ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/tengDissertation/Introduction.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/tengDissertation/Introduction.tex (file contents):
Revision 2941 by tim, Mon Jul 17 20:01:05 2006 UTC vs.
Revision 2945 by tim, Tue Jul 18 14:19:49 2006 UTC

# Line 623 | Line 623 | against non-Hamiltonian perturbations, ordinary implic
623   variational methods can capture the decay of energy
624   accurately.\cite{Kane2000} Since they are geometrically unstable
625   against non-Hamiltonian perturbations, ordinary implicit Runge-Kutta
626 < methods are not suitable for Hamiltonian system. Recently, various
627 < high-order explicit Runge-Kutta methods \cite{Owren1992,Chen2003}
628 < have been developed to overcome this instability. However, due to
629 < computational penalty involved in implementing the Runge-Kutta
630 < methods, they have not attracted much attention from the Molecular
631 < Dynamics community. Instead, splitting methods have been widely
632 < accepted since they exploit natural decompositions of the
633 < system.\cite{McLachlan1998, Tuckerman1992}
626 > methods are not suitable for Hamiltonian
627 > system.\cite{Cartwright1992} Recently, various high-order explicit
628 > Runge-Kutta methods \cite{Owren1992,Chen2003} have been developed to
629 > overcome this instability. However, due to computational penalty
630 > involved in implementing the Runge-Kutta methods, they have not
631 > attracted much attention from the Molecular Dynamics community.
632 > Instead, splitting methods have been widely accepted since they
633 > exploit natural decompositions of the system.\cite{McLachlan1998,
634 > Tuckerman1992}
635  
636   \subsubsection{\label{introSection:splittingMethod}\textbf{Splitting Methods}}
637  
# Line 653 | Line 654 | simple first order expression is then given by the Lie
654   problem. If $H_1$ and $H_2$ can be integrated using exact
655   propagators $\varphi_1(t)$ and $\varphi_2(t)$, respectively, a
656   simple first order expression is then given by the Lie-Trotter
657 < formula
657 > formula\cite{Trotter1959}
658   \begin{equation}
659   \varphi _h  = \varphi _{1,h}  \circ \varphi _{2,h},
660   \label{introEquation:firstOrderSplitting}
# Line 751 | Line 752 | to determine the local error of a splitting method in
752  
753   The Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula\cite{Gilmore1974} can be used
754   to determine the local error of a splitting method in terms of the
755 < commutator of the
756 < operators(Eq.~\ref{introEquation:exponentialOperator}) associated
757 < with the sub-propagator. For operators $hX$ and $hY$ which are
757 < associated with $\varphi_1(t)$ and $\varphi_2(t)$ respectively , we
758 < have
755 > commutator of the operators associated with the sub-propagator. For
756 > operators $hX$ and $hY$ which are associated with $\varphi_1(t)$ and
757 > $\varphi_2(t)$ respectively , we have
758   \begin{equation}
759   \exp (hX + hY) = \exp (hZ)
760   \end{equation}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines