ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/mdRipple/mdripple.tex
Revision: 3199
Committed: Thu Jul 26 19:47:06 2007 UTC (18 years ago) by gezelter
Content type: application/x-tex
File size: 29904 byte(s)
Log Message:
Edits

File Contents

# Content
1 %\documentclass[aps,pre,twocolumn,amssymb,showpacs,floatfix]{revtex4}
2 \documentclass[aps,pre,preprint,amssymb,showpacs]{revtex4}
3 \usepackage{amsmath}
4 \usepackage{amssymb}
5 \usepackage{graphicx}
6
7 \begin{document}
8 \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}
9 \renewcommand{\theequation}{\arabic{section}.\arabic{equation}}
10
11 %\bibliographystyle{aps}
12
13 \title{Dipolar Ordering in Molecular-scale Models of the Ripple Phase
14 in Lipid Membranes}
15 \author{Xiuquan Sun and J. Daniel Gezelter}
16 \email[E-mail:]{gezelter@nd.edu}
17 \affiliation{Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,\\
18 University of Notre Dame, \\
19 Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
20
21 \date{\today}
22
23 \begin{abstract}
24 The ripple phase in phosphatidylcholine (PC) bilayers has never been
25 completely explained.
26 \end{abstract}
27
28 \pacs{}
29 \maketitle
30
31 \section{Introduction}
32 \label{sec:Int}
33 Fully hydrated lipids will aggregate spontaneously to form bilayers
34 which exhibit a variety of phases depending on their temperatures and
35 compositions. Among these phases, a periodic rippled phase
36 ($P_{\beta'}$) appears as an intermediate phase between the gel
37 ($L_\beta$) and fluid ($L_{\alpha}$) phases for relatively pure
38 phosphatidylcholine (PC) bilayers. The ripple phase has attracted
39 substantial experimental interest over the past 30 years. Most
40 structural information of the ripple phase has been obtained by the
41 X-ray diffraction~\cite{Sun96,Katsaras00} and freeze-fracture electron
42 microscopy (FFEM).~\cite{Copeland80,Meyer96} Recently, Kaasgaard {\it
43 et al.} used atomic force microscopy (AFM) to observe ripple phase
44 morphology in bilayers supported on mica.~\cite{Kaasgaard03} The
45 experimental results provide strong support for a 2-dimensional
46 hexagonal packing lattice of the lipid molecules within the ripple
47 phase. This is a notable change from the observed lipid packing
48 within the gel phase.~\cite{Cevc87}
49
50 A number of theoretical models have been presented to explain the
51 formation of the ripple phase. Marder {\it et al.} used a
52 curvature-dependent Landau-de Gennes free-energy functional to predict
53 a rippled phase.~\cite{Marder84} This model and other related continuum
54 models predict higher fluidity in convex regions and that concave
55 portions of the membrane correspond to more solid-like regions.
56 Carlson and Sethna used a packing-competition model (in which head
57 groups and chains have competing packing energetics) to predict the
58 formation of a ripple-like phase. Their model predicted that the
59 high-curvature portions have lower-chain packing and correspond to
60 more fluid-like regions. Goldstein and Leibler used a mean-field
61 approach with a planar model for {\em inter-lamellar} interactions to
62 predict rippling in multilamellar phases.~\cite{Goldstein88} McCullough
63 and Scott proposed that the {\em anisotropy of the nearest-neighbor
64 interactions} coupled to hydrophobic constraining forces which
65 restrict height differences between nearest neighbors is the origin of
66 the ripple phase.~\cite{McCullough90} Lubensky and MacKintosh
67 introduced a Landau theory for tilt order and curvature of a single
68 membrane and concluded that {\em coupling of molecular tilt to membrane
69 curvature} is responsible for the production of
70 ripples.~\cite{Lubensky93} Misbah, Duplat and Houchmandzadeh proposed
71 that {\em inter-layer dipolar interactions} can lead to ripple
72 instabilities.~\cite{Misbah98} Heimburg presented a {\em coexistence
73 model} for ripple formation in which he postulates that fluid-phase
74 line defects cause sharp curvature between relatively flat gel-phase
75 regions.~\cite{Heimburg00} Kubica has suggested that a lattice model of
76 polar head groups could be valuable in trying to understand bilayer
77 phase formation.~\cite{Kubica02} Bannerjee used Monte Carlo simulations
78 of lamellar stacks of hexagonal lattices to show that large headgroups
79 and molecular tilt with respect to the membrane normal vector can
80 cause bulk rippling.~\cite{Bannerjee02}
81
82 In contrast, few large-scale molecular modelling studies have been
83 done due to the large size of the resulting structures and the time
84 required for the phases of interest to develop. With all-atom (and
85 even unified-atom) simulations, only one period of the ripple can be
86 observed and only for timescales in the range of 10-100 ns. One of
87 the most interesting molecular simulations was carried out by De Vries
88 {\it et al.}~\cite{deVries05}. According to their simulation results,
89 the ripple consists of two domains, one resembling the gel bilayer,
90 while in the other, the two leaves of the bilayer are fully
91 interdigitated. The mechanism for the formation of the ripple phase
92 suggested by their work is a packing competition between the head
93 groups and the tails of the lipid molecules.\cite{Carlson87} Recently,
94 the ripple phase has also been studied by Lenz and Schmid using Monte
95 Carlo simulations.\cite{Lenz07} Their structures are similar to the De
96 Vries {\it et al.} structures except that the connection between the
97 two leaves of the bilayer is a narrow interdigitated line instead of
98 the fully interdigitated domain. The symmetric ripple phase was also
99 observed by Lenz {\it et al.}, and their work supports other claims
100 that the mismatch between the size of the head group and tail of the
101 lipid molecules is the driving force for the formation of the ripple
102 phase. Ayton and Voth have found significant undulations in
103 zero-surface-tension states of membranes simulated via dissipative
104 particle dynamics, but their results are consistent with purely
105 thermal undulations.~\cite{Ayton02}
106
107 Although the organization of the tails of lipid molecules are
108 addressed by these molecular simulations and the packing competition
109 between headgroups and tails is strongly implicated as the primary
110 driving force for ripple formation, questions about the ordering of
111 the head groups in ripple phase has not been settled.
112
113 In a recent paper, we presented a simple ``web of dipoles'' spin
114 lattice model which provides some physical insight into relationship
115 between dipolar ordering and membrane buckling.\cite{Sun2007} We found
116 that dipolar elastic membranes can spontaneously buckle, forming
117 ripple-like topologies. The driving force for the buckling in dipolar
118 elastic membranes the antiferroelectric ordering of the dipoles, and
119 this was evident in the ordering of the dipole director axis
120 perpendicular to the wave vector of the surface ripples. A similiar
121 phenomenon has also been observed by Tsonchev {\it et al.} in their
122 work on the spontaneous formation of dipolar peptide chains into
123 curved nano-structures.\cite{Tsonchev04,Tsonchev04II}
124
125 In this paper, we construct a somewhat more realistic molecular-scale
126 lipid model than our previous ``web of dipoles'' and use molecular
127 dynamics simulations to elucidate the role of the head group dipoles
128 in the formation and morphology of the ripple phase. We describe our
129 model and computational methodology in section \ref{sec:method}.
130 Details on the simulations are presented in section
131 \ref{sec:experiment}, with results following in section
132 \ref{sec:results}. A final discussion of the role of dipolar heads in
133 the ripple formation can be found in section
134 \ref{sec:discussion}.
135
136 \section{Computational Model}
137 \label{sec:method}
138
139 \begin{figure}[htb]
140 \centering
141 \includegraphics[width=4in]{lipidModels}
142 \caption{Three different representations of DPPC lipid molecules,
143 including the chemical structure, an atomistic model, and the
144 head-body ellipsoidal coarse-grained model used in this
145 work.\label{fig:lipidModels}}
146 \end{figure}
147
148 Our simple molecular-scale lipid model for studying the ripple phase
149 is based on two facts: one is that the most essential feature of lipid
150 molecules is their amphiphilic structure with polar head groups and
151 non-polar tails. Another fact is that the majority of lipid molecules
152 in the ripple phase are relatively rigid (i.e. gel-like) which makes
153 some fraction of the details of the chain dynamics negligible. Figure
154 \ref{fig:lipidModels} shows the molecular strucure of a DPPC
155 molecule, as well as atomistic and molecular-scale representations of
156 a DPPC molecule. The hydrophilic character of the head group is
157 largely due to the separation of charge between the nitrogen and
158 phosphate groups. The zwitterionic nature of the PC headgroups leads
159 to abnormally large dipole moments (as high as 20.6 D), and this
160 strongly polar head group interacts strongly with the solvating water
161 layers immediately surrounding the membrane. The hydrophobic tail
162 consists of fatty acid chains. In our molecular scale model, lipid
163 molecules have been reduced to these essential features; the fatty
164 acid chains are represented by an ellipsoid with a dipolar ball
165 perched on one end to represent the effects of the charge-separated
166 head group. In real PC lipids, the direction of the dipole is
167 nearly perpendicular to the tail, so we have fixed the direction of
168 the point dipole rigidly in this orientation.
169
170 The ellipsoidal portions of the model interact via the Gay-Berne
171 potential which has seen widespread use in the liquid crystal
172 community. Ayton and Voth have also used Gay-Berne ellipsoids for
173 modelling large length-scale properties of lipid
174 bilayers.\cite{Ayton01} In its original form, the Gay-Berne potential
175 was a single site model for the interactions of rigid ellipsoidal
176 molecules.\cite{Gay81} It can be thought of as a modification of the
177 Gaussian overlap model originally described by Berne and
178 Pechukas.\cite{Berne72} The potential is constructed in the familiar
179 form of the Lennard-Jones function using orientation-dependent
180 $\sigma$ and $\epsilon$ parameters,
181 \begin{eqnarray*}
182 V_{ij}({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, {\mathbf{\hat u}_j}, {\mathbf{\hat
183 r}_{ij}}) = 4\epsilon ({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, {\mathbf{\hat u}_j},
184 {\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}})\left[\left(\frac{\sigma_0}{r_{ij}-\sigma({\mathbf{\hat u}_i},
185 {\mathbf{\hat u}_j}, {\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}})+\sigma_0}\right)^{12}
186 -\left(\frac{\sigma_0}{r_{ij}-\sigma({\mathbf{\hat u}_i}, {\mathbf{\hat u}_j},
187 {\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}})+\sigma_0}\right)^6\right]
188 \label{eq:gb}
189 \end{eqnarray*}
190
191 The range $(\sigma({\bf \hat{u}}_{i},{\bf \hat{u}}_{j},{\bf
192 \hat{r}}_{ij}))$, and strength $(\epsilon({\bf \hat{u}}_{i},{\bf
193 \hat{u}}_{j},{\bf \hat{r}}_{ij}))$ parameters
194 are dependent on the relative orientations of the two molecules (${\bf
195 \hat{u}}_{i},{\bf \hat{u}}_{j}$) as well as the direction of the
196 intermolecular separation (${\bf \hat{r}}_{ij}$). $\sigma$ and
197 $\sigma_0$ are also governed by shape mixing and anisotropy variables,
198 \begin {equation}
199 \begin{array}{rcl}
200 \sigma_0 & = & \sqrt{d_i^2 + d_j^2} \\ \\
201 \chi & = & \left[ \frac{\left( l_i^2 - d_i^2 \right) \left(l_j^2 -
202 d_j^2 \right)}{\left( l_j^2 + d_i^2 \right) \left(l_i^2 +
203 d_j^2 \right)}\right]^{1/2} \\ \\
204 \alpha^2 & = & \left[ \frac{\left( l_i^2 - d_i^2 \right) \left(l_j^2 +
205 d_i^2 \right)}{\left( l_j^2 - d_j^2 \right) \left(l_i^2 +
206 d_j^2 \right)}\right]^{1/2},
207 \end{array}
208 \end{equation}
209 where $l$ and $d$ describe the length and width of each uniaxial
210 ellipsoid. These shape anisotropy parameters can then be used to
211 calculate the range function,
212 \begin {equation}
213 \sigma({\bf \hat{u}}_{i},{\bf \hat{u}}_{j},{\bf \hat{r}}_{ij}) = \sigma_{0}
214 \left[ 1- \left\{ \frac{ \chi \alpha^2 ({\bf \hat{u}}_i \cdot {\bf
215 \hat{r}}_{ij} ) + \chi \alpha^{-2} ({\bf \hat{u}}_j \cdot {\bf
216 \hat{r}}_{ij} ) - 2 \chi^2 ({\bf \hat{u}}_i \cdot {\bf
217 \hat{r}}_{ij} )({\bf \hat{u}}_j \cdot {\bf
218 \hat{r}}_{ij} ) ({\bf \hat{u}}_i \cdot {\bf \hat{u}}_j)}{1 - \chi^2
219 \left({\bf \hat{u}}_i \cdot {\bf \hat{u}}_j\right)^2} \right\}
220 \right]^{-1/2}
221 \end{equation}
222
223 Gay-Berne ellipsoids also have an energy scaling parameter,
224 $\epsilon^s$, which describes the well depth for two identical
225 ellipsoids in a {\it side-by-side} configuration. Additionaly, a well
226 depth aspect ratio, $\epsilon^r = \epsilon^e / \epsilon^s$, describes
227 the ratio between the well depths in the {\it end-to-end} and
228 side-by-side configurations. As in the range parameter, a set of
229 mixing and anisotropy variables can be used to describe the well
230 depths for dissimilar particles,
231 \begin {eqnarray*}
232 \epsilon_0 & = & \sqrt{\epsilon^s_i * \epsilon^s_j} \\ \\
233 \epsilon^r & = & \sqrt{\epsilon^r_i * \epsilon^r_j} \\ \\
234 \chi' & = & \frac{1 - (\epsilon^r)^{1/\mu}}{1 + (\epsilon^r)^{1/\mu}}
235 \\ \\
236 \alpha'^2 & = & \left[1 + (\epsilon^r)^{1/\mu}\right]^{-1}
237 \end{eqnarray*}
238 The form of the strength function is somewhat complicated,
239 \begin {eqnarray*}
240 \epsilon({\bf \hat{u}}_{i}, {\bf \hat{u}}_{j},{\bf \hat{r}}_{ij}) & = &
241 \epsilon_{0} \epsilon_{1}^{\nu}({\bf \hat{u}}_{i}.{\bf \hat{u}}_{j})
242 \epsilon_{2}^{\mu}({\bf \hat{u}}_{i},{\bf \hat{u}}_{j},{\bf
243 \hat{r}}_{ij}) \\ \\
244 \epsilon_{1}({\bf \hat{u}}_{i},{\bf \hat{u}}_{j}) & = &
245 \left[1-\chi^{2}({\bf \hat{u}}_{i}.{\bf
246 \hat{u}}_{j})^{2}\right]^{-1/2} \\ \\
247 \epsilon_{2}({\bf \hat{u}}_{i},{\bf \hat{u}}_{j},{\bf \hat{r}}_{ij}) &
248 = &
249 1 - \left\{ \frac{ \chi' \alpha'^2 ({\bf \hat{u}}_i \cdot {\bf
250 \hat{r}}_{ij} ) + \chi' \alpha'^{-2} ({\bf \hat{u}}_j \cdot {\bf
251 \hat{r}}_{ij} ) - 2 \chi'^2 ({\bf \hat{u}}_i \cdot {\bf
252 \hat{r}}_{ij} )({\bf \hat{u}}_j \cdot {\bf
253 \hat{r}}_{ij} ) ({\bf \hat{u}}_i \cdot {\bf \hat{u}}_j)}{1 - \chi'^2
254 \left({\bf \hat{u}}_i \cdot {\bf \hat{u}}_j\right)^2} \right\},
255 \end {eqnarray*}
256 although many of the quantities and derivatives are identical with
257 those obtained for the range parameter. Ref. \onlinecite{Luckhurst90}
258 has a particularly good explanation of the choice of the Gay-Berne
259 parameters $\mu$ and $\nu$ for modeling liquid crystal molecules. An
260 excellent overview of the computational methods that can be used to
261 efficiently compute forces and torques for this potential can be found
262 in Ref. \onlinecite{Golubkov06}
263
264 The choices of parameters we have used in this study correspond to a
265 shape anisotropy of 3 for the chain portion of the molecule. In
266 principle, this could be varied to allow for modeling of longer or
267 shorter chain lipid molecules. For these prolate ellipsoids, we have:
268 \begin{equation}
269 \begin{array}{rcl}
270 d & < & l \\
271 \epsilon^{r} & < & 1
272 \end{array}
273 \end{equation}
274
275 \begin{figure}[htb]
276 \centering
277 \includegraphics[width=4in]{2lipidModel}
278 \caption{The parameters defining the behavior of the lipid
279 models. $l / d$ is the ratio of the head group to body diameter.
280 Molecular bodies had a fixed aspect ratio of 3.0. The solvent model
281 was a simplified 4-water bead ($\sigma_w \approx d$) that has been
282 used in other coarse-grained (DPD) simulations. The dipolar strength
283 (and the temperature and pressure) were the only other parameters that
284 were varied systematically.\label{fig:lipidModel}}
285 \end{figure}
286
287 To take into account the permanent dipolar interactions of the
288 zwitterionic head groups, we place fixed dipole moments $\mu_{i}$ at
289 one end of the Gay-Berne particles. The dipoles are oriented at an
290 angle $\theta = \pi / 2$ relative to the major axis. These dipoles
291 are protected by a head ``bead'' with a range parameter which we have
292 varied between $1.20 d$ and $1.41 d$. The head groups interact with
293 each other using a combination of Lennard-Jones,
294 \begin{eqnarray*}
295 V_{ij} = 4\epsilon \left[\left(\frac{\sigma_h}{r_{ij}}\right)^{12} -
296 \left(\frac{\sigma_h}{r_{ij}}\right)^6\right],
297 \end{eqnarray*}
298 and dipole-dipole,
299 \begin{eqnarray*}
300 V_{ij} = \frac{|\mu|^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r_{ij}^3}
301 \left[ \hat{\bf u}_i \cdot \hat{\bf u}_j - 3 (\hat{\bf u}_i \cdot
302 \hat{\bf r}_{ij})(\hat{\bf u}_j \cdot \hat{\bf r}_{ij}) \right]
303 \end{eqnarray*}
304 potentials.
305 In these potentials, $\mathbf{\hat u}_i$ is the unit vector pointing
306 along dipole $i$ and $\mathbf{\hat r}_{ij}$ is the unit vector
307 pointing along the inter-dipole vector $\mathbf{r}_{ij}$.
308
309 For the interaction between nonequivalent uniaxial ellipsoids (in this
310 case, between spheres and ellipsoids), the spheres are treated as
311 ellipsoids with an aspect ratio of 1 ($d = l$) and with an well depth
312 ratio of 1 ($\epsilon^e = \epsilon^s$). The form of the Gay-Berne
313 potential we are using was generalized by Cleaver {\it et al.} and is
314 appropriate for dissimilar uniaxial ellipsoids.\cite{Cleaver96}
315
316 The solvent model in our simulations is identical to one used by
317 Marrink {\it et al.} in their dissipative particle dynamics (DPD)
318 simulation of lipid bilayers.\cite{Marrink04} This solvent bead is a single
319 site that represents four water molecules (m = 72 amu) and has
320 comparable density and diffusive behavior to liquid water. However,
321 since there are no electrostatic sites on these beads, this solvent
322 model cannot replicate the dielectric properties of water.
323 \begin{table*}
324 \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
325 \begin{center}
326 \caption{Potential parameters used for molecular-scale coarse-grained
327 lipid simulations}
328 \begin{tabular}{llccc}
329 \hline
330 & & Head & Chain & Solvent \\
331 \hline
332 $d$ (\AA) & & varied & 4.6 & 4.7 \\
333 $l$ (\AA) & & 1 & 3 & 1 \\
334 $\epsilon^s$ (kcal/mol) & & 0.185 & 1.0 & 0.8 \\
335 $\epsilon_r$ (well-depth aspect ratio)& & 1 & 0.2 & 1 \\
336 $m$ (amu) & & 196 & 760 & 72.06112 \\
337 $\overleftrightarrow{\mathsf I}$ (amu \AA$^2$) & & & & \\
338 \multicolumn{2}c{$I_{xx}$} & 1125 & 45000 & N/A \\
339 \multicolumn{2}c{$I_{yy}$} & 1125 & 45000 & N/A \\
340 \multicolumn{2}c{$I_{zz}$} & 0 & 9000 & N/A \\
341 $\mu$ (Debye) & & varied & 0 & 0 \\
342 \end{tabular}
343 \label{tab:parameters}
344 \end{center}
345 \end{minipage}
346 \end{table*}
347
348 A switching function has been applied to all potentials to smoothly
349 turn off the interactions between a range of $22$ and $25$ \AA.
350
351 \section{Experimental Methodology}
352 \label{sec:experiment}
353
354 To create unbiased bilayers, all simulations were started from two
355 perfectly flat monolayers separated by a 20 \AA\ gap between the
356 molecular bodies of the upper and lower leaves. The separated
357 monolayers were evolved in a vaccum with $x-y$ anisotropic pressure
358 coupling. The length of $z$ axis of the simulations was fixed and a
359 constant surface tension was applied to enable real fluctuations of
360 the bilayer. Periodic boundaries were used, and $480-720$ lipid
361 molecules were present in the simulations depending on the size of the
362 head beads. The two monolayers spontaneously collapse into bilayer
363 structures within 100 ps, and following this collapse, all systems
364 were equlibrated for $100$ ns at $300$ K.
365
366 The resulting structures were then solvated at a ratio of $6$ DPD
367 solvent beads (24 water molecules) per lipid. These configurations
368 were then equilibrated for another $30$ ns. All simulations with
369 solvent were carried out at constant pressure ($P=1$ atm) by $3$D
370 anisotropic coupling, and constant surface tension ($\gamma=0.015$
371 UNIT). Given the absence of fast degrees of freedom in this model, a
372 timestep of $50$ fs was utilized. Data collection for structural
373 properties of the bilayers was carried out during a final 5 ns run
374 following the solvent equilibration. All simulations were performed
375 using the OOPSE molecular modeling program.\cite{Meineke05}
376
377 \section{Results}
378 \label{sec:results}
379
380 Snapshots in Figure \ref{fig:phaseCartoon} show that the membrane is
381 more corrugated increasing size of the head groups. The surface is
382 nearly flat when $\sigma_h=1.20\sigma_0$. With
383 $\sigma_h=1.28\sigma_0$, although the surface is still flat, the
384 bilayer starts to splay inward; the upper leaf of the bilayer is
385 connected to the lower leaf with an interdigitated line defect. Two
386 periodicities with $100$ \AA\ width were observed in the
387 simulation. This structure is very similiar to the structure observed
388 by de Vries and Lenz {\it et al.}. The same basic structure is also
389 observed when $\sigma_h=1.41\sigma_0$, but the wavelength of the
390 surface corrugations depends sensitively on the size of the ``head''
391 beads. From the undulation spectrum, the corrugation is clearly
392 non-thermal.
393 \begin{figure}[htb]
394 \centering
395 \includegraphics[width=4in]{phaseCartoon}
396 \caption{A sketch to discribe the structure of the phases observed in
397 our simulations.\label{fig:phaseCartoon}}
398 \end{figure}
399
400 When $\sigma_h=1.35\sigma_0$, we observed another corrugated surface
401 morphology. This structure is different from the asymmetric rippled
402 surface; there is no interdigitation between the upper and lower
403 leaves of the bilayer. Each leaf of the bilayer is broken into several
404 hemicylinderical sections, and opposite leaves are fitted together
405 much like roof tiles. Unlike the surface in which the upper
406 hemicylinder is always interdigitated on the leading or trailing edge
407 of lower hemicylinder, the symmetric ripple has no prefered direction.
408 The corresponding cartoons are shown in Figure
409 \ref{fig:phaseCartoon} for elucidation of the detailed structures of
410 different phases. Figure \ref{fig:phaseCartoon} (a) is the flat phase,
411 (b) is the asymmetric ripple phase corresponding to the lipid
412 organization when $\sigma_h=1.28\sigma_0$ and $\sigma_h=1.41\sigma_0$,
413 and (c) is the symmetric ripple phase observed when
414 $\sigma_h=1.35\sigma_0$. In symmetric ripple phase, the bilayer is
415 continuous everywhere on the whole membrane, however, in asymmetric
416 ripple phase, the bilayer is intermittent domains connected by thin
417 interdigitated monolayer which consists of upper and lower leaves of
418 the bilayer.
419 \begin{table*}
420 \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
421 \begin{center}
422 \caption{}
423 \begin{tabular}{lccc}
424 \hline
425 $\sigma_h/\sigma_0$ & type of phase & $\lambda/\sigma_0$ & $A/\sigma_0$\\
426 \hline
427 1.20 & flat & N/A & N/A \\
428 1.28 & asymmetric flat & 21.7 & N/A \\
429 1.35 & symmetric ripple & 17.2 & 2.2 \\
430 1.41 & asymmetric ripple & 15.4 & 1.5 \\
431 \end{tabular}
432 \label{tab:property}
433 \end{center}
434 \end{minipage}
435 \end{table*}
436
437 The membrane structures and the reduced wavelength $\lambda/\sigma_0$,
438 reduced amplitude $A/\sigma_0$ of the ripples are summerized in Table
439 \ref{tab:property}. The wavelength range is $15~21$ and the amplitude
440 is $1.5$ for asymmetric ripple and $2.2$ for symmetric ripple. These
441 values are consistent to the experimental results. Note, the
442 amplitudes are underestimated without the melted tails in our
443 simulations.
444
445 \begin{figure}[htb]
446 \centering
447 \includegraphics[width=4in]{topDown}
448 \caption{Top views of the flat (upper), asymmetric ripple (middle),
449 and symmetric ripple (lower) phases. Note that the head-group dipoles
450 have formed head-to-tail chains in all three of these phases, but in
451 the two rippled phases, the dipolar chains are all aligned
452 {\it perpendicular} to the direction of the ripple. The flat membrane
453 has multiple point defects in the dipolar orientational ordering, and
454 the dipolar ordering on the lower leaf of the bilayer can be in a
455 different direction from the upper leaf.\label{fig:topView}}
456 \end{figure}
457
458 The $P_2$ order paramters (for molecular bodies and head group
459 dipoles) have been calculated to clarify the ordering in these phases
460 quantatively. $P_2=1$ means a perfectly ordered structure, and $P_2=0$
461 implies orientational randomization. Figure \ref{fig:rP2} shows the
462 $P_2$ order paramter of the dipoles on head group rising with
463 increasing head group size. When the heads of the lipid molecules are
464 small, the membrane is flat. The dipolar ordering is essentially
465 frustrated on orientational ordering in this circumstance. Figure
466 \ref{fig:topView} shows the snapshots of the top view for the flat system
467 ($\sigma_h=1.20\sigma$) and rippled system
468 ($\sigma_h=1.41\sigma$). The pointing direction of the dipoles on the
469 head groups are represented by two colored half spheres from blue to
470 yellow. For flat surfaces, the system obviously shows frustration on
471 the dipolar ordering, there are kinks on the edge of defferent
472 domains. Another reason is that the lipids can move independently in
473 each monolayer, it is not nessasory for the direction of dipoles on
474 one leaf is consistant to another layer, which makes total order
475 parameter is relatively low. With increasing head group size, the
476 surface is corrugated, and dipoles do not move as freely on the
477 surface. Therefore, the translational freedom of lipids in one layer
478 is dependent upon the position of lipids in another layer, as a
479 result, the symmetry of the dipoles on head group in one layer is tied
480 to the symmetry in the other layer. Furthermore, as the membrane
481 deforms from two to three dimensions due to the corrugation, the
482 symmetry of the ordering for the dipoles embedded on each leaf is
483 broken. The dipoles then self-assemble in a head-tail configuration,
484 and the order parameter increases dramaticaly. However, the total
485 polarization of the system is still close to zero. This is strong
486 evidence that the corrugated structure is an antiferroelectric
487 state. From the snapshot in Figure \ref{}, the dipoles arrange as
488 arrays along $Y$ axis and fall into head-to-tail configuration in each
489 line, but every $3$ or $4$ lines of dipoles change their direction
490 from neighbour lines. The system shows antiferroelectric
491 charactoristic as a whole. The orientation of the dipolar is always
492 perpendicular to the ripple wave vector. These results are consistent
493 with our previous study on dipolar membranes.
494
495 The ordering of the tails is essentially opposite to the ordering of
496 the dipoles on head group. The $P_2$ order parameter decreases with
497 increasing head size. This indicates the surface is more curved with
498 larger head groups. When the surface is flat, all tails are pointing
499 in the same direction; in this case, all tails are parallel to the
500 normal of the surface,(making this structure remindcent of the
501 $L_{\beta}$ phase. Increasing the size of the heads, results in
502 rapidly decreasing $P_2$ ordering for the molecular bodies.
503
504 \begin{figure}[htb]
505 \centering
506 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{rP2}
507 \caption{The $P_2$ order parameter as a funtion of the ratio of
508 $\sigma_h$ to $\sigma_0$.\label{fig:rP2}}
509 \end{figure}
510
511 We studied the effects of the interactions between head groups on the
512 structure of lipid bilayer by changing the strength of the dipole.
513 Figure \ref{fig:sP2} shows how the $P_2$ order parameter changes with
514 increasing strength of the dipole. Generally the dipoles on the head
515 group are more ordered by increase in the strength of the interaction
516 between heads and are more disordered by decreasing the interaction
517 stength. When the interaction between the heads is weak enough, the
518 bilayer structure does not persist; all lipid molecules are solvated
519 directly in the water. The critial value of the strength of the dipole
520 depends on the head size. The perfectly flat surface melts at $5$
521 $0.03$ debye, the asymmetric rippled surfaces melt at $8$ $0.04$
522 $0.03$ debye, the symmetric rippled surfaces melt at $10$ $0.04$
523 debye. The ordering of the tails is the same as the ordering of the
524 dipoles except for the flat phase. Since the surface is already
525 perfect flat, the order parameter does not change much until the
526 strength of the dipole is $15$ debye. However, the order parameter
527 decreases quickly when the strength of the dipole is further
528 increased. The head groups of the lipid molecules are brought closer
529 by stronger interactions between them. For a flat surface, a large
530 amount of free volume between the head groups is available, but when
531 the head groups are brought closer, the tails will splay outward,
532 forming an inverse micelle. When $\sigma_h=1.28\sigma_0$, the $P_2$
533 order parameter decreases slightly after the strength of the dipole is
534 increased to $16$ debye. For rippled surfaces, there is less free
535 volume available between the head groups. Therefore there is little
536 effect on the structure of the membrane due to increasing dipolar
537 strength. However, the increase of the $P_2$ order parameter implies
538 the membranes are flatten by the increase of the strength of the
539 dipole. Unlike other systems that melt directly when the interaction
540 is weak enough, for $\sigma_h=1.41\sigma_0$, part of the membrane
541 melts into itself first. The upper leaf of the bilayer becomes totally
542 interdigitated with the lower leaf. This is different behavior than
543 what is exhibited with the interdigitated lines in the rippled phase
544 where only one interdigitated line connects the two leaves of bilayer.
545 \begin{figure}[htb]
546 \centering
547 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{sP2}
548 \caption{The $P_2$ order parameter as a funtion of the strength of the
549 dipole.\label{fig:sP2}}
550 \end{figure}
551
552 Figure \ref{fig:tP2} shows the dependence of the order parameter on
553 temperature. The behavior of the $P_2$ order paramter is
554 straightforward. Systems are more ordered at low temperature, and more
555 disordered at high temperatures. When the temperature is high enough,
556 the membranes are instable. For flat surfaces ($\sigma_h=1.20\sigma_0$
557 and $\sigma_h=1.28\sigma_0$), when the temperature is increased to
558 $310$, the $P_2$ order parameter increases slightly instead of
559 decreases like ripple surface. This is an evidence of the frustration
560 of the dipolar ordering in each leaf of the lipid bilayer, at low
561 temperature, the systems are locked in a local minimum energy state,
562 with increase of the temperature, the system can jump out the local
563 energy well to find the lower energy state which is the longer range
564 orientational ordering. Like the dipolar ordering of the flat
565 surfaces, the ordering of the tails of the lipid molecules for ripple
566 membranes ($\sigma_h=1.35\sigma_0$ and $\sigma_h=1.41\sigma_0$) also
567 show some nonthermal characteristic. With increase of the temperature,
568 the $P_2$ order parameter decreases firstly, and increases afterward
569 when the temperature is greater than $290 K$. The increase of the
570 $P_2$ order parameter indicates a more ordered structure for the tails
571 of the lipid molecules which corresponds to a more flat surface. Since
572 our model lacks the detailed information on lipid tails, we can not
573 simulate the fluid phase with melted fatty acid chains. Moreover, the
574 formation of the tilted $L_{\beta'}$ phase also depends on the
575 organization of fatty groups on tails.
576 \begin{figure}[htb]
577 \centering
578 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{tP2}
579 \caption{The $P_2$ order parameter as a funtion of
580 temperature.\label{fig:tP2}}
581 \end{figure}
582
583 \section{Discussion}
584 \label{sec:discussion}
585
586 \newpage
587 \bibliography{mdripple}
588 \end{document}