ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/electrostaticMethodsPaper/electrostaticMethods.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/electrostaticMethodsPaper/electrostaticMethods.tex (file contents):
Revision 2645 by gezelter, Mon Mar 20 21:40:49 2006 UTC vs.
Revision 2649 by chrisfen, Tue Mar 21 14:58:12 2006 UTC

# Line 140 | Line 140 | V_\textrm{elec} = \frac{1}{2}& \sum_{i=1}^N\sum_{j=1}^
140   \end{split}
141   \label{eq:EwaldSum}
142   \end{equation}
143 < where $\alpha$ is a damping parameter, or separation constant, with
144 < units of \AA$^{-1}$, $\mathbf{k}$ are the reciprocal vectors and are
145 < equal to $2\pi\mathbf{n}/L^2$, and $\epsilon_\textrm{S}$ is the
146 < dielectric constant of the surrounding medium. The final two terms of
143 > where $\alpha$ is the damping or convergence parameter with units of
144 > \AA$^{-1}$, $\mathbf{k}$ are the reciprocal vectors and are equal to
145 > $2\pi\mathbf{n}/L^2$, and $\epsilon_\textrm{S}$ is the dielectric
146 > constant of the surrounding medium. The final two terms of
147   eq. (\ref{eq:EwaldSum}) are a particle-self term and a dipolar term
148   for interacting with a surrounding dielectric.\cite{Allen87} This
149   dipolar term was neglected in early applications in molecular
# Line 159 | Line 159 | convergent behavior.  Indeed, it has often been observ
159   convergence.  In more modern simulations, the simulation boxes have
160   grown large enough that a real-space cutoff could potentially give
161   convergent behavior.  Indeed, it has often been observed that the
162 < reciprocal-space portion of the Ewald sum can be vanishingly
163 < small compared to the real-space portion.\cite{XXX}
162 > reciprocal-space portion of the Ewald sum can be small and rapidly
163 > convergent compared to the real-space portion with the choice of small
164 > $\alpha$.\cite{Karasawa89,Kolafa92}
165  
166   \begin{figure}
167   \centering
# Line 176 | Line 177 | The original Ewald summation is an $\mathscr{O}(N^2)$
177   \end{figure}
178  
179   The original Ewald summation is an $\mathscr{O}(N^2)$ algorithm.  The
180 < separation constant $(\alpha)$ plays an important role in balancing
180 > convergence parameter $(\alpha)$ plays an important role in balancing
181   the computational cost between the direct and reciprocal-space
182   portions of the summation.  The choice of this value allows one to
183   select whether the real-space or reciprocal space portion of the
# Line 714 | Line 715 | The althernative methods were also evaluated with thre
715   manner across all systems and configurations.
716  
717   The althernative methods were also evaluated with three different
718 < cutoff radii (9, 12, and 15 \AA).  It should be noted that the damping
719 < parameter chosen in SPME, or so called ``Ewald Coefficient'', has a
720 < significant effect on the energies and forces calculated.  Typical
721 < molecular mechanics packages set this to a value dependent on the
722 < cutoff radius and a tolerance (typically less than $1 \times 10^{-4}$
723 < kcal/mol).  Smaller tolerances are typically associated with increased
724 < accuracy at the expense of increased time spent calculating the
725 < reciprocal-space portion of the summation.\cite{Perram88,Essmann95}
726 < The default TINKER tolerance of $1 \times 10^{-8}$ kcal/mol was used
727 < in all SPME calculations, resulting in Ewald Coefficients of 0.4200,
728 < 0.3119, and 0.2476 \AA$^{-1}$ for cutoff radii of 9, 12, and 15 \AA\
729 < respectively.
718 > cutoff radii (9, 12, and 15 \AA).  As noted previously, the
719 > convergence parameter ($\alpha$) plays a role in the balance of the
720 > real-space and reciprocal-space portions of the Ewald calculation.
721 > Typical molecular mechanics packages set this to a value dependent on
722 > the cutoff radius and a tolerance (typically less than $1 \times
723 > 10^{-4}$ kcal/mol).  Smaller tolerances are typically associated with
724 > increased accuracy at the expense of increased time spent calculating
725 > the reciprocal-space portion of the
726 > summation.\cite{Perram88,Essmann95} The default TINKER tolerance of $1
727 > \times 10^{-8}$ kcal/mol was used in all SPME calculations, resulting
728 > in Ewald Coefficients of 0.4200, 0.3119, and 0.2476 \AA$^{-1}$ for
729 > cutoff radii of 9, 12, and 15 \AA\ respectively.
730  
731   \section{Results and Discussion}
732  

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines