1 |
\chapter{\label{chap:intro}INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND} |
2 |
|
3 |
\section{Background on the Problem\label{In:sec:pro}} |
4 |
Phospholipid molecules are the primary topic of this dissertation |
5 |
because of their critical role as the foundation of biological |
6 |
membranes. Lipids, when dispersed in water, self assemble into bilayer |
7 |
structures. The phase behavior of lipid bilayers have been explored |
8 |
experimentally~\cite{Cevc87}, however, a complete understanding of the |
9 |
mechanism for self-assembly has not been achieved. |
10 |
|
11 |
\subsection{Ripple Phase\label{In:ssec:ripple}} |
12 |
The $P_{\beta'}$ {\it ripple phase} of lipid bilayers, named from the |
13 |
periodic buckling of the membrane, is an intermediate phase which is |
14 |
developed either from heating the gel phase $L_{\beta'}$ or cooling |
15 |
the fluid phase $L_\alpha$. Although the ripple phase has been |
16 |
observed in several |
17 |
experiments~\cite{Sun96,Katsaras00,Copeland80,Meyer96,Kaasgaard03}, |
18 |
the physical mechanism for the formation of the ripple phase has never been |
19 |
explained and the microscopic structure of the ripple phase has never |
20 |
been elucidated by experiments. Computational simulation is a perfect |
21 |
tool to study the microscopic properties for a system. However, the |
22 |
large length scale the ripple structure and the long time scale |
23 |
of the formation of the ripples are crucial obstacles to performing |
24 |
the actual work. The principal ideas explored in this dissertation are |
25 |
attempts to break the computational task up by |
26 |
\begin{itemize} |
27 |
\item Simplifying the lipid model. |
28 |
\item Improving algorithm for integrating the equations of motion. |
29 |
\end{itemize} |
30 |
In chapters~\ref{chap:mc} and~\ref{chap:md}, we use a simple point |
31 |
dipole model and a coarse-grained model to perform the Monte Carlo and |
32 |
Molecular Dynamics simulations respectively, and in |
33 |
chapter~\ref{chap:ld}, we develop a Langevin Dynamics algorithm which |
34 |
excludes the explicit solvent to improve the efficiency of the |
35 |
simulations. |
36 |
|
37 |
\subsection{Lattice Model\label{In:ssec:model}} |
38 |
The gel-like characteristic of the ripple phase makes it feasible to |
39 |
apply a lattice model to study the system. It is claimed that the |
40 |
packing of the lipid molecules in ripple phase is |
41 |
hexagonal~\cite{Cevc87}. The popular $2$ dimensional lattice models, |
42 |
{\it i.e.}, the Ising, $X-Y$, and Heisenberg models, show {\it |
43 |
frustration} on triangular lattices. The Hamiltonian of the systems |
44 |
are given by |
45 |
\begin{equation} |
46 |
H = |
47 |
\begin{cases} |
48 |
-J \sum_n \sum_{n'} s_n s_n' & \text{Ising}, \\ |
49 |
-J \sum_n \sum_{n'} \vec s_n \cdot \vec s_{n'} & \text{$X-Y$ and |
50 |
Heisenberg}, |
51 |
\end{cases} |
52 |
\end{equation} |
53 |
where $J$ has non zero value only when spins $s_n$ ($\vec s_n$) and |
54 |
$s_{n'}$ ($\vec s_{n'}$) are the nearest neighbours. |
55 |
\begin{figure} |
56 |
\centering |
57 |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/inFrustration.pdf} |
58 |
\caption{Frustration on a triangular lattice, the spins are |
59 |
represented by arrows. No matter which direction the spin on the top |
60 |
of triangle points to, the Hamiltonain of the system goes up.} |
61 |
\label{Infig:frustration} |
62 |
\end{figure} |
63 |
Figure~\ref{Infig:frustration} shows an illustration of the |
64 |
frustration on a triangular lattice. When $J < 0$, the spins want to |
65 |
be anti-aligned, The direction of the spin on top of the triangle will |
66 |
make the energy go up no matter which direction it picks, therefore |
67 |
infinite possibilities for the packing of spins induce what is known |
68 |
as ``complete regular frustration'' which leads to disordered low |
69 |
temperature phases. |
70 |
|
71 |
The lack of translational degree of freedom in lattice models prevents |
72 |
their utilization in models for surface buckling which would |
73 |
correspond to ripple formation. In chapter~\ref{chap:mc}, a modified |
74 |
lattice model is introduced to tackle this specific situation. |
75 |
|
76 |
\section{Overview of Classical Statistical Mechanics\label{In:sec:SM}} |
77 |
Statistical mechanics provides a way to calculate the macroscopic |
78 |
properties of a system from the molecular interactions used in |
79 |
computational simulations. This section serves as a brief introduction |
80 |
to key concepts of classical statistical mechanics that we used in |
81 |
this dissertation. Tolman gives an excellent introduction to the |
82 |
principles of statistical mechanics~\cite{Tolman1979}. A large part of |
83 |
section~\ref{In:sec:SM} will follow Tolman's notation. |
84 |
|
85 |
\subsection{Ensembles\label{In:ssec:ensemble}} |
86 |
In classical mechanics, the state of the system is completely |
87 |
described by the positions and momenta of all particles. If we have an |
88 |
$N$ particle system, there are $6N$ coordinates ($3N$ position $(q_1, |
89 |
q_2, \ldots, q_{3N})$ and $3N$ momenta $(p_1, p_2, \ldots, p_{3N})$) |
90 |
to define the instantaneous state of the system. Each single set of |
91 |
the $6N$ coordinates can be considered as a unique point in a $6N$ |
92 |
dimensional space where each perpendicular axis is one of |
93 |
$q_{i\alpha}$ or $p_{i\alpha}$ ($i$ is the particle and $\alpha$ is |
94 |
the spatial axis). This $6N$ dimensional space is known as phase |
95 |
space. The instantaneous state of the system is a single point in |
96 |
phase space. A trajectory is a connected path of points in phase |
97 |
space. An ensemble is a collection of systems described by the same |
98 |
macroscopic observables but which have microscopic state |
99 |
distributions. In phase space an ensemble is a collection of a set of |
100 |
representive points. A density distribution $\rho(q^N, p^N)$ of the |
101 |
representive points in phase space describes the condition of an |
102 |
ensemble of identical systems. Since this density may change with |
103 |
time, it is also a function of time. $\rho(q^N, p^N, t)$ describes the |
104 |
ensemble at a time $t$, and $\rho(q^N, p^N, t')$ describes the |
105 |
ensemble at a later time $t'$. For convenience, we will use $\rho$ |
106 |
instead of $\rho(q^N, p^N, t)$ in the following disccusion. If we |
107 |
normalize $\rho$ to unity, |
108 |
\begin{equation} |
109 |
1 = \int d \vec q~^N \int d \vec p~^N \rho, |
110 |
\label{Ineq:normalized} |
111 |
\end{equation} |
112 |
then the value of $\rho$ gives the probability of finding the system |
113 |
in a unit volume in the phase space. |
114 |
|
115 |
Liouville's theorem describes the change in density $\rho$ with |
116 |
time. The number of representive points at a given volume in the phase |
117 |
space at any instant can be written as: |
118 |
\begin{equation} |
119 |
\label{Ineq:deltaN} |
120 |
\delta N = \rho~\delta q_1 \delta q_2 \ldots \delta q_N \delta p_1 \delta p_2 \ldots \delta p_N. |
121 |
\end{equation} |
122 |
To calculate the change in the number of representive points in this |
123 |
volume, let us consider a simple condition: the change in the number |
124 |
of representive points in $q_1$ axis. The rate of the number of the |
125 |
representive points entering the volume at $q_1$ per unit time is: |
126 |
\begin{equation} |
127 |
\label{Ineq:deltaNatq1} |
128 |
\rho~\dot q_1 \delta q_2 \ldots \delta q_N \delta p_1 \delta p_2 \ldots \delta p_N, |
129 |
\end{equation} |
130 |
and the rate of the number of representive points leaving the volume |
131 |
at another position $q_1 + \delta q_1$ is: |
132 |
\begin{equation} |
133 |
\label{Ineq:deltaNatq1plusdeltaq1} |
134 |
\left( \rho + \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial q_1} \delta q_1 \right)\left(\dot q_1 + |
135 |
\frac{\partial \dot q_1}{\partial q_1} \delta q_1 \right)\delta q_2 \ldots \delta q_N \delta p_1 \delta p_2 \ldots \delta p_N. |
136 |
\end{equation} |
137 |
Here the higher order differentials are neglected. So the change of |
138 |
the number of the representive points is the difference of |
139 |
eq.~\ref{Ineq:deltaNatq1} and eq.~\ref{Ineq:deltaNatq1plusdeltaq1}, which |
140 |
gives us: |
141 |
\begin{equation} |
142 |
\label{Ineq:deltaNatq1axis} |
143 |
-\left(\rho \frac{\partial {\dot q_1}}{\partial q_1} + \frac{\partial {\rho}}{\partial q_1} \dot q_1 \right)\delta q_1 \delta q_2 \ldots \delta q_N \delta p_1 \delta p_2 \ldots \delta p_N, |
144 |
\end{equation} |
145 |
where, higher order differetials are neglected. If we sum over all the |
146 |
axes in the phase space, we can get the change of the number of |
147 |
representive points in a given volume with time: |
148 |
\begin{equation} |
149 |
\label{Ineq:deltaNatGivenVolume} |
150 |
\frac{d(\delta N)}{dt} = -\sum_{i=1}^N \left[\rho \left(\frac{\partial |
151 |
{\dot q_i}}{\partial q_i} + \frac{\partial |
152 |
{\dot p_i}}{\partial p_i}\right) + \left( \frac{\partial {\rho}}{\partial |
153 |
q_i} \dot q_i + \frac{\partial {\rho}}{\partial p_i} \dot p_i\right)\right]\delta q_1 \delta q_2 \ldots \delta q_N \delta p_1 \delta p_2 \ldots \delta p_N. |
154 |
\end{equation} |
155 |
From Hamilton's equation of motion, |
156 |
\begin{equation} |
157 |
\frac{\partial {\dot q_i}}{\partial q_i} = - \frac{\partial |
158 |
{\dot p_i}}{\partial p_i}, |
159 |
\label{Ineq:canonicalFormOfEquationOfMotion} |
160 |
\end{equation} |
161 |
this cancels out the first term on the right side of |
162 |
eq.~\ref{Ineq:deltaNatGivenVolume}. If both sides of |
163 |
eq.~\ref{Ineq:deltaNatGivenVolume} are divided by $\delta q_1 \delta q_2 |
164 |
\ldots \delta q_N \delta p_1 \delta p_2 \ldots \delta p_N$, then we |
165 |
can derive Liouville's theorem: |
166 |
\begin{equation} |
167 |
\left( \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} \right)_{q, p} = -\sum_{i} \left( |
168 |
\frac{\partial {\rho}}{\partial |
169 |
q_i} \dot q_i + \frac{\partial {\rho}}{\partial p_i} \dot p_i \right). |
170 |
\label{Ineq:simpleFormofLiouville} |
171 |
\end{equation} |
172 |
This is the basis of statistical mechanics. If we move the right |
173 |
side of equation~\ref{Ineq:simpleFormofLiouville} to the left, we |
174 |
will obtain |
175 |
\begin{equation} |
176 |
\left( \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} \right)_{q, p} + \sum_{i} \left( |
177 |
\frac{\partial {\rho}}{\partial |
178 |
q_i} \dot q_i + \frac{\partial {\rho}}{\partial p_i} \dot p_i \right) |
179 |
= 0. |
180 |
\label{Ineq:anotherFormofLiouville} |
181 |
\end{equation} |
182 |
It is easy to note that the left side of |
183 |
equation~\ref{Ineq:anotherFormofLiouville} is the total derivative of |
184 |
$\rho$ with respect of $t$, which means |
185 |
\begin{equation} |
186 |
\frac{d \rho}{dt} = 0, |
187 |
\label{Ineq:conservationofRho} |
188 |
\end{equation} |
189 |
and the rate of density change is zero in the neighborhood of any |
190 |
selected moving representive points in the phase space. |
191 |
|
192 |
The condition of the ensemble is determined by the density |
193 |
distribution. If we consider the density distribution as only a |
194 |
function of $q$ and $p$, which means the rate of change of the phase |
195 |
space density in the neighborhood of all representive points in the |
196 |
phase space is zero, |
197 |
\begin{equation} |
198 |
\left( \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} \right)_{q, p} = 0. |
199 |
\label{Ineq:statEquilibrium} |
200 |
\end{equation} |
201 |
We may conclude the ensemble is in {\it statistical equilibrium}. An |
202 |
ensemble in statistical equilibrium often means the system is also in |
203 |
macroscopic equilibrium. If $\left( \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} |
204 |
\right)_{q, p} = 0$, then |
205 |
\begin{equation} |
206 |
\sum_{i} \left( |
207 |
\frac{\partial {\rho}}{\partial |
208 |
q_i} \dot q_i + \frac{\partial {\rho}}{\partial p_i} \dot p_i \right) |
209 |
= 0. |
210 |
\label{Ineq:constantofMotion} |
211 |
\end{equation} |
212 |
If $\rho$ is a function only of some constant of the motion, $\rho$ is |
213 |
independent of time. For a conservative system, the energy of the |
214 |
system is one of the constants of the motion. Here are several |
215 |
examples: when the density distribution is constant everywhere in the |
216 |
phase space, |
217 |
\begin{equation} |
218 |
\rho = \mathrm{const.} |
219 |
\label{Ineq:uniformEnsemble} |
220 |
\end{equation} |
221 |
the ensemble is called {\it uniform ensemble}. Another useful |
222 |
ensemble is called {\it microcanonical ensemble}, for which: |
223 |
\begin{equation} |
224 |
\rho = \delta \left( H(q^N, p^N) - E \right) \frac{1}{\Sigma (N, V, E)} |
225 |
\label{Ineq:microcanonicalEnsemble} |
226 |
\end{equation} |
227 |
where $\Sigma(N, V, E)$ is a normalization constant parameterized by |
228 |
$N$, the total number of particles, $V$, the total physical volume and |
229 |
$E$, the total energy. The physical meaning of $\Sigma(N, V, E)$ is |
230 |
the phase space volume accessible to a microcanonical system with |
231 |
energy $E$ evolving under Hamilton's equations. $H(q^N, p^N)$ is the |
232 |
Hamiltonian of the system. The Gibbs entropy is defined as |
233 |
\begin{equation} |
234 |
S = - k_B \int d \vec q~^N \int d \vec p~^N \rho \ln [C^N \rho], |
235 |
\label{Ineq:gibbsEntropy} |
236 |
\end{equation} |
237 |
where $k_B$ is the Boltzmann constant and $C^N$ is a number which |
238 |
makes the argument of $\ln$ dimensionless, in this case, it is the |
239 |
total phase space volume of one state. The entropy in microcanonical |
240 |
ensemble is given by |
241 |
\begin{equation} |
242 |
S = k_B \ln \left(\frac{\Sigma(N, V, E)}{C^N}\right). |
243 |
\label{Ineq:entropy} |
244 |
\end{equation} |
245 |
If the density distribution $\rho$ is given by |
246 |
\begin{equation} |
247 |
\rho = \frac{1}{Z_N}e^{-H(q^N, p^N) / k_B T}, |
248 |
\label{Ineq:canonicalEnsemble} |
249 |
\end{equation} |
250 |
the ensemble is known as the {\it canonical ensemble}. Here, |
251 |
\begin{equation} |
252 |
Z_N = \int d \vec q~^N \int_\Gamma d \vec p~^N e^{-H(q^N, p^N) / k_B T}, |
253 |
\label{Ineq:partitionFunction} |
254 |
\end{equation} |
255 |
which is also known as {\it partition function}. $\Gamma$ indicates |
256 |
that the integral is over all the phase space. In the canonical |
257 |
ensemble, $N$, the total number of particles, $V$, total volume, and |
258 |
$T$, the temperature are constants. The systems with the lowest |
259 |
energies hold the largest population. According to maximum principle, |
260 |
the thermodynamics maximizes the entropy $S$, |
261 |
\begin{equation} |
262 |
\begin{array}{ccc} |
263 |
\delta S = 0 & \mathrm{and} & \delta^2 S < 0. |
264 |
\end{array} |
265 |
\label{Ineq:maximumPrinciple} |
266 |
\end{equation} |
267 |
From Eq.~\ref{Ineq:maximumPrinciple} and two constrains of the canonical |
268 |
ensemble, {\it i.e.}, total probability and average energy conserved, |
269 |
the partition function is calculated as |
270 |
\begin{equation} |
271 |
Z_N = e^{-A/k_B T}, |
272 |
\label{Ineq:partitionFunctionWithFreeEnergy} |
273 |
\end{equation} |
274 |
where $A$ is the Helmholtz free energy. The significance of |
275 |
Eq.~\ref{Ineq:entropy} and~\ref{Ineq:partitionFunctionWithFreeEnergy} is |
276 |
that they serve as a connection between macroscopic properties of the |
277 |
system and the distribution of the microscopic states. |
278 |
|
279 |
There is an implicit assumption that our arguments are based on so |
280 |
far. A representive point in the phase space is equally to be found in |
281 |
any same extent of the regions. In other words, all energetically |
282 |
accessible states are represented equally, the probabilities to find |
283 |
the system in any of the accessible states is equal. This is called |
284 |
equal a {\it priori} probabilities. |
285 |
|
286 |
\subsection{Statistical Average\label{In:ssec:average}} |
287 |
Given the density distribution $\rho$ in the phase space, the average |
288 |
of any quantity ($F(q^N, p^N$)) which depends on the coordinates |
289 |
($q^N$) and the momenta ($p^N$) for all the systems in the ensemble |
290 |
can be calculated based on the definition shown by |
291 |
Eq.~\ref{Ineq:statAverage1} |
292 |
\begin{equation} |
293 |
\langle F(q^N, p^N, t) \rangle = \frac{\int d \vec q~^N \int d \vec p~^N |
294 |
F(q^N, p^N, t) \rho}{\int d \vec q~^N \int d \vec p~^N \rho}. |
295 |
\label{Ineq:statAverage1} |
296 |
\end{equation} |
297 |
Since the density distribution $\rho$ is normalized to unity, the mean |
298 |
value of $F(q^N, p^N)$ is simplified to |
299 |
\begin{equation} |
300 |
\langle F(q^N, p^N, t) \rangle = \int d \vec q~^N \int d \vec p~^N F(q^N, |
301 |
p^N, t) \rho, |
302 |
\label{Ineq:statAverage2} |
303 |
\end{equation} |
304 |
called {\it ensemble average}. However, the quantity is often averaged |
305 |
for a finite time in real experiments, |
306 |
\begin{equation} |
307 |
\langle F(q^N, p^N) \rangle_t = \lim_{T \rightarrow \infty} |
308 |
\frac{1}{T} \int_{t_0}^{t_0+T} F(q^N, p^N, t) dt. |
309 |
\label{Ineq:timeAverage1} |
310 |
\end{equation} |
311 |
Usually this time average is independent of $t_0$ in statistical |
312 |
mechanics, so Eq.~\ref{Ineq:timeAverage1} becomes |
313 |
\begin{equation} |
314 |
\langle F(q^N, p^N) \rangle_t = \lim_{T \rightarrow \infty} |
315 |
\frac{1}{T} \int_{0}^{T} F(q^N, p^N, t) dt |
316 |
\label{Ineq:timeAverage2} |
317 |
\end{equation} |
318 |
for an infinite time interval. |
319 |
|
320 |
{\it ergodic hypothesis}, an important hypothesis from the statistical |
321 |
mechanics point of view, states that the system will eventually pass |
322 |
arbitrarily close to any point that is energetically accessible in |
323 |
phase space. Mathematically, this leads to |
324 |
\begin{equation} |
325 |
\langle F(q^N, p^N, t) \rangle = \langle F(q^N, p^N) \rangle_t. |
326 |
\label{Ineq:ergodicity} |
327 |
\end{equation} |
328 |
Eq.~\ref{Ineq:ergodicity} validates the Monte Carlo method which we will |
329 |
discuss in section~\ref{In:ssec:mc}. An ensemble average of a quantity |
330 |
can be related to the time average measured in the experiments. |
331 |
|
332 |
\subsection{Correlation Function\label{In:ssec:corr}} |
333 |
Thermodynamic properties can be computed by equillibrium statistical |
334 |
mechanics. On the other hand, {\it Time correlation function} is a |
335 |
powerful method to understand the evolution of a dynamic system in |
336 |
non-equillibrium statistical mechanics. Imagine a property $A(q^N, |
337 |
p^N, t)$ as a function of coordinates $q^N$ and momenta $p^N$ has an |
338 |
intial value at $t_0$, at a later time $t_0 + \tau$ this value is |
339 |
changed. If $\tau$ is very small, the change of the value is minor, |
340 |
and the later value of $A(q^N, p^N, t_0 + |
341 |
\tau)$ is correlated to its initial value. Howere, when $\tau$ is large, |
342 |
this correlation is lost. The correlation function is a measurement of |
343 |
this relationship and is defined by~\cite{Berne90} |
344 |
\begin{equation} |
345 |
C(t) = \langle A(0)A(\tau) \rangle = \lim_{T \rightarrow \infty} |
346 |
\frac{1}{T} \int_{0}^{T} dt A(t) A(t + \tau). |
347 |
\label{Ineq:autocorrelationFunction} |
348 |
\end{equation} |
349 |
Eq.~\ref{Ineq:autocorrelationFunction} is the correlation function of a |
350 |
single variable, called {\it autocorrelation function}. The defination |
351 |
of the correlation function for two different variables is similar to |
352 |
that of autocorrelation function, which is |
353 |
\begin{equation} |
354 |
C(t) = \langle A(0)B(\tau) \rangle = \lim_{T \rightarrow \infty} |
355 |
\frac{1}{T} \int_{0}^{T} dt A(t) B(t + \tau), |
356 |
\label{Ineq:crosscorrelationFunction} |
357 |
\end{equation} |
358 |
and called {\it cross correlation function}. |
359 |
|
360 |
In section~\ref{In:ssec:average} we know from Eq.~\ref{Ineq:ergodicity} |
361 |
the relationship between time average and ensemble average. We can put |
362 |
the correlation function in a classical mechanics form, |
363 |
\begin{equation} |
364 |
C(t) = \langle A(0)A(\tau) \rangle = \int d \vec q~^N \int d \vec p~^N A(t) A(t + \tau) \rho(q, p) |
365 |
\label{Ineq:autocorrelationFunctionCM} |
366 |
\end{equation} |
367 |
and |
368 |
\begin{equation} |
369 |
C(t) = \langle A(0)B(\tau) \rangle = \int d \vec q~^N \int d \vec p~^N A(t) B(t + \tau) |
370 |
\rho(q, p) |
371 |
\label{Ineq:crosscorrelationFunctionCM} |
372 |
\end{equation} |
373 |
as autocorrelation function and cross correlation function |
374 |
respectively. $\rho(q, p)$ is the density distribution at equillibrium |
375 |
in phase space. In many cases, the correlation function decay is a |
376 |
single exponential |
377 |
\begin{equation} |
378 |
C(t) \sim e^{-t / \tau_r}, |
379 |
\label{Ineq:relaxation} |
380 |
\end{equation} |
381 |
where $\tau_r$ is known as relaxation time which discribes the rate of |
382 |
the decay. |
383 |
|
384 |
\section{Methodolody\label{In:sec:method}} |
385 |
The simulations performed in this dissertation are branched into two |
386 |
main catalog, Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics. There are two main |
387 |
difference between Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics simulations. One |
388 |
is that the Monte Carlo simulation is time independent, and Molecular |
389 |
Dynamics simulation is time involved. Another dissimilar is that the |
390 |
Monte Carlo is a stochastic process, the configuration of the system |
391 |
is not determinated by its past, however, using Moleuclar Dynamics, |
392 |
the system is propagated by Newton's equation of motion, the |
393 |
trajectory of the system evolved in the phase space is determined. A |
394 |
brief introduction of the two algorithms are given in |
395 |
section~\ref{In:ssec:mc} and~\ref{In:ssec:md}. An extension of the |
396 |
Molecular Dynamics, Langevin Dynamics, is introduced by |
397 |
section~\ref{In:ssec:ld}. |
398 |
|
399 |
\subsection{Monte Carlo\label{In:ssec:mc}} |
400 |
Monte Carlo algorithm was first introduced by Metropolis {\it et |
401 |
al.}.~\cite{Metropolis53} Basic Monte Carlo algorithm is usually |
402 |
applied to the canonical ensemble, a Boltzmann-weighted ensemble, in |
403 |
which the $N$, the total number of particles, $V$, total volume, $T$, |
404 |
temperature are constants. The average energy is given by substituding |
405 |
Eq.~\ref{Ineq:canonicalEnsemble} into Eq.~\ref{Ineq:statAverage2}, |
406 |
\begin{equation} |
407 |
\langle E \rangle = \frac{1}{Z_N} \int d \vec q~^N \int d \vec p~^N E e^{-H(q^N, p^N) / k_B T}. |
408 |
\label{Ineq:energyofCanonicalEnsemble} |
409 |
\end{equation} |
410 |
So are the other properties of the system. The Hamiltonian is the |
411 |
summation of Kinetic energy $K(p^N)$ as a function of momenta and |
412 |
Potential energy $U(q^N)$ as a function of positions, |
413 |
\begin{equation} |
414 |
H(q^N, p^N) = K(p^N) + U(q^N). |
415 |
\label{Ineq:hamiltonian} |
416 |
\end{equation} |
417 |
If the property $A$ is only a function of position ($ A = A(q^N)$), |
418 |
the mean value of $A$ is reduced to |
419 |
\begin{equation} |
420 |
\langle A \rangle = \frac{\int d \vec q~^N \int d \vec p~^N A e^{-U(q^N) / k_B T}}{\int d \vec q~^N \int d \vec p~^N e^{-U(q^N) / k_B T}}, |
421 |
\label{Ineq:configurationIntegral} |
422 |
\end{equation} |
423 |
The kinetic energy $K(p^N)$ is factored out in |
424 |
Eq.~\ref{Ineq:configurationIntegral}. $\langle A |
425 |
\rangle$ is a configuration integral now, and the |
426 |
Eq.~\ref{Ineq:configurationIntegral} is equivalent to |
427 |
\begin{equation} |
428 |
\langle A \rangle = \int d \vec q~^N A \rho(q^N). |
429 |
\label{Ineq:configurationAve} |
430 |
\end{equation} |
431 |
|
432 |
In a Monte Carlo simulation of canonical ensemble, the probability of |
433 |
the system being in a state $s$ is $\rho_s$, the change of this |
434 |
probability with time is given by |
435 |
\begin{equation} |
436 |
\frac{d \rho_s}{dt} = \sum_{s'} [ -w_{ss'}\rho_s + w_{s's}\rho_{s'} ], |
437 |
\label{Ineq:timeChangeofProb} |
438 |
\end{equation} |
439 |
where $w_{ss'}$ is the tansition probability of going from state $s$ |
440 |
to state $s'$. Since $\rho_s$ is independent of time at equilibrium, |
441 |
\begin{equation} |
442 |
\frac{d \rho_{s}^{equilibrium}}{dt} = 0, |
443 |
\label{Ineq:equiProb} |
444 |
\end{equation} |
445 |
which means $\sum_{s'} [ -w_{ss'}\rho_s + w_{s's}\rho_{s'} ]$ is $0$ |
446 |
for all $s'$. So |
447 |
\begin{equation} |
448 |
\frac{\rho_s^{equilibrium}}{\rho_{s'}^{equilibrium}} = \frac{w_{s's}}{w_{ss'}}. |
449 |
\label{Ineq:relationshipofRhoandW} |
450 |
\end{equation} |
451 |
If |
452 |
\begin{equation} |
453 |
\frac{w_{s's}}{w_{ss'}} = e^{-(U_s - U_{s'}) / k_B T}, |
454 |
\label{Ineq:conditionforBoltzmannStatistics} |
455 |
\end{equation} |
456 |
then |
457 |
\begin{equation} |
458 |
\frac{\rho_s^{equilibrium}}{\rho_{s'}^{equilibrium}} = e^{-(U_s - U_{s'}) / k_B T}. |
459 |
\label{Ineq:satisfyofBoltzmannStatistics} |
460 |
\end{equation} |
461 |
Eq.~\ref{Ineq:satisfyofBoltzmannStatistics} implies that |
462 |
$\rho^{equilibrium}$ satisfies Boltzmann statistics. An algorithm, |
463 |
shows how Monte Carlo simulation generates a transition probability |
464 |
governed by \ref{Ineq:conditionforBoltzmannStatistics}, is schemed as |
465 |
\begin{enumerate} |
466 |
\item\label{Initm:oldEnergy} Choose an particle randomly, calculate the energy. |
467 |
\item\label{Initm:newEnergy} Make a random displacement for particle, |
468 |
calculate the new energy. |
469 |
\begin{itemize} |
470 |
\item Keep the new configuration and return to step~\ref{Initm:oldEnergy} if energy |
471 |
goes down. |
472 |
\item Pick a random number between $[0,1]$ if energy goes up. |
473 |
\begin{itemize} |
474 |
\item Keep the new configuration and return to |
475 |
step~\ref{Initm:oldEnergy} if the random number smaller than |
476 |
$e^{-(U_{new} - U_{old})} / k_B T$. |
477 |
\item Keep the old configuration and return to |
478 |
step~\ref{Initm:oldEnergy} if the random number larger than |
479 |
$e^{-(U_{new} - U_{old})} / k_B T$. |
480 |
\end{itemize} |
481 |
\end{itemize} |
482 |
\item\label{Initm:accumulateAvg} Accumulate the average after it converges. |
483 |
\end{enumerate} |
484 |
It is important to notice that the old configuration has to be sampled |
485 |
again if it is kept. |
486 |
|
487 |
\subsection{Molecular Dynamics\label{In:ssec:md}} |
488 |
Although some of properites of the system can be calculated from the |
489 |
ensemble average in Monte Carlo simulations, due to the nature of |
490 |
lacking in the time dependence, it is impossible to gain information |
491 |
of those dynamic properties from Monte Carlo simulations. Molecular |
492 |
Dynamics is a measurement of the evolution of the positions and |
493 |
momenta of the particles in the system. The evolution of the system |
494 |
obeys laws of classical mechanics, in most situations, there is no |
495 |
need for the count of the quantum effects. For a real experiment, the |
496 |
instantaneous positions and momenta of the particles in the system are |
497 |
neither important nor measurable, the observable quantities are |
498 |
usually a average value for a finite time interval. These quantities |
499 |
are expressed as a function of positions and momenta in Melecular |
500 |
Dynamics simulations. Like the thermal temperature of the system is |
501 |
defined by |
502 |
\begin{equation} |
503 |
\frac{1}{2} k_B T = \langle \frac{1}{2} m v_\alpha \rangle, |
504 |
\label{Ineq:temperature} |
505 |
\end{equation} |
506 |
here $m$ is the mass of the particle and $v_\alpha$ is the $\alpha$ |
507 |
component of the velocity of the particle. The right side of |
508 |
Eq.~\ref{Ineq:temperature} is the average kinetic energy of the |
509 |
system. A simple Molecular Dynamics simulation scheme |
510 |
is:~\cite{Frenkel1996} |
511 |
\begin{enumerate} |
512 |
\item\label{Initm:initialize} Assign the initial positions and momenta |
513 |
for the particles in the system. |
514 |
\item\label{Initm:calcForce} Calculate the forces. |
515 |
\item\label{Initm:equationofMotion} Integrate the equation of motion. |
516 |
\begin{itemize} |
517 |
\item Return to step~\ref{Initm:calcForce} if the equillibrium is |
518 |
not achieved. |
519 |
\item Go to step~\ref{Initm:calcAvg} if the equillibrium is |
520 |
achieved. |
521 |
\end{itemize} |
522 |
\item\label{Initm:calcAvg} Compute the quantities we are interested in. |
523 |
\end{enumerate} |
524 |
The initial positions of the particles are chosen as that there is no |
525 |
overlap for the particles. The initial velocities at first are |
526 |
distributed randomly to the particles, and then shifted to make the |
527 |
momentum of the system $0$, at last scaled to the desired temperature |
528 |
of the simulation according Eq.~\ref{Ineq:temperature}. |
529 |
|
530 |
The core of Molecular Dynamics simulations is step~\ref{Initm:calcForce} |
531 |
and~\ref{Initm:equationofMotion}. The calculation of the forces are |
532 |
often involved numerous effort, this is the most time consuming step |
533 |
in the Molecular Dynamics scheme. The evaluation of the forces is |
534 |
followed by |
535 |
\begin{equation} |
536 |
f(q) = - \frac{\partial U(q)}{\partial q}, |
537 |
\label{Ineq:force} |
538 |
\end{equation} |
539 |
$U(q)$ is the potential of the system. Once the forces computed, are |
540 |
the positions and velocities updated by integrating Newton's equation |
541 |
of motion, |
542 |
\begin{equation} |
543 |
f(q) = \frac{dp}{dt} = \frac{m dv}{dt}. |
544 |
\label{Ineq:newton} |
545 |
\end{equation} |
546 |
Here is an example of integrating algorithms, Verlet algorithm, which |
547 |
is one of the best algorithms to integrate Newton's equation of |
548 |
motion. The Taylor expension of the position at time $t$ is |
549 |
\begin{equation} |
550 |
q(t+\Delta t)= q(t) + v(t) \Delta t + \frac{f(t)}{2m}\Delta t^2 + |
551 |
\frac{\Delta t^3}{3!}\frac{\partial^3 q(t)}{\partial t^3} + |
552 |
\mathcal{O}(\Delta t^4) |
553 |
\label{Ineq:verletFuture} |
554 |
\end{equation} |
555 |
for a later time $t+\Delta t$, and |
556 |
\begin{equation} |
557 |
q(t-\Delta t)= q(t) - v(t) \Delta t + \frac{f(t)}{2m}\Delta t^2 - |
558 |
\frac{\Delta t^3}{3!}\frac{\partial^3 q(t)}{\partial t^3} + |
559 |
\mathcal{O}(\Delta t^4) , |
560 |
\label{Ineq:verletPrevious} |
561 |
\end{equation} |
562 |
for a previous time $t-\Delta t$. The summation of the |
563 |
Eq.~\ref{Ineq:verletFuture} and~\ref{Ineq:verletPrevious} gives |
564 |
\begin{equation} |
565 |
q(t+\Delta t)+q(t-\Delta t) = |
566 |
2q(t) + \frac{f(t)}{m}\Delta t^2 + \mathcal{O}(\Delta t^4), |
567 |
\label{Ineq:verletSum} |
568 |
\end{equation} |
569 |
so, the new position can be expressed as |
570 |
\begin{equation} |
571 |
q(t+\Delta t) \approx |
572 |
2q(t) - q(t-\Delta t) + \frac{f(t)}{m}\Delta t^2. |
573 |
\label{Ineq:newPosition} |
574 |
\end{equation} |
575 |
The higher order of the $\Delta t$ is omitted. |
576 |
|
577 |
Numerous technics and tricks are applied to Molecular Dynamics |
578 |
simulation to gain more efficiency or more accuracy. The simulation |
579 |
engine used in this dissertation for the Molecular Dynamics |
580 |
simulations is {\sc oopse}, more details of the algorithms and |
581 |
technics can be found in~\cite{Meineke2005}. |
582 |
|
583 |
\subsection{Langevin Dynamics\label{In:ssec:ld}} |
584 |
In many cases, the properites of the solvent in a system, like the |
585 |
lipid-water system studied in this dissertation, are less important to |
586 |
the researchers. However, the major computational expense is spent on |
587 |
the solvent in the Molecular Dynamics simulations because of the large |
588 |
number of the solvent molecules compared to that of solute molecules, |
589 |
the ratio of the number of lipid molecules to the number of water |
590 |
molecules is $1:25$ in our lipid-water system. The efficiency of the |
591 |
Molecular Dynamics simulations is greatly reduced. |
592 |
|
593 |
As an extension of the Molecular Dynamics simulations, the Langevin |
594 |
Dynamics seeks a way to avoid integrating equation of motion for |
595 |
solvent particles without losing the Brownian properites of solute |
596 |
particles. A common approximation is that the coupling of the solute |
597 |
and solvent is expressed as a set of harmonic oscillators. So the |
598 |
Hamiltonian of such a system is written as |
599 |
\begin{equation} |
600 |
H = \frac{p^2}{2m} + U(q) + H_B + \Delta U(q), |
601 |
\label{Ineq:hamiltonianofCoupling} |
602 |
\end{equation} |
603 |
where $H_B$ is the Hamiltonian of the bath which equals to |
604 |
\begin{equation} |
605 |
H_B = \sum_{\alpha = 1}^{N} \left\{ \frac{p_\alpha^2}{2m_\alpha} + |
606 |
\frac{1}{2} m_\alpha \omega_\alpha^2 q_\alpha^2\right\}, |
607 |
\label{Ineq:hamiltonianofBath} |
608 |
\end{equation} |
609 |
$\alpha$ is all the degree of freedoms of the bath, $\omega$ is the |
610 |
bath frequency, and $\Delta U(q)$ is the bilinear coupling given by |
611 |
\begin{equation} |
612 |
\Delta U = -\sum_{\alpha = 1}^{N} g_\alpha q_\alpha q, |
613 |
\label{Ineq:systemBathCoupling} |
614 |
\end{equation} |
615 |
where $g$ is the coupling constant. By solving the Hamilton's equation |
616 |
of motion, the {\it Generalized Langevin Equation} for this system is |
617 |
derived to |
618 |
\begin{equation} |
619 |
m \ddot q = -\frac{\partial W(q)}{\partial q} - \int_0^t \xi(t) \dot q(t-t')dt' + R(t), |
620 |
\label{Ineq:gle} |
621 |
\end{equation} |
622 |
with mean force, |
623 |
\begin{equation} |
624 |
W(q) = U(q) - \sum_{\alpha = 1}^N \frac{g_\alpha^2}{2m_\alpha |
625 |
\omega_\alpha^2}q^2, |
626 |
\label{Ineq:meanForce} |
627 |
\end{equation} |
628 |
being only a dependence of coordinates of the solute particles, {\it |
629 |
friction kernel}, |
630 |
\begin{equation} |
631 |
\xi(t) = \sum_{\alpha = 1}^N \frac{-g_\alpha}{m_\alpha |
632 |
\omega_\alpha} \cos(\omega_\alpha t), |
633 |
\label{Ineq:xiforGLE} |
634 |
\end{equation} |
635 |
and the random force, |
636 |
\begin{equation} |
637 |
R(t) = \sum_{\alpha = 1}^N \left( g_\alpha q_\alpha(0)-\frac{g_\alpha}{m_\alpha |
638 |
\omega_\alpha^2}q(0)\right) \cos(\omega_\alpha t) + \frac{\dot |
639 |
q_\alpha(0)}{\omega_\alpha} \sin(\omega_\alpha t), |
640 |
\label{Ineq:randomForceforGLE} |
641 |
\end{equation} |
642 |
as only a dependence of the initial conditions. The relationship of |
643 |
friction kernel $\xi(t)$ and random force $R(t)$ is given by |
644 |
\begin{equation} |
645 |
\xi(t) = \frac{1}{k_B T} \langle R(t)R(0) \rangle |
646 |
\label{Ineq:relationshipofXiandR} |
647 |
\end{equation} |
648 |
from their definitions. In Langevin limit, the friction is treated |
649 |
static, which means |
650 |
\begin{equation} |
651 |
\xi(t) = 2 \xi_0 \delta(t). |
652 |
\label{Ineq:xiofStaticFriction} |
653 |
\end{equation} |
654 |
After substitude $\xi(t)$ into Eq.~\ref{Ineq:gle} with |
655 |
Eq.~\ref{Ineq:xiofStaticFriction}, {\it Langevin Equation} is extracted |
656 |
to |
657 |
\begin{equation} |
658 |
m \ddot q = -\frac{\partial U(q)}{\partial q} - \xi \dot q(t) + R(t). |
659 |
\label{Ineq:langevinEquation} |
660 |
\end{equation} |
661 |
The applying of Langevin Equation to dynamic simulations is discussed |
662 |
in Ch.~\ref{chap:ld}. |