fits to our undulation spectra are
354 > obtained by setting the value of $k_c$ to 0.  In Fig. \ref{mcfig:fit} we
355 > show typical undulation spectra for two different regions of the phase
356 > diagram along with their fits from the Landau free energy approach
357 > (Eq. \ref{mceq:fit2}).  In the high-temperature disordered phase, the
358 > Landau fits can be nearly perfect, and from these fits we can estimate
359 > the tension in the surface.  In reduced units, typical values of
360 > $\gamma^{*} = \gamma / \epsilon = 2500$ are obtained for the
361 > disordered phase ($\gamma^{*} = 2551.7$ in the top panel of
362 > Fig. \ref{mcfig:fit}).
363 >
364 > Typical values of $\gamma^{*}$ in the dipolar-ordered phase are much
365 > higher than in the dipolar-disordered phase ($\gamma^{*} = 73,538$ in
366 > the lower panel of Fig. \ref{mcfig:fit}).  For the dipolar-ordered
367 > triangular lattice near the coexistence temperature, we also observe
368 > long wavelength undulations that are far outliers to the fits.  That
369 > is, the Landau free energy fits are well within error bars for most of
370 > the other points, but can be off by {\em orders of magnitude} for a
371 > few low frequency components.
372 >
373 > We interpret these outliers as evidence that these low frequency modes
374 > are {\em non-thermal undulations}.  We take this as evidence that we
375 > are actually seeing a rippled phase developing in this model system.
376 >
377 > \begin{figure}
378 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcLogFit.pdf}
379 > \caption{\label{mcfig:fit} Evidence that the observed ripples are {\em
380 > not} thermal undulations is obtained from the 2-d Fourier transform
381 > $\langle |h^{*}(\vec{q})|^2 \rangle$ of the height profile ($\langle
382 > h^{*}(x,y) \rangle$). Rippled samples show low-wavelength peaks that
383 > are outliers on the Landau free energy fits by an order of magnitude.
384 > Samples exhibiting only thermal undulations fit Eq. \ref{mceq:fit}
385 > remarkably well.}
386 > \end{figure}
387 >
388 > \subsection{Effects of Potential Parameters on Amplitude and Wavelength}
389 >
390 > We have used two different methods to estimate the amplitude and
391 > periodicity of the ripples.  The first method requires projection of
392 > the ripples onto a one dimensional rippling axis. Since the rippling
393 > is always perpendicular to the dipole director axis, we can define a
394 > ripple vector as follows.  The largest eigenvector, $s_1$, of the
395 > $\mathsf{S}$ matrix in Eq. \ref{mceq:opmatrix} is projected onto a
396 > planar director axis,
397 > \begin{equation}
398 > \vec{d} = \left(\begin{array}{c}
399 > \vec{s}_1 \cdot \hat{i} \\
400 > \vec{s}_1 \cdot \hat{j} \\
401 > 0
402 > \end{array} \right).
403 > \end{equation}
404 > ($\hat{i}$, $\hat{j}$ and $\hat{k}$ are unit vectors along the $x$,
405 > $y$, and $z$ axes, respectively.)  The rippling axis is in the plane of
406 > the membrane and is perpendicular to the planar director axis,
407 > \begin{equation}
408 > \vec{q}_{\mathrm{rip}} = \vec{d} \times \hat{k}
409 > \end{equation}
410 > We can then find the height profile of the membrane along the ripple
411 > axis by projecting heights of the dipoles to obtain a one-dimensional
412 > height profile, $h(q_{\mathrm{rip}})$. Ripple wavelengths can be
413 > estimated from the largest non-thermal low-frequency component in the
414 > Fourier transform of $h(q_{\mathrm{rip}})$.  Amplitudes can be
415 > estimated by measuring peak-to-trough distances in
416 > $h(q_{\mathrm{rip}})$ itself.
417 >
418 > A second, more accurate, and simpler method for estimating ripple
419 > shape is to extract the wavelength and height information directly
420 > from the largest non-thermal peak in the undulation spectrum.  For
421 > large-amplitude ripples, the two methods give similar results.  The
422 > one-dimensional projection method is more prone to noise (particularly
423 > in the amplitude estimates for the distorted lattices).  We report
424 > amplitudes and wavelengths taken directly from the undulation spectrum
425 > below.
426 >
427 > In the triangular lattice ($\gamma = \sqrt{3}$), the rippling is
428 > observed for temperatures ($T^{*}$) from $61-122$.  The wavelength of
429 > the ripples is remarkably stable at 21.4~$\sigma$ for all but the
430 > temperatures closest to the order-disorder transition.  At $T^{*} =
431 > 122$, the wavelength drops to 17.1~$\sigma$.
432 >
433 > The dependence of the amplitude on temperature is shown in the top
434 > panel of Fig. \ref{mcfig:Amplitude}.  The rippled structures shrink
435 > smoothly as the temperature rises towards the order-disorder
436 > transition.  The wavelengths and amplitudes we observe are
437 > surprisingly close to the $\Lambda / 2$ phase observed by Kaasgaard
438 > {\it et al.} in their work on PC-based lipids.\cite{Kaasgaard03}
439 > However, this is coincidental agreement based on a choice of 7~\AA~as
440 > the mean spacing between lipids.
441 >
442 > \begin{figure}
443 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcProperties_sq.pdf}
444 > \caption{\label{mcfig:Amplitude} a) The amplitude $A^{*}$ of the ripples
445 > vs. temperature for a triangular lattice. b) The amplitude $A^{*}$ of
446 > the ripples vs. dipole strength ($\mu^{*}$) for both the triangular
447 > lattice (circles) and distorted lattice (squares).  The reduced
448 > temperatures were kept fixed at $T^{*} = 94$ for the triangular
449 > lattice and $T^{*} = 106$ for the distorted lattice (approximately 2/3
450 > of the order-disorder transition temperature for each lattice).}
451 > \end{figure}
452 >
453 > The ripples can be made to disappear by increasing the internal
454 > elastic tension (i.e. by increasing $k_r$ or equivalently, reducing
455 > the dipole moment).  The amplitude of the ripples depends critically
456 > on the strength of the dipole moments ($\mu^{*}$) in Eq. \ref{mceq:pot}.
457 > If the dipoles are weakened substantially (below $\mu^{*}$ = 20) at a
458 > fixed temperature of 94, the membrane loses dipolar ordering
459 > and the ripple structures. The ripples reach a peak amplitude of
460 > 3.7~$\sigma$ at a dipolar strength of 25.  We show the dependence
461 > of ripple amplitude on the dipolar strength in
462 > Fig. \ref{mcfig:Amplitude}.
463 >
464 > \subsection{Distorted lattices}
465 >
466 > We have also investigated the effect of the lattice geometry by
467 > changing the ratio of lattice constants ($\gamma$) while keeping the
468 > average nearest-neighbor spacing constant. The anti-ferroelectric state
469 > is accessible for all $\gamma$ values we have used, although the
470 > distorted triangular lattices prefer a particular director axis due to
471 > the anisotropy of the lattice.
472 >
473 > Our observation of rippling behavior was not limited to the triangular
474 > lattices.  In distorted lattices the anti-ferroelectric phase can
475 > develop nearly instantaneously in the Monte Carlo simulations, and
476 > these dipolar-ordered phases tend to be remarkably flat.  Whenever
477 > rippling has been observed in these distorted lattices
478 > (e.g. $\gamma = 1.875$), we see relatively short ripple wavelengths
479 > (14 $\sigma$) and amplitudes of 2.4~$\sigma$.  These ripples are
480 > weakly dependent on dipolar strength (see Fig. \ref{mcfig:Amplitude}),
481 > although below a dipolar strength of $\mu^{*} = 20$, the membrane
482 > loses dipolar ordering and displays only thermal undulations.
483 >
484 > The ripple phase does {\em not} appear at all values of $\gamma$.  We
485 > have only observed non-thermal undulations in the range $1.625 <
486 > \gamma < 1.875$.  Outside this range, the order-disorder transition in
487 > the dipoles remains, but the ordered dipolar phase has only thermal
488 > undulations.  This is one of our strongest pieces of evidence that
489 > rippling is a symmetry-breaking phenomenon for triangular and
490 > nearly-triangular lattices.
491 >
492 > \subsection{Effects of System Size}
493 > To evaluate the effect of finite system size, we have performed a
494 > series of simulations on the triangular lattice at a reduced
495 > temperature of 122, which is just below the order-disorder transition
496 > temperature ($T^{*} = 139$).  These conditions are in the
497 > dipole-ordered and rippled portion of the phase diagram.  These are
498 > also the conditions that should be most susceptible to system size
499 > effects.
500 >
501 > \begin{figure}
502 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcSystemSize.pdf}
503 > \caption{\label{mcfig:systemsize} The ripple wavelength (top) and
504 > amplitude (bottom) as a function of system size for a triangular
505 > lattice ($\gamma=1.732$) at $T^{*} = 122$.}
506 > \end{figure}
507 >
508 > There is substantial dependence on system size for small (less than
509 > 29~$\sigma$) periodic boxes.  Notably, there are resonances apparent
510 > in the ripple amplitudes at box lengths of 17.3 and 29.5 $\sigma$.
511 > For larger systems, the behavior of the ripples appears to have
512 > stabilized and is on a trend to slightly smaller amplitudes (and
513 > slightly longer wavelengths) than were observed from the 34.3 $\sigma$
514 > box sizes that were used for most of the calculations.
515 >
516 > It is interesting to note that system sizes which are multiples of the
517 > default ripple wavelength can enhance the amplitude of the observed
518 > ripples, but appears to have only a minor effect on the observed
519 > wavelength.  It would, of course, be better to use system sizes that
520 > were many multiples of the ripple wavelength to be sure that the
521 > periodic box is not driving the phenomenon, but at the largest system
522 > size studied (70 $\sigma$ $\times$ 70 $\sigma$), the number of dipoles
523 > (5440) made long Monte Carlo simulations prohibitively expensive.
524 >
525 > \section{Discussion}
526 > \label{mc:sec:discussion}
527 >
528 > We have been able to show that a simple dipolar lattice model which
529 > contains only molecular packing (from the lattice), anisotropy (in the
530 > form of electrostatic dipoles) and a weak elastic tension (in the form
531 > of a nearest-neighbor harmonic potential) is capable of exhibiting
532 > stable long-wavelength non-thermal surface corrugations.  The best
533 > explanation for this behavior is that the ability of the dipoles to
534 > translate out of the plane of the membrane is enough to break the
535 > symmetry of the triangular lattice and allow the energetic benefit
536 > from the formation of a bulk anti-ferroelectric phase.  Were the weak
537 > elastic tension absent from our model, it would be possible for the
538 > entire lattice to ``tilt'' using $z$-translation.  Tilting the lattice
539 > in this way would yield an effectively non-triangular lattice which
540 > would avoid dipolar frustration altogether.  With the elastic tension
541 > in place, bulk tilt causes a large strain, and the least costly way to
542 > release this strain is between two rows of anti-aligned dipoles.
543 > These ``breaks'' will result in rippled or sawtooth patterns in the
544 > membrane, and allow small stripes of membrane to form
545 > anti-ferroelectric regions that are tilted relative to the averaged
546 > membrane normal.
547 >
548 > Although the dipole-dipole interaction is the major driving force for
549 > the long range orientational ordered state, the formation of the
550 > stable, smooth ripples is a result of the competition between the
551 > elastic tension and the dipole-dipole interactions.  This statement is
552 > supported by the variation in $\mu^{*}$.  Substantially weaker dipoles
553 > relative to the surface tension can cause the corrugated phase to
554 > disappear.
555 >
556 > The packing of the dipoles into a nearly-triangular lattice is clearly
557 > an important piece of the puzzle.  The dipolar head groups of lipid
558 > molecules are sterically (as well as electrostatically) anisotropic,
559 > and would not pack in triangular arrangements without the steric
560 > interference of adjacent molecular bodies.  Since we only see rippled
561 > phases in the neighborhood of $\gamma=\sqrt{3}$, this implies that
562 > even if this dipolar mechanism is the correct explanation for the
563 > ripple phase in realistic bilayers, there would still be a role played
564 > by the lipid chains in the in-plane organization of the triangularly
565 > ordered phases which could support ripples.  The present model is
566 > certainly not detailed enough to answer exactly what drives the
567 > formation of the $P_{\beta'}$ phase in real lipids, but suggests some
568 > avenues for further experiments.
569 >
570 > The most important prediction we can make using the results from this
571 > simple model is that if dipolar ordering is driving the surface
572 > corrugation, the wave vectors for the ripples should always found to
573 > be {\it perpendicular} to the dipole director axis.  This prediction
574 > should suggest experimental designs which test whether this is really
575 > true in the phosphatidylcholine $P_{\beta'}$ phases.  The dipole
576 > director axis should also be easily computable for the all-atom and
577 > coarse-grained simulations that have been published in the literature.
578 >
579 > Our other observation about the ripple and dipolar directionality is
580 > that the dipole director axis can be found to be parallel to any of
581 > the three equivalent lattice vectors in the triangular lattice.
582 > Defects in the ordering of the dipoles can cause the dipole director
583 > (and consequently the surface corrugation) of small regions to be
584 > rotated relative to each other by 120$^{\circ}$.  This is a similar
585 > behavior to the domain rotation seen in the AFM studies of Kaasgaard
586 > {\it et al.}\cite{Kaasgaard03}  
587 >
588 > Although our model is simple, it exhibits some rich and unexpected
589 > behaviors.  It would clearly be a closer approximation to the reality
590 > if we allowed greater translational freedom to the dipoles and
591 > replaced the somewhat artificial lattice packing and the harmonic
592 > elastic tension with more realistic molecular modeling potentials.
593 > What we have done is to present a simple model which exhibits bulk
594 > non-thermal corrugation, and our explanation of this rippling
595 > phenomenon will help us design more accurate molecular models for
596 > corrugated membranes and experiments to test whether rippling is
597 > dipole-driven or not.

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines