ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/nanoglass/conclusion.tex
Revision: 3244
Committed: Thu Oct 4 18:07:51 2007 UTC (17 years, 10 months ago) by gezelter
Content type: application/x-tex
File size: 2356 byte(s)
Log Message:
adding conclusion

File Contents

# Content
1 \section{Conclusions}
2 \label{sec:conclusion}
3
4 Our heat-transfer calculations have utilized the best current
5 estimates of the interfacial heat transfer coefficient (G) from recent
6 experiments. Using reasonable values for thermal conductivity in both
7 the metallic particle and the surrounding solvent, we have obtained
8 cooling rates for laser-heated nanoparticles that are in excess of
9 10$^{13}$ K / s. To test whether or not this cooling rate can form
10 glassy nanoparticles, we have performed a mixed molecular dynamics
11 simulation in which the atoms in contact with the solvent or capping
12 agent are evolved under Langevin dynamics while the remaining atoms
13 are evolved under Newtonian dynamics. The effective solvent viscosity
14 ($\eta$) is a free parameter which we have tuned so that the particles
15 in the simulation follow the same cooling curve as their experimental
16 counterparts. From the local icosahedral ordering around the atoms in
17 the nanoparticles (particularly Copper atoms), we deduce that it is
18 likely that glassy nanobeads are created via laser heating of
19 bimetallic nanoparticles, particularly when the initial temperature of
20 the particles approaches the melting temperature of the bulk metal
21 alloy.
22
23 Improvements to our calculations would require: 1) explicit treatment
24 of the capping agent and solvent, 2) another radial region to handle
25 the heat transfer to the solvent vapor layer that is likely to form
26 immediately surrounding the hot particle, and 3) larger particles in
27 the size range most easily studied via laser heating experiments.
28
29 The local icosahedral ordering we observed in these bimetallic
30 particles is centered almost completely around the copper atoms, and
31 this is likely due to the size mismatch leading to a more efficient
32 packing of 5-membered rings of silver around a central copper atom.
33 This size mismatch should be reflected in bulk calculations, and work
34 is ongoing in our lab to confirm this observation in bulk
35 glass-formers.
36
37 The physical properties (bulk modulus, frequency of the breathing
38 mode, and density) of glassy nanobeads should be somewhat different
39 from their crystalline counterparts. However, observation of these
40 differences may require single-particle resolution of the ultrafast
41 vibrational spectrum of one particle both before and after the
42 crystallite has been converted into a glassy bead.
43