ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/nanoglass/introduction.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/nanoglass/introduction.tex (file contents):
Revision 3258 by chuckv, Thu Oct 11 18:53:11 2007 UTC vs.
Revision 3259 by gezelter, Fri Oct 12 21:21:04 2007 UTC

# Line 4 | Line 4
4  
5   \section{Introduction}
6  
7 < Excitation of the plasmon resonance in metallic nanoparticles has attracted enormous interest in the past several years. This is partly due to the location of the plasmon band in the near IR for particles in a wide range of sizes and geometries. (Living tissue is nearly transparent in the near IR, and for this reason, there is an unrealized potential for metallic nanoparticles to be used in both diagnostic and therapeutic settings.\cite{West:2003fk,Hu:2006lr} One of the side effects of absorption of laser radiation at these frequencies is the rapid (sub-picosecond) heating of the electronic degrees of freedom in the metal. This hot electron gas quickly transfers heat to the phonon modes of the lattice, resulting in a rapid heating of the metal particles.
7 > Excitation of the plasmon resonance in metallic nanoparticles has
8 > attracted enormous interest in the past several years. This is partly
9 > due to the location of the plasmon band in the near IR for particles
10 > in a wide range of sizes and geometries. Living tissue is nearly
11 > transparent in the near IR, and for this reason, there is an
12 > unrealized potential for metallic nanoparticles to be used in both
13 > diagnostic and therapeutic settings.\cite{West:2003fk,Hu:2006lr} One
14 > of the side effects of absorption of laser radiation at these
15 > frequencies is the rapid (sub-picosecond) heating of the electronic
16 > degrees of freedom in the metal. This hot electron gas quickly
17 > transfers heat to the phonon modes of the particle, resulting in a
18 > rapid heating of the lattice of the metal particles.  Since metallic
19 > nanoparticles have a large surface area to volume ratio, many of the
20 > metal atoms are at surface locations and experience relatively weak
21 > bonding. This is observable in a lowering of the melting temperatures
22 > of these particles when compared with bulk metallic
23 > samples.\cite{Buffat:1976yq,Dick:2002qy} One of the side effects of
24 > the excitation of small metallic nanoparticles at the plasmon
25 > resonance is the facile creation of liquid metal
26 > droplets.\cite{Mafune01,HartlandG.V._jp0276092,Link:2000lr,Plech:2003yq,plech:195423,Plech:2007rt}
27  
28 < Since metallic nanoparticles have a large surface area to volume ratio, many of the metal atoms are at surface locations and experience relatively weak bonding. This is observable in a lowering of the melting temperatures and of these particles when compared with bulk metallic samples.\cite{Buffat:1976yq,Dick:2002qy} One of the side effects of the excitation of small metallic nanoparticles at the plasmon resonance is the facile creation of liquid metal droplets.
28 > Much of the experimental work on this subject has been carried out in
29 > the Hartland, El-Sayed and Plech
30 > groups.\cite{HartlandG.V._jp0276092,Hodak:2000rb,Hartland:2003lr,Petrova:2007qy,Link:2000lr,plech:195423,Plech:2007rt}
31 > These experiments mostly use the technique of time-resolved optical
32 > pump-probe spectroscopy, where a pump laser pulse serves to excite
33 > conduction band electrons in the nanoparticle and a following probe
34 > laser pulse allows observation of the time evolution of the
35 > electron-phonon coupling. Hu and Hartland have observed a direct
36 > relation between the size of the nanoparticle and the observed cooling
37 > rate using such pump-probe techniques.\cite{Hu:2004lr} Plech {\it et
38 > al.} have use pulsed x-ray scattering as a probe to directly access
39 > changes to atomic structure following pump
40 > excitation.\cite{plech:195423} They further determined that heat
41 > transfer in nanoparticles to the surrounding solvent is goverened by
42 > interfacial dynamics and not the thermal transport properties of the
43 > solvent.  This is in agreement with Cahill,\cite{Wilson:2002uq}
44 > but opposite to the conclusions in Reference \citen{Hu:2004lr}.
45  
46 < Much of the experimental work on this subject has been carried out in the Hartland and von~Plessen groups.\cite{HartlandG.V._jp0276092,Hodak:2000rb,Hartland:2003lr,Petrova:2007qy,Link:2000lr} These experiments mostly use the technique of time-resolved optical pump-probe spectroscopy where a pump laser pulse serves to excite conduction band electrons in the nanoparticle and a following probe laser pulse allows observation of the time evolution of the electron-phonon coupling. Hu and Hartland have observed a direct relation between the size of the nanoparticle and the observed cooling rate using such pump-probe techniques.\cite{Hu:2004lr} Plech {\it et al.} have use pulsed x-ray scattering as a probe to directly access changes to atomic structure following pump excitation.\cite{plech:195423} They further determined that heat transfer in nanoparticles to the surrounding solvent is goverened by interfacial dynamics and not the thermal transport properties of the solvent.\cite{Mafune01,HartlandG.V._jp0276092,Link:2000lr,Plech:2003yq,plech:195423,Plech:2007rt}
46 > Since these experiments are carried out in condensed phase
47 > surroundings, the large surface area to volume ratio makes the heat
48 > transfer to the surrounding solvent a relatively rapid process. In our
49 > recent simulation study of the laser excitation of gold
50 > nanoparticles,\cite{VardemanC.F._jp051575r} we observed that the
51 > cooling rate for these particles (10$^{11}$-10$^{12}$ K/s) is in
52 > excess of the cooling rate required for glass formation in bulk
53 > metallic alloys.\cite{Greer:1995qy} Given this fact, it may be
54 > possible to use laser excitation to melt, alloy and quench metallic
55 > nanoparticles in order to form glassy nanobeads.
56  
57 < Since these experiments are often carried out in condensed phase surroundings, the large surface area to volume ratio makes the heat transfer to the surrounding solvent also a relatively rapid process. In our recent simulation study of the laser excitation of gold nanoparticles,\cite{VardemanC.F._jp051575r} we observed that the cooling rate for these particles (10$^{11}$-10$^{12}$ K/s) is in excess of the cooling rate required for glass formation in bulk metallic alloys. Given this fact, it may be possible to use laser excitation to melt, alloy and quench metallic nanoparticles in order to form glassy nanobeads.
57 > To study whether or not glass nanobead formation is feasible, we have
58 > chosen the bimetallic alloy of Silver (60\%) and Copper (40\%) as a
59 > model system because it is an experimentally known glass former, and
60 > has been used previously as a theoretical model for glassy
61 > dynamics.\cite{Vardeman-II:2001jn} The Hume-Rothery rules suggest that
62 > alloys composed of Copper and Silver should be miscible in the solid
63 > state, because their lattice constants are within 15\% of each
64 > another.\cite{Kittel:1996fk} Experimentally, however Ag-Cu alloys are
65 > a well-known exception to this rule and are only miscible in the
66 > liquid state given equilibrium conditions.\cite{Massalski:1986rt}
67 > Below the eutectic temperature of 779 $^\circ$C and composition
68 > (60.1\% Ag, 39.9\% Cu), the solid alloys of Ag and Cu will phase
69 > separate into Ag and Cu rich $\alpha$ and $\beta$ phases,
70 > respectively.\cite{Banhart:1992sv,Ma:2005fk} This behavior is due to a
71 > positive heat of mixing in both the solid and liquid phases. For the
72 > one-to-one composition fcc solid solution, $\Delta H_{\rm mix}$ is on
73 > the order of +6~kJ/mole.\cite{Ma:2005fk} Non-equilibrium solid
74 > solutions may be formed by undercooling, and under these conditions, a
75 > compositionally-disordered $\gamma$ fcc phase can be
76 > formed.\cite{najafabadi:3144}
77  
78 < To study whether or not glass nanobead formation is feasible, we have chosen the bimetallic alloy of Silver (60\%) and Copper (40\%) as a model system because it is an experimentally known glass former and has been used previously as a theoretical model for glassy dynamics.\cite{Vardeman-II:2001jn} The Hume-Rothery rules suggest that alloys composed of Copper and Silver should be miscible in the solid state, because their lattice constants are within 15\% of each another.\cite{Kittel:1996fk} Experimentally, however Ag-Cu alloys are a well-known exception to this rule and are only miscible in the liquid state given equilibrium conditions.\cite{Massalski:1986rt} Below the eutectic temperature of 779 $^\circ$C and composition (60.1\% Ag, 39.9\% Cu), the solid alloys of Ag and Cu will phase separate into Ag and Cu rich $\alpha$ and $\beta$ phases, respectively.\cite{Banhart:1992sv,Ma:2005fk} This behavior is due to a positive heat of mixing in both the solid and liquid phases. For the one-to-one composition fcc solid solution, $\Delta H_{\rm mix}$ is on the order of +6~kJ/mole.\cite{Ma:2005fk} Non-equilibrium solid solutions may be formed by undercooling, and under these conditions, a compositionally-disordered $\gamma$ fcc phase can be formed.\cite{najafabadi:3144}
78 > Metastable alloys composed of Ag-Cu were first reported by Duwez in
79 > 1960 and were created by using a ``splat quenching'' technique in
80 > which a liquid droplet is propelled by a shock wave against a cooled
81 > metallic target.\cite{duwez:1136} Because of the small positive
82 > $\Delta H_{\rm mix}$, supersaturated crystalline solutions are
83 > typically obtained rather than an amorphous phase. Higher $\Delta
84 > H_{\rm mix}$ systems, such as Ag-Ni, are immiscible even in liquid
85 > states, but they tend to form metastable alloys much more readily than
86 > Ag-Cu. If present, the amorphous Ag-Cu phase is usually seen as the
87 > minority phase in most experiments. Because of this unique
88 > crystalline-amorphous behavior, the Ag-Cu system has been widely
89 > studied. Methods for creating such bulk phase structures include splat
90 > quenching, vapor deposition, ion beam mixing and mechanical
91 > alloying. Both structural \cite{sheng:184203} and
92 > dynamic\cite{Vardeman-II:2001jn} computational studies have also been
93 > performed on this system.
94  
95 < Metastable alloys composed of Ag-Cu were first reported by Duwez in 1960 and were created by using a ``splat quenching'' technique in which a liquid droplet is propelled by a shock wave against a cooled metallic target.\cite{duwez:1136} Because of the small positive $\Delta H_{\rm mix}$, supersaturated crystalline solutions are typically obtained rather than an amorphous phase. Higher $\Delta H_{\rm mix}$ systems, such as Ag-Ni, are immiscible even in liquid states, but they tend to form metastable alloys much more readily than Ag-Cu. If present, the amorphous Ag-Cu phase is usually seen as the minority phase in most experiments. Because of this unique crystalline-amorphous behavior, the Ag-Cu system has been widely studied. Methods for creating such bulk phase structures include splat quenching, vapor deposition, ion beam mixing and mechanical alloying. Both structural \cite{sheng:184203} and dynamic\cite{Vardeman-II:2001jn} computational studies have also been performed on this system.
95 > Although bulk Ag-Cu alloys have been studied widely, this alloy has
96 > been mostly overlooked in nanoscale materials. The literature on
97 > alloyed metallic nanoparticles has dealt with the Ag-Au system, which
98 > has the useful property of being miscible on both solid and liquid
99 > phases. Nanoparticles of another miscible system, Au-Cu, have been
100 > successfully constructed using techniques such as laser
101 > ablation,\cite{Malyavantham:2004cu} and the synthetic reduction of
102 > metal ions in solution.\cite{Kim:2003lv} Laser induced alloying has
103 > been used as a technique for creating Au-Ag alloy particles from
104 > core-shell particles.\cite{Hartland:2003lr} To date, attempts at
105 > creating Ag-Cu nanoparticles have used ion implantation to embed
106 > nanoparticles in a glass matrix.\cite{De:1996ta,Magruder:1994rg} These
107 > attempts have been largely unsuccessful in producing mixed alloy
108 > nanoparticles, and instead produce phase segregated or core-shell
109 > structures.
110  
111 < Although bulk Ag-Cu alloys have been studied widely, this alloy has been mostly overlooked in nanoscale materials. The literature on alloyed metallic nanoparticles has dealt with the Ag-Au system, which has the useful property of being miscible on both solid and liquid phases. Nanoparticles of another miscible system, Au-Cu, have been successfully constructed using techniques such as laser ablation,\cite{Malyavantham:2004cu} and the synthetic reduction of metal ions in solution.\cite{Kim:2003lv} Laser induced alloying has been used as a technique for creating Au-Ag alloy particles from core-shell particles.\cite{Hartland:2003lr} To date, attempts at creating Ag-Cu nanoparticles have used ion implantation to embed nanoparticles in a glass matrix.\cite{De:1996ta,Magruder:1994rg} These attempts have been largely unsuccessful in producing mixed alloy nanoparticles, and instead produce phase segregated or core-shell structures.
111 > One of the more successful attempts at creating intermixed Ag-Cu
112 > nanoparticles used alternate pulsed laser ablation and deposition in
113 > an amorphous Al$_2$O$_3$ matrix.\cite{gonzalo:5163} Surface plasmon
114 > resonance (SPR) of bimetallic core-shell structures typically show two
115 > distinct resonance peaks where mixed particles show a single shifted
116 > and broadened resonance.\cite{Hodak:2000rb} The SPR for pure silver
117 > occurs at 400 nm and for copper at 570 nm.\cite{HengleinA._jp992950g}
118 > On Al$_2$O$_3$ films, these resonances move to 424 nm and 572 nm for
119 > the pure metals. For bimetallic nanoparticles with 40\% Ag an
120 > absorption peak is seen between 400-550 nm. With increasing Ag
121 > content, the SPR shifts towards the blue, with the peaks nearly
122 > coincident at a composition of 57\% Ag. Gonzalo {\it et al.} cited the
123 > existence of a single broad resonance peak as evidence of an alloyed
124 > particle rather than a phase segregated system.  However, spectroscopy
125 > may not be able to tell the difference between alloyed particles and
126 > mixtures of segregated particles.  High-resolution electron microscopy
127 > has so far been unable to determine whether the mixed nanoparticles
128 > were an amorphous phase or a supersaturated crystalline phase.
129  
130 < One of the more successful attempts at creating intermixed Ag-Cu nanoparticles used alternate pulsed laser ablation and deposition in an amorphous Al$_2$O$_3$ matrix.\cite{gonzalo:5163} Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) of bimetallic core-shell structures typically show two distinct resonance peaks where mixed particles show a single shifted and broadened resonance.\cite{Hodak:2000rb} The SPR for pure silver occurs at 400 nm and for copper at 570 nm.\cite{HengleinA._jp992950g} On Al$_2$O$_3$ films, these resonances move to 424 nm and 572 nm for the pure metals. For bimetallic nanoparticles with 40\% Ag an absorption peak is seen between 400-550 nm. With increasing Ag content, the SPR shifts towards the blue, with the peaks nearly coincident at a composition of 57\% Ag. Gonzalo {\it et al.} cited the existence of a single broad resonance peak as evidence of a mixed alloy particle rather than a phase segregated system. It should be noted that  spectroscopy is a poor characterization technique for determining the the structure in nanoparticles. Characterization by high-resolution electron microscopy was unable to determine whether the mixed nanoparticles were an amorphous phase or a supersaturated crystalline phase.
130 > Characterization of glassy behavior by molecular dynamics simulations
131 > is typically done using dynamic measurements such as the mean squared
132 > displacement, $\langle r^2(t) \rangle$. Liquids exhibit a mean squared
133 > displacement that is linear in time (at long times). Glassy materials
134 > deviate significantly from this linear behavior at intermediate times,
135 > entering a sub-linear regime with a return to linear behavior in the
136 > infinite time limit.\cite{Kob:1999fk} However, diffusion in
137 > nanoparticles differs significantly from the bulk in that atoms are
138 > confined to a roughly spherical volume and cannot explore any region
139 > larger than the particle radius ($R$). In these confined geometries,
140 > $\langle r^2(t) \rangle$ approaches a limiting value of
141 > $3R^2/40$.\cite{ShibataT._ja026764r} This limits the utility of
142 > dynamical measures of glass formation when studying nanoparticles.
143  
144 < Characterization of glassy behavior by molecular dynamics simulations is typically done using dynamic measurements such as the mean squared displacement, $\langle r^2(t) \rangle$. Liquids exhibit a mean squared displacement that is linear in time (at long times). Glassy materials deviate significantly from this linear behavior at intermediate times, entering a sub-linear regime with a return to linear behavior in the infinite time limit.\cite{Kob:1999fk} However, diffusion in nanoparticles differs significantly from the bulk in that atoms are confined to a roughly spherical volume and cannot explore any region larger than the particle radius ($R$). In these confined geometries, $\langle r^2(t) \rangle$ approaches a limiting value of $3R^2/40$.\cite{ShibataT._ja026764r} This limits the utility of dynamical measures of glass formation when studying nanoparticles.
144 > However, glassy materials exhibit strong icosahedral ordering among
145 > nearest-neghbors (in contrast with crystalline and liquid-like
146 > configurations). Local icosahedral structures are the
147 > three-dimensional equivalent of covering a two-dimensional plane with
148 > 5-sided tiles; they cannot be used to tile space in a periodic
149 > fashion, and are therefore an indicator of non-periodic packing in
150 > amorphous solids. Steinhart {\it et al.} defined an orientational bond
151 > order parameter that is sensitive to icosahedral
152 > ordering.\cite{Steinhardt:1983mo} This bond order parameter can
153 > therefore be used to characterize glass formation in liquid and solid
154 > solutions.\cite{wolde:9932}
155  
156 < However, glassy materials exhibit strong icosahedral ordering among nearest-neghbors (in contrast with crystalline and liquid-like configurations). Local icosahedral structures are the three-dimensional equivalent of covering a two-dimensional plane with 5-sided tiles; they cannot be used to tile space in a periodic fashion, and are therefore an indicator of non-periodic packing in amorphous solids. Steinhart {\it et al.} defined an orientational bond order parameter that is sensitive to icosahedral ordering.\cite{Steinhardt:1983mo} This bond order parameter can therefore be used to characterize glass formation in liquid and solid solutions.\cite{wolde:9932}
156 > Theoretical molecular dynamics studies have been performed on the
157 > formation of amorphous single component nanoclusters of either
158 > gold,\cite{Chen:2004ec,Cleveland:1997jb,Cleveland:1997gu} or
159 > nickel,\cite{Gafner:2004bg,Qi:2001nn} by rapid cooling($\thicksim
160 > 10^{12}-10^{13}$ K/s) from a liquid state. All of these studies found
161 > icosahedral ordering in the resulting structures produced by this
162 > rapid cooling which can be evidence of the formation of an amorphous
163 > structure.\cite{Strandburg:1992qy} The nearest neighbor information
164 > was obtained from pair correlation functions, common neighbor analysis
165 > and bond order parameters.\cite{Steinhardt:1983mo} It should be noted
166 > that these studies used single component systems with cooling rates
167 > that are only obtainable in computer simulations and particle sizes
168 > less than 20\AA. Single component systems are known to form amorphous
169 > states in small clusters,\cite{Breaux:rz} but do not generally form
170 > amorphous structures in bulk materials.
171  
172 < Theoretical molecular dynamics studies have been performed on the formation of amorphous single component nanoclusters of either gold,\cite{Chen:2004ec,Cleveland:1997jb,Cleveland:1997gu} or nickel,\cite{Gafner:2004bg,Qi:2001nn} by rapid cooling($\thicksim 10^{12}-10^{13}$ K/s) from a liquid state. All of these studies found icosahedral ordering in the resulting structures produced by this rapid cooling which can be evidence of the formation of an amorphous structure.\cite{Strandburg:1992qy} The nearest neighbor information was obtained from pair correlation functions, common neighbor analysis and bond order parameters.\cite{Steinhardt:1983mo} It should be noted that these studies used single component systems with cooling rates that are only obtainable in computer simulations and particle sizes less than 20\AA. Single component systems are known to form amorphous states in small clusters,\cite{Breaux:rz} but do not generally form amorphous structures in bulk materials.
172 > Since the nanoscale Ag-Cu alloy has been largely unexplored, many
173 > interesting questions remain about the formation and properties of
174 > such a system. Does the large surface area to volume ratio aid Ag-Cu
175 > nanoparticles in rapid cooling and formation of an amorphous state?
176 > Nanoparticles have been shown to have a size dependent melting
177 > transition ($T_m$),\cite{Buffat:1976yq,Dick:2002qy} so we might expect
178 > a similar trend to follow for the glass transition temperature
179 > ($T_g$). By analogy, bulk metallic glasses exhibit a correlation
180 > between $T_m$ and $T_g$ although such dependence is difficult to
181 > establish because of the dependence of $T_g$ on cooling rate and the
182 > process by which the glass is formed.\cite{Wang:2003fk} It has also
183 > been demonstrated that there is a finite size effect depressing $T_g$
184 > in polymer glasses in confined geometries.\cite{Alcoutlabi:2005kx}
185  
186 < Since the nanoscale Ag-Cu alloy has been largely unexplored, many interesting questions remain about the formation and properties of such a system. Does the large surface area to volume ratio aid Ag-Cu nanoparticles in rapid cooling and formation of an amorphous state? Would a predisposition to isosahedral ordering in nanoparticles also allow for easier formation of an amorphous state and what is the preferred ordering in a amorphous nanoparticle? Nanoparticles have been shown to have size dependent melting transition ($T_m$), so we would expect a similar trend to follow for the glass transition temperature ($T_g$).\cite{Buffat:1976yq,Dick:2002qy} By analogy, bulk metallic glasses exhibit a correlation between $T_m$ and $T_g$ although such dependence is difficult to establish because of the dependence of $T_g$ on cooling rate and the process by which the glass is formed.\cite{Wang:2003fk} It is also been demonstrated that there is a finite size effect depressing $T_g$ in polymer glasses in confined geometries.\cite{Alcoutlabi:2005kx}
187 <
188 <
189 < In the sections below, we describe our modeling of the laser excitation and subsequent cooling of the particles {\it in silico} to mimic real experimental conditions. The simulation parameters have been tuned to the degree possible to match experimental conditions, and we discusss both the icosahedral ordering in the system, as well as the clustering of icosahedral centers that we observed.
186 > In the sections below, we describe our modeling of the laser
187 > excitation and subsequent cooling of the particles {\it in silico} to
188 > mimic real experimental conditions. The simulation parameters have
189 > been tuned to the degree possible to match experimental conditions,
190 > and we discusss both the icosahedral ordering in the system, as well
191 > as the clustering of icosahedral centers that we observed.

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines