ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/scienceIcei/iceiPaper.tex
Revision: 1845
Committed: Fri Dec 3 22:39:30 2004 UTC (20 years, 9 months ago) by chrisfen
Content type: application/x-tex
File size: 16712 byte(s)
Log Message:
the short version

File Contents

# Content
1 %\documentclass[prb,aps,twocolumn,tabularx]{revtex4}
2 \documentclass[11pt]{article}
3 %\documentclass[11pt]{article}
4 \usepackage{endfloat}
5 \usepackage{amsmath}
6 \usepackage{epsf}
7 \usepackage{berkeley}
8 \usepackage{setspace}
9 \usepackage{tabularx}
10 \usepackage{graphicx}
11 \usepackage[ref]{overcite}
12 \pagestyle{plain}
13 \pagenumbering{arabic}
14 \oddsidemargin 0.0cm \evensidemargin 0.0cm
15 \topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt
16 \textheight 9.0in \textwidth 6.5in
17 \brokenpenalty=10000
18 \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.2}
19 \renewcommand\citemid{\ } % no comma in optional reference note
20
21 \begin{document}
22
23 \title{Free Energy Analysis of Simulated Ice Polymorphs}
24
25 \author{Christopher J. Fennell and J. Daniel Gezelter \\
26 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\ University of Notre Dame\\
27 Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
28
29 \date{\today}
30
31 \maketitle
32 %\doublespacing
33
34 \begin{abstract}
35 The absolute free energies of several ice polymorphs which are stable
36 at low pressures were calculated using thermodynamic integration with
37 a variety of common water models. A recently discovered ice polymorph
38 that has yet only been observed in computer simulations (Ice-{\it i}),
39 was determined to be the stable crystalline state for {\it all} the
40 water models investigated. Phase diagrams were generated, and phase
41 coexistence lines were determined for all of the known low-pressure
42 ice structures. Additionally, potential truncation was show to play a
43 role in the resulting shape of the free energy landscape.
44 \end{abstract}
45
46 %\narrowtext
47
48 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
49 % BODY OF TEXT
50 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
51
52 \section{Introduction}
53
54 Water has proven to be a challenging substance to depict in
55 simulations, and a variety of models have been developed to describe
56 its behavior under varying simulation
57 conditions.\cite{Stillinger74,Rahman75,Berendsen81,Jorgensen83,Bratko85,Berendsen87,Caldwell95,Liu96,Berendsen98,Dill00,Mahoney00,Fennell04}
58 These models have been used to investigate important physical
59 phenomena like phase transitions, transport properties, and the
60 hydrophobic effect.\cite{Yamada02,Marrink94,Gallagher03} With the
61 choice of models available, it is only natural to compare the models
62 under interesting thermodynamic conditions in an attempt to clarify
63 the limitations of each of the
64 models.\cite{Jorgensen83,Jorgensen98b,Clancy94,Mahoney01} Two
65 important properties to quantify are the Gibbs and Helmholtz free
66 energies, particularly for the solid forms of water. Difficulties in
67 studies addressing these thermodynamic quantities typically arise from
68 the assortment of possible crystalline polymorphs that water adopts
69 over a wide range of pressures and temperatures. It is a challenging
70 task to investigate the entire free energy landscape\cite{Sanz04};
71 and ideally, research is focused on the phases having the lowest free
72 energy at a given state point, because these phases will dictate the
73 relevant transition temperatures and pressures for the model.
74
75 In this paper, standard reference state methods were applied to known
76 crystalline water polymorphs in the low pressure regime. This work is
77 unique in that one of the crystal lattices was arrived at through
78 crystallization of a computationally efficient water model under
79 constant pressure and temperature conditions. Crystallization events
80 are interesting in and of themselves\cite{Matsumoto02,Yamada02};
81 however, the crystal structure obtained in this case is different from
82 any previously observed ice polymorphs in experiment or
83 simulation.\cite{Fennell04} We have named this structure Ice-{\it i}
84 to indicate its origin in computational simulation. The unit cell of
85 Ice-{\it i} and an extruded variant named Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ both
86 consist of eight water molecules that stack in rows of interlocking
87 water tetramers as illustrated in figures \ref{iCrystal}A and
88 \ref{iCrystal}B. These tetramers make the crystal structure similar
89 in appearance to a recent two-dimensional ice tessellation simulated
90 on a silica surface.\cite{Yang04} As expected in an ice crystal
91 constructed of water tetramers, the hydrogen bonds are not as linear
92 as those observed in ice $I_h$, however the interlocking of these
93 subunits appears to provide significant stabilization to the overall
94 crystal. The arrangement of these tetramers results in surrounding
95 open octagonal cavities that are typically greater than 6.3 \AA\ in
96 diameter (Fig. \ref{iCrystal}C). This open structure leads to
97 crystals that are typically 0.07 g/cm$^3$ less dense than ice $I_h$.
98
99 \begin{figure}
100 \includegraphics[width=4in]{iCrystal.eps}
101 \caption{(A) Unit cell for Ice-{\it i}, (B) Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$,
102 and (C) a rendering of a proton ordered crystal of Ice-{\it i} looking
103 down the (001) crystal face. In the unit cells, the spheres represent
104 the center-of-mass locations of the water molecules. The $a$ to $c$
105 ratios for Ice-{\it i} and Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ are given by
106 $a:2.1214c$ and $a:1.785c$ respectively. The presence of large
107 octagonal pores in both crystal forms lead to a polymorph that is less
108 dense than ice $I_h$.}
109 \label{iCrystal}
110 \end{figure}
111
112 Results from our previous study indicated that Ice-{\it i} is the
113 minimum energy crystal structure for the single point water models
114 investigated (for discussions on these single point dipole models, see
115 our previous work and related
116 articles).\cite{Fennell04,Liu96,Bratko85} Those results only
117 considered energetic stabilization and neglected entropic
118 contributions to the overall free energy. To address this issue, we
119 have calculated the absolute free energy of this crystal using
120 thermodynamic integration and compared to the free energies of cubic
121 and hexagonal ice $I$ (the experimental low density ice polymorphs)
122 and ice B (a higher density, but very stable crystal structure
123 observed by B\`{a}ez and Clancy in free energy studies of
124 SPC/E).\cite{Baez95b} This work includes results for the water model
125 from which Ice-{\it i} was crystallized (SSD/E) in addition to several
126 common water models (TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P, and SPC/E) and a reaction
127 field parametrized single point dipole water model (SSD/RF). The
128 extruded variant, Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$, was used in calculations
129 involving SPC/E, TIP4P, and TIP5P due to its enhanced stability with
130 these models. There is typically a small distortion of proton ordered
131 Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ that converts the normally square tetramer into a
132 rhombus with alternating approximately 85 and 95 degree angles. The
133 degree of this distortion is model dependent and significant enough to
134 split the tetramer diagonal location peak in the radial distribution
135 function.
136
137 Thermodynamic integration was utilized to calculate the free energies
138 of the listed water models at various state points using a modified
139 form of the OOPSE molecular dynamics package.\cite{Meineke05}
140 This calculation method involves a sequence of simulations during
141 which the system of interest is converted into a reference system for
142 which the free energy is known analytically. This transformation path
143 is then integrated in order to determine the free energy difference
144 between the two states:
145 \begin{equation}
146 \Delta A = \int_0^1\left\langle\frac{\partial V(\lambda
147 )}{\partial\lambda}\right\rangle_\lambda d\lambda,
148 \end{equation}
149 where $V$ is the interaction potential and $\lambda$ is the
150 transformation parameter that scales the overall potential. For
151 liquid and solid phases, the ideal gas and harmonically restrained
152 crystal are chosen as the reference states respectively. Thermodynamic
153 integration is an established technique that has been used extensively
154 in the calculation of free energies for condensed phases of
155 materials.\cite{Frenkel84,Hermens88,Meijer90,Baez95a,Vlot99}.
156
157 The calculated free energies of proton-ordered varients of three low
158 density polymorphs ($I_h$, $I_c$, and Ice-{\it i} or Ice-{\it
159 i}$^\prime$) and the stable higher density ice B are listed in Table
160 \ref{freeEnergy}. The reason for inclusion of ice B was that it was
161 shown to be a minimum free energy structure for SPC/E at ambient
162 conditions.\cite{Baez95b} In addition to the free energies, the
163 relavent transition temperatures at standard pressure are also
164 displayed in Table \ref{freeEnergy}. These free energy values
165 indicate that Ice-{\it i} is the most stable state for all of the
166 investigated water models. With the free energy at these state
167 points, the Gibbs-Helmholtz equation was used to project to other
168 state points and to build phase diagrams, and figure \ref{tp3PhaseDia}
169 is an example diagram built from the results for the TIP3P water
170 model. All other models have similar structure, although the crossing
171 points between the phases move to different temperatures and pressures
172 as indicated from the transition temperatures in Table
173 \ref{freeEnergy}. It is interesting to note that ice $I$ does not
174 exist in either cubic or hexagonal form in any of the phase diagrams
175 for any of the models. For purposes of this study, ice B is
176 representative of the dense ice polymorphs. A recent study by Sanz
177 {\it et al.} goes into detail on the phase diagrams for SPC/E and
178 TIP4P at higher pressures than those studied here.\cite{Sanz04}
179
180 \begin{table*}
181 \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
182 \begin{center}
183 \caption{Calculated free energies for several ice polymorphs along
184 with the calculated melting (or sublimation) and boiling points for
185 the investigated water models. All free energy calculations used a
186 cutoff radius of 9.0 \AA\ and were performed at 200 K and $\sim$1 atm.
187 Units of free energy are kcal/mol, while transition temperature are in
188 Kelvin. Calculated error of the final digits is in parentheses.}
189 \begin{tabular}{lccccccc}
190 \hline
191 Water Model & $I_h$ & $I_c$ & B & Ice-{\it i} & Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ & $T_m$ (*$T_s$) & $T_b$\\
192 \hline
193 TIP3P & -11.41(2) & -11.23(3) & -11.82(3) & -12.30(3) & - & 269(4) & 357(2)\\
194 TIP4P & -11.84(3) & -12.04(2) & -12.08(3) & - & -12.33(3) & 266(5) & 354(2)\\
195 TIP5P & -11.85(3) & -11.86(2) & -11.96(2) & - & -12.29(2) & 271(4) & 337(2)\\
196 SPC/E & -12.87(2) & -13.05(2) & -13.26(3) & - & -13.55(2) & 296(3) & 396(2)\\
197 SSD/E & -11.27(2) & -11.19(4) & -12.09(2) & -12.54(2) & - & *355(2) & -\\
198 SSD/RF & -11.51(2) & -11.47(2) & -12.08(3) & -12.29(2) & - & 278(4) & 349(2)\\
199 \end{tabular}
200 \label{freeEnergy}
201 \end{center}
202 \end{minipage}
203 \end{table*}
204
205 \begin{figure}
206 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{tp3PhaseDia.eps}
207 \caption{Phase diagram for the TIP3P water model in the low pressure
208 regime. The displayed $T_m$ and $T_b$ values are good predictions of
209 the experimental values; however, the solid phases shown are not the
210 experimentally observed forms. Both cubic and hexagonal ice $I$ are
211 higher in energy and don't appear in the phase diagram.}
212 \label{tp3PhaseDia}
213 \end{figure}
214
215 Most of the water models have melting points that compare quite
216 favorably with the experimental value of 273 K. The unfortunate
217 aspect of this result is that this phase change occurs between
218 Ice-{\it i} and the liquid state rather than ice $I_h$ and the liquid
219 state. Surprisingly, these results are not contrary to other studies.
220 Studies of ice $I_h$ using TIP4P predict a $T_m$ ranging from 214 to
221 238 K (differences being attributed to choice of interaction
222 truncation and different ordered and disordered molecular
223 arrangements).\cite{Vlot99,Gao00,Sanz04} If the presence of ice B and
224 Ice-{\it i} were omitted, a $T_m$ value around 210 K would be
225 predicted from this work. However, the $T_m$ from Ice-{\it i} is
226 calculated to be 265 K, indicating that these simulation based
227 structures ought to be included in studies probing phase transitions
228 with this model. Also of interest in these results is that SSD/E does
229 not exhibit a melting point at 1 atm, but it rather shows a
230 sublimation point at 355 K. This is due to the significant stability
231 of Ice-{\it i} over all other polymorphs for this particular model
232 under these conditions. While troubling, this behavior resulted in
233 spontaneous crystallization of Ice-{\it i} and led us to investigate
234 this structure. These observations provide a warning that simulations
235 of SSD/E as a ``liquid'' near 300 K are actually metastable and run
236 the risk of spontaneous crystallization. However, when applying a
237 longer cutoff, the liquid state is preferred under standard
238 conditions.
239
240 \begin{figure}
241 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{cutoffChange.eps}
242 \caption{Free energy as a function of cutoff radius for SSD/E, TIP3P,
243 SPC/E, SSD/RF with a reaction field, and the TIP3P and SPC/E models
244 with an added Ewald correction term. Error for the larger cutoff
245 points is equivalent to that observed at 9.0\AA\ (see Table
246 \ref{freeEnergy}). Data for ice I$_c$ with TIP3P using both 12 and
247 13.5 \AA\ cutoffs were omitted because the crystal was prone to
248 distortion and melting at 200 K. Ice-{\it i}$^\prime$ is the form of
249 Ice-{\it i} used in the SPC/E simulations.}
250 \label{incCutoff}
251 \end{figure}
252
253 Increasing the cutoff radius in simulations of the more
254 computationally efficient water models was done in order to evaluate
255 the trend in free energy values when moving to systems that do not
256 involve potential truncation. As seen in Fig. \ref{incCutoff}, the
257 free energy of the ice polymorphs with water models lacking a
258 long-range correction show a significant cutoff radius dependence. In
259 general, there is a narrowing of the free energy differences while
260 moving to greater cutoff radii. As the free energies for the
261 polymorphs converge, the stability advantage that Ice-{\it i} exhibits
262 is reduced. Adjacent to each of these model plots is a system with an
263 applied or estimated long-range correction. SSD/RF was parametrized
264 for use with a reaction field, and the benefit provided by this
265 computationally inexpensive correction is apparent. Due to the
266 relative independence of the resultant free energies, calculations
267 performed with a small cutoff radius provide resultant properties
268 similar to what one would expect for the bulk material. In the cases
269 of TIP3P and SPC/E, the effect of an Ewald summation was estimated by
270 applying the potential energy difference do to its inclusion in
271 systems in the presence and absence of the correction. This was
272 accomplished by calculation of the potential energy of identical
273 crystals both with and without particle mesh Ewald (PME). Similar
274 behavior to that observed with reaction field is seen for both of
275 these models. The free energies show less dependence on cutoff radius
276 and span a more narrowed range for the various polymorphs. Like the
277 dipolar water models, TIP3P displays a relatively constant preference
278 for the Ice-{\it i} polymorph. Crystal preference is much more
279 difficult to determine for SPC/E. Without a long-range correction,
280 each of the polymorphs studied assumes the role of the preferred
281 polymorph under different cutoff conditions. The inclusion of the
282 Ewald correction flattens and narrows the sequences of free energies
283 so much that they often overlap within error, indicating that other
284 conditions, such as cell volume in microcanonical simulations, can
285 influence the chosen polymorph upon crystallization. All of these
286 results support the finding that the Ice-{\it i} polymorph is a stable
287 crystal structure that should be considered when studying the phase
288 behavior of water models.
289
290 Due to this relative stability of Ice-{\it i} in all of the
291 investigated simulation conditions, the question arises as to possible
292 experimental observation of this polymorph. The rather extensive past
293 and current experimental investigation of water in the low pressure
294 regime makes us hesitant to ascribe any relevance of this work outside
295 of the simulation community. It is for this reason that we chose a
296 name for this polymorph which involves an imaginary quantity. That
297 said, there are certain experimental conditions that would provide the
298 most ideal situation for possible observation. These include the
299 negative pressure or stretched solid regime, small clusters in vacuum
300 deposition environments, and in clathrate structures involving small
301 non-polar molecules. Regardless of possible experimental observation,
302 the presence of these stable ice polymorphs has implications in the
303 understanding and depiction of phase changes involving the common
304 water models used in simulations.
305
306 \section{Acknowledgments}
307 Support for this project was provided by the National Science
308 Foundation under grant CHE-0134881. Computation time was provided by
309 the Notre Dame High Performance Computing Cluster and the Notre Dame
310 Bunch-of-Boxes (B.o.B) computer cluster (NSF grant DMR-0079647).
311
312 \newpage
313
314 \bibliographystyle{jcp}
315 \bibliography{iceiPaper}
316
317
318 \end{document}