1 |
|
|
2 |
< |
\section{\label{sec:empericalEnergy}The Emperical Energy Functions} |
2 |
> |
\section{\label{sec:empiricalEnergy}The Empirical Energy Functions} |
3 |
|
|
4 |
|
\subsection{\label{sec:atomsMolecules}Atoms, Molecules and Rigid Bodies} |
5 |
|
|
6 |
< |
The basic unit of an {\sc oopse} simulation is the atom. The parameters |
7 |
< |
describing the atom are generalized to make the atom as flexible a |
8 |
< |
representation as possible. They may represent specific atoms of an |
9 |
< |
element, or be used for collections of atoms such as a methyl |
10 |
< |
group. The atoms are also capable of having a directional component |
11 |
< |
associated with them, often in the form of a dipole. Charges on atoms |
12 |
< |
are not currently suported by {\sc oopse}. |
6 |
> |
The basic unit of an {\sc oopse} simulation is the atom. The |
7 |
> |
parameters describing the atom are generalized to make the atom as |
8 |
> |
flexible a representation as possible. They may represent specific |
9 |
> |
atoms of an element, or be used for collections of atoms such as |
10 |
> |
methyl and carbonyl groups. The atoms are also capable of having |
11 |
> |
directional components associated with them (\emph{e.g.}~permanent |
12 |
> |
dipoles). Charges on atoms are not currently supported by {\sc oopse}. |
13 |
|
|
14 |
+ |
\begin{lstlisting}[caption={[Specifier for molecules and atoms] An example specifying the simple Ar molecule},label=sch:AtmMole] |
15 |
+ |
molecule{ |
16 |
+ |
name = "Ar"; |
17 |
+ |
nAtoms = 1; |
18 |
+ |
atom[0]{ |
19 |
+ |
type="Ar"; |
20 |
+ |
position( 0.0, 0.0, 0.0 ); |
21 |
+ |
} |
22 |
+ |
} |
23 |
+ |
\end{lstlisting} |
24 |
+ |
|
25 |
|
The second most basic building block of a simulation is the |
26 |
|
molecule. The molecule is a way for {\sc oopse} to keep track of the |
27 |
|
atoms in a simulation in logical manner. This particular unit will |
29 |
|
responsible for the evaluation of its own bonded interaction |
30 |
|
(i.e.~bonds, bends, and torsions). |
31 |
|
|
32 |
< |
As stated previously, one of the features that sets {\sc OOPSE} apart |
32 |
> |
As stated previously, one of the features that sets {\sc oopse} apart |
33 |
|
from most of the current molecular simulation packages is the ability |
34 |
|
to handle rigid body dynamics. Rigid bodies are non-spherical |
35 |
|
particles or collections of particles that have a constant internal |
36 |
|
potential and move collectively.\cite{Goldstein01} They are not |
37 |
< |
included in most simulation packages because of the need to |
38 |
< |
consider orientational degrees of freedom and include an integrator |
39 |
< |
that accurately propagates these motions in time. |
37 |
> |
included in most simulation packages because of the requirement to |
38 |
> |
propagate the orientational degrees of freedom. Until recently, |
39 |
> |
integrators which propagate orientational motion have been lacking. |
40 |
|
|
41 |
|
Moving a rigid body involves determination of both the force and |
42 |
|
torque applied by the surroundings, which directly affect the |
43 |
< |
translation and rotation in turn. In order to accumulate the total |
44 |
< |
force on a rigid body, the external forces must first be calculated |
45 |
< |
for all the internal particles. The total force on the rigid body is |
46 |
< |
simply the sum of these external forces. Accumulation of the total |
47 |
< |
torque on the rigid body is more complex than the force in that it is |
48 |
< |
the torque applied on the center of mass that dictates rotational |
49 |
< |
motion. The summation of this torque is given by |
43 |
> |
translational and rotational motion in turn. In order to accumulate |
44 |
> |
the total force on a rigid body, the external forces and torques must |
45 |
> |
first be calculated for all the internal particles. The total force on |
46 |
> |
the rigid body is simply the sum of these external forces. |
47 |
> |
Accumulation of the total torque on the rigid body is more complex |
48 |
> |
than the force in that it is the torque applied on the center of mass |
49 |
> |
that dictates rotational motion. The torque on rigid body {\it i} is |
50 |
|
\begin{equation} |
51 |
< |
\mathbf{\tau}_i= |
52 |
< |
\sum_{a}(\mathbf{r}_{ia}-\mathbf{r}_i)\times \mathbf{f}_{ia}, |
51 |
> |
\boldsymbol{\tau}_i= |
52 |
> |
\sum_{a}(\mathbf{r}_{ia}-\mathbf{r}_i)\times \mathbf{f}_{ia} |
53 |
> |
+ \boldsymbol{\tau}_{ia}, |
54 |
|
\label{eq:torqueAccumulate} |
55 |
|
\end{equation} |
56 |
< |
where $\mathbf{\tau}_i$ and $\mathbf{r}_i$ are the torque about and |
57 |
< |
position of the center of mass respectively, while $\mathbf{f}_{ia}$ |
58 |
< |
and $\mathbf{r}_{ia}$ are the force on and position of the component |
59 |
< |
particles of the rigid body.\cite{allen87:csl} |
56 |
> |
where $\boldsymbol{\tau}_i$ and $\mathbf{r}_i$ are the torque on and |
57 |
> |
position of the center of mass respectively, while $\mathbf{f}_{ia}$, |
58 |
> |
$\mathbf{r}_{ia}$, and $\boldsymbol{\tau}_{ia}$ are the force on, |
59 |
> |
position of, and torque on the component particles of the rigid body. |
60 |
|
|
61 |
< |
The application of the total torque is done in the body fixed axis of |
61 |
> |
The summation of the total torque is done in the body fixed axis of |
62 |
|
the rigid body. In order to move between the space fixed and body |
63 |
|
fixed coordinate axes, parameters describing the orientation must be |
64 |
|
maintained for each rigid body. At a minimum, the rotation matrix |
65 |
< |
(\textbf{A}) can be described and propagated by the three Euler angles |
66 |
< |
($\phi, \theta, \text{and} \psi$), where \textbf{A} is composed of |
65 |
> |
(\textbf{A}) can be described by the three Euler angles ($\phi, |
66 |
> |
\theta,$ and $\psi$), where the elements of \textbf{A} are composed of |
67 |
|
trigonometric operations involving $\phi, \theta,$ and |
68 |
< |
$\psi$.\cite{Goldstein01} In order to avoid rotational limitations |
68 |
> |
$\psi$.\cite{Goldstein01} In order to avoid numerical instabilities |
69 |
|
inherent in using the Euler angles, the four parameter ``quaternion'' |
70 |
< |
scheme can be used instead, where \textbf{A} is composed of arithmetic |
71 |
< |
operations involving the four components of a quaternion ($q_0, q_1, |
72 |
< |
q_2, \text{and} q_3$).\cite{allen87:csl} Use of quaternions also leads |
73 |
< |
to performance enhancements, particularly for very small |
70 |
> |
scheme is often used. The elements of \textbf{A} can be expressed as |
71 |
> |
arithmetic operations involving the four quaternions ($q_0, q_1, q_2,$ |
72 |
> |
and $q_3$).\cite{allen87:csl} Use of quaternions also leads to |
73 |
> |
performance enhancements, particularly for very small |
74 |
|
systems.\cite{Evans77} |
75 |
|
|
76 |
< |
{\sc OOPSE} utilizes a relatively new scheme that uses the entire nine |
77 |
< |
parameter rotation matrix internally. Further discussion on this |
78 |
< |
choice can be found in Sec.~\ref{sec:integrate}. |
76 |
> |
{\sc oopse} utilizes a relatively new scheme that propagates the |
77 |
> |
entire nine parameter rotation matrix internally. Further discussion |
78 |
> |
on this choice can be found in Sec.~\ref{sec:integrate}. |
79 |
|
|
80 |
|
\subsection{\label{sec:LJPot}The Lennard Jones Potential} |
81 |
|
|
82 |
< |
The most basic force field implemented in OOPSE is the Lennard-Jones |
82 |
> |
The most basic force field implemented in {\sc oopse} is the Lennard-Jones |
83 |
|
potential. The Lennard-Jones potential. Which mimics the Van der Waals |
84 |
< |
interaction at long distances, and uses an emperical repulsion at |
84 |
> |
interaction at long distances, and uses an empirical repulsion at |
85 |
|
short distances. The Lennard-Jones potential is given by: |
86 |
|
\begin{equation} |
87 |
|
V_{\text{LJ}}(r_{ij}) = |
97 |
|
|
98 |
|
Because this potential is calculated between all pairs, the force |
99 |
|
evaluation can become computationally expensive for large systems. To |
100 |
< |
keep the pair evaluation to a manegable number, OOPSE employs a |
100 |
> |
keep the pair evaluation to a manageable number, {\sc oopse} employs a |
101 |
|
cut-off radius.\cite{allen87:csl} The cutoff radius is set to be |
102 |
|
$2.5\sigma_{ii}$, where $\sigma_{ii}$ is the largest Lennard-Jones length |
103 |
|
parameter in the system. Truncating the calculation at |
145 |
|
phosphatidylcholine.\cite{Cevc87} Additionally, a Lennard-Jones site |
146 |
|
is located at the pseudoatom's center of mass. The model is |
147 |
|
illustrated by the dark grey atom in Fig.~\ref{fig:lipidModel}. The water model we use to complement the dipoles of the lipids is out |
148 |
< |
repaarameterization of the soft sticky dipole (SSD) model of Ichiye |
148 |
> |
reparameterization of the soft sticky dipole (SSD) model of Ichiye |
149 |
|
\emph{et al.}\cite{liu96:new_model} |
150 |
|
|
151 |
|
\begin{figure} |
224 |
|
\end{equation} |
225 |
|
Here $\phi_{ijkl}$ is the angle defined by four bonded neighbors $i$, |
226 |
|
$j$, $k$, and $l$ (again, see Fig.~\ref{fig:lipidModel}). For |
227 |
< |
computaional efficency, the torsion potential has been recast after |
227 |
> |
computational efficiency, the torsion potential has been recast after |
228 |
|
the method of CHARMM\cite{charmm1983} whereby the angle series is |
229 |
|
converted to a power series of the form: |
230 |
|
\begin{equation} |
279 |
|
$\boldsymbol{\Omega}_i$. |
280 |
|
|
281 |
|
|
282 |
< |
\subsection{\label{sec:SSD}The {\sc DUFF} Water Models: SSD/E and SSD/RF} |
282 |
> |
\subsection{\label{sec:SSD}The {\sc duff} Water Models: SSD/E and SSD/RF} |
283 |
|
|
284 |
|
In the interest of computational efficiency, the default solvent used |
285 |
< |
in {\sc oopse} is the Soft Sticky Dipole (SSD) water model. SSD was |
286 |
< |
developed by Ichiye \emph{et al.} as a modified form of the |
287 |
< |
hard-sphere water model proposed by Bratko, Blum, and |
285 |
> |
by {\sc oopse} is the extended Soft Sticky Dipole (SSD/E) water |
286 |
> |
model.\cite{Gezelter04} The original SSD was developed by Ichiye |
287 |
> |
\emph{et al.}\cite{liu96:new_model} as a modified form of the hard-sphere |
288 |
> |
water model proposed by Bratko, Blum, and |
289 |
|
Luzar.\cite{Bratko85,Bratko95} It consists of a single point dipole |
290 |
|
with a Lennard-Jones core and a sticky potential that directs the |
291 |
|
particles to assume the proper hydrogen bond orientation in the first |
337 |
|
while $w^\prime$ is a purely empirical function. A more detailed |
338 |
|
description of the functional parts and variables in this potential |
339 |
|
can be found in the original SSD |
340 |
< |
articles.\cite{Ichiye96,Ichiye96b,Ichiye99,Ichiye03} |
340 |
> |
articles.\cite{liu96:new_model,liu96:monte_carlo,chandra99:ssd_md,Ichiye03} |
341 |
|
|
342 |
|
Since SSD is a single-point {\it dipolar} model, the force |
343 |
|
calculations are simplified significantly relative to the standard |
344 |
|
{\it charged} multi-point models. In the original Monte Carlo |
345 |
|
simulations using this model, Ichiye {\it et al.} reported that using |
346 |
|
SSD decreased computer time by a factor of 6-7 compared to other |
347 |
< |
models.\cite{Ichiye96} What is most impressive is that this savings |
347 |
> |
models.\cite{liu96:new_model} What is most impressive is that these savings |
348 |
|
did not come at the expense of accurate depiction of the liquid state |
349 |
|
properties. Indeed, SSD maintains reasonable agreement with the Soper |
350 |
< |
data for the structural features of liquid |
351 |
< |
water.\cite{Soper86,Ichiye96} Additionally, the dynamical properties |
350 |
> |
diffraction data for the structural features of liquid |
351 |
> |
water.\cite{Soper86,liu96:new_model} Additionally, the dynamical properties |
352 |
|
exhibited by SSD agree with experiment better than those of more |
353 |
|
computationally expensive models (like TIP3P and |
354 |
< |
SPC/E).\cite{Ichiye99} The combination of speed and accurate depiction |
354 |
> |
SPC/E).\cite{chandra99:ssd_md} The combination of speed and accurate depiction |
355 |
|
of solvent properties makes SSD a very attractive model for the |
356 |
|
simulation of large scale biochemical simulations. |
357 |
|
|
358 |
|
Recent constant pressure simulations revealed issues in the original |
359 |
|
SSD model that led to lower than expected densities at all target |
360 |
|
pressures.\cite{Ichiye03,Gezelter04} The default model in {\sc oopse} |
361 |
< |
is SSD/E, a density corrected derivative of SSD that exhibits improved |
362 |
< |
liquid structure and transport behavior. If the use of a reaction |
363 |
< |
field long-range interaction correction is desired, it is recommended |
364 |
< |
that the parameters be modified to those of the SSD/RF model. Solvent |
365 |
< |
parameters can be easily modified in an accompanying {\sc BASS} file |
366 |
< |
as illustrated in the scheme below. A table of the parameter values |
367 |
< |
and the drawbacks and benefits of the different density corrected SSD |
368 |
< |
models can be found in reference \ref{Gezelter04}. |
361 |
> |
is therefore SSD/E, a density corrected derivative of SSD that |
362 |
> |
exhibits improved liquid structure and transport behavior. If the use |
363 |
> |
of a reaction field long-range interaction correction is desired, it |
364 |
> |
is recommended that the parameters be modified to those of the SSD/RF |
365 |
> |
model. Solvent parameters can be easily modified in an accompanying |
366 |
> |
{\sc BASS} file as illustrated in the scheme below. A table of the |
367 |
> |
parameter values and the drawbacks and benefits of the different |
368 |
> |
density corrected SSD models can be found in reference |
369 |
> |
\ref{Gezelter04}. |
370 |
|
|
371 |
|
!!!Place a {\sc BASS} scheme showing SSD parameters around here!!! |
372 |
|
|
384 |
|
describes the interaction of the positively charged metal core ions |
385 |
|
with one another. A particular potential description called the |
386 |
|
Embedded Atom Method\cite{Daw84,FBD86,johnson89,Lu97}({\sc eam}) that has |
387 |
< |
particularly wide adoption has been selected for inclusion in OOPSE. A |
387 |
> |
particularly wide adoption has been selected for inclusion in {\sc oopse}. A |
388 |
|
good review of {\sc eam} and other metallic potential formulations was done |
389 |
|
by Voter.\cite{voter} |
390 |
|
|
397 |
|
|
398 |
|
where $F_{i} $ is the embedding function that equates the energy required to embed a |
399 |
|
positively-charged core ion $i$ into a linear superposition of |
400 |
< |
sperically averaged atomic electron densities given by |
400 |
> |
spherically averaged atomic electron densities given by |
401 |
|
$\rho_{i}$. $\phi_{ij}$ is a primarily repulsive pairwise interaction |
402 |
|
between atoms $i$ and $j$. In the original formulation of |
403 |
|
{\sc eam} cite{Daw84}, $\phi_{ij}$ was an entirely repulsive term, however |
404 |
< |
in later refinements to EAM have shown that nonuniqueness between $F$ |
404 |
> |
in later refinements to EAM have shown that non-uniqueness between $F$ |
405 |
|
and $\phi$ allow for more general forms for $\phi$.\cite{Daw89} |
406 |
|
There is a cutoff distance, $r_{cut}$, which limits the |
407 |
|
summations in the {\sc eam} equation to the few dozen atoms |
410 |
|
|
411 |
|
|
412 |
|
\subsection{\label{Sec:pbc}Periodic Boundary Conditions} |
413 |
+ |
|
414 |
+ |
\newcommand{\roundme}{\operatorname{round}} |
415 |
|
|
416 |
|
\textit{Periodic boundary conditions} are widely used to simulate truly |
417 |
|
macroscopic systems with a relatively small number of particles. The |
418 |
|
simulation box is replicated throughout space to form an infinite |
419 |
|
lattice. During the simulation, when a particle moves in the primary |
420 |
< |
cell, its image in other boxes move in exactly the same direction with |
421 |
< |
exactly the same orientation.Thus, as a particle leaves the primary |
420 |
> |
cell, its images in other boxes move in exactly the same direction with |
421 |
> |
exactly the same orientation. So, as a particle leaves the primary |
422 |
|
cell, one of its images will enter through the opposite face.If the |
423 |
< |
simulation box is large enough to avoid "feeling" the symmetries of |
423 |
> |
simulation box is large enough to avoid \textquotedblleft feeling\textquotedblright\ the symmetries of |
424 |
|
the periodic lattice, surface effects can be ignored. Cubic, |
425 |
< |
orthorhombic and parallelepiped are the available periodic cells In |
426 |
< |
OOPSE. We use a matrix to describe the property of the simulation |
427 |
< |
box. Therefore, both the size and shape of the simulation box can be |
425 |
> |
orthorhombic and parallelepiped are the available periodic cells in |
426 |
> |
{\sc oopse}. We use a matrix to describe the property of the simulation |
427 |
> |
box. Both the size and shape of the simulation box can be |
428 |
|
changed during the simulation. The transformation from box space |
429 |
|
vector $\mathbf{s}$ to its corresponding real space vector |
430 |
|
$\mathbf{r}$ is defined by |
431 |
|
\begin{equation} |
432 |
< |
\mathbf{r}=\underline{\underline{H}}\cdot\mathbf{s}% |
432 |
> |
\mathbf{r}=\underline{\mathbf{H}}\cdot\mathbf{s}% |
433 |
|
\end{equation} |
434 |
|
|
435 |
|
|
437 |
|
the three box axis vectors. $h_{x},h_{y}$ and $h_{z}$ represent the |
438 |
|
three sides of the simulation box respectively. |
439 |
|
|
440 |
< |
To find the minimum image, we convert the real vector to its |
440 |
> |
To find the minimum image of a vector $\mathbf{r}$, we convert the real vector to its |
441 |
|
corresponding vector in box space first, \bigskip% |
442 |
|
\begin{equation} |
443 |
< |
\mathbf{s}=\underline{\underline{H}}^{-1}\cdot\mathbf{r}% |
443 |
> |
\mathbf{s}=\underline{\mathbf{H}}^{-1}\cdot\mathbf{r}% |
444 |
|
\end{equation} |
445 |
|
And then, each element of $\mathbf{s}$ is wrapped to lie between -0.5 to 0.5, |
446 |
|
\begin{equation} |
447 |
< |
s_{i}^{\prime}=s_{i}-round(s_{i}) |
447 |
> |
s_{i}^{\prime}=s_{i}-\roundme(s_{i}) |
448 |
|
\end{equation} |
449 |
|
where |
450 |
|
|
451 |
|
% |
452 |
|
|
453 |
|
\begin{equation} |
454 |
< |
round(x)=\left\{ |
455 |
< |
\begin{array}[c]{c}% |
454 |
> |
\roundme(x)=\left\{ |
455 |
> |
\begin{array}{cc} |
456 |
|
\lfloor{x+0.5}\rfloor & \text{if \ }x\geqslant0\\ |
457 |
|
\lceil{x-0.5}\rceil & \text{otherwise}% |
458 |
|
\end{array} |
459 |
|
\right. |
460 |
|
\end{equation} |
461 |
+ |
For example, $\roundme(3.6)=4$, $\roundme(3.1)=3$, $\roundme(-3.6)=-4$, |
462 |
+ |
$\roundme(-3.1)=-3$. |
463 |
|
|
464 |
< |
|
447 |
< |
For example, $round(3.6)=4$,$round(3.1)=3$, $round(-3.6)=-4$, |
448 |
< |
$round(-3.1)=-3$. |
449 |
< |
|
450 |
< |
Finally, we obtain the minimum image coordinates by transforming back |
464 |
> |
Finally, we obtain the minimum image coordinates $\mathbf{r}^{\prime}$ by transforming back |
465 |
|
to real space,% |
466 |
|
|
467 |
|
\begin{equation} |
468 |
< |
\mathbf{r}^{\prime}=\underline{\underline{H}}^{-1}\cdot\mathbf{s}^{\prime}% |
468 |
> |
\mathbf{r}^{\prime}=\underline{\mathbf{H}}^{-1}\cdot\mathbf{s}^{\prime}% |
469 |
|
\end{equation} |
470 |
|
|