ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/mattDisertation/lipid.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/mattDisertation/lipid.tex (file contents):
Revision 1092 by mmeineke, Tue Mar 16 21:35:16 2004 UTC vs.
Revision 1115 by mmeineke, Thu Apr 15 19:19:06 2004 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1  
2  
3 < \chapter{\label{chapt:lipid}Phospholipid Simulations}
3 > \chapter{\label{chapt:lipid}PHOSPHOLIPID SIMULATIONS}
4  
5   \section{\label{lipidSec:Intro}Introduction}
6  
# Line 10 | Line 10 | spontaneous aggregation of DPPC molecules into fluid p
10   simulation of the gel ($L_{\beta}$) phase of
11   dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC),\cite{lindahl00} to the
12   spontaneous aggregation of DPPC molecules into fluid phase
13 < ($L_{\alpha}$) bilayers.\cite{marrink01} With the exception of a few
13 > ($L_{\alpha}$) bilayers.\cite{Marrink01} With the exception of a few
14   ambitious
15   simulations, \cite{marrink01:undulation,marrink:2002,lindahl00} most
16   investigations are limited to a range of 64 to 256
17 < phospholipids.\cite{lindahl00,sum:2003,venable00,gomez:2003,smondyrev:1999,marrink01}
17 > phospholipids.\cite{lindahl00,sum:2003,venable00,gomez:2003,smondyrev:1999,Marrink01}
18   The expense of the force calculations involved when performing these
19   simulations limits the system size. To properly hydrate a bilayer, one
20   typically needs 25 water molecules for every lipid, bringing the total
# Line 131 | Line 131 | V_{\text{LJ}}(r_{ij}) =
131          4\epsilon_{ij} \biggl[
132          \biggl(\frac{\sigma_{ij}}{r_{ij}}\biggr)^{12}
133          - \biggl(\frac{\sigma_{ij}}{r_{ij}}\biggr)^{6}
134 <        \biggr]
134 >        \biggr],
135   \label{lipidEq:LJpot}
136   \end{equation}
137   and
# Line 141 | Line 141 | V_{\text{dipole}}(\mathbf{r}_{ij},\boldsymbol{\Omega}_
141          \boldsymbol{\hat{u}}_{i} \cdot \boldsymbol{\hat{u}}_{j}
142          -
143          3(\boldsymbol{\hat{u}}_i \cdot \mathbf{\hat{r}}_{ij}) %
144 <                (\boldsymbol{\hat{u}}_j \cdot \mathbf{\hat{r}}_{ij} )\biggr]
144 >                (\boldsymbol{\hat{u}}_j \cdot \mathbf{\hat{r}}_{ij} )\biggr].
145   \label{lipidEq:dipolePot}
146   \end{equation}
147 < Where $V_{\text{LJ}}$ is the Lennard-Jones potential and
147 > Here $V_{\text{LJ}}$ is the Lennard-Jones potential and
148   $V_{\text{dipole}}$ is the dipole-dipole potential.  As previously
149   stated, $\sigma_{ij}$ and $\epsilon_{ij}$ are the Lennard-Jones
150   parameters which scale the length and depth of the interaction
# Line 162 | Line 162 | potential:
162   algorithm.\cite{andersen83} The bends are subject to a harmonic
163   potential:
164   \begin{equation}
165 < V_{\text{bend}}(\theta) = k_{\theta}( \theta - \theta_0 )^2
165 > V_{\text{bend}}(\theta) = k_{\theta}( \theta - \theta_0 )^2,
166   \label{lipidEq:bendPot}
167   \end{equation}
168   where $k_{\theta}$ scales the strength of the harmonic well, and
# Line 177 | Line 177 | V_{\text{torsion}}(\phi) =  
177   molecule.  The torsion potential is given by:
178   \begin{equation}
179   V_{\text{torsion}}(\phi) =  
180 <        k_3 \cos^3 \phi + k_2 \cos^2 \phi + k_1 \cos \phi + k_0
180 >        k_3 \cos^3 \phi + k_2 \cos^2 \phi + k_1 \cos \phi + k_0.
181   \label{lipidEq:torsionPot}
182   \end{equation}
183   Here, the parameters $k_0$, $k_1$, $k_2$, and $k_3$ fit the cosine
# Line 207 | Line 207 | Table~\ref{lipidTable:tcBendParams} and
207   \ref{lipidTable:tcTorsionParams}.
208  
209   \begin{table}
210 < \caption[Lennard-Jones parameters for the two chain phospholipids]{THE LENNARD JONES PARAMETERS FOR THE TWO CHAIN PHOSPHOLIPIDS}
210 > \caption{THE LENNARD JONES PARAMETERS FOR THE TWO CHAIN PHOSPHOLIPIDS}
211   \label{lipidTable:tcLJParams}
212   \begin{center}
213   \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|c|}
# Line 224 | Line 224 | $\text{{\sc ch}}_3$\cite{Siepmann1998} & 15.04 & 3.75
224   \end{table}
225  
226   \begin{table}
227 < \caption[Bend Parameters for the two chain phospholipids]{BEND PARAMETERS FOR THE TWO CHAIN PHOSPHOLIPIDS}
227 > \caption{BEND PARAMETERS FOR THE TWO CHAIN PHOSPHOLIPIDS}
228   \label{lipidTable:tcBendParams}
229   \begin{center}
230   \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|}
# Line 244 | Line 244 | All alkane parameters are based off of those from TraP
244   \end{table}
245  
246   \begin{table}
247 < \caption[Torsion Parameters for the two chain phospholipids]{TORSION PARAMETERS FOR THE TWO CHAIN PHOSPHOLIPIDS}
247 > \caption{TORSION PARAMETERS FOR THE TWO CHAIN PHOSPHOLIPIDS}
248   \label{lipidTable:tcTorsionParams}
249   \begin{center}
250   \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|c|}
# Line 280 | Line 280 | the largest, varying as much as $\pm 250$~atm. However
280   its equilibrium value by $\sim 0.6\%$, temperature fluctuations are
281   about $\sim 1.4\%$ of their set value, and pressure fluctuations are
282   the largest, varying as much as $\pm 250$~atm. However, such large
283 < fluctuations in pressure are typical for liquid state simulations.
283 > fluctuations in pressure are typical for liquid state simulations.\cite{leach01:mm}
284  
285  
286   \subsection{\label{lipidSec:ExpSetup}Experimental Setup}
# Line 354 | Line 354 | function of distance from the center of the box. The p
354   Fig.~\ref{lipidFig:densityProfile} illustrates the densities of the
355   atoms in the bilayer systems normalized by the bulk density as a
356   function of distance from the center of the box. The profile is taken
357 < along the bilayer normal (in this case the $z$ axis). The profile at
358 < 270~K shows several structural features that are largely smoothed out
359 < at 300~K. The left peak for the {\sc head} atoms is split at 270~K,
360 < implying that some freezing of the structure into a gel phase might
361 < already be occurring at this temperature. However, movies of the
362 < trajectories at this temperature show that the tails are very fluid,
363 < and have not gelled. But this profile could indicate that a phase
364 < transition may simply be beyond the time length of the current
365 < simulation, and that given more time the system may tend towards a gel
366 < phase. In all profiles, the water penetrates almost 5~$\mbox{\AA}$
367 < into the bilayer, completely solvating the {\sc head} atoms. The
368 < $\text{{\sc ch}}_3$ atoms, although mainly centered at the middle of
369 < the bilayer, show appreciable penetration into the head group
370 < region. This indicates that the chains have enough flexibility to bend
371 < back upward to allow the ends to explore areas around the {\sc head}
372 < atoms. It is unlikely that this is penetration from a lipid of the
373 < opposite face, as the lipids are only 12~$\mbox{\AA}$ in length, and
374 < the typical leaf spacing as measured from the {\sc head-head} spacing
375 < in the profile is 17.5~$\mbox{\AA}$.
357 > along the bilayer normal (in this case the $z$ axis). The first interesting point to note is the penetration of water into the membrane. Water penetrates about 5~$\mbox{\AA}$ into the bilayer, completely solvating the head groups. This is common in atomistic and some coarse grain simulations of phospholipid bilayers.\cite{Marrink01,marrink04,klein01} It is an indication that the water molecules are very attracted to the polar head region, yet there is still enough of a hydrophobic effect to exclude water from the inside of the bilayer.
358  
359 + Another interesting point is the fluidity of the chains. Although the ends of the tails, the $\text{{\sc ch}}_3$ atoms, are mostly concentrated at the centers of the bilayers, they have a significant density around the head regions. This indicates that there is much freedom of movement in the chains of our model. Typical atomistic simulations of DPPC show the terminal groups concentrated at the center of the bilayer.\cite{marrink03:vesicles} This is most likely an indication that our chain lengths are too small, and given longer chains, the tail groups would stay more deeply buried in the bilayer.
360 +
361 + The last point to consider is the splitting in the density peak of the {\sc head} atom at 270~K. This implies  that there is some freezing of structure at this temperature. By 280~K, this feature is smoothed out, demonstrating a more fluid phase in the bilayer. Within the time scale of the simulation, the gel phase has not formed at 270~K, so this splitting in the peak is likely a glassy transition in the head groups, and could possibly indicate that we are simulating in a super cooled region of our phospholipid model.
362 +
363   \begin{figure}
364   \centering
365   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{densityProfile.eps}
# Line 388 | Line 374 | deuterium bond in relation to the bilayer normal at va
374   the experimental characterizations of phospholipids. It is obtained
375   through deuterium NMR, and measures the ordering of the carbon
376   deuterium bond in relation to the bilayer normal at various points
377 < along the chains. In our model, there are no explicit hydrogens, but
377 > along the chains. The order parameter has a range of $[1,-\frac{1}{2}]$. A value of 1
378 > implies full order aligned to the bilayer axis, 0 implies full
379 > disorder, and $-\frac{1}{2}$ implies full order perpendicular to the
380 > bilayer axis. The {\sc cd} bond vector for carbons near the head group
381 > are usually ordered perpendicular to the bilayer normal, with tails
382 > farther away tending toward disorder. This makes the order parameter
383 > negative for most carbons, and as such $|S_{\text{{\sc cd}}}|$ is more
384 > commonly reported than $S_{\text{{\sc cd}}}$.
385 >
386 > In our model, there are no explicit hydrogens, but
387   the order parameter can be written in terms of the carbon ordering at
388   each point in the chain:\cite{egberts88}
389   \begin{equation}
390 < S_{\text{{\sc cd}}}  = \frac{2}{3}S_{xx} + \frac{1}{3}S_{yy}
390 > S_{\text{{\sc cd}}}  = \frac{2}{3}S_{xx} + \frac{1}{3}S_{yy},
391   \label{lipidEq:scd1}
392   \end{equation}
393 < Where $S_{ij}$ is given by:
393 > where $S_{ij}$ is given by:
394   \begin{equation}
395   S_{ij} = \frac{1}{2}\Bigl\langle(3\cos\Theta_i\cos\Theta_j
396 <        - \delta_{ij})\Bigr\rangle
396 >        - \delta_{ij})\Bigr\rangle.
397   \label{lipidEq:scd2}
398   \end{equation}
399   Here, $\Theta_i$ is the angle the $i$th axis in the reference frame of
400   the carbon atom makes with the bilayer normal. The brackets denote an
401   average over time and molecules. The carbon atom axes are defined:
402   \begin{itemize}
403 < \item $\mathbf{\hat{z}}\rightarrow$ vector from $C_{n-1}$ to $C_{n+1}$
404 < \item $\mathbf{\hat{y}}\rightarrow$ vector that is perpendicular to $z$ and
405 < in the plane through $C_{n-1}$, $C_{n}$, and $C_{n+1}$
406 < \item $\mathbf{\hat{x}}\rightarrow$ vector perpendicular to
403 > \item $\mathbf{\hat{z}}$ is the vector from $C_{n-1}$ to $C_{n+1}$.
404 > \item $\mathbf{\hat{y}}$ is the vector that is perpendicular to $z$ and
405 > in the plane through $C_{n-1}$, $C_{n}$, and $C_{n+1}$.
406 > \item $\mathbf{\hat{x}}$ is the vector perpendicular to
407   $\mathbf{\hat{y}}$ and $\mathbf{\hat{z}}$.
408   \end{itemize}
409   This assumes that the hydrogen atoms are always in a plane
410   perpendicular to the $C_{n-1}-C_{n}-C_{n+1}$ plane.
411  
417 The order parameter has a range of $[1,-\frac{1}{2}]$. A value of 1
418 implies full order aligned to the bilayer axis, 0 implies full
419 disorder, and $-\frac{1}{2}$ implies full order perpendicular to the
420 bilayer axis. The {\sc cd} bond vector for carbons near the head group
421 are usually ordered perpendicular to the bilayer normal, with tails
422 farther away tending toward disorder. This makes the order parameter
423 negative for most carbons, and as such $|S_{\text{{\sc cd}}}|$ is more
424 commonly reported than $S_{\text{{\sc cd}}}$.
425
412   Fig.~\ref{lipidFig:scdFig} shows the $S_{\text{{\sc cd}}}$ order
413   parameters for the bilayer system at 300~K. There is no appreciable
414   difference in the plots for the various temperatures, however, there
# Line 433 | Line 419 | glycerol linkage between the head group and the acyl c
419   group separating the chains from the top of the lipid. In DMPC, with
420   the flexibility inherent in a multiple atom head group, as well as a
421   glycerol linkage between the head group and the acyl chains, there is
422 < more loss of ordering by the point when the chains start.
422 > more loss of ordering by the point when the chains start. Also, there is more ordering in the model due to the our assumptions about the locations of the hydrogen atoms. Our method assumes a rigid location for each hydrogen atom based on the carbon positions. This does not allow for any small fluctuations in their positions that would be inherent in an atomistic simulation or in experiments. These small fluctuations would serve to lower the ordering measured in the $S_{\text{{\sc cd}}}$.
423  
424   \begin{figure}
425   \centering
# Line 461 | Line 447 | Define an ordering tensor $\overleftrightarrow{\mathsf
447          u_{ix}u_{ix}-\frac{1}{3} & u_{ix}u_{iy} & u_{ix}u_{iz} \\
448          u_{iy}u_{ix} & u_{iy}u_{iy}-\frac{1}{3} & u_{iy}u_{iz} \\
449          u_{iz}u_{ix} & u_{iz}u_{iy} & u_{iz}u_{iz}-\frac{1}{3} %
450 <        \end{pmatrix}
450 >        \end{pmatrix},
451   \label{lipidEq:po1}
452   \end{equation}
453 < Where the $u_{i\alpha}$ is the $\alpha$ element of the unit vector
453 > where the $u_{i\alpha}$ is the $\alpha$ element of the unit vector
454   $\mathbf{\hat{u}}_i$, and the sum over $i$ averages over the whole
455   collection of unit vectors. This allows the tensor to be written:
456   \begin{equation}
457   \overleftrightarrow{\mathsf{Q}} = \frac{1}{N}\sum_i^N \biggl[
458          \mathbf{\hat{u}}_i \otimes \mathbf{\hat{u}}_i
459 <        - \frac{1}{3} \cdot \mathsf{1} \biggr]
459 >        - \frac{1}{3} \cdot \mathsf{1} \biggr].
460   \label{lipidEq:po2}
461   \end{equation}
462  
# Line 481 | Line 467 | are pointing. The $P_2$ order parameter is then simply
467   vectors. The director axis is the average direction all of the unit vectors
468   are pointing. The $P_2$ order parameter is then simply
469   \begin{equation}
470 < \langle P_2 \rangle = \frac{3}{2}\lambda_{\text{max}}
470 > \langle P_2 \rangle = \frac{3}{2}\lambda_{\text{max}}.
471   \label{lipidEq:po3}
472   \end{equation}
473  
474   Table~\ref{lipidTab:blSummary} summarizes the $P_2$ values for the
475 < bilayers, as well as the dipole orientations. The unit vector for the
475 > bilayers, as well as for the dipole orientations. The unit vector for the
476   lipid molecules was defined by finding the moment of inertia for each
477   lipid, then setting $\mathbf{\hat{u}}$ to point along the axis of
478 < minimum inertia. For the {\sc head} atoms, the unit vector simply
478 > minimum inertia (the long axis). For the {\sc head} atoms, the unit vector simply
479   pointed in the same direction as the dipole moment. For the lipid
480   molecules, the ordering was consistent across all temperatures, with
481   the director pointed along the $z$ axis of the box. More
482   interestingly, is the high degree of ordering the dipoles impose on
483   the {\sc head} atoms. The directors for the dipoles themselves
484 < consistently pointed along the plane of the bilayer, with the
499 < directors anti-aligned on the top and bottom leaf.
484 > consistently pointed along the plane of the bilayer, with head groups lining up in rows of alternating alignment. The ordering implies that the dipole interaction is a little too strong, or that perhaps the dipoles are allowed to approach each other a bit too closely. A possible change in future models would alter the size or shape of the head group to discourage too rigid ordering of the dipoles.
485  
486   \begin{table}
487 < \caption[Structural properties of the bilayers]{BILAYER STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES AS A FUNCTION OF TEMPERATURE}
487 > \caption{BILAYER STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES AS A FUNCTION OF TEMPERATURE}
488   \label{lipidTab:blSummary}
489   \begin{center}
490   \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|}
# Line 538 | Line 523 | D_L = \lim_{t\rightarrow\infty}\frac{1}{4t}\langle |\m
523   is given by the following Einstein relation:\cite{allen87:csl}
524   \begin{equation}
525   D_L = \lim_{t\rightarrow\infty}\frac{1}{4t}\langle |\mathbf{r}(t)
526 <        - \mathbf{r}(0)|^2\rangle
526 >        - \mathbf{r}(0)|^2\rangle,
527   \end{equation}
528 < Where $\mathbf{r}(t)$ is the $xy$ position of the lipid at time $t$
529 < (assuming the $z$-axis is parallel to the bilayer normal).
528 > where $\mathbf{r}(t)$ is the $xy$ position of the lipid at time $t$
529 > (assuming the $z$-axis is parallel to the bilayer normal). Calculating the $D_L$ involves first plotting the mean square displacement,  $\langle |\mathbf{r}(t) - \mathbf{r}(0)|^2\rangle$, finding the slope at long times, and dividing the slope by 4 to give the diffusion constant (Fig.~\ref{lipidFig:msdFig}). When finding the slope only the 1~ns to 3~ns times are considered. Points at the longer times are not included due to the lack of good statistics at long time intervals.
530  
531   Fig.~\ref{lipidFig:diffusionFig} shows the lateral diffusion constants
532   as a function of temperature. There is a definite increase in the
533   lateral diffusion with higher temperatures, which is exactly what one
534   would expect with greater fluidity of the chains. However, the
535 < diffusion constants are two orders of magnitude smaller than those
536 < typical of DPPC.\cite{Cevc87} This is counter-intuitive as the DPPC
537 < molecule is sterically larger and heavier than our model. This could
553 < be an indication that our model's chains are too interwoven and hinder
554 < the motion of the lipid or that the dipolar head groups are too
555 < tightly bound to each other. In contrast, the diffusion constant of
535 > diffusion constants are two orders of magnitude larger than those
536 > typical of DPPC ($\sim10^{-9}\text{cm}^2/\text{s}$ over this temperature range).\cite{Cevc87} This is what one would expect as the DPPC
537 > molecule is sterically larger and heavier than our model, indicating that further modifications to the model should increase the lengths of the tail chains, and perhaps explore larger, more massive head groups. In contrast, the diffusion constant of
538   the {\sc ssd} water, $9.84\times 10^{-6}\,\text{cm}^2/\text{s}$, is
539   reasonably close to the bulk water diffusion constant ($2.2999\times
540   10^{-5}\,\text{cm}^2/\text{s}$).\cite{Holz00}
541  
542   \begin{figure}
543   \centering
544 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{msdFig.eps}
545 + \caption[Lateral mean square displacement for the phospholipid at 300~K]{This is a representative lateral mean square displacement for the center of mass motion of the phospholipid model. This particular example is from the 300~K simulation. The box is drawn about the region used in the calculation of the diffusion constant.}
546 + \label{lipidFig:msdFig}
547 + \end{figure}
548 +
549 + \begin{figure}
550 + \centering
551   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{diffusionFig.eps}
552   \caption[The lateral diffusion constants versus temperature]{The lateral diffusion constants for the bilayers as a function of temperature.}
553   \label{lipidFig:diffusionFig}
# Line 569 | Line 558 | configuration. Fig.~\ref{lipidFig:blImage} shows an im
558   A very important accomplishment for our model is its ability to
559   spontaneously form bilayers from a randomly dispersed starting
560   configuration. Fig.~\ref{lipidFig:blImage} shows an image sequence for
561 < the bilayer aggregation. After 3.0~ns, the basic form of the bilayer
573 < can already be seen. By 7.0~ns, the bilayer has a lipid bridge
574 < stretched across the simulation box to itself that will turn out to be
575 < very long lived ($\sim$20~ns), as well as a water pore, that will
576 < persist for the length of the current simulation. At 24~ns, the lipid
577 < bridge has broken, and the bilayer is still integrating the lipid
578 < molecules from the bridge into itself. However, the water pore is
579 < still present at 24~ns.
561 > the bilayer aggregation. After 1.0~ns, bulk aggregation has occured. By 5.0~ns, the basic bilayer aggregation can be seen, however there is a vertical lipid bridge connecting the periodic image of the bilayer to itself. At 15.0~ns, the lipid bridge has finally broken up, and the lipid molecules are starting to re-incorporate themselves into the bilayer. A water pore is still present through the membrane. In the last frame at 42.0~ns, the water pore is still present, although does show some signs of rejoining the bulk water section. These behaviors are typical for coarse grain model simulations, which can have lipid bridge lifetimes of up to 20~ns, and water pores typically lasting 3 to 25~ns.\cite{marrink04}
562  
563   \begin{figure}
564   \centering
# Line 593 | Line 575 | slightly, but there are still many water molecules per
575   1.5~ns, The main body of water in the system has already collected
576   into a central water channel. By 10.0~ns, the channel has widened
577   slightly, but there are still many water molecules permeating the
578 < lipid macro-structure. At 23.0~ns, the central water channel has
578 > lipid macro-structure. At 35.0~ns, the central water channel has
579   stabilized and several smaller water channels have been absorbed by
580   the main one. However, there is still an appreciable water
581   concentration throughout the lipid structure.
# Line 610 | Line 592 | structure. The time scales of the macro-molecular aggr
592   We have presented a simple unified-atom phospholipid model capable of
593   spontaneous aggregation into a bilayer and an inverted rod
594   structure. The time scales of the macro-molecular aggregations are
595 < approximately 24~ns. In addition the model's properties have been
595 > approximately 24~ns, with water permeation of the structures persisting for times longer than the scope of both aggregations. In addition the model's properties have been
596   explored over a range of temperatures through prefabricated
597   bilayers. No freezing transition is seen in the temperature range of
598   our current simulations. However, structural information from 270~K

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines