ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/mattDisertation/Introduction.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/mattDisertation/Introduction.tex (file contents):
Revision 1006 by mmeineke, Tue Feb 3 16:52:25 2004 UTC vs.
Revision 1009 by mmeineke, Tue Feb 3 17:54:39 2004 UTC

# Line 6 | Line 6 | Carlo. Molecular Dynamic simulations integrate the equ
6   The techniques used in the course of this research fall under the two
7   main classes of molecular simulation: Molecular Dynamics and Monte
8   Carlo. Molecular Dynamic simulations integrate the equations of motion
9 < for a given system of particles, allowing the researher to gain
9 > for a given system of particles, allowing the researcher to gain
10   insight into the time dependent evolution of a system. Diffusion
11   phenomena are readily studied with this simulation technique, making
12   Molecular Dynamics the main simulation technique used in this
13   research. Other aspects of the research fall under the Monte Carlo
14   class of simulations. In Monte Carlo, the configuration space
15 < available to the collection of particles is sampled stochastichally,
15 > available to the collection of particles is sampled stochastically,
16   or randomly. Each configuration is chosen with a given probability
17 < based on the Maxwell Boltzman distribution. These types of simulations
17 > based on the Maxwell Boltzmann distribution. These types of simulations
18   are best used to probe properties of a system that are only dependent
19   only on the state of the system. Structural information about a system
20   is most readily obtained through these types of methods.
# Line 31 | Line 31 | Statistical Mechanics concepts present in this dissert
31  
32   The following section serves as a brief introduction to some of the
33   Statistical Mechanics concepts present in this dissertation.  What
34 < follows is a brief derivation of Blotzman weighted statistics, and an
34 > follows is a brief derivation of Boltzmann weighted statistics, and an
35   explanation of how one can use the information to calculate an
36   observable for a system.  This section then concludes with a brief
37   discussion of the ergodic hypothesis and its relevance to this
38   research.
39  
40 < \subsection{\label{introSec:boltzman}Boltzman weighted statistics}
40 > \subsection{\label{introSec:boltzman}Boltzmann weighted statistics}
41  
42   Consider a system, $\gamma$, with some total energy,, $E_{\gamma}$.
43   Let $\Omega(E_{\gamma})$ represent the number of degenerate ways
# Line 86 | Line 86 | S = k_B \ln \Omega(E)
86   S = k_B \ln \Omega(E)
87   \label{introEq:SM5}
88   \end{equation}
89 < Where $k_B$ is the Boltzman constant.  Having defined entropy, one can
89 > Where $k_B$ is the Boltzmann constant.  Having defined entropy, one can
90   also define the temperature of the system using the relation
91   \begin{equation}
92   \frac{1}{T} = \biggl ( \frac{\partial S}{\partial E} \biggr )_{N,V}
# Line 111 | Line 111 | is allowed to fluctuate. Returning to the previous exa
111   the canonical ensemble, the number of particles, $N$, the volume, $V$,
112   and the temperature, $T$, are all held constant while the energy, $E$,
113   is allowed to fluctuate. Returning to the previous example, the bath
114 < system is now an infinitly large thermal bath, whose exchange of
114 > system is now an infinitely large thermal bath, whose exchange of
115   energy with the system $\gamma$ holds the temperature constant.  The
116   partitioning of energy in the bath system is then related to the total
117   energy of both systems and the fluctuations in $E_{\gamma}$:
# Line 127 | Line 127 | Where $\int\limits_{\boldsymbol{\Gamma}} d\boldsymbol{
127   \label{introEq:SM10}
128   \end{equation}
129   Where $\int\limits_{\boldsymbol{\Gamma}} d\boldsymbol{\Gamma}$ denotes
130 < an integration over all accessable phase space, $P_{\gamma}$ is the
130 > an integration over all accessible phase space, $P_{\gamma}$ is the
131   probability of being in a given phase state and
132   $A(\boldsymbol{\Gamma})$ is some observable that is a function of the
133   phase state.
# Line 156 | Line 156 | P_{\gamma} \propto e^{-\beta E_{\gamma}}
156   P_{\gamma} \propto e^{-\beta E_{\gamma}}
157   \label{introEq:SM13}
158   \end{equation}
159 < Where $\ln \Omega(E)$ has been factored out of the porpotionality as a
159 > Where $\ln \Omega(E)$ has been factored out of the proportionality as a
160   constant.  Normalizing the probability ($\int\limits_{\boldsymbol{\Gamma}}
161   d\boldsymbol{\Gamma} P_{\gamma} = 1$) gives
162   \begin{equation}
# Line 164 | Line 164 | P_{\gamma} = \frac{e^{-\beta E_{\gamma}}}
164   {\int\limits_{\boldsymbol{\Gamma}} d\boldsymbol{\Gamma} e^{-\beta E_{\gamma}}}
165   \label{introEq:SM14}
166   \end{equation}
167 < This result is the standard Boltzman statistical distribution.
167 > This result is the standard Boltzmann statistical distribution.
168   Applying it to Eq.~\ref{introEq:SM10} one can obtain the following relation for ensemble averages:
169   \begin{equation}
170   \langle A \rangle =
# Line 182 | Line 182 | ergodicity allows the unification of a time averaged o
182   systems, this is a valid assumption, except in cases where the system
183   may be trapped in a local feature (\emph{e.g.}~glasses). When valid,
184   ergodicity allows the unification of a time averaged observation and
185 < an ensemble averged one. If an observation is averaged over a
185 > an ensemble averaged one. If an observation is averaged over a
186   sufficiently long time, the system is assumed to visit all
187   appropriately available points in phase space, giving a properly
188   weighted statistical average. This allows the researcher freedom of
# Line 217 | Line 217 | the value of $f(x)$ at each point. The accumulated ave
217   $[a,b]$. The calculation of the integral could then be solved by
218   randomly choosing points along the interval $[a,b]$ and calculating
219   the value of $f(x)$ at each point. The accumulated average would then
220 < approach $I$ in the limit where the number of trials is infintely
220 > approach $I$ in the limit where the number of trials is infinitely
221   large.
222  
223   However, in Statistical Mechanics, one is typically interested in
# Line 235 | Line 235 | brute force method to this system would yield highly i
235   momentum. Therefore the momenta contribution of the integral can be
236   factored out, leaving the configurational integral. Application of the
237   brute force method to this system would yield highly inefficient
238 < results. Due to the Boltzman weighting of this integral, most random
238 > results. Due to the Boltzmann weighting of this integral, most random
239   configurations will have a near zero contribution to the ensemble
240   average. This is where importance sampling comes into
241   play.\cite{allen87:csl}
# Line 263 | Line 263 | Looking at Eq.~\ref{eq:mcEnsAvg}, and realizing
263          {\int d^N \mathbf{r}~e^{-\beta V(\mathbf{r}^N)}}
264   \label{introEq:MCboltzman}
265   \end{equation}
266 < Where $\rho_{kT}$ is the boltzman distribution.  The ensemble average
266 > Where $\rho_{kT}$ is the Boltzmann distribution.  The ensemble average
267   can be rewritten as
268   \begin{equation}
269   \langle A \rangle = \int d^N \mathbf{r}~A(\mathbf{r}^N)
# Line 285 | Line 285 | sampled from the distribution $\rho_{kT}(\mathbf{r}^N)
285   \end{equation}
286   The difficulty is selecting points $\mathbf{r}^N$ such that they are
287   sampled from the distribution $\rho_{kT}(\mathbf{r}^N)$.  A solution
288 < was proposed by Metropolis et al.\cite{metropolis:1953} which involved
288 > was proposed by Metropolis \emph{et al}.\cite{metropolis:1953} which involved
289   the use of a Markov chain whose limiting distribution was
290   $\rho_{kT}(\mathbf{r}^N)$.
291  
# Line 297 | Line 297 | conditions:\cite{leach01:mm}
297   \item The outcome of each trial depends only on the outcome of the previous trial.
298   \item Each trial belongs to a finite set of outcomes called the state space.
299   \end{enumerate}
300 < If given two configuartions, $\mathbf{r}^N_m$ and $\mathbf{r}^N_n$,
301 < $\rho_m$ and $\rho_n$ are the probablilities of being in state
300 > If given two configurations, $\mathbf{r}^N_m$ and $\mathbf{r}^N_n$,
301 > $\rho_m$ and $\rho_n$ are the probabilities of being in state
302   $\mathbf{r}^N_m$ and $\mathbf{r}^N_n$ respectively.  Further, the two
303   states are linked by a transition probability, $\pi_{mn}$, which is the
304   probability of going from state $m$ to state $n$.
# Line 343 | Line 343 | Eq.~\ref{introEq:MCmarkovEquil} is solved such that
343  
344   In the Metropolis method\cite{metropolis:1953}
345   Eq.~\ref{introEq:MCmarkovEquil} is solved such that
346 < $\boldsymbol{\rho}_{\text{limit}}$ matches the Boltzman distribution
346 > $\boldsymbol{\rho}_{\text{limit}}$ matches the Boltzmann distribution
347   of states.  The method accomplishes this by imposing the strong
348   condition of microscopic reversibility on the equilibrium
349   distribution.  Meaning, that at equilibrium the probability of going
# Line 352 | Line 352 | from $m$ to $n$ is the same as going from $n$ to $m$.
352   \rho_m\pi_{mn} = \rho_n\pi_{nm}
353   \label{introEq:MCmicroReverse}
354   \end{equation}
355 < Further, $\boldsymbol{\alpha}$ is chosen to be a symetric matrix in
355 > Further, $\boldsymbol{\alpha}$ is chosen to be a symmetric matrix in
356   the Metropolis method.  Using Eq.~\ref{introEq:MCpi},
357   Eq.~\ref{introEq:MCmicroReverse} becomes
358   \begin{equation}
# Line 360 | Line 360 | Eq.~\ref{introEq:MCmicroReverse} becomes
360          \frac{\rho_n}{\rho_m}
361   \label{introEq:MCmicro2}
362   \end{equation}
363 < For a Boltxman limiting distribution,
363 > For a Boltzmann limiting distribution,
364   \begin{equation}
365   \frac{\rho_n}{\rho_m} = e^{-\beta[\mathcal{U}(n) - \mathcal{U}(m)]}
366          = e^{-\beta \Delta \mathcal{U}}
# Line 380 | Line 380 | Metropolis method proceeds as follows
380   Metropolis method proceeds as follows
381   \begin{enumerate}
382   \item Generate an initial configuration $\mathbf{r}^N$ which has some finite probability in $\rho_{kT}$.
383 < \item Modify $\mathbf{r}^N$, to generate configuratioon $\mathbf{r^{\prime}}^N$.
383 > \item Modify $\mathbf{r}^N$, to generate configuration $\mathbf{r^{\prime}}^N$.
384   \item If the new configuration lowers the energy of the system, accept the move with unity ($\mathbf{r}^N$ becomes $\mathbf{r^{\prime}}^N$).  Otherwise accept with probability $e^{-\beta \Delta \mathcal{U}}$.
385 < \item Accumulate the average for the configurational observable of intereest.
385 > \item Accumulate the average for the configurational observable of interest.
386   \item Repeat from step 2 until the average converges.
387   \end{enumerate}
388   One important note is that the average is accumulated whether the move
389   is accepted or not, this ensures proper weighting of the average.
390   Using Eq.~\ref{introEq:Importance4} it becomes clear that the
391   accumulated averages are the ensemble averages, as this method ensures
392 < that the limiting distribution is the Boltzman distribution.
392 > that the limiting distribution is the Boltzmann distribution.
393  
394   \section{\label{introSec:MD}Molecular Dynamics Simulations}
395  
# Line 409 | Line 409 | However, when the observable is dependent only on the
409   researcher is interested.  If the observables depend on momenta in
410   any fashion, then the only choice is molecular dynamics in some form.
411   However, when the observable is dependent only on the configuration,
412 < then most of the time Monte Carlo techniques will be more efficent.
412 > then most of the time Monte Carlo techniques will be more efficient.
413  
414   The focus of research in the second half of this dissertation is
415   centered around the dynamic properties of phospholipid bilayers,
# Line 432 | Line 432 | positions were selected that in some cases dispersed t
432   Ch.~\ref{chapt:lipid} deals with the formation and equilibrium dynamics of
433   phospholipid membranes.  Therefore in these simulations initial
434   positions were selected that in some cases dispersed the lipids in
435 < water, and in other cases structured the lipids into preformed
435 > water, and in other cases structured the lipids into performed
436   bilayers.  Important considerations at this stage of the simulation are:
437   \begin{itemize}
438   \item There are no major overlaps of molecular or atomic orbitals
439 < \item Velocities are chosen in such a way as to not gie the system a non=zero total momentum or angular momentum.
440 < \item It is also sometimes desireable to select the velocities to correctly sample the target temperature.
439 > \item Velocities are chosen in such a way as to not give the system a non=zero total momentum or angular momentum.
440 > \item It is also sometimes desirable to select the velocities to correctly sample the target temperature.
441   \end{itemize}
442  
443   The first point is important due to the amount of potential energy
444   generated by having two particles too close together.  If overlap
445   occurs, the first evaluation of forces will return numbers so large as
446 < to render the numerical integration of teh motion meaningless.  The
446 > to render the numerical integration of the motion meaningless.  The
447   second consideration keeps the system from drifting or rotating as a
448   whole.  This arises from the fact that most simulations are of systems
449   in equilibrium in the absence of outside forces.  Therefore any net
450   movement would be unphysical and an artifact of the simulation method
451   used.  The final point addresses the selection of the magnitude of the
452 < initial velocities.  For many simulations it is convienient to use
452 > initial velocities.  For many simulations it is convenient to use
453   this opportunity to scale the amount of kinetic energy to reflect the
454   desired thermal distribution of the system.  However, it must be noted
455   that most systems will require further velocity rescaling after the
# Line 474 | Line 474 | group in a vacuum, the behavior of the system will be
474   arranged in a $10 \times 10 \times 10$ cube, 488 particles will be
475   exposed to the surface.  Unless one is simulating an isolated particle
476   group in a vacuum, the behavior of the system will be far from the
477 < desired bulk charecteristics.  To offset this, simulations employ the
477 > desired bulk characteristics.  To offset this, simulations employ the
478   use of periodic boundary images.\cite{born:1912}
479  
480   The technique involves the use of an algorithm that replicates the
481 < simulation box on an infinite lattice in cartesian space.  Any given
481 > simulation box on an infinite lattice in Cartesian space.  Any given
482   particle leaving the simulation box on one side will have an image of
483   itself enter on the opposite side (see Fig.~\ref{introFig:pbc}).  In
484 < addition, this sets that any given particle pair has an image, real or
485 < periodic, within $fix$ of each other.  A discussion of the method used
486 < to calculate the periodic image can be found in
484 > addition, this sets that any two particles have an image, real or
485 > periodic, within $\text{box}/2$ of each other.  A discussion of the
486 > method used to calculate the periodic image can be found in
487   Sec.\ref{oopseSec:pbc}.
488  
489   \begin{figure}
490   \centering
491   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{pbcFig.eps}
492 < \caption[An illustration of periodic boundry conditions]{A 2-D illustration of periodic boundry conditions. As one particle leaves the right of the simulation box, an image of it enters the left.}
492 > \caption[An illustration of periodic boundary conditions]{A 2-D illustration of periodic boundary conditions. As one particle leaves the right of the simulation box, an image of it enters the left.}
493   \label{introFig:pbc}
494   \end{figure}
495  
# Line 498 | Line 498 | predetermined distance, $r_{\text{cut}}$, are not incl
498   cutoff radius be employed.  Using a cutoff radius improves the
499   efficiency of the force evaluation, as particles farther than a
500   predetermined distance, $r_{\text{cut}}$, are not included in the
501 < calculation.\cite{Frenkel1996} In a simultation with periodic images,
501 > calculation.\cite{Frenkel1996} In a simulation with periodic images,
502   $r_{\text{cut}}$ has a maximum value of $\text{box}/2$.
503   Fig.~\ref{introFig:rMax} illustrates how when using an
504   $r_{\text{cut}}$ larger than this value, or in the extreme limit of no
505   $r_{\text{cut}}$ at all, the corners of the simulation box are
506   unequally weighted due to the lack of particle images in the $x$, $y$,
507 < or $z$ directions past a disance of $\text{box} / 2$.
507 > or $z$ directions past a distance of $\text{box} / 2$.
508  
509   \begin{figure}
510   \centering
# Line 524 | Line 524 | Newtonian equations of motion.
524   \begin{figure}
525   \centering
526   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{shiftedPot.eps}
527 < \caption[Shifting the Lennard-Jones Potential]{The Lennard-Jones potential is shifted to remove the discontiuity at $r_{\text{cut}}$.}
527 > \caption[Shifting the Lennard-Jones Potential]{The Lennard-Jones potential (blue line) is shifted (red line) to remove the discontinuity at $r_{\text{cut}}$.}
528   \label{introFig:shiftPot}
529   \end{figure}
530  
# Line 542 | Line 542 | A starting point for the discussion of molecular dynam
542   \subsection{\label{introSec:mdIntegrate} Integration of the equations of motion}
543  
544   A starting point for the discussion of molecular dynamics integrators
545 < is the Verlet algorithm. \cite{Frenkel1996} It begins with a Taylor
545 > is the Verlet algorithm.\cite{Frenkel1996} It begins with a Taylor
546   expansion of position in time:
547   \begin{equation}
548 < eq here
548 > q(t+\Delta t)= q(t) + v(t)\Delta t + \frac{F(t)}{2m}\Delta t^2 +
549 >        \frac{\Delta t^3}{3!}\frac{\partial q(t)}{\partial t} +
550 >        \mathcal{O}(\Delta t^4)
551   \label{introEq:verletForward}
552   \end{equation}
553   As well as,
554   \begin{equation}
555 < eq here
555 > q(t-\Delta t)= q(t) - v(t)\Delta t + \frac{F(t)}{2m}\Delta t^2 -
556 >        \frac{\Delta t^3}{3!}\frac{\partial q(t)}{\partial t} +
557 >        \mathcal{O}(\Delta t^4)
558   \label{introEq:verletBack}
559   \end{equation}
560 < Adding together Eq.~\ref{introEq:verletForward} and
560 > Where $m$ is the mass of the particle, $q(t)$ is the position at time
561 > $t$, $v(t)$ the velocity, and $F(t)$ the force acting on the
562 > particle. Adding together Eq.~\ref{introEq:verletForward} and
563   Eq.~\ref{introEq:verletBack} results in,
564   \begin{equation}
565 < eq here
565 > q(t+\Delta t)+q(t-\Delta t) =
566 >        2q(t) + \frac{F(t)}{m}\Delta t^2 + \mathcal{O}(\Delta t^4)
567   \label{introEq:verletSum}
568   \end{equation}
569   Or equivalently,
570   \begin{equation}
571 < eq here
571 > q(t+\Delta t) =
572 >        2q(t) - q(t-\Delta t) + \frac{F(t)}{m}\Delta t^2 +
573 >        \mathcal{O}(\Delta t^4)
574   \label{introEq:verletFinal}
575   \end{equation}
576   Which contains an error in the estimate of the new positions on the
577   order of $\Delta t^4$.
578  
579   In practice, however, the simulations in this research were integrated
580 < with a velocity reformulation of teh Verlet method.\cite{allen87:csl}
580 > with a velocity reformulation of the Verlet method.\cite{allen87:csl}
581   \begin{equation}
582 < eq here
582 > q(t+\Delta t)= q(t) + v(t)\Delta t + \frac{F(t)}{2m}\Delta t^2
583   \label{introEq:MDvelVerletPos}
584   \end{equation}
585   \begin{equation}
586 < eq here
586 > v(t+\Delta t) = v(t) + \frac{\Delta t}{2m}[F(t) + F(t+\Delta t)]
587   \label{introEq:MDvelVerletVel}
588   \end{equation}
589   The original Verlet algorithm can be regained by substituting the
# Line 583 | Line 592 | importance, as it is a measure of how closely one is f
592   very little long term drift in energy conservation.  Energy
593   conservation in a molecular dynamics simulation is of extreme
594   importance, as it is a measure of how closely one is following the
595 < ``true'' trajectory wtih the finite integration scheme.  An exact
595 > ``true'' trajectory with the finite integration scheme.  An exact
596   solution to the integration will conserve area in phase space, as well
597   as be reversible in time, that is, the trajectory integrated forward
598   or backwards will exactly match itself.  Having a finite algorithm
# Line 594 | Line 603 | a pseudo-Hamiltonian which shadows the real one in pha
603   It can be shown,\cite{Frenkel1996} that although the Verlet algorithm
604   does not rigorously preserve the actual Hamiltonian, it does preserve
605   a pseudo-Hamiltonian which shadows the real one in phase space.  This
606 < pseudo-Hamiltonian is proveably area-conserving as well as time
606 > pseudo-Hamiltonian is provably area-conserving as well as time
607   reversible.  The fact that it shadows the true Hamiltonian in phase
608   space is acceptable in actual simulations as one is interested in the
609   ensemble average of the observable being measured.  From the ergodic
# Line 605 | Line 614 | parameters are needed to describe the motions.  The si
614   \subsection{\label{introSec:MDfurther}Further Considerations}
615   In the simulations presented in this research, a few additional
616   parameters are needed to describe the motions.  The simulations
617 < involving water and phospholipids in Chapt.~\ref{chaptLipids} are
617 > involving water and phospholipids in Ch.~\ref{chaptLipids} are
618   required to integrate the equations of motions for dipoles on atoms.
619   This involves an additional three parameters be specified for each
620   dipole atom: $\phi$, $\theta$, and $\psi$.  These three angles are
# Line 627 | Line 636 | Where $\omega^s_i$ is the angular velocity in the lab
636   \label{introEq:MDeuleeerPsi}
637   \end{equation}
638   Where $\omega^s_i$ is the angular velocity in the lab space frame
639 < along cartesian coordinate $i$.  However, a difficulty arises when
639 > along Cartesian coordinate $i$.  However, a difficulty arises when
640   attempting to integrate Eq.~\ref{introEq:MDeulerPhi} and
641   Eq.~\ref{introEq:MDeulerPsi}. The $\frac{1}{\sin \theta}$ present in
642   both equations means there is a non-physical instability present when
# Line 657 | Line 666 | degree of freedom, and $f_j$ is the force on that degr
666   \end{equation}
667   Here, $r_j$ and $p_j$ are the position and conjugate momenta of a
668   degree of freedom, and $f_j$ is the force on that degree of freedom.
669 < $\Gamma$ is defined as the set of all positions nad conjugate momenta,
669 > $\Gamma$ is defined as the set of all positions and conjugate momenta,
670   $\{r_j,p_j\}$, and the propagator, $U(t)$, is defined
671   \begin {equation}
672   eq here
# Line 713 | Line 722 | comprised of unitary propagators, it is symplectic, an
722   This is the velocity Verlet formulation presented in
723   Sec.~\ref{introSec:MDintegrate}.  Because this integration scheme is
724   comprised of unitary propagators, it is symplectic, and therefore area
725 < preserving in phase space.  From the preceeding fatorization, one can
725 > preserving in phase space.  From the preceding factorization, one can
726   see that the integration of the equations of motion would follow:
727   \begin{enumerate}
728   \item calculate the velocities at the half step, $\frac{\Delta t}{2}$, from the forces calculated at the initial position.
# Line 737 | Line 746 | eq here
746   eq here
747   \label{introEq:SR1}
748   \end{equation}
749 < Where $\boldsymbol{\tau}(\mathbf{A})$ are the tourques of the system
749 > Where $\boldsymbol{\tau}(\mathbf{A})$ are the torques of the system
750   due to the configuration, and $\boldsymbol{/pi}$ are the conjugate
751   angular momenta of the system. The propagator, $G(\Delta t)$, becomes
752   \begin{equation}
753   eq here
754   \label{introEq:SR2}
755   \end{equation}
756 < Propagation fo the linear and angular momenta follows as in the Verlet
757 < scheme.  The propagation of positions also follows the verlet scheme
756 > Propagation of the linear and angular momenta follows as in the Verlet
757 > scheme.  The propagation of positions also follows the Verlet scheme
758   with the addition of a further symplectic splitting of the rotation
759   matrix propagation, $\mathcal{G}_{\text{rot}}(\Delta t)$.
760   \begin{equation}
# Line 761 | Line 770 | presents the random sequential adsorption simulations
770  
771   This dissertation is divided as follows:Chapt.~\ref{chapt:RSA}
772   presents the random sequential adsorption simulations of related
773 < pthalocyanines on a gold (111) surface. Chapt.~\ref{chapt:OOPSE}
773 > pthalocyanines on a gold (111) surface. Ch.~\ref{chapt:OOPSE}
774   is about the writing of the molecular dynamics simulation package
775 < {\sc oopse}, Chapt.~\ref{chapt:lipid} regards the simulations of
775 > {\sc oopse}, Ch.~\ref{chapt:lipid} regards the simulations of
776   phospholipid bilayers using a mesoscale model, and lastly,
777 < Chapt.~\ref{chapt:conclusion} concludes this dissertation with a
777 > Ch.~\ref{chapt:conclusion} concludes this dissertation with a
778   summary of all results. The chapters are arranged in chronological
779   order, and reflect the progression of techniques I employed during my
780   research.  
781  
782   The chapter concerning random sequential adsorption
783   simulations is a study in applying the principles of theoretical
784 < research in order to obtain a simple model capaable of explaining the
784 > research in order to obtain a simple model capable of explaining the
785   results.  My advisor, Dr. Gezelter, and I were approached by a
786   colleague, Dr. Lieberman, about possible explanations for partial
787 < coverge of a gold surface by a particular compound of hers. We
787 > coverage of a gold surface by a particular compound of hers. We
788   suggested it might be due to the statistical packing fraction of disks
789   on a plane, and set about to simulate this system.  As the events in
790   our model were not dynamic in nature, a Monte Carlo method was
791 < emplyed.  Here, if a molecule landed on the surface without
791 > employed.  Here, if a molecule landed on the surface without
792   overlapping another, then its landing was accepted.  However, if there
793   was overlap, the landing we rejected and a new random landing location
794   was chosen.  This defined our acceptance rules and allowed us to
# Line 792 | Line 801 | is a unique package capable of not only integrating th
801   pre-existing molecular dynamic simulation packages available, none
802   were capable of implementing the models we were developing.{\sc oopse}
803   is a unique package capable of not only integrating the equations of
804 < motion in cartesian space, but is also able to integrate the
804 > motion in Cartesian space, but is also able to integrate the
805   rotational motion of rigid bodies and dipoles.  Add to this the
806   ability to perform calculations across parallel processors and a
807   flexible script syntax for creating systems, and {\sc oopse} becomes a
808   very powerful scientific instrument for the exploration of our model.
809  
810 < Bringing us to Chapt.~\ref{chapt:lipid}. Using {\sc oopse}, I have been
811 < able to parametrize a mesoscale model for phospholipid simulations.
810 > Bringing us to Ch.~\ref{chapt:lipid}. Using {\sc oopse}, I have been
811 > able to parameterize a mesoscale model for phospholipid simulations.
812   This model retains information about solvent ordering about the
813   bilayer, as well as information regarding the interaction of the
814   phospholipid head groups' dipole with each other and the surrounding

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines