ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/openmdDocs/openmdDoc.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/openmdDocs/openmdDoc.tex (file contents):
Revision 3607 by gezelter, Wed Jun 16 15:38:45 2010 UTC vs.
Revision 3792 by gezelter, Thu Aug 9 18:48:23 2012 UTC

# Line 38 | Line 38
38   \newcolumntype{H}{p{0.75in}}
39   \newcolumntype{I}{p{5in}}
40  
41 + \newcolumntype{J}{p{1.5in}}
42 + \newcolumntype{K}{p{1.2in}}
43 + \newcolumntype{L}{p{1.5in}}
44 + \newcolumntype{M}{p{1.55in}}
45  
46 +
47   \title{{\sc OpenMD}: Molecular Dynamics in the Open}
48  
49 < \author{Shenyu Kuang, Chunlei Li, Charles F. Vardeman II, \\
50 < Teng Lin, Christopher J. Fennell,  Xiuquan Sun, \\
51 < Kyle Daily, Yang Zheng, Matthew A. Meineke, and J. Daniel Gezelter\\
52 < Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\
53 < University of Notre Dame\\
54 < Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
49 > \author{Shenyu Kuang, Charles F. Vardeman II, \\
50 >  Teng Lin, Christopher J. Fennell,  Xiuquan Sun, \\
51 >  Chunlei Li, Kyle Daily, Yang Zheng, Matthew A. Meineke, and \\
52 >  J. Daniel Gezelter \\
53 >  Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\
54 >  University of Notre Dame\\
55 >  Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
56  
57   \maketitle
58  
# Line 64 | Line 70 | that is easy to learn.
70   that is easy to learn.
71  
72   \tableofcontents
73 < %\listoffigures
74 < %\listoftables
73 > \listoffigures
74 > \listoftables
75  
76   \mainmatter
77  
# Line 497 | Line 503 | are SD and CG. Either {\tt ensemble} or {\tt minimizer
503   {\tt minimizer} & string & Chooses a minimizer & Possible minimizers
504   are SD and CG. Either {\tt ensemble} or {\tt minimizer} must be specified. \\
505   {\tt ensemble} & string & Sets the ensemble. & Possible ensembles are
506 < NVE, NVT, NPTi, NPAT, NPTf, NPTxyz, and LD.  Either {\tt ensemble}
506 > NVE, NVT, NPTi, NPAT, NPTf, NPTxyz, LD and LangevinHull.  Either {\tt ensemble}
507   or {\tt minimizer} must be specified. \\
508   {\tt dt} & fs & Sets the time step. & Selection of {\tt dt} should be
509   small enough to sample the fastest motion of the simulation. ({\tt
# Line 707 | Line 713 | molecule{
713    <MetaData>
714   molecule{
715    name = "I2";
716 <  atom[0]{
717 <    type = "I";
718 <  }
713 <  atom[1]{
714 <    type = "I";
715 <  }
716 <  bond{
717 <    members( 0, 1);
718 <  }
716 >  atom[0]{ type = "I"; }
717 >  atom[1]{ type = "I"; }
718 >  bond{ members( 0, 1); }
719   }
720   molecule{
721    name = "HCl"
722 <  atom[0]{
723 <    type = "H";
724 <  }
725 <  atom[1]{
726 <    type = "Cl";
727 <  }
728 <  bond{
729 <    members( 0, 1);
730 <  }
722 >  atom[0]{ type = "H";}
723 >  atom[1]{ type = "Cl";}
724 >  bond{ members( 0, 1); }
725   }
726   component{
727    type = "HCl";
# Line 1906 | Line 1900 | LD & Langevin Dynamics & {\tt ensemble = LD;} \\
1900   &  (with separate barostats on each box dimension) & \\
1901   LD & Langevin Dynamics & {\tt ensemble = LD;} \\
1902   &  (approximates the effects of an implicit solvent) & \\
1903 + LangevinHull & Non-periodic Langevin Dynamics  & {\tt ensemble = LangevinHull;} \\
1904 + & (Langevin Dynamics for molecules on convex hull;\\
1905 + & Newtonian for interior molecules) & \\
1906   \end{tabular}
1907   \end{center}
1908  
# Line 2391 | Line 2388 | ${\bf V} =
2388   in the body-fixed frame) and ${\bf V}$ is a generalized velocity,
2389   ${\bf V} =
2390   \left\{{\bf v},{\bf \omega}\right\}$. The right side of
2391 < Eq.~\ref{LDGeneralizedForm} consists of three generalized forces: a
2391 > Eq. \ref{LDGeneralizedForm} consists of three generalized forces: a
2392   system force (${\bf F}_{s}$), a frictional or dissipative force (${\bf
2393   F}_{f}$) and a stochastic force (${\bf F}_{r}$). While the evolution
2394   of the system in Newtonian mechanics is typically done in the lab
# Line 2613 | Line 2610 | program that is included in the {\sc OpenMD} distribut
2610   \endhead
2611   \hline
2612   \endfoot
2613 < {\tt viscosity} & centipoise & Sets the value of viscosity of the implicit
2613 > {\tt viscosity} & poise & Sets the value of viscosity of the implicit
2614   solvent  \\
2615   {\tt targetTemp} & K & Sets the target temperature of the system.
2616   This parameter must be specified to use Langevin dynamics. \\
2617   {\tt HydroPropFile} & string & Specifies the name of the resistance
2618   tensor (usually a {\tt .diff} file) which is precalculated by {\tt
2619 < Hydro}. This keyworkd is not necessary if the simulation contains only
2619 > Hydro}. This keyword is not necessary if the simulation contains only
2620   simple bodies (spheres and ellipsoids). \\
2621   {\tt beadSize} & $\mbox{\AA}$ & Sets the diameter of the beads to use
2622   when the {\tt RoughShell} model is used to approximate the resistance
2623   tensor.
2624   \label{table:ldParameters}
2625   \end{longtable}
2626 +
2627 + \section{Constant Pressure without periodic boundary conditions (The LangevinHull)}
2628 +
2629 + The Langevin Hull\cite{Vardeman2011} uses an external bath at a fixed constant pressure
2630 + ($P$) and temperature ($T$) with an effective solvent viscosity
2631 + ($\eta$).  This bath interacts only with the objects on the exterior
2632 + hull of the system.  Defining the hull of the atoms in a simulation is
2633 + done in a manner similar to the approach of Kohanoff, Caro and
2634 + Finnis.\cite{Kohanoff:2005qm} That is, any instantaneous configuration
2635 + of the atoms in the system is considered as a point cloud in three
2636 + dimensional space.  Delaunay triangulation is used to find all facets
2637 + between coplanar
2638 + neighbors.\cite{delaunay,springerlink:10.1007/BF00977785} In highly
2639 + symmetric point clouds, facets can contain many atoms, but in all but
2640 + the most symmetric of cases, the facets are simple triangles in
2641 + 3-space which contain exactly three atoms.
2642 +
2643 + The convex hull is the set of facets that have {\it no concave
2644 +  corners} at an atomic site.\cite{Barber96,EDELSBRUNNER:1994oq} This
2645 + eliminates all facets on the interior of the point cloud, leaving only
2646 + those exposed to the bath. Sites on the convex hull are dynamic; as
2647 + molecules re-enter the cluster, all interactions between atoms on that
2648 + molecule and the external bath are removed.  Since the edge is
2649 + determined dynamically as the simulation progresses, no {\it a priori}
2650 + geometry is defined. The pressure and temperature bath interacts only
2651 + with the atoms on the edge and not with atoms interior to the
2652 + simulation.
2653 +
2654 + Atomic sites in the interior of the simulation move under standard
2655 + Newtonian dynamics,
2656 + \begin{equation}
2657 + m_i \dot{\mathbf v}_i(t)=-{\mathbf \nabla}_i U,
2658 + \label{eq:Newton}
2659 + \end{equation}
2660 + where $m_i$ is the mass of site $i$, ${\mathbf v}_i(t)$ is the
2661 + instantaneous velocity of site $i$ at time $t$, and $U$ is the total
2662 + potential energy.  For atoms on the exterior of the cluster
2663 + (i.e. those that occupy one of the vertices of the convex hull), the
2664 + equation of motion is modified with an external force, ${\mathbf
2665 +  F}_i^{\mathrm ext}$:
2666 + \begin{equation}
2667 + m_i \dot{\mathbf v}_i(t)=-{\mathbf \nabla}_i U + {\mathbf F}_i^{\mathrm ext}.
2668 + \end{equation}
2669  
2670 + The external bath interacts indirectly with the atomic sites through
2671 + the intermediary of the hull facets.  Since each vertex (or atom)
2672 + provides one corner of a triangular facet, the force on the facets are
2673 + divided equally to each vertex.  However, each vertex can participate
2674 + in multiple facets, so the resultant force is a sum over all facets
2675 + $f$ containing vertex $i$:
2676 + \begin{equation}
2677 + {\mathbf F}_{i}^{\mathrm ext} = \sum_{\begin{array}{c}\mathrm{facets\
2678 +    } f \\ \mathrm{containing\ } i\end{array}} \frac{1}{3}\  {\mathbf
2679 +  F}_f^{\mathrm ext}
2680 + \end{equation}
2681 +
2682 + The external pressure bath applies a force to the facets of the convex
2683 + hull in direct proportion to the area of the facet, while the thermal
2684 + coupling depends on the solvent temperature, viscosity and the size
2685 + and shape of each facet. The thermal interactions are expressed as a
2686 + standard Langevin description of the forces,
2687 + \begin{equation}
2688 + \begin{array}{rclclcl}
2689 + {\mathbf F}_f^{\text{ext}} & = &  \text{external pressure} & + & \text{drag force} & + & \text{random force} \\
2690 + & = &  -\hat{n}_f P A_f  & - & \Xi_f(t) {\mathbf v}_f(t)  & + & {\mathbf R}_f(t)
2691 + \end{array}
2692 + \end{equation}
2693 + Here, $A_f$ and $\hat{n}_f$ are the area and (outward-facing) normal
2694 + vectors for facet $f$, respectively.  ${\mathbf v}_f(t)$ is the
2695 + velocity of the facet centroid,
2696 + \begin{equation}
2697 + {\mathbf v}_f(t) =  \frac{1}{3} \sum_{i=1}^{3} {\mathbf v}_i,
2698 + \end{equation}
2699 + and $\Xi_f(t)$ is an approximate ($3 \times 3$) resistance tensor that
2700 + depends on the geometry and surface area of facet $f$ and the
2701 + viscosity of the bath.  The resistance tensor is related to the
2702 + fluctuations of the random force, $\mathbf{R}(t)$, by the
2703 + fluctuation-dissipation theorem (see Eq. \ref{eq:randomForce}).
2704 +
2705 + Once the resistance tensor is known for a given facet, a stochastic
2706 + vector that has the properties in Eq. (\ref{eq:randomForce}) can be
2707 + calculated efficiently by carrying out a Cholesky decomposition to
2708 + obtain the square root matrix of the resistance tensor (see
2709 + Eq. \ref{eq:Cholesky}).
2710 +
2711 + Our treatment of the resistance tensor for the Langevin Hull facets is
2712 + approximate.  $\Xi_f$ for a rigid triangular plate would normally be
2713 + treated as a $6 \times 6$ tensor that includes translational and
2714 + rotational drag as well as translational-rotational coupling. The
2715 + computation of resistance tensors for rigid bodies has been detailed
2716 + elsewhere,\cite{JoseGarciadelaTorre02012000,Garcia-de-la-Torre:2001wd,GarciadelaTorreJ2002,Sun:2008fk}
2717 + but the standard approach involving bead approximations would be
2718 + prohibitively expensive if it were recomputed at each step in a
2719 + molecular dynamics simulation.
2720 +
2721 + Instead, we are utilizing an approximate resistance tensor obtained by
2722 + first constructing the Oseen tensor for the interaction of the
2723 + centroid of the facet ($f$) with each of the subfacets $\ell=1,2,3$,
2724 + \begin{equation}
2725 + T_{\ell f}=\frac{A_\ell}{8\pi\eta R_{\ell f}}\left(I +
2726 +  \frac{\mathbf{R}_{\ell f}\mathbf{R}_{\ell f}^T}{R_{\ell f}^2}\right)
2727 + \end{equation}
2728 + Here, $A_\ell$ is the area of subfacet $\ell$ which is a triangle
2729 + containing two of the vertices of the facet along with the centroid.
2730 + $\mathbf{R}_{\ell f}$ is the vector between the centroid of facet $f$
2731 + and the centroid of sub-facet $\ell$, and $I$ is the ($3 \times 3$)
2732 + identity matrix.  $\eta$ is the viscosity of the external bath.
2733 +
2734 + The tensors for each of the sub-facets are added together, and the
2735 + resulting matrix is inverted to give a $3 \times 3$ resistance tensor
2736 + for translations of the triangular facet,
2737 + \begin{equation}
2738 + \Xi_f(t) =\left[\sum_{i=1}^3 T_{if}\right]^{-1}.
2739 + \end{equation}
2740 + Note that this treatment ignores rotations (and
2741 + translational-rotational coupling) of the facet.  In compact systems,
2742 + the facets stay relatively fixed in orientation between
2743 + configurations, so this appears to be a reasonably good approximation.
2744 +
2745 + At each
2746 + molecular dynamics time step, the following process is carried out:
2747 + \begin{enumerate}
2748 + \item The standard inter-atomic forces ($\nabla_iU$) are computed.
2749 + \item Delaunay triangulation is carried out using the current atomic
2750 +  configuration.
2751 + \item The convex hull is computed and facets are identified.
2752 + \item For each facet:
2753 + \begin{itemize}
2754 + \item[a.] The force from the pressure bath ($-\hat{n}_fPA_f$) is
2755 +  computed.
2756 + \item[b.] The resistance tensor ($\Xi_f(t)$) is computed using the
2757 +  viscosity ($\eta$) of the bath.
2758 + \item[c.] Facet drag ($-\Xi_f(t) \mathbf{v}_f(t)$) forces are
2759 +  computed.
2760 + \item[d.] Random forces ($\mathbf{R}_f(t)$) are computed using the
2761 +  resistance tensor and the temperature ($T$) of the bath.
2762 + \end{itemize}
2763 + \item The facet forces are divided equally among the vertex atoms.
2764 + \item Atomic positions and velocities are propagated.
2765 + \end{enumerate}
2766 + The Delaunay triangulation and computation of the convex hull are done
2767 + using calls to the qhull library,\cite{Qhull} and for this reason, if
2768 + qhull is not detected during the build, the Langevin Hull integrator
2769 + will not be available.  There is a minimal penalty for computing the
2770 + convex hull and resistance tensors at each step in the molecular
2771 + dynamics simulation (roughly 0.02 $\times$ cost of a single force
2772 + evaluation).
2773 +
2774 + \begin{longtable}[c]{GBF}
2775 + \caption{Meta-data Keywords: Required parameters for the Langevin Hull integrator}
2776 + \\
2777 + {\bf keyword} & {\bf units} & {\bf use}  \\ \hline
2778 + \endhead
2779 + \hline
2780 + \endfoot
2781 + {\tt viscosity} & poise & Sets the value of viscosity of the implicit
2782 + solven . \\
2783 + {\tt targetTemp} & K & Sets the target temperature of the system.
2784 + This parameter must be specified to use Langevin Hull dynamics. \\
2785 + {\tt targetPressure} & atm & Sets the target pressure of the system.
2786 + This parameter must be specified to use Langevin Hull dynamics. \\
2787 + {\tt usePeriodicBoundaryConditions} & logical & Turns off periodic boundary conditions.
2788 + This parameter must be set to \tt false \\
2789 + \label{table:lhullParameters}
2790 + \end{longtable}
2791 +
2792 +
2793   \section{\label{sec:constraints}Constraint Methods}
2794  
2795   \subsection{\label{section:rattle}The {\sc rattle} Method for Bond
# Line 2775 | Line 2938 | Harmonic Forces are used by default
2938   \label{table:zconParams}
2939   \end{longtable}
2940  
2941 < \chapter{\label{section:restraints}Restraints}
2942 < Restraints are external potentials that are added to a system to keep
2943 < particular molecules or collections of particles close to some
2944 < reference structure.  A restraint can be a collective
2941 > % \chapter{\label{section:restraints}Restraints}
2942 > % Restraints are external potentials that are added to a system to keep
2943 > % particular molecules or collections of particles close to some
2944 > % reference structure.  A restraint can be a collective
2945  
2946   \chapter{\label{section:thermInt}Thermodynamic Integration}
2947  
# Line 2916 | Line 3079 | Einstein crystal
3079   \mbox{rad}^{-2}$ & & spring constant for rotation around z-axis in
3080   Einstein crystal
3081   \label{table:thermIntParams}
3082 + \end{longtable}
3083 +
3084 + \chapter{\label{section:rnemd}RNEMD}
3085 +
3086 + There are many ways to compute transport properties from molecular
3087 + dynamic simulations.  Equilibrium Molecular Dynamics (EMD) simulations
3088 + can be used by computing relevant time correlation functions and
3089 + assuming linear response theory holds.  These approaches are generally
3090 + subject to noise and poor convergence of the relevant correlation
3091 + functions. Traditional Non-equilibrium Molecular Dynamics (NEMD)
3092 + methods impose a gradient (e.g. thermal or momentum) on a simulation.
3093 + However, the resulting flux is often difficult to
3094 + measure. Furthermore, problems arise for NEMD simulations of
3095 + heterogeneous systems, such as phase-phase boundaries or interfaces,
3096 + where the type of gradient to enforce at the boundary between
3097 + materials is unclear.
3098 +
3099 + {\it Reverse} Non-Equilibrium Molecular Dynamics (RNEMD) methods adopt a
3100 + different approach in that an unphysical {\it flux} is imposed between
3101 + different regions or ``slabs'' of the simulation box.  The response of
3102 + the system is to develop a temperature or momentum {\it gradient}
3103 + between the two regions. Since the amount of the applied flux is known
3104 + exactly, and the measurement of gradient is generally less
3105 + complicated, imposed-flux methods typically take shorter simulation
3106 + times to obtain converged results for transport properties.
3107 +
3108 + %RNEMD figure
3109 +
3110 +
3111 + RNEMD methods further its advantages by utilizing momentum- and
3112 + energy-conserving approaches to apply fluxes. The original
3113 + ``swapping'' approach by Muller-Plathe {\it et al.} %CITATIONS
3114 + can be seen as an imaginary elastic collision between selected
3115 + particles for each momentum exchange. This simple to implement
3116 + algorithm turned out to be quite useful in many simulations. However,
3117 + the approach inherently perturbs the ideal Maxwell-Boltzmann
3118 + distributions, which leads to undesirable side-effects when the
3119 + applied exchanged flux becomes quite large. %CITATION
3120 + This limits the range of flux available to the method, and also its
3121 + applications.
3122 +
3123 + In OpenMD, we improve the above method by introducing two alternative
3124 + approaches:
3125 +
3126 + Non-Isotropic Velocity Scaling (NIVS): %CITATION
3127 + Instead of have two individual particles involved in momentum
3128 + exchange, this algorithm applies scaling to all the particles in
3129 + particular regions:
3130 +
3131 + %NIVS equations
3132 +
3133 + Although the above matrices can be diagonal as shown, these
3134 + coefficients cannot be always the same, in order to satisfy the linear
3135 + momentum and kinetic energy conservation constraints:
3136 +
3137 + %Conservation equations
3138 +
3139 + And to apply a kinetic energy exchange between the two regions, the
3140 + following should be satisfied as well:
3141 +
3142 + %Flux equations
3143 +
3144 + Mathematically, any points in the 3-dimensional space of the solution
3145 + set would satisfy the equations. However, to avoid solving an
3146 + ill-conditioned high-order polynomial in actual practice, another
3147 + constraint, ${x_c=y_c}$, is applied, taking into consideration of its
3148 + physical relevance. Therefore, a quartic equation is solved in actual
3149 + practice to determine the sets of possible coefficients. To determine
3150 + which set is actually used to perform the scaling, two criteria are
3151 + mainly considered: 1. ${x,y,z\rightarrow 1}$ so that the perturbation
3152 + could be as gentle as possible. 2. ${K^x, K^y, K^z}$ have minimal
3153 + difference among each other, so that the anisotropy introduced by the
3154 + algorithm can be offset to some extend. One set of scaling
3155 + coefficients is chosen against these criteria, and the best one is
3156 + used to perform the scaling for that particular step. However, if no
3157 + solution found, the NIVS move is not performed in that step.
3158 +
3159 + Although the NIVS algorithm can also be applied to impose a
3160 + directional momentum flux, thermal anisotropy was observed in
3161 + relatively high flux simulations. %This is because...
3162 + However, the gentleness and ability to apply a wide range of kinetic
3163 + energy flux makes the method useful in thermal transport simulations,
3164 + particularly for complex and heterogeneous systems including
3165 + interfaces. %CITATION
3166 +
3167 + Velocity Shearing and Scaling (VSS): %CITATION
3168 + Learning from NIVS that imposing directional momentum flux by velocity
3169 + scaling could cause problem, we shift the approach to combine the move
3170 + of velocity shearing and scaling:
3171 +
3172 + %VSS equations
3173 +
3174 + It turned out that this approach results in a set of simpler-to-solve
3175 + equations for conservation and to satisfy momentum exchange:
3176 +
3177 + %conservation equations
3178 +
3179 + Furthermore, isotropic scaling is now possible, with the presence of
3180 + velocity shearing quantities. Only a set of simple quadratic equations
3181 + need to be solved, and the positive set of coefficients are chosen, in
3182 + order to reach minimal perturbations. Similar to the NIVS method, no
3183 + VSS is performed in a step given that no solution can be found.
3184 +
3185 + The VSS approach turned out to be versatile in both thermal and
3186 + directional momentum transport simulations. It is found that the
3187 + perturbation is minimal and undesired side-effects like thermal
3188 + anisotropy can be avoided. Another nice feature of VSS is its ability
3189 + to combine a thermal and a directional momentum flux. This feature has
3190 + been utilized to map out the shear viscosity of SPC/E water in a wide
3191 + range of temperature (90~K) just with one single simulation. Possible
3192 + applications may also include the studies of thermal-momentum coupled
3193 + transport phenomena. VSS also allows the directional momentum flux to
3194 + have quite arbitary directions, which could benefit researches of
3195 + anisotropic systems.
3196 +
3197 + Table \ref{table:rnemd} summarizes the parameters used in RNEMD
3198 + simulations.
3199 +
3200 + \begin{longtable}[c]{JKLM}
3201 + \caption{The following keywords must be enclosed inside a {\tt RNEMD\{\}} block}
3202 + \\
3203 + {\bf keyword} & {\bf units} & {\bf use} & {\bf remarks}  \\ \hline
3204 + \endhead
3205 + \hline
3206 + \endfoot
3207 + {\tt useRNEMD} & logical & perform RNEMD? & default is ``false'' \\
3208 + {\tt objectSelection} & string & see section \ref{section:syntax}
3209 + for selection syntax & default is ``select all'' \\
3210 + {\tt method} & string & exchange method & one of the following:
3211 + {\tt Swap, NIVS,} or {\tt VSS}  (default is {\tt VSS}) \\
3212 + {\tt fluxType} & string & what is being exchanged between slabs? & one
3213 + of the following: {\tt KE, Px, Py, Pz, Pvector, KE+Px, KE+Py, KE+Pvector} \\
3214 + {\tt kineticFlux} & kcal mol$^{-1}$ \AA$^{-2}$ fs$^{-1}$ & specify the kinetic energy flux &  \\
3215 + {\tt momentumFlux} & amu \AA$^{-1}$ fs$^{-2}$ & specify the momentum flux & \\
3216 + {\tt momentumFluxVector} & amu \AA$^{-1}$ fs$^{-2}$ & specify the momentum flux when
3217 + {\tt Pvector} is part of the exchange & Vector3d input\\
3218 + {\tt exchangeTime} & fs & how often to perform the exchange & default is 100 fs\\
3219 +
3220 + {\tt slabWidth} & $\mbox{\AA}$ & width of the two exchange slabs & default is $\mathsf{H}_{zz} / 10.0$ \\
3221 + {\tt slabAcenter} & $\mbox{\AA}$ & center of the end slab & default is 0 \\
3222 + {\tt slabBcenter} & $\mbox{\AA}$ & center of the middle slab & default is $\mathsf{H}_{zz} / 2$ \\
3223 + {\tt outputFileName} & string & file name for output histograms & default is the same prefix as the
3224 + .md file, but with the {\tt .rnemd} extension \\
3225 + {\tt outputBins} & int & number of $z$-bins in the output histogram &
3226 + default is 20 \\
3227 + {\tt outputFields} & string & columns to print in the {\tt .rnemd}
3228 + file where each column is separated by a pipe ($\mid$) symbol. & Allowed column names are: {\sc z, temperature, velocity, density}} \\
3229 + \label{table:rnemd}
3230   \end{longtable}
3231  
3232  
# Line 3190 | Line 3501 | For example, the phrase {\tt select mass > 16.0 and ch
3501   \end{center}
3502  
3503   For example, the phrase {\tt select mass > 16.0 and charge < -2}
3504 < wouldselect StuntDoubles which have mass greater than 16.0 and charges
3504 > would select StuntDoubles which have mass greater than 16.0 and charges
3505   less than -2.
3506  
3507   \subsection{\label{section:within}Within expressions}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines