ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/oopsePaper/EmpericalEnergy.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/oopsePaper/EmpericalEnergy.tex (file contents):
Revision 937 by mmeineke, Tue Jan 13 20:46:01 2004 UTC vs.
Revision 966 by mmeineke, Mon Jan 19 21:44:47 2004 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1  
2 < \section{\label{sec:empericalEnergy}The Emperical Energy Functions}
2 > \section{\label{sec:empiricalEnergy}The Empirical Energy Functions}
3  
4   \subsection{\label{sec:atomsMolecules}Atoms, Molecules and Rigid Bodies}
5  
6 < The basic unit of an {\sc oopse} simulation is the atom. The parameters
7 < describing the atom are generalized to make the atom as flexible a
8 < representation as possible. They may represent specific atoms of an
9 < element, or be used for collections of atoms such as a methyl
10 < group. The atoms are also capable of having a directional component
11 < associated with them, often in the form of a dipole. Charges on atoms
12 < are not currently suported by {\sc oopse}.
6 > The basic unit of an {\sc oopse} simulation is the atom. The
7 > parameters describing the atom are generalized to make the atom as
8 > flexible a representation as possible. They may represent specific
9 > atoms of an element, or be used for collections of atoms such as
10 > methyl and carbonyl groups. The atoms are also capable of having
11 > directional components associated with them (\emph{e.g.}~permanent
12 > dipoles). Charges on atoms are not currently supported by {\sc oopse}.
13  
14 + \begin{lstlisting}[caption={[Specifier for molecules and atoms] An example specifying the simple Ar molecule},label=sch:AtmMole]
15 + molecule{
16 +  name = "Ar";
17 +  nAtoms = 1;
18 +  atom[0]{
19 +     type="Ar";
20 +     position( 0.0, 0.0, 0.0 );
21 +  }
22 + }
23 + \end{lstlisting}
24 +
25   The second most basic building block of a simulation is the
26   molecule. The molecule is a way for {\sc oopse} to keep track of the
27   atoms in a simulation in logical manner. This particular unit will
# Line 68 | Line 79 | on this choice can be found in Sec.~\ref{sec:integrate
79  
80   \subsection{\label{sec:LJPot}The Lennard Jones Potential}
81  
82 < The most basic force field implemented in OOPSE is the Lennard-Jones
82 > The most basic force field implemented in {\sc oopse} is the Lennard-Jones
83   potential. The Lennard-Jones potential. Which mimics the Van der Waals
84 < interaction at long distances, and uses an emperical repulsion at
84 > interaction at long distances, and uses an empirical repulsion at
85   short distances. The Lennard-Jones potential is given by:
86   \begin{equation}
87   V_{\text{LJ}}(r_{ij}) =
# Line 86 | Line 97 | evaluation can become computationally expensive for la
97  
98   Because this potential is calculated between all pairs, the force
99   evaluation can become computationally expensive for large systems. To
100 < keep the pair evaluation to a manegable number, OOPSE employs a
100 > keep the pair evaluation to a manageable number, {\sc oopse} employs a
101   cut-off radius.\cite{allen87:csl} The cutoff radius is set to be
102   $2.5\sigma_{ii}$, where $\sigma_{ii}$ is the largest Lennard-Jones length
103   parameter in the system. Truncating the calculation at
# Line 134 | Line 145 | illustrated by the dark grey atom in Fig.~\ref{fig:lip
145   phosphatidylcholine.\cite{Cevc87} Additionally, a Lennard-Jones site
146   is located at the pseudoatom's center of mass. The model is
147   illustrated by the dark grey atom in Fig.~\ref{fig:lipidModel}. The water model we use to complement the dipoles of the lipids is out
148 < repaarameterization of the soft sticky dipole (SSD) model of Ichiye
148 > reparameterization of the soft sticky dipole (SSD) model of Ichiye
149   \emph{et al.}\cite{liu96:new_model}
150  
151   \begin{figure}
# Line 213 | Line 224 | $j$, $k$, and $l$ (again, see Fig.~\ref{fig:lipidModel
224   \end{equation}
225   Here $\phi_{ijkl}$ is the angle defined by four bonded neighbors $i$,
226   $j$, $k$, and $l$ (again, see Fig.~\ref{fig:lipidModel}). For
227 < computaional efficency, the torsion potential has been recast after
227 > computational efficiency, the torsion potential has been recast after
228   the method of CHARMM\cite{charmm1983} whereby the angle series is
229   converted to a power series of the form:
230   \begin{equation}
# Line 268 | Line 279 | $\boldsymbol{\Omega}_i$.
279   $\boldsymbol{\Omega}_i$.
280  
281  
282 < \subsection{\label{sec:SSD}The {\sc DUFF} Water Models: SSD/E and SSD/RF}
282 > \subsection{\label{sec:SSD}The {\sc duff} Water Models: SSD/E and SSD/RF}
283  
284   In the interest of computational efficiency, the default solvent used
285 < in {\sc oopse} is the Soft Sticky Dipole (SSD) water model. SSD was
286 < developed by Ichiye \emph{et al.} as a modified form of the
287 < hard-sphere water model proposed by Bratko, Blum, and
285 > by {\sc oopse} is the extended Soft Sticky Dipole (SSD/E) water
286 > model.\cite{Gezelter04} The original SSD was developed by Ichiye
287 > \emph{et al.}\cite{Ichiye96} as a modified form of the hard-sphere
288 > water model proposed by Bratko, Blum, and
289   Luzar.\cite{Bratko85,Bratko95} It consists of a single point dipole
290   with a Lennard-Jones core and a sticky potential that directs the
291   particles to assume the proper hydrogen bond orientation in the first
# Line 332 | Line 344 | SSD decreased computer time by a factor of 6-7 compare
344   {\it charged} multi-point models. In the original Monte Carlo
345   simulations using this model, Ichiye {\it et al.} reported that using
346   SSD decreased computer time by a factor of 6-7 compared to other
347 < models.\cite{Ichiye96} What is most impressive is that this savings
347 > models.\cite{Ichiye96} What is most impressive is that these savings
348   did not come at the expense of accurate depiction of the liquid state
349   properties.  Indeed, SSD maintains reasonable agreement with the Soper
350 < data for the structural features of liquid
350 > diffraction data for the structural features of liquid
351   water.\cite{Soper86,Ichiye96} Additionally, the dynamical properties
352   exhibited by SSD agree with experiment better than those of more
353   computationally expensive models (like TIP3P and
# Line 346 | Line 358 | pressures.\cite{Ichiye03,Gezelter04} The default model
358   Recent constant pressure simulations revealed issues in the original
359   SSD model that led to lower than expected densities at all target
360   pressures.\cite{Ichiye03,Gezelter04} The default model in {\sc oopse}
361 < is SSD/E, a density corrected derivative of SSD that exhibits improved
362 < liquid structure and transport behavior. If the use of a reaction
363 < field long-range interaction correction is desired, it is recommended
364 < that the parameters be modified to those of the SSD/RF model. Solvent
365 < parameters can be easily modified in an accompanying {\sc BASS} file
366 < as illustrated in the scheme below. A table of the parameter values
367 < and the drawbacks and benefits of the different density corrected SSD
368 < models can be found in reference \ref{Gezelter04}.
361 > is therefore SSD/E, a density corrected derivative of SSD that
362 > exhibits improved liquid structure and transport behavior. If the use
363 > of a reaction field long-range interaction correction is desired, it
364 > is recommended that the parameters be modified to those of the SSD/RF
365 > model. Solvent parameters can be easily modified in an accompanying
366 > {\sc BASS} file as illustrated in the scheme below. A table of the
367 > parameter values and the drawbacks and benefits of the different
368 > density corrected SSD models can be found in reference
369 > \ref{Gezelter04}.
370  
371   !!!Place a {\sc BASS} scheme showing SSD parameters around here!!!
372  
# Line 371 | Line 384 | Embedded Atom Method\cite{Daw84,FBD86,johnson89,Lu97}(
384   describes the interaction of the positively charged metal core ions
385   with one another. A particular potential description called the
386   Embedded Atom Method\cite{Daw84,FBD86,johnson89,Lu97}({\sc eam}) that has
387 < particularly wide adoption has been selected for inclusion in OOPSE. A
387 > particularly wide adoption has been selected for inclusion in {\sc oopse}. A
388   good review of {\sc eam} and other metallic potential formulations was done
389   by Voter.\cite{voter}
390  
# Line 384 | Line 397 | positively-charged core ion $i$ into a linear superpos
397  
398   where $F_{i} $ is the embedding function that equates the energy required to embed a
399   positively-charged core ion $i$ into a linear superposition of
400 < sperically averaged atomic electron densities given by
400 > spherically averaged atomic electron densities given by
401   $\rho_{i}$.  $\phi_{ij}$ is a primarily repulsive pairwise interaction
402   between atoms $i$ and $j$. In the original formulation of
403   {\sc eam} cite{Daw84}, $\phi_{ij}$ was an entirely repulsive term, however
# Line 410 | Line 423 | orthorhombic and parallelepiped are the available peri
423   simulation box is large enough to avoid "feeling" the symmetries of
424   the periodic lattice, surface effects can be ignored. Cubic,
425   orthorhombic and parallelepiped are the available periodic cells In
426 < OOPSE. We use a matrix to describe the property of the simulation
426 > {\sc oopse}. We use a matrix to describe the property of the simulation
427   box. Therefore, both the size and shape of the simulation box can be
428   changed during the simulation. The transformation from box space
429   vector $\mathbf{s}$ to its corresponding real space vector

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines