ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/nanoglass/introduction.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/nanoglass/introduction.tex (file contents):
Revision 3208 by chuckv, Thu Aug 23 17:47:31 2007 UTC vs.
Revision 3217 by gezelter, Thu Sep 6 15:02:07 2007 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1 \input{header.tex}
1   \section{Introduction}
2 <
3 < \input{footer.tex}
2 >
3 > Excitation of the plasmon resonance in metallic nanoparticles has
4 > attracted enormous interest in the past several years.  This is partly
5 > due to the location of the plasmon band in the near IR for particles
6 > in a wide range of sizes and geometries.  (Living tissue is nearly
7 > transparent in the near IR, and for this reason, there is an
8 > unrealized potential for metallic nanoparticles to be used in both
9 > diagnostic and therapeutic settings.)  One of the side effects of
10 > absorption of laser radiation at these frequencies is the rapid
11 > (sub-picosecond) heating of the electronic degrees of freedom in the
12 > metal.  This hot electron gas quickly transfers heat to the phonon
13 > modes of the lattice, resulting in a rapid heating of the metal
14 > particles.
15 >
16 > Since metallic nanoparticles have a large surface area to volume
17 > ratio, many of the metal atoms are at surface locations and experience
18 > relatively weak bonding.  This is observable in a lowering of the
19 > melting temperatures and a substantial softening of the bulk modulus
20 > of these particles when compared with bulk metallic samples.  One of
21 > the side effects of the excitation of small metallic nanoparticles at
22 > the plasmon resonance is the facile creation of liquid metal
23 > droplets.  
24 >
25 > Much of the experimental work on this subject has been carried out in
26 > the Hartland and von~Plessen
27 > groups.\cite{HartlandG.V._jp0276092,Hodak:2000rb,Hartland:2003yf,HuM._jp020581+,plech:195423}
28 > They have [BRIEF SURVEY OF THE EXPERIMENTAL WORK]
29 >
30 >
31 > Since these experiments are often carried out in condensed phase
32 > surroundings, the large surface area to volume ratio makes the heat
33 > transfer to the surrounding solvent also a relatively rapid process.
34 > In our recent simulation study of the laser excitation of gold
35 > nanoparticles,\cite{} we observed that the cooling rate for these
36 > particles (10$^11$-10$^12$ K/s) is in excess of the cooling rate
37 > required for glass formation in bulk metallic alloys.  Given this
38 > fact, it may be possible to use laser excitation to melt, alloy and
39 > quench metallic nanoparticles in order to form metallic glass
40 > nanobeads.  
41 >
42 > To study whether or not glass nanobead formation is feasible, we have
43 > chosen the bimetallic alloy of Silver (60\%) and Copper (40\%) as a
44 > model system because it is an experimentally known glass former and
45 > has been used previously as a theoretical model for glassy
46 > dynamics.\cite{Vardeman2001}
47 >
48 > XXX stuff from ORP
49 >
50 > In the sections below, we describe our
51 > modeling of the laser excitation and subsequent cooling of the
52 > particles in silico to mimic real experimental conditions.
53 >
54 >
55 > constructing and relaxing the eutectic composition (Ag$_6$Cu$_4$) on a
56 > FCC lattice with a lattice constant of 4.09 \AA\ for 20, 30 and 40
57 > \AA\ radius nanoparticles. The nanoparticles are melted at 900 K and
58 > allowed to mix for 1 ns. Resulting structures are then quenched using
59 > a implicit solvent model where Langevin dynamics is applied to the
60 > outer 4 \AA\ radius of the nanoparticle and normal Newtonian dynamics
61 > are applied to the rest of the atoms. By fitting to
62 > experimentally-determined cooling rates, we find that collision
63 > frequencies of 3.58 fs$^-1$ for Ag and 5.00 fs$^-1$ for Cu lead to
64 > nearly exact agreement with the Temperature vs. time data. The cooling
65 > rates are therefore 2.37 x 10$^13$ K/s, 1.37 x 10$^13$ K/s and 1.06 x
66 > 10$^13$ K/s for the 20, 30 and 40 \AA\ radius nanoparticles
67 > respectively.
68 >
69 > Structural Measures for Glass Formation
70 >
71 > Characterization of glassy behavior by molecular dynamics simulations
72 > is typically done using dynamic measurements such as the mean squared
73 > displacement, <r2(t)>. Liquids exhibit a mean squared displacement
74 > that is linear in time. Glassy materials deviate significantly from
75 > this linear behavior at intermediate times, entering a sub-linear
76 > regime with a return to linear behavior in the infinite time
77 > limit. Diffusion in nanoparticles differs significantly from the bulk
78 > in that atoms are confined to a roughly spherical volume and cannot
79 > explore any region larger than the particle radius. In these confined
80 > geometries, <r2(t)> in the radial direction approaches a limiting
81 > value of 6R2/40.
82 >
83 > However, glassy materials exhibit strong icosahedral ordering among nearest-neghbors in contrast to crystalline or liquid structures. Steinhart, et al., defined an orientational bond order parameter that is sensitive to the nearest-neighbor environment by using invariant combinations of spherical harmonics Yl,m(?,?).[10] Spherical harmonics involving the Y6,m(?,?) are particularly sensitive to icosohedral order among nearest neighbors as can be seen in the cartoon to the left. The second and third-order invariants, Q6 and W6 are used to determine the level of icosahedral order present in a quenched nanoparticle. Perfect icosahedral structures have a maximal value of 0.663 for Q6 and -0.170 for W6. A plot of the distributions of Q6 and W6 with cooling temperature indicates increasing icosahedral order with decreasing temperature. This is a clear indication that glassy structures are forming as the nanoparticles are quenched.

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines