ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/nanoglass/analysis.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/nanoglass/analysis.tex (file contents):
Revision 3232 by gezelter, Tue Sep 25 19:23:21 2007 UTC vs.
Revision 3233 by gezelter, Thu Sep 27 18:45:55 2007 UTC

# Line 35 | Line 35 | bond-orientational analysis formulated by Steinhart
35   One method that has been used extensively for determining local and
36   extended orientational symmetry in condensed phases is the
37   bond-orientational analysis formulated by Steinhart
38 < et.al.\cite{Steinhardt:1983mo} In this model, a set of spherical
38 > {\it et al.}\cite{Steinhardt:1983mo} In this model, a set of spherical
39   harmonics is associated with each of the near neighbors of a central
40   atom.  Neighbors (or ``bonds'') are defined as having a distance from
41   the central atom that is within the first peak in the radial
# Line 65 | Line 65 | over all $N$ particles
65   \bar{Q}_{lm} = \frac{\sum^{N}_{i=1}N_{b}(i)\bar{q}_{lm}(i)}{\sum^{N}_{i=1}N_{b}(i)}
66   \label{eq:sys_avg_bo}
67   \end{equation}
68 < The $\bar{Q}_{lm}$ contained in Equation(\ref{eq:sys_avg_bo}) is not
69 < necessarily invariant with respect to rotation of the arbitrary reference
70 < coordinate system.
71 < Second- and third-order rotationally invariant combinations, $Q_l$ and
72 < $W_l$, can be taken by summing over $m$ values of $\bar{Q}_{lm}$,
68 > The $\bar{Q}_{lm}$ contained in equation \ref{eq:sys_avg_bo} is not
69 > necessarily invariant under rotations of the arbitrary reference
70 > coordinate system.  Second- and third-order rotationally invariant
71 > combinations, $Q_l$ and $W_l$, can be taken by summing over $m$ values
72 > of $\bar{Q}_{lm}$,
73   \begin{equation}
74   Q_{l} = \left( \frac{4\pi}{2 l+1} \sum^{l}_{m=-l} \left| \bar{Q}_{lm} \right|^2\right)^{1/2}
75   \label{eq:sec_ord_inv}
# Line 85 | Line 85 | The factor in parentheses in Eq. \ref{eq:third_inv} is
85   \label{eq:third_inv}
86   \end{equation}
87   The factor in parentheses in Eq. \ref{eq:third_inv} is the Wigner-3$j$
88 < symbol.  
88 > symbol, and the sum is over all valid ($|m| \leq l$) values of $m_1$,
89 > $m_2$, and $m_3$ which sum to zero.
90  
91   \begin{table}
92   \caption{Values of bond orientational order parameters for
# Line 130 | Line 131 | parameters for individual liquid-like structures.
131   Similar behavior is observed in the bond-orientational order
132   parameters for individual liquid-like structures.
133  
134 < Additionally, both $Q_6$ and $\hat{W}_6$ have extreme values for the
135 < icosahedral clusters.  This makes the $l=6$ bond-orientational order
136 < parameters particularly useful in identifying the extent of local
137 < icosahedral ordering in condensed phases.  For example, a local
138 < structure which exhibits $\hat{W}_6$ values near -0.17 is easily
139 < identified as an icosahedral cluster and cannot be mistaken for
140 < distorted cubic or liquid-like structures.
134 > Additionally, both $Q_6$ and $\hat{W}_6$ are thought to have extreme
135 > values for the icosahedral clusters.\cite{Steinhardt:1983mo} This
136 > makes the $l=6$ bond-orientational order parameters particularly
137 > useful in identifying the extent of local icosahedral ordering in
138 > condensed phases.  For example, a local structure which exhibits
139 > $\hat{W}_6$ values near -0.17 is easily identified as an icosahedral
140 > cluster and cannot be mistaken for distorted cubic or liquid-like
141 > structures.
142  
143 + One may use these bond orientational order parameters as an averaged
144 + property to obtain the extent of icosahedral ordering in a supercooled
145 + liquid or cluster.  It is also possible to accumulate information
146 + about the {\it distributions} of local bond orientational order
147 + parameters, $p(\hat{W}_6)$ and $p(Q_6)$, which provide information
148 + about individual atomic sites that are central to local icosahedral
149 + structures.
150  
151 + The distributions of atomic $Q_6$ and $\hat{W}_6$ values are plotted
152 + as a function of temperature for our nanoparticles in figures
153 + \ref{fig:q6} and \ref{fig:w6}.   At high temperatures, the
154 + distributions are unstructured and are broadly distributed across the
155 + entire range of values.  As the particles are cooled, however, there
156 + is a dramatic increase in the fraction of atomic sites which have
157 + local icosahedral ordering around them.  (This corresponds to the
158 + sharp peak appearing in figure \ref{fig:w6} at $\hat{W}_6=-0.17$ and
159 + to the broad shoulder appearing in figure \ref{fig:q6} at $Q_6 =
160 + 0.663$.)
161 +
162 + \begin{figure}[htbp]
163 + \centering
164 + %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{images/w6fig.pdf}
165 + \caption{Distributions of the bond orientational order parameter
166 + ($\hat{W}_6$) at different temperatures.  The upper, middle, and lower
167 + panels are for 20, 30, and 40 \AA\ particles, respectively.  The
168 + left-hand column used cooling rates commensurate with a low
169 + interfacial conductance ($87.5 \times 10^{6}$
170 + $\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}}$), while the right-hand column used a more
171 + physically reasonable value of $117 \times 10^{6}$
172 + $\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}}$.  The peak at $\hat{W}_6 \approx -0.17$ is
173 + due to local icosahedral structures.}
174 + \label{fig:w6}
175 + \end{figure}
176 +
177 + \begin{figure}[htbp]
178 + \centering
179 + %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{images/q6fig.pdf}
180 + \caption{Distributions of the bond orientational order parameter
181 + ($Q_6$) at different temperatures.  The curves in the six panels in
182 + this figure were computed at identical conditions to the same panels in
183 + figure \ref{fig:w6}.}
184 + \label{fig:q6}
185 + \end{figure}
186 +
187 + We have also looked at the fraction of atomic centers which have local
188 + icosahedral order:
189 + \begin{equation}
190 + f_\textrm{icos} = \int_{-\infty}^{w_i} p(\hat{W}_6) d \hat{W}_6
191 + \label{eq:ficos}
192 + \end{equation}
193 + where $w_i$ is a cutoff value in $\hat{W}_6$ for atomic centers that
194 + are displaying icosahedral environments.  We have chosen a (somewhat
195 + arbitrary) value of $w_i= -0.15$ for the purposes of this work.  A
196 + plot of $f_\textrm{icos}(T)$ as a function of temperature of the
197 + particles is given in figure \ref{fig:ficos}.  As the particles cool,
198 + the fraction of local icosahedral ordering rises smoothly to a plateau
199 + value.  The larger particles (particularly the ones that were cooled
200 + in a lower viscosity solvent) show a lower tendency towards icosahedral
201 + ordering.
202 +
203 + \begin{figure}[htbp]
204 + \centering
205 + %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{images/ficos.pdf}
206 + \caption{Temperautre dependence of the fraction of atoms with local
207 + icosahedral ordering, $f_\textrm{icos}(T)$ for 20, 30, and 40 \AA\
208 + particles cooled at two different values of the interfacial
209 + conductance.}
210 + \label{fig:q6}
211 + \end{figure}
212 +
213 + Since we have atomic-level resolution of the local bond-orientational
214 + ordering information, we can also look at the local ordering as a
215 + function of the identities of the central atoms.  In figure
216 + \ref{fig:AgVsCu} we display the distributions of $\hat{W}_6$ values
217 + for both the silver and copper atoms, and we note a strong
218 + predilection for the copper atoms to be central to local icosahedral
219 + ordering.  This is probably due to local packing competition of the
220 + larger silver atoms around the copper, which would tend to favor
221 + icosahedral structures over the more densely packed cubic structures.
222 +
223 + \begin{figure}[htbp]
224 + \centering
225 + %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{images/AgVsCu.pdf}
226 + \caption{Distributions of the bond orientational order parameter
227 + ($\hat{W}_6$) for the two different elements present in the
228 + nanoparticles.  This distribution was taken from the fully-cooled 40
229 + \AA\ nanoparticle.  Local icosahedral ordering around copper atoms is
230 + much more prevalent than around silver atoms.}
231 + \label{fig:q6}
232 + \end{figure}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines