| 1 | mmeineke | 914 |  | 
| 2 |  |  |  | 
| 3 |  |  | \chapter{\label{chapt:intro}Introduction and Theoretical Background} | 
| 4 |  |  |  | 
| 5 |  |  |  | 
| 6 |  |  |  | 
| 7 |  |  | \section{\label{introSec:theory}Theoretical Background} | 
| 8 |  |  |  | 
| 9 | mmeineke | 953 | The techniques used in the course of this research fall under the two | 
| 10 |  |  | main classes of molecular simulation: Molecular Dynamics and Monte | 
| 11 |  |  | Carlo. Molecular Dynamic simulations integrate the equations of motion | 
| 12 |  |  | for a given system of particles, allowing the researher to gain | 
| 13 |  |  | insight into the time dependent evolution of a system. Diffusion | 
| 14 |  |  | phenomena are readily studied with this simulation technique, making | 
| 15 |  |  | Molecular Dynamics the main simulation technique used in this | 
| 16 |  |  | research. Other aspects of the research fall under the Monte Carlo | 
| 17 |  |  | class of simulations. In Monte Carlo, the configuration space | 
| 18 |  |  | available to the collection of particles is sampled stochastichally, | 
| 19 |  |  | or randomly. Each configuration is chosen with a given probability | 
| 20 |  |  | based on the Maxwell Boltzman distribution. These types of simulations | 
| 21 |  |  | are best used to probe properties of a system that are only dependent | 
| 22 |  |  | only on the state of the system. Structural information about a system | 
| 23 |  |  | is most readily obtained through these types of methods. | 
| 24 | mmeineke | 914 |  | 
| 25 | mmeineke | 953 | Although the two techniques employed seem dissimilar, they are both | 
| 26 |  |  | linked by the overarching principles of Statistical | 
| 27 |  |  | Thermodynamics. Statistical Thermodynamics governs the behavior of | 
| 28 |  |  | both classes of simulations and dictates what each method can and | 
| 29 |  |  | cannot do. When investigating a system, one most first analyze what | 
| 30 |  |  | thermodynamic properties of the system are being probed, then chose | 
| 31 |  |  | which method best suits that objective. | 
| 32 | mmeineke | 914 |  | 
| 33 |  |  | \subsection{\label{introSec:statThermo}Statistical Thermodynamics} | 
| 34 |  |  |  | 
| 35 |  |  | ergodic hypothesis | 
| 36 |  |  |  | 
| 37 |  |  | enesemble averages | 
| 38 |  |  |  | 
| 39 |  |  | \subsection{\label{introSec:monteCarlo}Monte Carlo Simulations} | 
| 40 |  |  |  | 
| 41 | mmeineke | 953 | The Monte Carlo method was developed by Metropolis and Ulam for their | 
| 42 |  |  | work in fissionable material.\cite{metropolis:1949} The method is so | 
| 43 | mmeineke | 955 | named, because it heavily uses random numbers in its | 
| 44 |  |  | solution.\cite{allen87:csl} The Monte Carlo method allows for the | 
| 45 |  |  | solution of integrals through the stochastic sampling of the values | 
| 46 |  |  | within the integral. In the simplest case, the evaluation of an | 
| 47 |  |  | integral would follow a brute force method of | 
| 48 |  |  | sampling.\cite{Frenkel1996} Consider the following single dimensional | 
| 49 |  |  | integral: | 
| 50 |  |  | \begin{equation} | 
| 51 |  |  | I = f(x)dx | 
| 52 |  |  | \label{eq:MCex1} | 
| 53 |  |  | \end{equation} | 
| 54 |  |  | The equation can be recast as: | 
| 55 |  |  | \begin{equation} | 
| 56 |  |  | I = (b-a)<f(x)> | 
| 57 |  |  | \label{eq:MCex2} | 
| 58 |  |  | \end{equation} | 
| 59 |  |  | Where $<f(x)>$ is the unweighted average over the interval | 
| 60 |  |  | $[a,b]$. The calculation of the integral could then be solved by | 
| 61 |  |  | randomly choosing points along the interval $[a,b]$ and calculating | 
| 62 |  |  | the value of $f(x)$ at each point. The accumulated average would then | 
| 63 |  |  | approach $I$ in the limit where the number of trials is infintely | 
| 64 |  |  | large. | 
| 65 | mmeineke | 914 |  | 
| 66 | mmeineke | 955 | However, in Statistical Mechanics, one is typically interested in | 
| 67 |  |  | integrals of the form: | 
| 68 |  |  | \begin{equation} | 
| 69 |  |  | <A> = \frac{A}{exp^{-\beta}} | 
| 70 |  |  | \label{eq:mcEnsAvg} | 
| 71 |  |  | \end{equation} | 
| 72 |  |  | Where $r^N$ stands for the coordinates of all $N$ particles and $A$ is | 
| 73 |  |  | some observable that is only dependent on position. $<A>$ is the | 
| 74 |  |  | ensemble average of $A$ as presented in | 
| 75 |  |  | Sec.~\ref{introSec:statThermo}. Because $A$ is independent of | 
| 76 |  |  | momentum, the momenta contribution of the integral can be factored | 
| 77 |  |  | out, leaving the configurational integral. Application of the brute | 
| 78 |  |  | force method to this system would yield highly inefficient | 
| 79 |  |  | results. Due to the Boltzman weighting of this integral, most random | 
| 80 |  |  | configurations will have a near zero contribution to the ensemble | 
| 81 |  |  | average. This is where a importance sampling comes into | 
| 82 |  |  | play.\cite{allen87:csl} | 
| 83 | mmeineke | 914 |  | 
| 84 | mmeineke | 955 | Importance Sampling is a method where one selects a distribution from | 
| 85 |  |  | which the random configurations are chosen in order to more | 
| 86 |  |  | efficiently calculate the integral.\cite{Frenkel1996} Consider again | 
| 87 |  |  | Eq.~\ref{eq:MCex1} rewritten to be: | 
| 88 |  |  |  | 
| 89 |  |  |  | 
| 90 |  |  |  | 
| 91 | mmeineke | 914 | \subsection{\label{introSec:md}Molecular Dynamics Simulations} | 
| 92 |  |  |  | 
| 93 |  |  | time averages | 
| 94 |  |  |  | 
| 95 |  |  | time integrating schemes | 
| 96 |  |  |  | 
| 97 |  |  | time reversible | 
| 98 |  |  |  | 
| 99 |  |  | symplectic methods | 
| 100 |  |  |  | 
| 101 |  |  | Extended ensembles (NVT NPT) | 
| 102 |  |  |  | 
| 103 |  |  | constrained dynamics | 
| 104 |  |  |  | 
| 105 |  |  | \section{\label{introSec:chapterLayout}Chapter Layout} | 
| 106 |  |  |  | 
| 107 |  |  | \subsection{\label{introSec:RSA}Random Sequential Adsorption} | 
| 108 |  |  |  | 
| 109 |  |  | \subsection{\label{introSec:OOPSE}The OOPSE Simulation Package} | 
| 110 |  |  |  | 
| 111 |  |  | \subsection{\label{introSec:bilayers}A Mesoscale Model for Phospholipid Bilayers} |