ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/nonperiodicVSS/response.txt
Revision: 4100
Committed: Fri Apr 11 18:47:16 2014 UTC (11 years, 3 months ago) by gezelter
Content type: text/plain
File size: 1945 byte(s)
Log Message:
Final Edits and response

File Contents

# Content
1 For reviewer 1:
2
3 We would like to thank reviewer 1 for bringing the previous use of
4 RNEMD methods for curved interfaces to our attention. We have added
5 citations and a paragraph describing the work on thermal transport in
6 carbon nanotubes to the introduction.
7
8 Reviewer 1 also asked an important question about comparing this
9 method to equilibrium molecular simulations of rotational friction.
10 This is an excellent suggestion.
11
12 Rotational correlation times of roughened spheres in explicit solvent
13 were investigated using equilibrium molecular dynamics by Heyes et
14 al. (10.1080/002689798168682), and they found that rotational
15 diffusion of the rough spheres exhibits effective solvent viscosities
16 that are significantly below the bulk viscosity. From this they
17 concluded that the rate of rotation is faster than predicted using
18 classical Stokes-Einstein stick boundary conditions. This is
19 consistent with our observations for the smaller spheres. The effect
20 observed by Heyes et al. disappears or reverses for larger spheres in
21 higher density solvents. This would be consistent with our
22 observation of the 40 A nanoparticles.
23
24 Sun et al. (10.1063/1.2936991) have also done previous equilibrium MD
25 simulations on smooth ellipsoids and rigid dumbbell shapes in an
26 explicit solvent. They observed slower than stick boundary predictions
27 for the rotational motion of the smooth ellipsoid, but significantly
28 faster than stick behavior for the roughened surface of the rigid
29 dumbbell. Because our ellipsoids are relatively roughened atomic
30 surfaces, we appear to be closer to the dumb-bell behavior than the
31 smooth ellipsoid.
32
33 We have added a paragraph describing these comparisons to the
34 discussion section in our revised manuscript.
35
36
37 For reviewer 2:
38
39 We thank the reviewer for the comments. To address the questions
40 about the ellipsoidal results, we have added references to Perrin's
41 work on the hydrodynamics of ellipsoids near Eqs. 15-17

Properties

Name Value
svn:eol-style native