ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/electrostaticMethodsPaper/electrostaticMethods.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/electrostaticMethodsPaper/electrostaticMethods.tex (file contents):
Revision 2638 by chrisfen, Sun Mar 19 19:34:53 2006 UTC vs.
Revision 2640 by chrisfen, Mon Mar 20 13:31:52 2006 UTC

# Line 77 | Line 77 | accurately incorporate their effect, and since the com
77   leading to an effect excluded from the pair interactions within a unit
78   box.  In large systems, excessively large cutoffs need to be used to
79   accurately incorporate their effect, and since the computational cost
80 < increases proportionally with the cutoff sphere, it quickly becomes an
81 < impractical task to perform these calculations.
80 > increases proportionally with the cutoff sphere, it quickly becomes
81 > very time-consuming to perform these calculations.
82  
83 + There have been many efforts to address this issue of both proper and
84 + practical handling of electrostatic interactions, and these have
85 + resulted in the availability of a variety of
86 + techniques.\cite{Roux99,Sagui99,Tobias01} These are typically
87 + classified as implicit methods (i.e., continuum dielectrics, static
88 + dipolar fields),\cite{Born20,Grossfield00} explicit methods (i.e.,
89 + Ewald summations, interaction shifting or
90 + truncation),\cite{Ewald21,Steinbach94} or a mixture of the two (i.e.,
91 + reaction field type methods, fast multipole
92 + methods).\cite{Onsager36,Rokhlin85} The explicit or mixed methods are
93 + often preferred because they incorporate dynamic solvent molecules in
94 + the system of interest, but these methods are sometimes difficult to
95 + utilize because of their high computational cost.\cite{Roux99} In
96 + addition to this cost, there has been some question of the inherent
97 + periodicity of the explicit Ewald summation artificially influencing
98 + systems dynamics.\cite{Tobias01}
99 +
100 + In this paper, we focus on the common mixed and explicit methods of
101 + reaction filed and smooth particle mesh
102 + Ewald\cite{Onsager36,Essmann99} and a new set of shifted methods
103 + devised by Wolf {\it et al.} which we further extend.\cite{Wolf99}
104 + These new methods for handling electrostatics are quite
105 + computationally efficient, since they involve only a simple
106 + modification to the direct pairwise sum, and they lack the added
107 + periodicity of the Ewald sum. Below, these methods are evaluated using
108 + a variety of model systems and comparison methodologies to establish
109 + their usability in molecular simulations.
110 +
111   \subsection{The Ewald Sum}
112 < The complete accumulation electrostatic interactions in a system with periodic boundary conditions (PBC) requires the consideration of the effect of all charges within a simulation box, as well as those in the periodic replicas,
112 > The complete accumulation electrostatic interactions in a system with
113 > periodic boundary conditions (PBC) requires the consideration of the
114 > effect of all charges within a simulation box, as well as those in the
115 > periodic replicas,
116   \begin{equation}
117   V_\textrm{elec} = \frac{1}{2} {\sum_{\mathbf{n}}}^\prime \left[ \sum_{i=1}^N\sum_{j=1}^N \phi\left( \mathbf{r}_{ij} + L\mathbf{n},\bm{\Omega}_i,\bm{\Omega}_j\right) \right],
118   \label{eq:PBCSum}
119   \end{equation}
120 < where the sum over $\mathbf{n}$ is a sum over all periodic box replicas
121 < with integer coordinates $\mathbf{n} = (l,m,n)$, and the prime indicates
122 < $i = j$ are neglected for $\mathbf{n} = 0$.\cite{deLeeuw80} Within the
123 < sum, $N$ is the number of electrostatic particles, $\mathbf{r}_{ij}$ is
124 < $\mathbf{r}_j - \mathbf{r}_i$, $L$ is the cell length, $\bm{\Omega}_{i,j}$ are
125 < the Euler angles for $i$ and $j$, and $\phi$ is Poisson's equation
126 < ($\phi(\mathbf{r}_{ij}) = q_i q_j |\mathbf{r}_{ij}|^{-1}$ for charge-charge
127 < interactions). In the case of monopole electrostatics,
128 < eq. (\ref{eq:PBCSum}) is conditionally convergent and is discontiuous
129 < for non-neutral systems.
120 > where the sum over $\mathbf{n}$ is a sum over all periodic box
121 > replicas with integer coordinates $\mathbf{n} = (l,m,n)$, and the
122 > prime indicates $i = j$ are neglected for $\mathbf{n} =
123 > 0$.\cite{deLeeuw80} Within the sum, $N$ is the number of electrostatic
124 > particles, $\mathbf{r}_{ij}$ is $\mathbf{r}_j - \mathbf{r}_i$, $L$ is
125 > the cell length, $\bm{\Omega}_{i,j}$ are the Euler angles for $i$ and
126 > $j$, and $\phi$ is Poisson's equation ($\phi(\mathbf{r}_{ij}) = q_i
127 > q_j |\mathbf{r}_{ij}|^{-1}$ for charge-charge interactions). In the
128 > case of monopole electrostatics, eq. (\ref{eq:PBCSum}) is
129 > conditionally convergent and is discontinuous for non-neutral systems.
130  
131   This electrostatic summation problem was originally studied by Ewald
132   for the case of an infinite crystal.\cite{Ewald21}. The approach he
# Line 145 | Line 176 | real-space or reciprocal space portion of the summatio
176   direct and reciprocal-space portions of the summation.  The choice of
177   the magnitude of this value allows one to select whether the
178   real-space or reciprocal space portion of the summation is an
179 < $\mathscr{O}(N^2)$ calcualtion (with the other being
179 > $\mathscr{O}(N^2)$ calculation (with the other being
180   $\mathscr{O}(N)$).\cite{Sagui99} With appropriate choice of $\alpha$
181   and thoughtful algorithm development, this cost can be brought down to
182   $\mathscr{O}(N^{3/2})$.\cite{Perram88} The typical route taken to
# Line 181 | Line 212 | considering the use of the Ewald summation where the i
212   artificially stabilized by the periodic replicas introduced by the
213   Ewald summation.\cite{Weber00} Thus, care ought to be taken when
214   considering the use of the Ewald summation where the intrinsic
215 < perodicity may negatively affect the system dynamics.
215 > periodicity may negatively affect the system dynamics.
216  
217  
218   \subsection{The Wolf and Zahn Methods}
# Line 199 | Line 230 | the real-space portion of the Ewald sum) to aid conver
230   and a distance-dependent damping function (identical to that seen in
231   the real-space portion of the Ewald sum) to aid convergence
232   \begin{equation}
233 < V_{\textrm{Wolf}}(r_{ij})= \frac{q_iq_j \textrm{erfc}(\alpha r_{ij})}{r_{ij}}-\lim_{r_{ij}\rightarrow R_\textrm{c}}\left\{\frac{q_iq_j \textrm{erfc}(\alpha r_{ij})}{r_{ij}}\right\}.
233 > V_{\textrm{Wolf}}(r_{ij})= \frac{q_i q_j \textrm{erfc}(\alpha r_{ij})}{r_{ij}}-\lim_{r_{ij}\rightarrow R_\textrm{c}}\left\{\frac{q_iq_j \textrm{erfc}(\alpha r_{ij})}{r_{ij}}\right\}.
234   \label{eq:WolfPot}
235   \end{equation}
236   Eq. (\ref{eq:WolfPot}) is essentially the common form of a shifted
# Line 542 | Line 573 | between those computed from the particular method and
573   investigated through measurement of the angle ($\theta$) formed
574   between those computed from the particular method and those from SPME,
575   \begin{equation}
576 < \theta_f = \cos^{-1} \hat{f}_\textrm{SPME} \cdot \hat{f}_\textrm{Method},
576 > \theta_f = \cos^{-1} \left(\hat{f}_\textrm{SPME} \cdot \hat{f}_\textrm{Method}\right),
577   \end{equation}
578   where $\hat{f}_\textrm{M}$ is the unit vector pointing along the
579   force vector computed using method $M$.  
# Line 707 | Line 738 | al.},\cite{Wolf99} and this correction indeed improves
738   Correcting the resulting charged cutoff sphere is one of the purposes
739   of the damped Coulomb summation proposed by Wolf \textit{et
740   al.},\cite{Wolf99} and this correction indeed improves the results as
741 < seen in the Shifted-Potental rows.  While the undamped case of this
741 > seen in the {\sc sp} rows.  While the undamped case of this
742   method is a significant improvement over the pure cutoff, it still
743   doesn't correlate that well with SPME.  Inclusion of potential damping
744   improves the results, and using an $\alpha$ of 0.2 \AA $^{-1}$ shows
# Line 920 | Line 951 | the point charges for the pairwise summation methods;
951   increased, these peaks are smoothed out, and approach the SPME
952   curve. The damping acts as a distance dependent Gaussian screening of
953   the point charges for the pairwise summation methods; thus, the
954 < collisions are more elastic in the undamped {\sc sf} potental, and the
954 > collisions are more elastic in the undamped {\sc sf} potential, and the
955   stiffness of the potential is diminished as the electrostatic
956   interactions are softened by the damping function.  With $\alpha$
957   values of 0.2 \AA$^{-1}$, the {\sc sf} and {\sc sp} functions are

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines