ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/oopsePaper/EmpericalEnergy.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/oopsePaper/EmpericalEnergy.tex (file contents):
Revision 917 by mmeineke, Fri Jan 9 20:25:50 2004 UTC vs.
Revision 918 by mmeineke, Fri Jan 9 20:57:55 2004 UTC

# Line 125 | Line 125 | atom in Fig.~\ref{fig:lipidModel}.
125   atom in Fig.~\ref{fig:lipidModel}.
126  
127   \begin{figure}
128 < \epsfxsize=6in
129 < \epsfbox{lipidModel.epsi}
128 > \epsfbox{lipidModel.eps}
129   \caption{A representation of the lipid model. $\phi$ is the torsion angle, $\theta$ %
130   is the bend angle, $\mu$ is the dipole moment of the head group, and n is the chain length.}
131   \label{fig:lipidModel}
# Line 345 | Line 344 | these parameters simply need to be changed to the upda
344  
345   \subsection{\label{sec:eam}Embedded Atom Model}
346  
347 < here there be Monsters
347 > Several molecular dynamics codes\cite{dynamo86} exist which have the
348 > capacity to simulate metallic systems, including some that have
349 > parallel computational abilities\cite{plimpton93}. Potentials that
350 > describe bonding transition metal
351 > systems\cite{Finnis84,Ercolessi88,Chen90,Qi99,Ercolessi02} have a
352 > attractive interaction which models the stabilization of ``Embedding''
353 > a positively charged metal ion in an electron density created by the
354 > free valance ``sea'' of electrons created by the surrounding atoms in
355 > the system. A mostly repulsive pairwise part of the potential
356 > describes the interaction of the positively charged metal core ions
357 > with one another. A particular potential description called the
358 > Embedded Atom Method\cite{Daw84,FBD86,johnson89,Lu97}(EAM) that has
359 > particularly wide adoption has been selected for inclusion in OOPSE. A
360 > good review of EAM and other metallic potential formulations was done
361 > by Voter.\cite{voter}
362  
363 + The {\sc eam} potential has the form:
364 + \begin{eqnarray}
365 + V & = & \sum_{i} F_{i}\left[\rho_{i}\right] + \sum_{i} \sum_{j \neq i}
366 + \phi_{ij}({\bf r}_{ij})  \\
367 + \rho_{i}  & = & \sum_{j \neq i} f_{j}({\bf r}_{ij})
368 + \end{eqnarray}
369 +
370 + where $\phi_{ij}$ is a primarily repulsive pairwise interaction
371 + between atoms $i$ and $j$.In the origional formulation of
372 + EAM\cite{Daw84}, $\phi_{ij}$ was an entirely repulsive term, however
373 + in later refinements to EAM have shown that nonuniqueness between $F$
374 + and $\phi$ allow for more general forms for $\phi$.\cite{Daw89} The
375 + embedding function $F_{i}$ is the energy required to embedded an
376 + positively-charged core ion $i$ into a linear supeposition of
377 + sperically averaged atomic electron densities given by
378 + $\rho_{i}$. There is a cutoff distance, $r_{cut}$, which limits the
379 + summations in the {\sc eam} equation to the few dozen atoms
380 + surrounding atom $i$ for both the density $\rho$ and pairwise $\phi$
381 + interactions.
382 +
383   \subsection{\label{Sec:pbc}Periodic Boundary Conditions}
384  
385   \textit{Periodic boundary conditions} are widely used to simulate truly

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines