ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/xDissertation/mc.tex
Revision: 3354
Committed: Sat Mar 1 22:11:41 2008 UTC (17 years, 2 months ago) by xsun
Content type: application/x-tex
File size: 32124 byte(s)
Log Message:
writing up the dissertation.

File Contents

# Content
1 \chapter{\label{chap:mc}Spontaneous Corrugation of Dipolar Membranes}
2
3 \section{Introduction}
4 \label{mc:sec:Int}
5
6 The properties of polymeric membranes are known to depend sensitively
7 on the details of the internal interactions between the constituent
8 monomers. A flexible membrane will always have a competition between
9 the energy of curvature and the in-plane stretching energy and will be
10 able to buckle in certain limits of surface tension and
11 temperature.\cite{Safran94} The buckling can be non-specific and
12 centered at dislocation~\cite{Seung1988} or grain-boundary
13 defects,\cite{Carraro1993} or it can be directional and cause long
14 ``roof-tile'' or tube-like structures to appear in
15 partially-polymerized phospholipid vesicles.\cite{Mutz1991}
16
17 One would expect that anisotropic local interactions could lead to
18 interesting properties of the buckled membrane. We report here on the
19 buckling behavior of a membrane composed of harmonically-bound, but
20 freely-rotating electrostatic dipoles. The dipoles have strongly
21 anisotropic local interactions and the membrane exhibits coupling
22 between the buckling and the long-range ordering of the dipoles.
23
24 Buckling behavior in liquid crystalline and biological membranes is a
25 well-known phenomenon. Relatively pure phosphatidylcholine (PC)
26 bilayers form a corrugated or ``rippled'' phase ($P_{\beta'}$) which
27 appears as an intermediate phase between the gel ($L_\beta$) and fluid
28 ($L_{\alpha}$) phases. The $P_{\beta'}$ phase has attracted
29 substantial experimental interest over the past 30 years. Most
30 structural information of the ripple phase has been obtained by the
31 X-ray diffraction~\cite{Sun96,Katsaras00} and freeze-fracture electron
32 microscopy (FFEM).~\cite{Copeland80,Meyer96} Recently, Kaasgaard {\it
33 et al.} used atomic force microscopy (AFM) to observe ripple phase
34 morphology in bilayers supported on mica.~\cite{Kaasgaard03} The
35 experimental results provide strong support for a 2-dimensional
36 triangular packing lattice of the lipid molecules within the ripple
37 phase. This is a notable change from the observed lipid packing
38 within the gel phase.~\cite{Cevc87} There have been a number of
39 theoretical
40 approaches~\cite{Marder84,Goldstein88,McCullough90,Lubensky93,Misbah98,Heimburg00,Kubica02,Bannerjee02}
41 (and some heroic
42 simulations~\cite{Ayton02,Jiang04,Brannigan04a,deVries05,deJoannis06})
43 undertaken to try to explain this phase, but to date, none have looked
44 specifically at the contribution of the dipolar character of the lipid
45 head groups towards this corrugation. Lipid chain interdigitation
46 certainly plays a major role, and the structures of the ripple phase
47 are highly ordered. The model we investigate here lacks chain
48 interdigitation (as well as the chains themselves!) and will not be
49 detailed enough to rule in favor of (or against) any of these
50 explanations for the $P_{\beta'}$ phase.
51
52 Membranes containing electrostatic dipoles can also exhibit the
53 flexoelectric effect,\cite{Todorova2004,Harden2006,Petrov2006} which
54 is the ability of mechanical deformations to result in electrostatic
55 organization of the membrane. This phenomenon is a curvature-induced
56 membrane polarization which can lead to potential differences across a
57 membrane. Reverse flexoelectric behavior (in which applied currents
58 effect membrane curvature) has also been observed. Explanations of
59 the details of these effects have typically utilized membrane
60 polarization perpendicular to the face of the
61 membrane,\cite{Petrov2006} and the effect has been observed in both
62 biological,\cite{Raphael2000} bent-core liquid
63 crystalline,\cite{Harden2006} and polymer-dispersed liquid crystalline
64 membranes.\cite{Todorova2004}
65
66 The problem with using atomistic and even coarse-grained approaches to
67 study membrane buckling phenomena is that only a relatively small
68 number of periods of the corrugation (i.e. one or two) can be
69 realistically simulated given current technology. Also, simulations
70 of lipid bilayers are traditionally carried out with periodic boundary
71 conditions in two or three dimensions and these have the potential to
72 enhance the periodicity of the system at that wavelength. To avoid
73 this pitfall, we are using a model which allows us to have
74 sufficiently large systems so that we are not causing artificial
75 corrugation through the use of periodic boundary conditions.
76
77 The simplest dipolar membrane is one in which the dipoles are located
78 on fixed lattice sites. Ferroelectric states (with long-range dipolar
79 order) can be observed in dipolar systems with non-triangular
80 packings. However, {\em triangularly}-packed 2-D dipolar systems are
81 inherently frustrated and one would expect a dipolar-disordered phase
82 to be the lowest free energy
83 configuration.\cite{Toulouse1977,Marland1979} Dipolar lattices already
84 have rich phase behavior, but in order to allow the membrane to
85 buckle, a single degree of freedom (translation normal to the membrane
86 face) must be added to each of the dipoles. It would also be possible
87 to allow complete translational freedom. This approach
88 is similar in character to a number of elastic Ising models that have
89 been developed to explain interesting mechanical properties in
90 magnetic alloys.\cite{Renard1966,Zhu2005,Zhu2006,Jiang2006}
91
92 What we present here is an attempt to find the simplest dipolar model
93 which will exhibit buckling behavior. We are using a modified XYZ
94 lattice model; details of the model can be found in section
95 \ref{mc:sec:model}, results of Monte Carlo simulations using this model
96 are presented in section
97 \ref{mc:sec:results}, and section \ref{mc:sec:discussion} contains our conclusions.
98
99 \section{2-D Dipolar Membrane}
100 \label{mc:sec:model}
101
102 The point of developing this model was to arrive at the simplest
103 possible theoretical model which could exhibit spontaneous corrugation
104 of a two-dimensional dipolar medium. Since molecules in polymerized
105 membranes and in the $P_{\beta'}$ ripple phase have limited
106 translational freedom, we have chosen a lattice to support the dipoles
107 in the x-y plane. The lattice may be either triangular (lattice
108 constants $a/b =
109 \sqrt{3}$) or distorted. However, each dipole has 3 degrees of
110 freedom. They may move freely {\em out} of the x-y plane (along the
111 $z$ axis), and they have complete orientational freedom ($0 <= \theta
112 <= \pi$, $0 <= \phi < 2
113 \pi$). This is essentially a modified X-Y-Z model with translational
114 freedom along the z-axis.
115
116 The potential energy of the system,
117 \begin{eqnarray}
118 V = \sum_i & & \left( \sum_{j>i} \frac{|\mu|^2}{4\pi \epsilon_0 r_{ij}^3} \left[
119 {\mathbf{\hat u}_i} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat u}_j} -
120 3({\mathbf{\hat u}_i} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat
121 r}_{ij}})({\mathbf{\hat u}_j} \cdot {\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}})\right]
122 \right. \nonumber \\
123 & & \left. + \sum_{j \in NN_i}^6 \frac{k_r}{2}\left(
124 r_{ij}-\sigma \right)^2 \right)
125 \label{mceq:pot}
126 \end{eqnarray}
127
128 In this potential, $\mathbf{\hat u}_i$ is the unit vector pointing
129 along dipole $i$ and $\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}$ is the unit vector
130 pointing along the inter-dipole vector $\mathbf{r}_{ij}$. The entire
131 potential is governed by three parameters, the dipolar strength
132 ($\mu$), the harmonic spring constant ($k_r$) and the preferred
133 intermolecular spacing ($\sigma$). In practice, we set the value of
134 $\sigma$ to the average inter-molecular spacing from the planar
135 lattice, yielding a potential model that has only two parameters for a
136 particular choice of lattice constants $a$ (along the $x$-axis) and
137 $b$ (along the $y$-axis). We also define a set of reduced parameters
138 based on the length scale ($\sigma$) and the energy of the harmonic
139 potential at a deformation of 2 $\sigma$ ($\epsilon = k_r \sigma^2 /
140 2$). Using these two constants, we perform our calculations using
141 reduced distances, ($r^{*} = r / \sigma$), temperatures ($T^{*} = 2
142 k_B T / k_r \sigma^2$), densities ($\rho^{*} = N \sigma^2 / L_x L_y$),
143 and dipole moments ($\mu^{*} = \mu / \sqrt{4 \pi \epsilon_0 \sigma^5
144 k_r / 2}$). It should be noted that the density ($\rho^{*}$) depends
145 only on the mean particle spacing in the $x-y$ plane; the lattice is
146 fully populated.
147
148 To investigate the phase behavior of this model, we have performed a
149 series of Metropolis Monte Carlo simulations of moderately-sized (34.3
150 $\sigma$ on a side) patches of membrane hosted on both triangular
151 ($\gamma = a/b = \sqrt{3}$) and distorted ($\gamma \neq \sqrt{3}$)
152 lattices. The linear extent of one edge of the monolayer was $20 a$
153 and the system was kept roughly square. The average distance that
154 coplanar dipoles were positioned from their six nearest neighbors was
155 1 $\sigma$ (on both triangular and distorted lattices). Typical
156 system sizes were 1360 dipoles for the triangular lattices and
157 840-2800 dipoles for the distorted lattices. Two-dimensional periodic
158 boundary conditions were used, and the cutoff for the dipole-dipole
159 interaction was set to 4.3 $\sigma$. This cutoff is roughly 2.5 times
160 the typical real-space electrostatic cutoff for molecular systems.
161 Since dipole-dipole interactions decay rapidly with distance, and
162 since the intrinsic three-dimensional periodicity of the Ewald sum can
163 give artifacts in 2-d systems, we have chosen not to use it in these
164 calculations. Although the Ewald sum has been reformulated to handle
165 2-D systems,\cite{Parry75,Parry76,Heyes77,deLeeuw79,Rhee89} these
166 methods are computationally expensive,\cite{Spohr97,Yeh99} and are not
167 necessary in this case. All parameters ($T^{*}$, $\mu^{*}$, and
168 $\gamma$) were varied systematically to study the effects of these
169 parameters on the formation of ripple-like phases.
170
171 \section{Results and Analysis}
172 \label{mc:sec:results}
173
174 \subsection{Dipolar Ordering and Coexistence Temperatures}
175 The principal method for observing the orientational ordering
176 transition in dipolar systems is the $P_2$ order parameter (defined as
177 $1.5 \times \lambda_{max}$, where $\lambda_{max}$ is the largest
178 eigenvalue of the matrix,
179 \begin{equation}
180 {\mathsf{S}} = \frac{1}{N} \sum_i \left(
181 \begin{array}{ccc}
182 u^{x}_i u^{x}_i-\frac{1}{3} & u^{x}_i u^{y}_i & u^{x}_i u^{z}_i \\
183 u^{y}_i u^{x}_i & u^{y}_i u^{y}_i -\frac{1}{3} & u^{y}_i u^{z}_i \\
184 u^{z}_i u^{x}_i & u^{z}_i u^{y}_i & u^{z}_i u^{z}_i -\frac{1}{3}
185 \end{array} \right).
186 \label{mceq:opmatrix}
187 \end{equation}
188 Here $u^{\alpha}_i$ is the $\alpha=x,y,z$ component of the unit vector
189 for dipole $i$. $P_2$ will be $1.0$ for a perfectly-ordered system
190 and near $0$ for a randomized system. Note that this order parameter
191 is {\em not} equal to the polarization of the system. For example,
192 the polarization of the perfect anti-ferroelectric system is $0$, but
193 $P_2$ for an anti-ferroelectric system is $1$. The eigenvector of
194 $\mathsf{S}$ corresponding to the largest eigenvalue is familiar as
195 the director axis, which can be used to determine a privileged dipolar
196 axis for dipole-ordered systems. The top panel in Fig. \ref{mcfig:phase}
197 shows the values of $P_2$ as a function of temperature for both
198 triangular ($\gamma = 1.732$) and distorted ($\gamma=1.875$)
199 lattices.
200
201 \begin{figure}
202 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcPhase.pdf}
203 \caption{\label{mcfig:phase} Top panel: The $P_2$ dipolar order parameter as
204 a function of temperature for both triangular ($\gamma = 1.732$) and
205 distorted ($\gamma = 1.875$) lattices. Bottom Panel: The phase
206 diagram for the dipolar membrane model. The line denotes the division
207 between the dipolar ordered (anti-ferroelectric) and disordered phases.
208 An enlarged view near the triangular lattice is shown inset.}
209 \end{figure}
210
211 There is a clear order-disorder transition in evidence from this data.
212 Both the triangular and distorted lattices have dipolar-ordered
213 low-temperature phases, and orientationally-disordered high
214 temperature phases. The coexistence temperature for the triangular
215 lattice is significantly lower than for the distorted lattices, and
216 the bulk polarization is approximately $0$ for both dipolar ordered
217 and disordered phases. This gives strong evidence that the dipolar
218 ordered phase is anti-ferroelectric. We have verified that this
219 dipolar ordering transition is not a function of system size by
220 performing identical calculations with systems twice as large. The
221 transition is equally smooth at all system sizes that were studied.
222 Additionally, we have repeated the Monte Carlo simulations over a wide
223 range of lattice ratios ($\gamma$) to generate a dipolar
224 order/disorder phase diagram. The bottom panel in Fig. \ref{mcfig:phase}
225 shows that the triangular lattice is a low-temperature cusp in the
226 $T^{*}-\gamma$ phase diagram.
227
228 This phase diagram is remarkable in that it shows an
229 anti-ferroelectric phase near $\gamma=1.732$ where one would expect
230 lattice frustration to result in disordered phases at all
231 temperatures. Observations of the configurations in this phase show
232 clearly that the system has accomplished dipolar ordering by forming
233 large ripple-like structures. We have observed anti-ferroelectric
234 ordering in all three of the equivalent directions on the triangular
235 lattice, and the dipoles have been observed to organize perpendicular
236 to the membrane normal (in the plane of the membrane). It is
237 particularly interesting to note that the ripple-like structures have
238 also been observed to propagate in the three equivalent directions on
239 the lattice, but the {\em direction of ripple propagation is always
240 perpendicular to the dipole director axis}. A snapshot of a typical
241 anti-ferroelectric rippled structure is shown in
242 Fig. \ref{mcfig:snapshot}.
243
244 \begin{figure}
245 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcSnapshot.pdf}
246 \caption{\label{mcfig:snapshot} Top and Side views of a representative
247 configuration for the dipolar ordered phase supported on the
248 triangular lattice. Note the anti-ferroelectric ordering and the long
249 wavelength buckling of the membrane. Dipolar ordering has been
250 observed in all three equivalent directions on the triangular lattice,
251 and the ripple direction is always perpendicular to the director axis
252 for the dipoles.}
253 \end{figure}
254
255 Although the snapshot in Fig. \ref{mcfig:snapshot} gives the appearance
256 of three-row stair-like structures, these appear to be transient. On
257 average, the corrugation of the membrane is a relatively smooth,
258 long-wavelength phenomenon, with occasional steep drops between
259 adjacent lines of anti-aligned dipoles.
260
261 The height-dipole correlation function ($C_{\textrm{hd}}(r, \cos
262 \theta)$) makes the connection between dipolar ordering and the wave
263 vector of the ripple even more explicit. $C_{\textrm{hd}}(r, \cos
264 \theta)$ is an angle-dependent pair distribution function. The angle
265 ($\theta$) is the angle between the intermolecular vector
266 $\vec{r}_{ij}$ and direction of dipole $i$,
267 \begin{equation}
268 C_{\textrm{hd}} = \frac{\langle \frac{1}{n(r)} \sum_{i}\sum_{j>i}
269 h_i \cdot h_j \delta(r - r_{ij}) \delta(\cos \theta_{ij} -
270 \cos \theta)\rangle} {\langle h^2 \rangle}
271 \end{equation}
272 where $\cos \theta_{ij} = \hat{\mu}_{i} \cdot \hat{r}_{ij}$ and
273 $\hat{r}_{ij} = \vec{r}_{ij} / r_{ij}$. $n(r)$ is the number of
274 dipoles found in a cylindrical shell between $r$ and $r+\delta r$ of
275 the central particle. Fig. \ref{mcfig:CrossCorrelation} shows contours
276 of this correlation function for both anti-ferroelectric, rippled
277 membranes as well as for the dipole-disordered portion of the phase
278 diagram.
279
280 \begin{figure}
281 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcHdc.pdf}
282 \caption{\label{mcfig:CrossCorrelation} Contours of the height-dipole
283 correlation function as a function of the dot product between the
284 dipole ($\hat{\mu}$) and inter-dipole separation vector ($\hat{r}$)
285 and the distance ($r$) between the dipoles. Perfect height
286 correlation (contours approaching 1) are present in the ordered phase
287 when the two dipoles are in the same head-to-tail line.
288 Anti-correlation (contours below 0) is only seen when the inter-dipole
289 vector is perpendicular to the dipoles. In the dipole-disordered
290 portion of the phase diagram, there is only weak correlation in the
291 dipole direction and this correlation decays rapidly to zero for
292 intermolecular vectors that are not dipole-aligned.}
293 \end{figure}
294
295 The height-dipole correlation function gives a map of how the topology
296 of the membrane surface varies with angular deviation around a given
297 dipole. The upper panel of Fig. \ref{mcfig:CrossCorrelation} shows that
298 in the anti-ferroelectric phase, the dipole heights are strongly
299 correlated for dipoles in head-to-tail arrangements, and this
300 correlation persists for very long distances (up to 15 $\sigma$). For
301 portions of the membrane located perpendicular to a given dipole, the
302 membrane height becomes anti-correlated at distances of 10 $\sigma$.
303 The correlation function is relatively smooth; there are no steep
304 jumps or steps, so the stair-like structures in
305 Fig. \ref{mcfig:snapshot} are indeed transient and disappear when
306 averaged over many configurations. In the dipole-disordered phase,
307 the height-dipole correlation function is relatively flat (and hovers
308 near zero). The only significant height correlations are for axial
309 dipoles at very short distances ($r \approx
310 \sigma$).
311
312 \subsection{Discriminating Ripples from Thermal Undulations}
313
314 In order to be sure that the structures we have observed are actually
315 a rippled phase and not simply thermal undulations, we have computed
316 the undulation spectrum,
317 \begin{equation}
318 h(\vec{q}) = A^{-1/2} \int d\vec{r}
319 h(\vec{r}) e^{-i \vec{q}\cdot\vec{r}}
320 \end{equation}
321 where $h(\vec{r})$ is the height of the membrane at location $\vec{r}
322 = (x,y)$.~\cite{Safran94,Seifert97} In simple (and more complicated)
323 elastic continuum models, it can shown that in the $NVT$ ensemble, the
324 absolute value of the undulation spectrum can be written,
325 \begin{equation}
326 \langle | h(q) |^2 \rangle_{NVT} = \frac{k_B T}{k_c q^4 +
327 \gamma q^2},
328 \label{mceq:fit}
329 \end{equation}
330 where $k_c$ is the bending modulus for the membrane, and $\gamma$ is
331 the mechanical surface tension.~\cite{Safran94} The systems studied in
332 this paper have essentially zero bending moduli ($k_c$) and relatively
333 large mechanical surface tensions ($\gamma$), so a much simpler form
334 can be written,
335 \begin{equation}
336 \langle | h(q) |^2 \rangle_{NVT} = \frac{k_B T}{\gamma q^2},
337 \label{mceq:fit2}
338 \end{equation}
339
340 The undulation spectrum is computed by superimposing a rectangular
341 grid on top of the membrane, and by assigning height ($h(\vec{r})$)
342 values to the grid from the average of all dipoles that fall within a
343 given $\vec{r}+d\vec{r}$ grid area. Empty grid pixels are assigned
344 height values by interpolation from the nearest neighbor pixels. A
345 standard 2-d Fourier transform is then used to obtain $\langle |
346 h(q)|^2 \rangle$. Alternatively, since the dipoles sit on a Bravais
347 lattice, one could use the heights of the lattice points themselves as
348 the grid for the Fourier transform (without interpolating to a square
349 grid). However, if lateral translational freedom is added to this
350 model (a likely extension), an interpolated grid method for computing
351 undulation spectra will be required.
352
353 As mentioned above, the best fits to our undulation spectra are
354 obtained by setting the value of $k_c$ to 0. In Fig. \ref{mcfig:fit} we
355 show typical undulation spectra for two different regions of the phase
356 diagram along with their fits from the Landau free energy approach
357 (Eq. \ref{mceq:fit2}). In the high-temperature disordered phase, the
358 Landau fits can be nearly perfect, and from these fits we can estimate
359 the tension in the surface. In reduced units, typical values of
360 $\gamma^{*} = \gamma / \epsilon = 2500$ are obtained for the
361 disordered phase ($\gamma^{*} = 2551.7$ in the top panel of
362 Fig. \ref{mcfig:fit}).
363
364 Typical values of $\gamma^{*}$ in the dipolar-ordered phase are much
365 higher than in the dipolar-disordered phase ($\gamma^{*} = 73,538$ in
366 the lower panel of Fig. \ref{mcfig:fit}). For the dipolar-ordered
367 triangular lattice near the coexistence temperature, we also observe
368 long wavelength undulations that are far outliers to the fits. That
369 is, the Landau free energy fits are well within error bars for most of
370 the other points, but can be off by {\em orders of magnitude} for a
371 few low frequency components.
372
373 We interpret these outliers as evidence that these low frequency modes
374 are {\em non-thermal undulations}. We take this as evidence that we
375 are actually seeing a rippled phase developing in this model system.
376
377 \begin{figure}
378 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcLogFit.pdf}
379 \caption{\label{mcfig:fit} Evidence that the observed ripples are {\em
380 not} thermal undulations is obtained from the 2-d Fourier transform
381 $\langle |h^{*}(\vec{q})|^2 \rangle$ of the height profile ($\langle
382 h^{*}(x,y) \rangle$). Rippled samples show low-wavelength peaks that
383 are outliers on the Landau free energy fits by an order of magnitude.
384 Samples exhibiting only thermal undulations fit Eq. \ref{mceq:fit}
385 remarkably well.}
386 \end{figure}
387
388 \subsection{Effects of Potential Parameters on Amplitude and Wavelength}
389
390 We have used two different methods to estimate the amplitude and
391 periodicity of the ripples. The first method requires projection of
392 the ripples onto a one dimensional rippling axis. Since the rippling
393 is always perpendicular to the dipole director axis, we can define a
394 ripple vector as follows. The largest eigenvector, $s_1$, of the
395 $\mathsf{S}$ matrix in Eq. \ref{mceq:opmatrix} is projected onto a
396 planar director axis,
397 \begin{equation}
398 \vec{d} = \left(\begin{array}{c}
399 \vec{s}_1 \cdot \hat{i} \\
400 \vec{s}_1 \cdot \hat{j} \\
401 0
402 \end{array} \right).
403 \end{equation}
404 ($\hat{i}$, $\hat{j}$ and $\hat{k}$ are unit vectors along the $x$,
405 $y$, and $z$ axes, respectively.) The rippling axis is in the plane of
406 the membrane and is perpendicular to the planar director axis,
407 \begin{equation}
408 \vec{q}_{\mathrm{rip}} = \vec{d} \times \hat{k}
409 \end{equation}
410 We can then find the height profile of the membrane along the ripple
411 axis by projecting heights of the dipoles to obtain a one-dimensional
412 height profile, $h(q_{\mathrm{rip}})$. Ripple wavelengths can be
413 estimated from the largest non-thermal low-frequency component in the
414 Fourier transform of $h(q_{\mathrm{rip}})$. Amplitudes can be
415 estimated by measuring peak-to-trough distances in
416 $h(q_{\mathrm{rip}})$ itself.
417
418 A second, more accurate, and simpler method for estimating ripple
419 shape is to extract the wavelength and height information directly
420 from the largest non-thermal peak in the undulation spectrum. For
421 large-amplitude ripples, the two methods give similar results. The
422 one-dimensional projection method is more prone to noise (particularly
423 in the amplitude estimates for the distorted lattices). We report
424 amplitudes and wavelengths taken directly from the undulation spectrum
425 below.
426
427 In the triangular lattice ($\gamma = \sqrt{3}$), the rippling is
428 observed for temperatures ($T^{*}$) from $61-122$. The wavelength of
429 the ripples is remarkably stable at 21.4~$\sigma$ for all but the
430 temperatures closest to the order-disorder transition. At $T^{*} =
431 122$, the wavelength drops to 17.1~$\sigma$.
432
433 The dependence of the amplitude on temperature is shown in the top
434 panel of Fig. \ref{mcfig:Amplitude}. The rippled structures shrink
435 smoothly as the temperature rises towards the order-disorder
436 transition. The wavelengths and amplitudes we observe are
437 surprisingly close to the $\Lambda / 2$ phase observed by Kaasgaard
438 {\it et al.} in their work on PC-based lipids.\cite{Kaasgaard03}
439 However, this is coincidental agreement based on a choice of 7~\AA~as
440 the mean spacing between lipids.
441
442 \begin{figure}
443 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcProperties_sq.pdf}
444 \caption{\label{mcfig:Amplitude} a) The amplitude $A^{*}$ of the ripples
445 vs. temperature for a triangular lattice. b) The amplitude $A^{*}$ of
446 the ripples vs. dipole strength ($\mu^{*}$) for both the triangular
447 lattice (circles) and distorted lattice (squares). The reduced
448 temperatures were kept fixed at $T^{*} = 94$ for the triangular
449 lattice and $T^{*} = 106$ for the distorted lattice (approximately 2/3
450 of the order-disorder transition temperature for each lattice).}
451 \end{figure}
452
453 The ripples can be made to disappear by increasing the internal
454 elastic tension (i.e. by increasing $k_r$ or equivalently, reducing
455 the dipole moment). The amplitude of the ripples depends critically
456 on the strength of the dipole moments ($\mu^{*}$) in Eq. \ref{mceq:pot}.
457 If the dipoles are weakened substantially (below $\mu^{*}$ = 20) at a
458 fixed temperature of 94, the membrane loses dipolar ordering
459 and the ripple structures. The ripples reach a peak amplitude of
460 3.7~$\sigma$ at a dipolar strength of 25. We show the dependence
461 of ripple amplitude on the dipolar strength in
462 Fig. \ref{mcfig:Amplitude}.
463
464 \subsection{Distorted lattices}
465
466 We have also investigated the effect of the lattice geometry by
467 changing the ratio of lattice constants ($\gamma$) while keeping the
468 average nearest-neighbor spacing constant. The anti-ferroelectric state
469 is accessible for all $\gamma$ values we have used, although the
470 distorted triangular lattices prefer a particular director axis due to
471 the anisotropy of the lattice.
472
473 Our observation of rippling behavior was not limited to the triangular
474 lattices. In distorted lattices the anti-ferroelectric phase can
475 develop nearly instantaneously in the Monte Carlo simulations, and
476 these dipolar-ordered phases tend to be remarkably flat. Whenever
477 rippling has been observed in these distorted lattices
478 (e.g. $\gamma = 1.875$), we see relatively short ripple wavelengths
479 (14 $\sigma$) and amplitudes of 2.4~$\sigma$. These ripples are
480 weakly dependent on dipolar strength (see Fig. \ref{mcfig:Amplitude}),
481 although below a dipolar strength of $\mu^{*} = 20$, the membrane
482 loses dipolar ordering and displays only thermal undulations.
483
484 The ripple phase does {\em not} appear at all values of $\gamma$. We
485 have only observed non-thermal undulations in the range $1.625 <
486 \gamma < 1.875$. Outside this range, the order-disorder transition in
487 the dipoles remains, but the ordered dipolar phase has only thermal
488 undulations. This is one of our strongest pieces of evidence that
489 rippling is a symmetry-breaking phenomenon for triangular and
490 nearly-triangular lattices.
491
492 \subsection{Effects of System Size}
493 To evaluate the effect of finite system size, we have performed a
494 series of simulations on the triangular lattice at a reduced
495 temperature of 122, which is just below the order-disorder transition
496 temperature ($T^{*} = 139$). These conditions are in the
497 dipole-ordered and rippled portion of the phase diagram. These are
498 also the conditions that should be most susceptible to system size
499 effects.
500
501 \begin{figure}
502 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/mcSystemSize.pdf}
503 \caption{\label{mcfig:systemsize} The ripple wavelength (top) and
504 amplitude (bottom) as a function of system size for a triangular
505 lattice ($\gamma=1.732$) at $T^{*} = 122$.}
506 \end{figure}
507
508 There is substantial dependence on system size for small (less than
509 29~$\sigma$) periodic boxes. Notably, there are resonances apparent
510 in the ripple amplitudes at box lengths of 17.3 and 29.5 $\sigma$.
511 For larger systems, the behavior of the ripples appears to have
512 stabilized and is on a trend to slightly smaller amplitudes (and
513 slightly longer wavelengths) than were observed from the 34.3 $\sigma$
514 box sizes that were used for most of the calculations.
515
516 It is interesting to note that system sizes which are multiples of the
517 default ripple wavelength can enhance the amplitude of the observed
518 ripples, but appears to have only a minor effect on the observed
519 wavelength. It would, of course, be better to use system sizes that
520 were many multiples of the ripple wavelength to be sure that the
521 periodic box is not driving the phenomenon, but at the largest system
522 size studied (70 $\sigma$ $\times$ 70 $\sigma$), the number of dipoles
523 (5440) made long Monte Carlo simulations prohibitively expensive.
524
525 \section{Discussion}
526 \label{mc:sec:discussion}
527
528 We have been able to show that a simple dipolar lattice model which
529 contains only molecular packing (from the lattice), anisotropy (in the
530 form of electrostatic dipoles) and a weak elastic tension (in the form
531 of a nearest-neighbor harmonic potential) is capable of exhibiting
532 stable long-wavelength non-thermal surface corrugations. The best
533 explanation for this behavior is that the ability of the dipoles to
534 translate out of the plane of the membrane is enough to break the
535 symmetry of the triangular lattice and allow the energetic benefit
536 from the formation of a bulk anti-ferroelectric phase. Were the weak
537 elastic tension absent from our model, it would be possible for the
538 entire lattice to ``tilt'' using $z$-translation. Tilting the lattice
539 in this way would yield an effectively non-triangular lattice which
540 would avoid dipolar frustration altogether. With the elastic tension
541 in place, bulk tilt causes a large strain, and the least costly way to
542 release this strain is between two rows of anti-aligned dipoles.
543 These ``breaks'' will result in rippled or sawtooth patterns in the
544 membrane, and allow small stripes of membrane to form
545 anti-ferroelectric regions that are tilted relative to the averaged
546 membrane normal.
547
548 Although the dipole-dipole interaction is the major driving force for
549 the long range orientational ordered state, the formation of the
550 stable, smooth ripples is a result of the competition between the
551 elastic tension and the dipole-dipole interactions. This statement is
552 supported by the variation in $\mu^{*}$. Substantially weaker dipoles
553 relative to the surface tension can cause the corrugated phase to
554 disappear.
555
556 The packing of the dipoles into a nearly-triangular lattice is clearly
557 an important piece of the puzzle. The dipolar head groups of lipid
558 molecules are sterically (as well as electrostatically) anisotropic,
559 and would not pack in triangular arrangements without the steric
560 interference of adjacent molecular bodies. Since we only see rippled
561 phases in the neighborhood of $\gamma=\sqrt{3}$, this implies that
562 even if this dipolar mechanism is the correct explanation for the
563 ripple phase in realistic bilayers, there would still be a role played
564 by the lipid chains in the in-plane organization of the triangularly
565 ordered phases which could support ripples. The present model is
566 certainly not detailed enough to answer exactly what drives the
567 formation of the $P_{\beta'}$ phase in real lipids, but suggests some
568 avenues for further experiments.
569
570 The most important prediction we can make using the results from this
571 simple model is that if dipolar ordering is driving the surface
572 corrugation, the wave vectors for the ripples should always found to
573 be {\it perpendicular} to the dipole director axis. This prediction
574 should suggest experimental designs which test whether this is really
575 true in the phosphatidylcholine $P_{\beta'}$ phases. The dipole
576 director axis should also be easily computable for the all-atom and
577 coarse-grained simulations that have been published in the literature.
578
579 Our other observation about the ripple and dipolar directionality is
580 that the dipole director axis can be found to be parallel to any of
581 the three equivalent lattice vectors in the triangular lattice.
582 Defects in the ordering of the dipoles can cause the dipole director
583 (and consequently the surface corrugation) of small regions to be
584 rotated relative to each other by 120$^{\circ}$. This is a similar
585 behavior to the domain rotation seen in the AFM studies of Kaasgaard
586 {\it et al.}\cite{Kaasgaard03}
587
588 Although our model is simple, it exhibits some rich and unexpected
589 behaviors. It would clearly be a closer approximation to the reality
590 if we allowed greater translational freedom to the dipoles and
591 replaced the somewhat artificial lattice packing and the harmonic
592 elastic tension with more realistic molecular modeling potentials.
593 What we have done is to present a simple model which exhibits bulk
594 non-thermal corrugation, and our explanation of this rippling
595 phenomenon will help us design more accurate molecular models for
596 corrugated membranes and experiments to test whether rippling is
597 dipole-driven or not.