ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/nanoglass/analysis.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/nanoglass/analysis.tex (file contents):
Revision 3280 by chuckv, Thu Nov 29 23:03:56 2007 UTC vs.
Revision 3281 by gezelter, Fri Nov 30 19:59:38 2007 UTC

# Line 339 | Line 339 | the surface.}
339   the surface.}
340   \label{fig:Surface}
341   \end{figure}
342 <
343 < The methods used by Sheng, He, and Ma to estimate the glass transition
344 < temperature, $T_g$, in bulk Ag-Cu alloys involve finding
345 < discontinuities in the slope of the average atomic volume, $\langle V
346 < \rangle / N$, or enthalpy when plotted against the temperature of the
347 < alloy.  They obtained a bulk glass transition temperature, $T_g$ = 510
348 < K for a quenching rate of $2.5 \times 10^{13}$ K/s.
342 >
343 > Similar behavior has been observed by Luo {\it et al.} in their work
344 > on amorphous Ni-Ag alloys.  They used a common neighbor analysis (CNA)
345 > technique that identified icosahedral ordering from simulated
346 > structures that match experimental EXAFS spectra.  Their simulated
347 > structures exhibited icosahedral structures that were nearly always
348 > centered on the smaller Ni atoms in the sample.\cite{luo:145502}
349 > Details of the common neighbor analysis technique can be found in
350 > Sheng {\it et al.}'s work on the glass transition in bulk Ag-Cu
351 > alloys.\cite{sheng:184203}  In the bulk Ag-Cu alloys, high quench
352 > rates do lead to an increase in icosahedral ordering, although the
353 > onset is much more gradual than what we have observed in the
354 > bimetallic nanoparticles.
355  
356 < For simulations of nanoparticles, there is no periodic box, and
357 < therefore, no easy way to compute the volume exactly.  Instead, we
358 < estimate the volume of our nanoparticles using Barber {\it et al.}'s
359 < very fast quickhull algorithm to obtain the convex hull for the
360 < collection of 3-d coordinates of all of atoms at each point in
356 > Sheng {\it et al.} also estimated the glass transition temperature
357 > ($T_g$) in bulk Ag-Cu alloys involve by locating a discontinuity in
358 > the slope of the average atomic volume, $\langle V \rangle / N$, or
359 > enthalpy when plotted against the temperature of the alloy.  They
360 > obtained a bulk glass transition temperature, $T_g$ = 510 K for a
361 > quenching rate of $2.5 \times 10^{13}$ K/s.  For simulations of
362 > nanoparticles, there is no periodic box, and therefore no facile way
363 > of exactly computing the volume.  Instead, we estimate the volume of
364 > our nanoparticles using Barber {\it et al.}'s very fast quickhull
365 > algorithm to obtain the convex hull for the collection of 3-d
366 > coordinates of all of atoms at each point in
367   time.~\cite{Barber96,qhull} The convex hull is the smallest convex
368   polyhedron which includes all of the atoms, so the volume of this
369   polyhedron is an excellent estimate of the volume of the nanoparticle.
# Line 365 | Line 377 | the onset of icosahedral ordering exhibited in the bon
377   vs. temperature, we arrive at an estimate of $T_g$ that is
378   approximately 488 K.  We note that this temperature is somewhat below
379   the onset of icosahedral ordering exhibited in the bond orientational
380 < order parameters. It appears that icosahedral ordering sets in while
381 < the system is still somewhat fluid, and is locked in place once the
382 < temperature falls below $T_g$.  We did not observe any dependence of
383 < our estimates for $T_g$ on either the nanoparticle size or the value
384 < of the interfacial conductance.  However, the cooling rates and size
385 < ranges we utilized are all sampled from a relatively narrow range, and
386 < it is possible that much larger particles would have substantially
387 < different values for $T_g$.  Our estimates for the glass transition
388 < temperatures for all three particle sizes and both interfacial
389 < conductance values are shown in table \ref{table:Tg}.
380 > order parameters. It appears that icosahedral ordering is initiated
381 > while the system is still somewhat fluid, and is locked in place once
382 > the temperature falls below $T_g$.  We did not observe any dependence
383 > of our estimates for $T_g$ on either the nanoparticle size or the
384 > value of the interfacial conductance.  However, the cooling rates and
385 > size ranges we utilized are all sampled from a relatively narrow
386 > range, and it is possible that much larger particles would have
387 > substantially different values for $T_g$.  Our estimates for the glass
388 > transition temperatures for all three particle sizes and both
389 > interfacial conductance values are shown in table \ref{table:Tg}.
390  
391   \begin{table}
392 < \caption{Estimates of the glass transition temperatures $T_g$ for
392 > \caption{Estimates of the glass transition temperatures ($T_g$) for
393   three different sizes of bimetallic Ag$_6$Cu$_4$ nanoparticles cooled
394   under two different values of the interfacial conductance, $G$.}
395   \begin{center}
# Line 385 | Line 397 | Radius (\AA\ ) & Interfacial conductance & Effective c
397   \hline
398   \hline
399   Radius (\AA\ ) & Interfacial conductance & Effective cooling rate
400 < (K/s $\times 10^{13}$) &  & $T_g$ (K) \\
400 > ($\times 10^{13}$ K/s) &  $T_g$ (K) \\
401   20 & 87.5 & 2.4 & 477 \\
402   20 & 117  & 4.5 & 502 \\
403   30 & 87.5 & 1.3 & 491 \\

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines