matt_papers/canidacy_paper/%23canidacy_paper.tex%23

\documentclass[11pt]{article}

\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{color}
\usepackage{floatflt}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{subfigure}
\usepackage{palatino}
\usepackage[ref]{overcite}


\pagestyle{plain}
\pagenumbering{arabic}
\oddsidemargin 0.0cm \evensidemargin 0.0cm
\topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt
\textheight 9.0in \textwidth 6.5in
\brokenpenalty=10000
\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.2}
\renewcommand\citemid{\ } % no comma in optional reference note


\begin{document}


\title{A Mesoscale Model for Phospholipid Simulations}

\author{Matthew A. Meineke\\
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\
University of Notre Dame\\
Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}

\date{\today}
\maketitle

\section{Background and Research Goals}

Simulations of phospholipid bilayers are, by necessity, quite
complex. The lipid molecules are large molecules containing many
atoms, and the head group of the lipid will typically contain charge
separated ions which set up a large dipole within the molecule. Adding
to the complexity are the number of water molecules needed to properly
solvate the lipid bilayer, typically 25 water molecules for every
lipid molecule. Because of these factors, many current simulations are
limited in both length and time scale due to to the sheer number of
calculations performed at every time step and the lifetime of the
researcher. A typical
simulation\cite{saiz02,lindahl00,venable00,Marrink01} will have around
64 phospholipids forming a bilayer approximately 40~$\mbox{\AA}$ by
50~$\mbox{\AA}$ with roughly 25 waters for every lipid. This means
there are on the order of 8,000 atoms needed to simulate these systems
and the trajectories are integrated for times up to 10 ns. 

These limitations make it difficult to study certain biologically
interesting phenomena that don't fit within the short time and length
scale requirements. One such phenomenon is the existence of the ripple
phase ($P_{\beta'}$) of the bilayer between the gel phase
($L_{\beta'}$) and the fluid phase ($L_{\alpha}$). The $P_{\beta'}$
phase has been shown to have a ripple period of
100-200~$\mbox{\AA}$.\cite{katsaras00,sengupta00} A simulation of this
length scale would require approximately 1,300 lipid molecules and
roughly 25 waters for every lipid to fully solvate the bilayer. With
the large number of atoms involved in a simulation of this magnitude,
steps \emph{must} be taken to simplify the system to the point where
the numbers of atoms becomes reasonable.

Another system of interest would be drug molecule diffusion through
the membrane. Due to the fluid-like properties of a lipid membrane,
not all diffusion takes place at membrane channels. It is of interest
to study certain molecules that may incorporate themselves directly
into the membrane. These molecules may then have an appreciable
waiting time (on the order of nanoseconds) within the
bilayer. Simulation of such a long time scale again requires
simplification of the system in order to lower the number of
calculations needed at each time step or to increase the length of
each time step.


\section{Methodology}

\subsection{Length and Time Scale Simplifications}

The length scale simplifications are aimed at increasing the number of
molecules that can be simulated without drastically increasing the
computational cost of the simulation. This is done through a
combination of substituting less expensive interactions for expensive
ones and decreasing the number of interaction sites per
molecule. Namely, groups of point charges are replaced with single
point-dipoles, and unified atoms are used in place of water,
phospholipid head groups, and alkyl groups.

The replacement of charges with dipoles allows us to replace an
interaction that has a relatively long range ($\frac{1}{r}$ for the
coulomb potential) with that of a relatively short range
($\frac{1}{r^{3}}$ for dipole - dipole potentials). Combined with
Verlet neighbor lists,\cite{allen87:csl} this should result in an
algorithm which scales linearly with increasing system size. This is
in comparison to the Ewald sum\cite{leach01:mm} needed to compute
periodic replicas of the coulomb interactions, which scales at
best\cite{darden93:pme} by $N \ln N$.

The second step taken to simplify the number of calculations is to
incorporate unified models for groups of atoms. In the case of water,
we use the soft sticky dipole (SSD) model developed by
Ichiye\cite{liu96:new_model,liu96:monte_carlo,chandra99:ssd_md}
(Section~\ref{sec:ssdModel}). For the phospholipids, a unified head
atom with a dipole will replace the atoms in the head group, while
unified $\text{CH}_2$ and $\text{CH}_3$ atoms will replace the alkyl
units in the tails (Section~\ref{sec:lipidModel}). This model is
similar in practice to that of Lipowsky and Goetz\cite{goetz98}, where
the whole system is reduced to attractive and repulsive Lennard-Jones
spheres. However, our model gives a greater level of detail to each
unified molecule, namely through dipole, bend, and torsion
interactions.

The time scale simplifications are introduced so that we can take
longer time steps. By increasing the size of the time steps taken by
the simulation, we are able to integrate a given length of time using
fewer calculations. However, care must be taken that any
simplifications used still conserve the total energy of the
simulation. In practice, this means taking steps small enough to
resolve all motion in the system without accidently moving an object
too far along a repulsive energy surface before it feels the effect of
the surface.

In our simulation we have chosen to constrain all bonds to be of fixed
length. This means the bonds are no longer allowed to vibrate about
their equilibrium positions. Bond vibrations are typically the fastest
periodic motion in a dynamics simulation. By taking this action, we
are able to take time steps of 3 fs while still maintaining constant
energy. This is in contrast to the 1 fs time step typically needed to
conserve energy when bonds lengths are allowed to oscillate.

\subsection{The Soft Sticky Dipole Water Model}
\label{sec:ssdModel}

\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=50mm]{ssd.epsi}
\caption{The SSD model with the oxygen and hydrogen atoms drawn in for reference.}
\label{fig:ssdModel}
\end{figure} 

The water model used in our simulations is a modified soft
Stockmayer-sphere model.\cite{stevens95} Like the Stockmayer-sphere, the SSD
model consists of a Lennard-Jones interaction site and a
dipole both located at the water's center of mass (Figure
\ref{fig:ssdModel}). However, the SSD model extends this by adding a
tetrahedral potential to correct for hydrogen bonding.

The SSD water potential for a pair of water molecules is then given by
the following equation:
\begin{equation}
V_{\text{SSD}} = V_{\text{LJ}}(r_{i\!j}) + V_{\text{dp}}(\mathbf{r}_{i\!j},
        \boldsymbol{\Omega}_{i},\boldsymbol{\Omega}_{j})
        + V_{\text{sp}}(\mathbf{r}_{i\!j},\boldsymbol{\Omega}_{i},
        \boldsymbol{\Omega}_{j})
\label{eq:ssdTotPot}
\end{equation}
where $\mathbf{r}_{ij}$ is the vector between molecules $i$ and $j$,
and $\boldsymbol{\Omega}_i$ and $\boldsymbol{\Omega}_j$ are the
Euler angles of molecule $i$ or $j$ respectively. $V_{\text{LJ}}$ is
the Lennard-Jones potential:
\begin{equation}
V_{\text{LJ}} = 
        4\epsilon_{ij} \biggl[
        \biggl(\frac{\sigma_{ij}}{r_{ij}}\biggr)^{12}
        - \biggl(\frac{\sigma_{ij}}{r_{ij}}\biggr)^{6}
        \biggr]
\label{eq:lennardJonesPot}
\end{equation}
where $\sigma_{ij}$ scales the length of the interaction, and
$\epsilon_{ij}$ scales the energy of the potential. For SSD,
$\sigma_{\text{SSD}} = 3.051 \mbox{
\AA}$ and $\epsilon_{\text{SSD}} = 0.152\text{ kcal/mol}$.
$V_{\text{dp}}$ is the dipole potential:
\begin{equation}
V_{\text{dp}}(\mathbf{r}_{ij},\boldsymbol{\Omega}_{i},
        \boldsymbol{\Omega}_{j}) = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}} \biggl[
        \frac{\boldsymbol{\mu}_{i} \cdot \boldsymbol{\mu}_{j}}{r^{3}_{ij}}
        -
        \frac{3(\boldsymbol{\mu}_i \cdot \mathbf{r}_{ij}) %
                (\boldsymbol{\mu}_j \cdot \mathbf{r}_{ij}) }
                {r^{5}_{ij}} \biggr]
\label{eq:dipolePot}
\end{equation}
where $\boldsymbol{\mu}_i$ is the dipole vector of molecule $i$,
$\boldsymbol{\mu}_i$ points along the z-axis in the body fixed
frame. This frame is then oriented in space by the Euler angles,
$\boldsymbol{\Omega}_i$. The SSD model specifies a dipole magnitude of
2.35~D for water.

The hydrogen bonding is modeled by the $V_{\text{sp}}$
term of the potential. Its form is as follows:
\begin{equation}
V_{\text{sp}}(\mathbf{r}_{i\!j},\boldsymbol{\Omega}_{i},
        \boldsymbol{\Omega}_{j}) =
        v^{\circ}[s(r_{ij})w_{ij}(\mathbf{r}_{ij},\boldsymbol{\Omega}_{i},
                \boldsymbol{\Omega}_{j})
        +
        s'(r_{ij})w^{x}_{ij}(\mathbf{r}_{ij},\boldsymbol{\Omega}_{i},
                \boldsymbol{\Omega}_{j})]
\label{eq:spPot}
\end{equation}
Where $v^\circ$ scales strength of the interaction.
$w_{ij}(\mathbf{r}_{ij},\boldsymbol{\Omega}_{i},\boldsymbol{\Omega}_{j})$
and
$w^{x}_{ij}(\mathbf{r}_{ij},\boldsymbol{\Omega}_{i},\boldsymbol{\Omega}_{j})$
are responsible for the tetrahedral potential and a correction to the
tetrahedral potential respectively. They are,
\begin{equation}
w_{ij}(\mathbf{r}_{ij},\boldsymbol{\Omega}_{i},\boldsymbol{\Omega}_{j}) =
        \sin\theta_{ij} \sin 2\theta_{ij} \cos 2\phi_{ij}
        + \sin \theta_{ji} \sin 2\theta_{ji} \cos 2\phi_{ji}
\label{eq:spPot2}
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}
\begin{split}
w^{x}_{ij}(\mathbf{r}_{ij},\boldsymbol{\Omega}_{i},\boldsymbol{\Omega}_{j}) =
        &(\cos\theta_{ij}-0.6)^2(\cos\theta_{ij} + 0.8)^2 \\
        &+ (\cos\theta_{ji}-0.6)^2(\cos\theta_{ji} + 0.8)^2 - 2w^{\circ}
\end{split}
\label{eq:spCorrection}
\end{equation}
The angles $\theta_{ij}$ and $\phi_{ij}$ are defined by the spherical
coordinates of the position of molecule $j$ in the reference frame
fixed on molecule $i$ with the z-axis aligned with the dipole moment.
The correction
$w^{x}_{ij}(\mathbf{r}_{ij},\boldsymbol{\Omega}_{i},\boldsymbol{\Omega}_{j})$
is needed because
$w_{ij}(\mathbf{r}_{ij},\boldsymbol{\Omega}_{i},\boldsymbol{\Omega}_{j})$
vanishes when $\theta_{ij}$ is $0^\circ$ or $180^\circ$.

Finally, the sticky potential is scaled by a switching function,
$s(r_{ij})$, that scales smoothly between 0 and 1. It is represented
by:
\begin{equation}
s(r_{ij}) = 
        \begin{cases}
        1&      \text{if $r_{ij} < r_{L}$}, \\
        \frac{(r_{U} - r_{ij})^2 (r_{U} + 2r_{ij} 
                - 3r_{L})}{(r_{U}-r_{L})^3}&
                \text{if $r_{L} \leq r_{ij} \leq r_{U}$},\\
        0&      \text{if $r_{ij} \geq r_{U}$}.
        \end{cases}
\label{eq:spCutoff}
\end{equation}

Despite the apparent complexity of Equation \ref{eq:spPot}, the SSD
model is still computationally inexpensive. This is due to Equation
\ref{eq:spCutoff}. With $r_{L}$ being 2.75~$\mbox{\AA}$ and $r_{U}$
being equal to either 3.35~$\mbox{\AA}$ for $s(r_{ij})$ or
4.0~$\mbox{\AA}$ for $s'(r_{ij})$, the sticky potential is only active
over an extremely short range, and then only with other SSD
molecules. Therefore, it's predominant interaction is through the
point dipole and the Lennard-Jones sphere. Of these, only the dipole
interaction can be considered ``long-range''.

\subsection{The Phospholipid Model}
\label{sec:lipidModel}

\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=80mm]{lipidModel.epsi}
\caption{A representation of the lipid model. $\phi$ is the torsion angle, $\theta$ is the bend angle, $\mu$ is the dipole moment of the head group, and n is the chain length.}
\label{fig:lipidModel}
\end{figure}

The lipid molecules in our simulations are unified atom models. Figure
\ref{fig:lipidModel} shows a schematic for one of our
lipids. The head group of the phospholipid is replaced by a single
Lennard-Jones sphere with a freely oriented dipole placed at it's
center. The magnitude of the dipole moment is 20.6 D, chosen to match
that of DPPC\cite{Cevc87}. The tail atoms are unified $\text{CH}_2$
and $\text{CH}_3$ atoms and are also modeled as Lennard-Jones
spheres. The total potential for the lipid is represented by Equation
\ref{eq:lipidModelPot}.

\begin{equation}
V_{\text{lipid}} =
        \sum_{i}V_{i}^{\text{internal}}
        + \sum_i \sum_{j>i} \sum_{\alpha_i} 
        \sum_{\beta_j}
        V_{\text{LJ}}(r_{\alpha_{i}\beta_{j}})
        +\sum_i\sum_{j>i}V_{\text{dp}}(r_{1_i,1_j},\Omega_{1_i},\Omega_{1_j})
\label{eq:lipidModelPot}
\end{equation}
where,
\begin{equation}
V_{i}^{\text{internal}} = 
        \sum_{\text{bends}}V_{\text{bend}}(\theta_{\alpha\beta\gamma})
        + \sum_{\text{torsions}}V_{\text{tors.}}(\phi_{\alpha\beta\gamma\zeta})
        + \sum_{\alpha_i} \sum_{\beta_i > (\alpha_i + 4)}V_{\text{LJ}}
                (r_{\alpha_i \beta_i})
\label{eq:lipidModelPotInternal}
\end{equation}

The non-bonded interactions, $V_{\text{LJ}}$ and $V_{\text{dp}}$, are
the Lennard-Jones and dipole-dipole interactions respectively. For the
bonded potentials, only the bend and the torsional potentials are
calculated. The bond potential is not calculated, and the bond lengths
are constrained via RATTLE.\cite{leach01:mm} The bend potential is of
the form: 
\begin{equation}
V_{\text{bend}}(\theta_{\alpha\beta\gamma}) 
        = k_{\theta}\frac{(\theta_{\alpha\beta\gamma} - \theta_0)^2}{2}
\label{eq:bendPot}
\end{equation}
Where $k_{\theta}$ sets the stiffness of the bend potential, and $\theta_0$
sets the equilibrium bend angle. The torsion potential was given by:
\begin{equation}
V_{\text{tors.}}(\phi_{\alpha\beta\gamma\zeta})
        = c_1 [1+\cos\phi_{\alpha\beta\gamma\zeta}]
        + c_2 [1 - \cos(2\phi_{\alpha\beta\gamma\zeta})] 
        + c_3 [1 + \cos(3\phi_{\alpha\beta\gamma\zeta})]
\label{eq:torsPot}
\end{equation}
All parameters for bonded and non-bonded potentials in the tail atoms
were taken from TraPPE.\cite{Siepmann1998} The bonded interactions for
the head atom were also taken from TraPPE, however it's dipole moment
and mass were based on the properties of the phosphatidylcholine head
group. The Lennard-Jones parameter for the head group was chosen such
that it was roughly twice the size of a $\text{CH}_3$ atom, and it's
well depth was set to be approximately equal to that of $\text{CH}_3$.

\section{Initial Simulation: 25 lipids in water}
\label{sec:5x5}

\subsection{Starting Configuration and Parameters}
\label{sec:5x5Start}

\begin{figure}
\centering
\mbox{
        \subfigure[The starting configuration of the 25 lipid system.]{%
                \label{fig:5x5Start}%
                \includegraphics[width=70mm]{5x5-initial.eps}}\quad
        \subfigure[The 25 lipid system at 6.27~ns.]{%
                \label{fig:5x5Final}%
                \includegraphics[width=70mm]{5x5-6.27ns.eps}}
}
\caption{Snapshots of the 25 lipid system. Carbon tail atoms are drawn in gray, the phospholipid head groups are colored blue, and the waters are scaled down for visibility. A box has been drawn around the periodic image.}
\end{figure}

Our first simulation is an array of 25 single chain lipids in a sea
of water (Figure \ref{fig:5x5Start}). The total number of water
molecules is 1386, giving a final of water concentration of 70\%
wt. The simulation box measures 34.5~$\mbox{\AA}$ x 39.4~$\mbox{\AA}$
x 39.4~$\mbox{\AA}$ with periodic boundary conditions imposed. The
system is simulated in the micro-canonical (NVE) ensemble with an
average temperature of 300~K.

\subsection{Results}
\label{sec:5x5Results}

\begin{figure}
\centering
        \subfigure[The self correlation of the phospholipid head groups. $g(r)$ is on the top, the bottom chart is the $g_\gamma(r)$.]{%
                \label{fig:5x5HHCorr}%
                \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=80mm]{all5x5-HEAD-HEAD.epsi}%
                }
        \subfigure[The $g(r)$ for the $\text{CH}_2$ molecules in the chain tails]{%
                \label{fig:5x5CCg}%
                \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=80mm]{all5x5-CH2-CH2.epsi}}
        \subfigure%
        [The pair correlations between the head groups and the water]{%
                \label{fig:5x5HXCorr}%
                \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=80mm]{all5x5-HEAD-X.epsi}}
\caption{The pair correlation functions for the 25 lipid system}
\end{figure}
                

Figure \ref{fig:5x5Final} shows a snapshot of the system at
6.27~ns. Note that the system has spontaneously self assembled into a
bilayer. Discussion of the length scales of the bilayer will follow in
this section. However, it is interesting to note a key qualitative
property of the system revealed by this snapshot, the tail chains are
tilted to the bilayer normal. This is usually indicative of the gel
($L_{\beta'}$) phase. In this system, the box size is probably too
small for the bilayer to relax to the fluid ($P_{\alpha}$) phase. This
demonstrates a need for an isobaric-isothermal ensemble where the box
size may relax or expand to keep the system at 1~atm.

The simulation was analyzed using the radial distribution function,
$g(r)$, which has the form:
\begin{equation}
g(r) = \frac{V}{N_{\text{pairs}}}\langle \sum_{i} \sum_{j > i} 
        \delta(|\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}_{ij}|) \rangle
\label{eq:gofr}
\end{equation}
Equation \ref{eq:gofr} gives us information about the spacing of two
species as a function of radius. Essentially, if the observer were
located at atom $i$ and were looking out in all directions, $g(r)$
shows the relative density of atom $j$ at any given radius, $r$,
normalized by the expected density of atom $j$ at $r$. In a
homogeneously mixed fluid, $g(r)$ will approach 1 at large $r$, as a
fluid contains no long range structure to contribute peaks in the
number density.

For the species containing dipoles, a second pair-wise distribution
function was used, $g_{\gamma}(r)$. It is of the form:
\begin{equation}
g_{\gamma}(r) = \langle \sum_i \sum_{j>i}
        (\cos \gamma_{ij}) \delta(| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}_{ij}|) \rangle
\label{eq:gammaofr}
\end{equation}
Where $\gamma_{ij}$ is the angle between the dipole of atom $j$ with
respect to the dipole of atom $i$. This correlation will vary between
$+1$ and $-1$ when the two dipoles are perfectly aligned and
anti-aligned respectively. This then gives us information about how
directional species are aligned with each other as a function of
distance.

Figure \ref{fig:5x5HHCorr} shows the two self correlation functions
for the Head groups of the lipids. The first peak in the $g(r)$ at
4.03~$\mbox{\AA}$ is the nearest neighbor separation of the heads of
two lipids. This corresponds to a maximum in the $g_{\gamma}(r)$ which
means that the two neighbors on the same leaf have their dipoles
aligned. The broad peak at 6.5~$\mbox{\AA}$ is the inter-surface
spacing. Here, there is a corresponding anti-alignment in the angular
correlation. This means that although the dipoles are aligned on the
same monolayer, the dipoles will orient themselves to be anti-aligned
on a opposite facing monolayer. With this information, the two peaks
at 7.0~$\mbox{\AA}$ and 7.4~$\mbox{\AA}$ are head groups on the same
monolayer, and they are the second nearest neighbors to the head
group. The peak is likely a split peak because of the small statistics
of this system. Finally, the peak at 8.0~$\mbox{\AA}$ is likely the
second nearest neighbor on the opposite monolayer because of the
anti-alignment evident in the angular correlation.

Figure \ref{fig:5x5CCg} shows the radial distribution function for the
$\text{CH}_2$ unified atoms. The spacing of the atoms along the tail
chains accounts for the regularly spaced sharp peaks, but the broad
underlying peak with its maximum at 4.6~$\mbox{\AA}$ is the
distribution of chain-chain distances between two lipids. The final
Figure, Figure \ref{fig:5x5HXCorr}, includes the correlation functions
between the Head group and the SSD atoms. The peak in $g(r)$ at
3.6~$\mbox{\AA}$ is the distance of closest approach between the two,
and $g_{\gamma}(r)$ shows that the SSD atoms will align their dipoles
with the head groups at close distance. However, as one increases the
distance, the SSD atoms are no longer aligned.

\section{Second Simulation: 50 randomly oriented lipids in water}
\label{sec:r50}

\subsection{Starting Configuration and Parameters}
\label{sec:r50Start}

\begin{figure}
\centering
\mbox{
        \subfigure[The starting configuration of the 50 lipid system.]{%
                \label{fig:r50Start}%
                \includegraphics[width=70mm]{r50-initial.eps}}\quad     
        \subfigure[The 50 lipid system at 2.21~ns]{%
                \label{fig:r50Final}%   
                \includegraphics[width=70mm]{r50-2.21ns.eps}}
}
\caption{Snapshots of the 50 lipid system}
\end{figure}

The second simulation consists of 50 single chained lipid molecules
embedded in a sea of 1384 SSD waters (54\% wt.). The lipids in this
simulation were started with random orientation and location (Figure
\ref{fig:r50Start} ) The simulation box measured 26.6~$\mbox{\AA}$ x
26.6~$\mbox{\AA}$ x 108.4~$\mbox{\AA}$ with periodic boundary conditions
imposed. The simulation was run in the NVE ensemble with an average
temperature of 300~K.

\subsection{Results}
\label{sec:r50Results}

\begin{figure}
\centering
        \subfigure[The self correlation of the phospholipid head groups.]{%
                \label{fig:r50HHCorr}%
                \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=80mm]{r50-HEAD-HEAD.epsi}%
                }
        \subfigure%
        [The pair correlations between the head groups and the water]{%
                \label{fig:r50HXCorr}%
                \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=80mm]{r50-HEAD-X.epsi}%
                }
        \subfigure[The $g(r)$ for the $\text{CH}_2$ molecules in the chain tails]{%
                \label{fig:r50CCg}%
                \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=80mm]{r50-CH2-CH2.epsi}}

\caption{The pair correlation functions for the 50 lipid system}
\end{figure}

Figure \ref{fig:r50Final} is a snapshot of the system at 2.21~ns. Here
we see that the system has already aggregated into several micelles
and two are even starting to merge. It will be interesting to watch as
this simulation continues what the total time scale for the micelle
aggregation and bilayer formation will be, in Marrink's\cite{Marrink01}
simulation, bilayer aggregation is predicted to occur around 10~ns.

Figures \ref{fig:r50HHCorr}, \ref{fig:r50HXCorr}, and \ref{fig:r50CCg} are
the same correlation functions for the random 50 simulation as for the
previous simulation of 25 lipids. What is most interesting to note, is
the high degree of similarity between the correlation functions
between systems. Even though the 25 lipid simulation formed a bilayer
and the random 50 simulation is still in the micelle stage, both have
an inter-surface spacing of 6.5~$\mbox{\AA}$ with the same
characteristic anti-alignment between surfaces. Not as surprising, is
the consistency of the closest packing statistics between
systems. Namely, a head-head closest approach distance of
4~$\mbox{\AA}$, and similar findings for the chain-chain and
head-water distributions as in the 25 lipid system.

\section{Future Directions}

Current simulations indicate that our model is a feasible one, however
improvements will need to be made to allow the system to be simulated
in the isobaric-isothermal ensemble. This will relax the system to an
equilibrium configuration at room temperature and pressure allowing us
to compare our model to experimental results. Also, we are in the
process of parallelizing the code for an even greater speedup. This
will allow us to simulate large enough systems to examine phenomena
such as the ripple phase and drug molecule diffusion

Once the work has been completed on the simulation engine, we will
then use it to explore the phase diagram for our model. By
characterizing how our model parameters affect the bilayer properties,
we will tailor our model to more closely match real biological
molecules. With this information, we will then incorporate
biologically relevant molecules into the system and observe their
transport properties across the membrane.

\section{Acknowledgments}

I would like to thank Dr.~J.~Daniel Gezelter for his guidance on this
project. I would also like to acknowledge the following for their help
and discussions during this project: Christopher Fennell, Charles
Vardeman, Teng Lin, Megan Sprague, Patrick Conforti, and Dan
Combest. Funding for this project came from the National Science
Foundation.

\pagebreak 
\bibliographystyle{achemso} 
\bibliography{canidacy_paper}
\end{document}
Revision:	507
Committed:	Mon Apr 28 16:03:10 2003 UTC (22 years, 7 months ago) by mmeineke
File size:	23895 byte(s)
Log Message:	added all the files