| 7 |  | In the past 10 years, computer speeds have allowed for the atomistic | 
| 8 |  | simulation of phospholipid bilayers.  These simulations have ranged | 
| 9 |  | from simulation of the gel phase ($L_{\beta}$) of | 
| 10 | < | dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC), \cite{Lindahl:2000} to the | 
| 10 | > | dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC),\cite{lindahl00} to the | 
| 11 |  | spontaneous aggregation of DPPC molecules into fluid phase | 
| 12 | < | ($L_{\alpha}$ bilayers. \cite{Marrinck:2001} With the exception of a | 
| 13 | < | few ambitious | 
| 14 | < | simulations,\cite{Marrinch:2001b,Marrinck:2002,Lindahl:2000} most | 
| 12 | > | ($L_{\alpha}$) bilayers.\cite{marrink01} With the exception of a few | 
| 13 | > | ambitious | 
| 14 | > | simulations,\cite{marrink01:undulation,marrink:2002,lindahl00} most | 
| 15 |  | investigations are limited to 64 to 256 | 
| 16 | < | phospholipids.\cite{Lindal:2000,Sum:2003,Venable:2000,Gomez:2003,Smondyrev:1999,Marrinck:2001a} | 
| 16 | > | phospholipids.\cite{lindahl00,sum:2003,venable00,gomez:2003,smondyrev:1999,marrink01} | 
| 17 |  | This is due to the expense of the computer calculations involved when | 
| 18 |  | performing these simulations.  To properly hydrate a bilayer, one | 
| 19 |  | typically needs 25 water molecules for every lipid, bringing the total | 
| 20 |  | number of atoms simulated to roughly 8,000 for a system of 64 DPPC | 
| 21 | < | molecules. Added to the difficluty is the electrostatic nature of the | 
| 21 | > | molecules. Added to the difficulty is the electrostatic nature of the | 
| 22 |  | phospholipid head groups and water, requiring the computationally | 
| 23 |  | expensive Ewald sum or its slightly faster derivative particle mesh | 
| 24 | < | Ewald sum.\cite{Nina:2002,Norberg:2000,Patra:2003} These factors all | 
| 25 | < | limit the potential size and time lenghts of bilayer simulations. | 
| 24 | > | Ewald sum.\cite{nina:2002,norberg:2000,patra:2003} These factors all | 
| 25 | > | limit the potential size and time lengths of bilayer simulations. | 
| 26 |  |  | 
| 27 |  | Unfortunately, much of biological interest happens on time and length | 
| 28 | < | scales unfeasible with current simulation. One such example is the | 
| 29 | < | observance of a ripple phase ($P_{\beta'}$) between the $L_{\beta}$ | 
| 30 | < | and $L_{\alpha}$ phases of certain phospholipid | 
| 31 | < | bilayers.\cite{Katsaras:2000,Sengupta:2000} These ripples are shown to | 
| 28 | > | scales infeasible with current simulation. One such example is the | 
| 29 | > | observance of a ripple phase ($P_{\beta^{\prime}}$) between the | 
| 30 | > | $L_{\beta}$ and $L_{\alpha}$ phases of certain phospholipid | 
| 31 | > | bilayers.\cite{katsaras00,sengupta00} These ripples are shown to | 
| 32 |  | have periodicity on the order of 100-200~$\mbox{\AA}$. A simulation on | 
| 33 |  | this length scale would have approximately 1,300 lipid molecules with | 
| 34 |  | an additional 25 water molecules per lipid to fully solvate the | 
| 41 |  | happens at pores.  Some molecules of interest may incorporate | 
| 42 |  | themselves directly into the membrane.  Once here, they may possess an | 
| 43 |  | appreciable waiting time (on the order of 10's to 100's of | 
| 44 | < | nanoseconds) within the bilayer.  Such long simulation times are | 
| 44 | > | nanoseconds) within the bilayer. Such long simulation times are | 
| 45 |  | difficulty to obtain when integrating the system with atomistic | 
| 46 |  | detail. | 
| 47 |  |  | 
| 48 |  | Addressing these issues, several schemes have been proposed.  One | 
| 49 | < | approach by Goetz and Liposky\cite{Goetz:1998} is to model the entire | 
| 49 | > | approach by Goetz and Liposky\cite{goetz98} is to model the entire | 
| 50 |  | system as Lennard-Jones spheres. Phospholipids are represented by | 
| 51 |  | chains of beads with the top most beads identified as the head | 
| 52 |  | atoms. Polar and non-polar interactions are mimicked through | 
| 53 |  | attractive and soft-repulsive potentials respectively.  A similar | 
| 54 | < | model proposed by Marrinck \emph{et. al.}\cite{Marrinck:2004}~ uses a | 
| 54 | > | model proposed by Marrinck \emph{et. al}.\cite{marrink04}~uses a | 
| 55 |  | similar technique for modeling polar and non-polar interactions with | 
| 56 |  | Lennard-Jones spheres. However, they also include charges on the head | 
| 57 |  | group spheres to mimic the electrostatic interactions of the | 
| 63 |  | interactions than the previous two models, while still balancing the | 
| 64 |  | need for simplifications over atomistic detail.  The model uses | 
| 65 |  | Lennard-Jones spheres for the head and tail groups of the | 
| 66 | < | phopholipids, allowing for the ability to scale the parameters to | 
| 66 | > | phospholipids, allowing for the ability to scale the parameters to | 
| 67 |  | reflect various sized chain configurations while keeping the number of | 
| 68 |  | interactions small.  What sets this model apart, however, is the use | 
| 69 | < | of dipoles to represent the electrosttaic nature of the | 
| 69 | > | of dipoles to represent the electrostatic nature of the | 
| 70 |  | phospholipids. The dipole electrostatic interaction is shorter range | 
| 71 | < | than coulombic ($\frac{1}{r^3}$ versus $\frac{1}{r}$), eliminating the | 
| 71 | > | than Coulombic ($\frac{1}{r^3}$ versus $\frac{1}{r}$), eliminating the | 
| 72 |  | need for a costly Ewald sum. | 
| 73 |  |  | 
| 74 |  | Another key feature of this model, is the use of a dipolar water model | 
| 75 | < | to represent the solvent. The soft sticky dipole ({\scssd}) | 
| 76 | < | water \cite{Liu:1996a} relies on the dipole for long range | 
| 77 | < | electrostatic effects, butalso contains a short range correction for | 
| 78 | < | hydrogen bonding. In this way the systems in this research mimic the | 
| 79 | < | entropic contribution to the hydrophobic effect due to hydrogen-bond | 
| 80 | < | network deformation around a non-polar entity, \emph{i.e.}~ the | 
| 81 | < | phospholipid. | 
| 75 | > | to represent the solvent. The soft sticky dipole ({\sc ssd}) water | 
| 76 | > | \cite{liu96:new_model} relies on the dipole for long range electrostatic | 
| 77 | > | effects, but also contains a short range correction for hydrogen | 
| 78 | > | bonding. In this way the systems in this research mimic the entropic | 
| 79 | > | contribution to the hydrophobic effect due to hydrogen-bond network | 
| 80 | > | deformation around a non-polar entity, \emph{i.e.}~the phospholipid. | 
| 81 |  |  | 
| 82 |  | The following is an outline of this chapter. | 
| 83 | < | Sec.~\ref{lipoidSec:Methods} is an introduction to the lipid model | 
| 83 | > | Sec.~\ref{lipidSec:Methods} is an introduction to the lipid model | 
| 84 |  | used in these simulations.  As well as clarification about the water | 
| 85 |  | model and integration techniques.  The various simulation setups | 
| 86 |  | explored in this research are outlined in | 
| 92 |  |  | 
| 93 |  | \section{\label{lipidSec:Methods}Methods} | 
| 94 |  |  | 
| 96 | – |  | 
| 97 | – |  | 
| 95 |  | \subsection{\label{lipidSec:lipidModel}The Lipid Model} | 
| 96 |  |  | 
| 97 |  | \begin{figure} | 
| 98 | < |  | 
| 99 | < | \caption{Schematic diagram of the single chain phospholipid model} | 
| 100 | < |  | 
| 98 | > | \centering | 
| 99 | > | \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{twoChainFig.eps} | 
| 100 | > | \caption[The two chained lipid model]{Schematic diagram of the double chain phospholipid model. The head group (in red) has a point dipole, $\boldsymbol{\mu}$, located at its center of mass. The two chains are eight methylene groups in length.} | 
| 101 |  | \label{lipidFig:lipidModel} | 
| 105 | – |  | 
| 102 |  | \end{figure} | 
| 103 |  |  | 
| 104 |  | The phospholipid model used in these simulations is based on the | 
| 105 |  | design illustrated in Fig.~\ref{lipidFig:lipidModel}.  The head group | 
| 106 |  | of the phospholipid is replaced by a single Lennard-Jones sphere of | 
| 107 | < | diameter $fix$, with $fix$ scaling the well depth of its van der Walls | 
| 108 | < | interaction.  This sphere also contains a single dipole of magnitude | 
| 109 | < | $fix$, where $fix$ can be varied to mimic the charge separation of a | 
| 107 | > | diameter $\sigma_{\text{head}}$, with $\epsilon_{\text{head}}$ scaling | 
| 108 | > | the well depth of its van der Walls interaction.  This sphere also | 
| 109 | > | contains a single dipole of magnitude $|\boldsymbol{\mu}|$, where | 
| 110 | > | $|\boldsymbol{\mu}|$ can be varied to mimic the charge separation of a | 
| 111 |  | given phospholipid head group.  The atoms of the tail region are | 
| 112 |  | modeled by unified atom beads.  They are free of partial charges or | 
| 113 |  | dipoles, containing only Lennard-Jones interaction sites at their | 
| 114 |  | centers of mass.  As with the head groups, their potentials can be | 
| 115 | < | scaled by $fix$ and $fix$. | 
| 115 | > | scaled by $\sigma_{\text{tail}}$ and $\epsilon_{\text{tail}}$. | 
| 116 |  |  | 
| 117 |  | The long range interactions between lipids are given by the following: | 
| 118 |  | \begin{equation} | 
| 119 | < | EQ Here | 
| 119 | > | V_{\text{LJ}}(r_{ij}) = | 
| 120 | > | 4\epsilon_{ij} \biggl[ | 
| 121 | > | \biggl(\frac{\sigma_{ij}}{r_{ij}}\biggr)^{12} | 
| 122 | > | - \biggl(\frac{\sigma_{ij}}{r_{ij}}\biggr)^{6} | 
| 123 | > | \biggr] | 
| 124 |  | \label{lipidEq:LJpot} | 
| 125 |  | \end{equation} | 
| 126 |  | and | 
| 127 |  | \begin{equation} | 
| 128 | < | EQ Here | 
| 128 | > | V_{\text{dipole}}(\mathbf{r}_{ij},\boldsymbol{\Omega}_{i}, | 
| 129 | > | \boldsymbol{\Omega}_{j}) = \frac{|\mu_i||\mu_j|}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}r_{ij}^{3}} \biggl[ | 
| 130 | > | \boldsymbol{\hat{u}}_{i} \cdot \boldsymbol{\hat{u}}_{j} | 
| 131 | > | - | 
| 132 | > | \frac{3(\boldsymbol{\hat{u}}_i \cdot \mathbf{r}_{ij}) % | 
| 133 | > | (\boldsymbol{\hat{u}}_j \cdot \mathbf{r}_{ij}) } | 
| 134 | > | {r^{2}_{ij}} \biggr] | 
| 135 |  | \label{lipidEq:dipolePot} | 
| 136 |  | \end{equation} | 
| 137 |  | Where $V_{\text{LJ}}$ is the Lennard-Jones potential and | 
| 146 |  | $i$, and $\boldsymbol{\hat{u}}_i$ is the standard unit orientation | 
| 147 |  | vector of $\boldsymbol{\Omega}_i$. | 
| 148 |  |  | 
| 149 | < | The model also allows for the bonded interactions of bonds, bends, and | 
| 150 | < | torsions.  The bonds between two beads on a chain are of fixed length, | 
| 151 | < | and are maintained according to the {\sc rattle} algorithm. \cite{fix} | 
| 149 | > | The model also allows for the bonded interactions bends, and torsions. | 
| 150 | > | The bond between two beads on a chain is of fixed length, and is | 
| 151 | > | maintained according to the {\sc rattle} algorithm.\cite{andersen83} | 
| 152 |  | The bends are subject to a harmonic potential: | 
| 153 |  | \begin{equation} | 
| 154 | < | eq here | 
| 154 | > | V_{\text{bend}}(\theta) = k_{\theta}( \theta - \theta_0 )^2 | 
| 155 |  | \label{lipidEq:bendPot} | 
| 156 |  | \end{equation} | 
| 157 | < | where $fix$ scales the strength of the harmonic well, and $fix$ is the | 
| 158 | < | angle between bond vectors $fix$ and $fix$.  The torsion potential is | 
| 159 | < | given by: | 
| 157 | > | where $k_{\theta}$ scales the strength of the harmonic well, and | 
| 158 | > | $\theta$ is the angle between bond vectors | 
| 159 | > | (Fig.~\ref{lipidFig:lipidModel}). In addition, we have placed a | 
| 160 | > | ``ghost'' bend on the phospholipid head. The ghost bend adds a | 
| 161 | > | potential to keep the dipole pointed along the bilayer surface, where | 
| 162 | > | $theta$ is now the angle the dipole makes with respect to the {\sc | 
| 163 | > | head}-$\text{{\sc ch}}_2$ bond vector. The torsion potential is given | 
| 164 | > | by: | 
| 165 |  | \begin{equation} | 
| 166 | < | eq here | 
| 166 | > | V_{\text{torsion}}(\phi) = | 
| 167 | > | k_3 \cos^3 \phi + k_2 \cos^2 \phi + k_1 \cos \phi + k_0 | 
| 168 |  | \label{lipidEq:torsionPot} | 
| 169 |  | \end{equation} | 
| 170 |  | Here, the parameters $k_0$, $k_1$, $k_2$, and $k_3$ fit the cosine | 
| 171 |  | power series to the desired torsion potential surface, and $\phi$ is | 
| 172 | < | the angle between bondvectors $fix$ and $fix$ along the vector $fix$ | 
| 173 | < | (see Fig.:\ref{lipidFig:lipidModel}).  Long range interactions such as | 
| 174 | < | the Lennard-Jones potential are excluded for bead pairs involved in | 
| 175 | < | the same bond, bend, or torsion.  However, internal interactions not | 
| 172 | > | the angle the two end atoms have rotated about the middle bond | 
| 173 | > | (Fig.:\ref{lipidFig:lipidModel}).  Long range interactions such as the | 
| 174 | > | Lennard-Jones potential are excluded for atom pairs involved in the | 
| 175 | > | same bond, bend, or torsion.  However, internal interactions not | 
| 176 |  | directly involved in a bonded pair are calculated. | 
| 177 |  |  | 
| 178 |  | All simulations presented here use a two chained lipid as pictured in | 
| 179 | < | Fig.~\ref{lipidFig:twochain}.  The chains are both eight beads long, | 
| 179 | > | Fig.~\ref{lipidFig:lipidModel}.  The chains are both eight beads long, | 
| 180 |  | and their mass and Lennard Jones parameters are summarized in | 
| 181 |  | Table~\ref{lipidTable:tcLJParams}. The magnitude of the dipole moment | 
| 182 |  | for the head bead is 10.6~Debye, and the bend and torsion parameters | 
| 183 | < | are summarized in Table~\ref{lipidTable:teBTParams}. | 
| 183 | > | are summarized in Table~\ref{lipidTable:tcBendParams} and | 
| 184 | > | \ref{lipidTable:tcTorsionParams}. | 
| 185 |  |  | 
| 186 | < | \section{label{lipidSec:furtherMethod}Further Methodology} | 
| 186 | > | \begin{table} | 
| 187 | > | \caption{The Lennard Jones Parameters for the two chain phospholipids.} | 
| 188 | > | \label{lipidTable:tcLJParams} | 
| 189 | > | \begin{center} | 
| 190 | > | \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|} | 
| 191 | > | \hline | 
| 192 | > | & mass (amu) & $\sigma$($\mbox{\AA}$)  & $\epsilon$ (kcal/mol) \\ \hline | 
| 193 | > | {\sc head} & 72  & 4.0 & 0.185 \\ \hline | 
| 194 | > | {\sc ch}\cite{Siepmann1998} & 13.02 & 4.0 & 0.0189 \\ \hline | 
| 195 | > | $\text{{\sc ch}}_2$\cite{Siepmann1998} & 14.03 & 3.95 & 0.18 \\ \hline | 
| 196 | > | $\text{{\sc ch}}_3$\cite{Siepmann1998} & 15.04 & 3.75 & 0.25 \\ \hline | 
| 197 | > | {\sc ssd}\cite{liu96:new_model} & 18.03 & 3.051 & 0.152 \\ \hline | 
| 198 | > | \end{tabular} | 
| 199 | > | \end{center} | 
| 200 | > | \end{table} | 
| 201 |  |  | 
| 202 | + | \begin{table} | 
| 203 | + | \caption[Bend Parameters for the two chain phospholipids]{Bend Parameters for the two chain phospholipids. All alkane parameters are based off of those from TraPPE.\cite{Siepmann1998}} | 
| 204 | + | \label{lipidTable:tcBendParams} | 
| 205 | + | \begin{center} | 
| 206 | + | \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|} | 
| 207 | + | \hline | 
| 208 | + | & $k_{\theta}$ ( kcal/($\text{mol deg}^2$) ) & $\theta_0$ ( deg ) \\ \hline | 
| 209 | + | {\sc ghost}-{\sc head}-$\text{{\sc ch}}_2$ & 0.00177 & 129.78 \\ \hline | 
| 210 | + | $x$-{\sc ch}-$y$ & 58.84 & 112.0 \\ \hline | 
| 211 | + | $x$-$\text{{\sc ch}}_2$-$y$ & 58.84 & 114.0 \\ \hline | 
| 212 | + | \end{tabular} | 
| 213 | + | \end{center} | 
| 214 | + | \end{table} | 
| 215 | + |  | 
| 216 | + | \begin{table} | 
| 217 | + | \caption[Torsion Parameters for the two chain phospholipids]{Torsion Parameters for the two chain phospholipids. Alkane parameters based on TraPPE.\cite{Siepmann1998}} | 
| 218 | + | \label{lipidTable:tcTorsionParams} | 
| 219 | + | \begin{center} | 
| 220 | + | \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|c|} | 
| 221 | + | \hline | 
| 222 | + | All are in kcal/mol $\rightarrow$ & $k_3$ & $k_2$ & $k_1$ & $k_0$ \\ \hline | 
| 223 | + | $x$-{\sc ch}-$y$-$z$ & 3.3254 & -0.4215 & -1.686 & 1.1661 \\ \hline | 
| 224 | + | $x$-$\text{{\sc ch}}_2$-$\text{{\sc ch}}_2$-$y$ & 5.9602 & -0.568 & -3.802 & 2.1586 \\ \hline | 
| 225 | + | \end{tabular} | 
| 226 | + | \end{center} | 
| 227 | + | \end{table} | 
| 228 | + |  | 
| 229 | + |  | 
| 230 | + | \section{\label{lipidSec:furtherMethod}Further Methodology} | 
| 231 | + |  | 
| 232 |  | As mentioned previously, the water model used throughout these | 
| 233 | < | simulations was the {\scssd} model of | 
| 234 | < | Ichiye.\cite{liu:1996a,Liu:1996b,Chandra:1999} A discussion of the | 
| 235 | < | model can be found in Sec.~\ref{oopseSec:SSD}. As for the integration | 
| 236 | < | of the equations of motion, all simulations were performed in an | 
| 237 | < | orthorhombic periodic box with a thermostat on velocities, and an | 
| 238 | < | independent barostat on each cartesian axis $x$, $y$, and $z$.  This | 
| 239 | < | is the $\text{NPT}_{xyz}$. ensemble described in Sec.~\ref{oopseSec:Ensembles}. | 
| 233 | > | simulations was the {\sc ssd} model of | 
| 234 | > | Ichiye.\cite{liu96:new_model,liu96:monte_carlo,chandra99:ssd_md} A | 
| 235 | > | discussion of the model can be found in Sec.~\ref{oopseSec:SSD}. As | 
| 236 | > | for the integration of the equations of motion, all simulations were | 
| 237 | > | performed in an orthorhombic periodic box with a thermostat on | 
| 238 | > | velocities, and an independent barostat on each Cartesian axis $x$, | 
| 239 | > | $y$, and $z$.  This is the $\text{NPT}_{xyz}$. ensemble described in | 
| 240 | > | Sec.~\ref{oopseSec:Ensembles}. | 
| 241 |  |  | 
| 242 |  |  | 
| 243 |  | \subsection{\label{lipidSec:ExpSetup}Experimental Setup} | 
| 284 |  |  | 
| 285 |  | Table ~\ref{lipidTable:simNames} summarizes the names and important | 
| 286 |  | details of the simulations.  The B set of simulations were all started | 
| 287 | < | in an ordered bilayer and observed over a period of 10~ns. Simulution | 
| 287 | > | in an ordered bilayer and observed over a period of 10~ns. Simulation | 
| 288 |  | RL was integrated for approximately 20~ns starting from a random | 
| 289 |  | configuration as an example of spontaneous bilayer aggregation. | 
| 290 |  | Lastly, simulation RH was also started from a random configuration, | 
| 291 |  | but with a lesser water content and higher temperature to show the | 
| 292 | < | spontaneous aggregation of an inverted hexagonal lamellar phase. | 
| 292 | > | spontaneous aggregation of an inverted hexagonal lamellar phase. |