ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/electrostaticMethodsPaper/electrostaticMethods.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/electrostaticMethodsPaper/electrostaticMethods.tex (file contents):
Revision 2639 by chrisfen, Mon Mar 20 02:00:26 2006 UTC vs.
Revision 2653 by gezelter, Tue Mar 21 20:46:55 2006 UTC

# Line 65 | Line 65 | In molecular simulations, proper accumulation of the e
65   \section{Introduction}
66  
67   In molecular simulations, proper accumulation of the electrostatic
68 < interactions is considered one of the most essential and
69 < computationally demanding tasks.  The common molecular mechanics force
70 < fields are founded on representation of the atomic sites centered on
71 < full or partial charges shielded by Lennard-Jones type interactions.
72 < This means that nearly every pair interaction involves an
73 < charge-charge calculation.  Coupled with $r^{-1}$ decay, the monopole
74 < interactions quickly become a burden for molecular systems of all
75 < sizes.  For example, in small systems, the electrostatic pair
76 < interaction may not have decayed appreciably within the box length
77 < leading to an effect excluded from the pair interactions within a unit
78 < box.  In large systems, excessively large cutoffs need to be used to
79 < accurately incorporate their effect, and since the computational cost
80 < increases proportionally with the cutoff sphere, it quickly becomes
81 < very time-consuming to perform these calculations.
68 > interactions is essential and is one of the most
69 > computationally-demanding tasks.  The common molecular mechanics force
70 > fields represent atomic sites with full or partial charges protected
71 > by Lennard-Jones (short range) interactions.  This means that nearly
72 > every pair interaction involves a calculation of charge-charge forces.
73 > Coupled with relatively long-ranged $r^{-1}$ decay, the monopole
74 > interactions quickly become the most expensive part of molecular
75 > simulations.  Historically, the electrostatic pair interaction would
76 > not have decayed appreciably within the typical box lengths that could
77 > be feasibly simulated.  In the larger systems that are more typical of
78 > modern simulations, large cutoffs should be used to incorporate
79 > electrostatics correctly.
80  
81 < There have been many efforts to address this issue of both proper and
82 < practical handling of electrostatic interactions, and these have
83 < resulted in the availability of a variety of
84 < techniques.\cite{Roux99,Sagui99,Tobias01} These are typically
85 < classified as implicit methods (i.e., continuum dielectrics, static
86 < dipolar fields),\cite{Born20,Grossfield00} explicit methods (i.e.,
87 < Ewald summations, interaction shifting or
90 < trucation),\cite{Ewald21,Steinbach94} or a mixture of the two (i.e.,
81 > There have been many efforts to address the proper and practical
82 > handling of electrostatic interactions, and these have resulted in a
83 > variety of techniques.\cite{Roux99,Sagui99,Tobias01} These are
84 > typically classified as implicit methods (i.e., continuum dielectrics,
85 > static dipolar fields),\cite{Born20,Grossfield00} explicit methods
86 > (i.e., Ewald summations, interaction shifting or
87 > truncation),\cite{Ewald21,Steinbach94} or a mixture of the two (i.e.,
88   reaction field type methods, fast multipole
89   methods).\cite{Onsager36,Rokhlin85} The explicit or mixed methods are
90 < often preferred because they incorporate dynamic solvent molecules in
91 < the system of interest, but these methods are sometimes difficult to
92 < utilize because of their high computational cost.\cite{Roux99} In
93 < addition to this cost, there has been some question of the inherent
94 < periodicity of the explicit Ewald summation artificially influencing
95 < systems dynamics.\cite{Tobias01}
90 > often preferred because they physically incorporate solvent molecules
91 > in the system of interest, but these methods are sometimes difficult
92 > to utilize because of their high computational cost.\cite{Roux99} In
93 > addition to the computational cost, there have been some questions
94 > regarding possible artifacts caused by the inherent periodicity of the
95 > explicit Ewald summation.\cite{Tobias01}
96  
97 < In this paper, we focus on the common mixed and explicit methods of
98 < reaction filed and smooth particle mesh
99 < Ewald\cite{Onsager36,Essmann99} and a new set of shifted methods
100 < devised by Wolf {\it et al.} which we further extend.\cite{Wolf99}
101 < These new methods for handling electrostatics are quite
102 < computationally efficient, since they involve only a simple
103 < modification to the direct pairwise sum, and they lack the added
104 < periodicity of the Ewald sum. Below, these methods are evaluated using
105 < a variety of model systems and comparison methodologies to establish
106 < their useability in molecular simulations.
97 > In this paper, we focus on a new set of shifted methods devised by
98 > Wolf {\it et al.},\cite{Wolf99} which we further extend.  These
99 > methods along with a few other mixed methods (i.e. reaction field) are
100 > compared with the smooth particle mesh Ewald
101 > sum,\cite{Onsager36,Essmann99} which is our reference method for
102 > handling long-range electrostatic interactions. The new methods for
103 > handling electrostatics have the potential to scale linearly with
104 > increasing system size since they involve only a simple modification
105 > to the direct pairwise sum.  They also lack the added periodicity of
106 > the Ewald sum, so they can be used for systems which are non-periodic
107 > or which have one- or two-dimensional periodicity.  Below, these
108 > methods are evaluated using a variety of model systems to establish
109 > their usability in molecular simulations.
110  
111   \subsection{The Ewald Sum}
112   The complete accumulation electrostatic interactions in a system with
113   periodic boundary conditions (PBC) requires the consideration of the
114 < effect of all charges within a simulation box, as well as those in the
115 < periodic replicas,
114 > effect of all charges within a (cubic) simulation box as well as those
115 > in the periodic replicas,
116   \begin{equation}
117   V_\textrm{elec} = \frac{1}{2} {\sum_{\mathbf{n}}}^\prime \left[ \sum_{i=1}^N\sum_{j=1}^N \phi\left( \mathbf{r}_{ij} + L\mathbf{n},\bm{\Omega}_i,\bm{\Omega}_j\right) \right],
118   \label{eq:PBCSum}
# Line 123 | Line 123 | the cell length, $\bm{\Omega}_{i,j}$ are the Euler ang
123   0$.\cite{deLeeuw80} Within the sum, $N$ is the number of electrostatic
124   particles, $\mathbf{r}_{ij}$ is $\mathbf{r}_j - \mathbf{r}_i$, $L$ is
125   the cell length, $\bm{\Omega}_{i,j}$ are the Euler angles for $i$ and
126 < $j$, and $\phi$ is Poisson's equation ($\phi(\mathbf{r}_{ij}) = q_i
127 < q_j |\mathbf{r}_{ij}|^{-1}$ for charge-charge interactions). In the
128 < case of monopole electrostatics, eq. (\ref{eq:PBCSum}) is
129 < conditionally convergent and is discontiuous for non-neutral systems.
126 > $j$, and $\phi$ is the solution to Poisson's equation
127 > ($\phi(\mathbf{r}_{ij}) = q_i q_j |\mathbf{r}_{ij}|^{-1}$ for
128 > charge-charge interactions). In the case of monopole electrostatics,
129 > eq. (\ref{eq:PBCSum}) is conditionally convergent and is divergent for
130 > non-neutral systems.
131  
132 < This electrostatic summation problem was originally studied by Ewald
132 > The electrostatic summation problem was originally studied by Ewald
133   for the case of an infinite crystal.\cite{Ewald21}. The approach he
134   took was to convert this conditionally convergent sum into two
135   absolutely convergent summations: a short-ranged real-space summation
# Line 139 | Line 140 | V_\textrm{elec} = \frac{1}{2}& \sum_{i=1}^N\sum_{j=1}^
140   \end{split}
141   \label{eq:EwaldSum}
142   \end{equation}
143 < where $\alpha$ is a damping parameter, or separation constant, with
144 < units of \AA$^{-1}$, $\mathbf{k}$ are the reciprocal vectors and equal
143 > where $\alpha$ is the damping or convergence parameter with units of
144 > \AA$^{-1}$, $\mathbf{k}$ are the reciprocal vectors and are equal to
145   $2\pi\mathbf{n}/L^2$, and $\epsilon_\textrm{S}$ is the dielectric
146 < constant of the encompassing medium. The final two terms of
146 > constant of the surrounding medium. The final two terms of
147   eq. (\ref{eq:EwaldSum}) are a particle-self term and a dipolar term
148   for interacting with a surrounding dielectric.\cite{Allen87} This
149   dipolar term was neglected in early applications in molecular
150   simulations,\cite{Brush66,Woodcock71} until it was introduced by de
151   Leeuw {\it et al.} to address situations where the unit cell has a
152 < dipole moment and this dipole moment gets magnified through
153 < replication of the periodic images.\cite{deLeeuw80,Smith81} If this
154 < term is taken to be zero, the system is using conducting boundary
152 > dipole moment which is magnified through replication of the periodic
153 > images.\cite{deLeeuw80,Smith81} If this term is taken to be zero, the
154 > system is said to be using conducting (or ``tin-foil'') boundary
155   conditions, $\epsilon_{\rm S} = \infty$. Figure
156   \ref{fig:ewaldTime} shows how the Ewald sum has been applied over
157 < time.  Initially, due to the small size of systems, the entire
158 < simulation box was replicated to convergence.  Currently, we balance a
159 < spherical real-space cutoff with the reciprocal sum and consider the
160 < surrounding dielectric.
157 > time.  Initially, due to the small system sizes that could be
158 > simulated feasibly, the entire simulation box was replicated to
159 > convergence.  In more modern simulations, the systems have grown large
160 > enough that a real-space cutoff could potentially give convergent
161 > behavior.  Indeed, it has been observed that with the choice of a
162 > small $\alpha$, the reciprocal-space portion of the Ewald sum can be
163 > rapidly convergent and small relative to the real-space
164 > portion.\cite{Karasawa89,Kolafa92}
165 >
166   \begin{figure}
167   \centering
168 < \includegraphics[width = \linewidth]{./ewaldProgression.pdf}
169 < \caption{How the application of the Ewald summation has changed with
170 < the increase in computer power.  Initially, only small numbers of
171 < particles could be studied, and the Ewald sum acted to replicate the
172 < unit cell charge distribution out to convergence.  Now, much larger
173 < systems of charges are investigated with fixed distance cutoffs.  The
168 < calculated structure factor is used to sum out to great distance, and
169 < a surrounding dielectric term is included.}
168 > \includegraphics[width = \linewidth]{./ewaldProgression2.pdf}
169 > \caption{The change in the application of the Ewald sum with
170 > increasing computational power.  Initially, only small systems could
171 > be studied, and the Ewald sum replicated the simulation box to
172 > convergence.  Now, much larger systems of charges are investigated
173 > with fixed-distance cutoffs.}
174   \label{fig:ewaldTime}
175   \end{figure}
176  
177 < The Ewald summation in the straight-forward form is an
178 < $\mathscr{O}(N^2)$ algorithm.  The separation constant $(\alpha)$
179 < plays an important role in the computational cost balance between the
180 < direct and reciprocal-space portions of the summation.  The choice of
181 < the magnitude of this value allows one to select whether the
182 < real-space or reciprocal space portion of the summation is an
183 < $\mathscr{O}(N^2)$ calcualtion (with the other being
184 < $\mathscr{O}(N)$).\cite{Sagui99} With appropriate choice of $\alpha$
185 < and thoughtful algorithm development, this cost can be brought down to
186 < $\mathscr{O}(N^{3/2})$.\cite{Perram88} The typical route taken to
187 < reduce the cost of the Ewald summation further is to set $\alpha$ such
188 < that the real-space interactions decay rapidly, allowing for a short
189 < spherical cutoff, and then optimize the reciprocal space summation.
190 < These optimizations usually involve the utilization of the fast
187 < Fourier transform (FFT),\cite{Hockney81} leading to the
177 > The original Ewald summation is an $\mathscr{O}(N^2)$ algorithm.  The
178 > convergence parameter $(\alpha)$ plays an important role in balancing
179 > the computational cost between the direct and reciprocal-space
180 > portions of the summation.  The choice of this value allows one to
181 > select whether the real-space or reciprocal space portion of the
182 > summation is an $\mathscr{O}(N^2)$ calculation (with the other being
183 > $\mathscr{O}(N)$).\cite{Sagui99} With the appropriate choice of
184 > $\alpha$ and thoughtful algorithm development, this cost can be
185 > reduced to $\mathscr{O}(N^{3/2})$.\cite{Perram88} The typical route
186 > taken to reduce the cost of the Ewald summation even further is to set
187 > $\alpha$ such that the real-space interactions decay rapidly, allowing
188 > for a short spherical cutoff. Then the reciprocal space summation is
189 > optimized.  These optimizations usually involve utilization of the
190 > fast Fourier transform (FFT),\cite{Hockney81} leading to the
191   particle-particle particle-mesh (P3M) and particle mesh Ewald (PME)
192   methods.\cite{Shimada93,Luty94,Luty95,Darden93,Essmann95} In these
193   methods, the cost of the reciprocal-space portion of the Ewald
194 < summation is from $\mathscr{O}(N^2)$ down to $\mathscr{O}(N \log N)$.
194 > summation is reduced from $\mathscr{O}(N^2)$ down to $\mathscr{O}(N
195 > \log N)$.
196  
197 < These developments and optimizations have led the use of the Ewald
198 < summation to become routine in simulations with periodic boundary
199 < conditions. However, in certain systems the intrinsic three
200 < dimensional periodicity can prove to be problematic, such as two
201 < dimensional surfaces and membranes.  The Ewald sum has been
202 < reformulated to handle 2D
203 < systems,\cite{Parry75,Parry76,Heyes77,deLeeuw79,Rhee89}, but the new
204 < methods have been found to be computationally
205 < expensive.\cite{Spohr97,Yeh99} Inclusion of a correction term in the
206 < full Ewald summation is a possible direction for enabling the handling
203 < of 2D systems and the inclusion of the optimizations described
204 < previously.\cite{Yeh99}
197 > These developments and optimizations have made the use of the Ewald
198 > summation routine in simulations with periodic boundary
199 > conditions. However, in certain systems, such as vapor-liquid
200 > interfaces and membranes, the intrinsic three-dimensional periodicity
201 > can prove problematic.  The Ewald sum has been reformulated to handle
202 > 2D systems,\cite{Parry75,Parry76,Heyes77,deLeeuw79,Rhee89}, but the
203 > new methods are computationally expensive.\cite{Spohr97,Yeh99}
204 > Inclusion of a correction term in the Ewald summation is a possible
205 > direction for handling 2D systems while still enabling the use of the
206 > modern optimizations.\cite{Yeh99}
207  
208   Several studies have recognized that the inherent periodicity in the
209 < Ewald sum can also have an effect on systems that have the same
210 < dimensionality.\cite{Roberts94,Roberts95,Luty96,Hunenberger99a,Hunenberger99b,Weber00}
211 < Good examples are solvated proteins kept at high relative
212 < concentration due to the periodicity of the electrostatics.  In these
209 > Ewald sum can also have an effect on three-dimensional
210 > systems.\cite{Roberts94,Roberts95,Luty96,Hunenberger99a,Hunenberger99b,Weber00}
211 > Solvated proteins are essentially kept at high concentration due to
212 > the periodicity of the electrostatic summation method.  In these
213   systems, the more compact folded states of a protein can be
214   artificially stabilized by the periodic replicas introduced by the
215 < Ewald summation.\cite{Weber00} Thus, care ought to be taken when
216 < considering the use of the Ewald summation where the intrinsic
217 < perodicity may negatively affect the system dynamics.
215 > Ewald summation.\cite{Weber00} Thus, care must be taken when
216 > considering the use of the Ewald summation where the assumed
217 > periodicity would introduce spurious effects in the system dynamics.
218  
217
219   \subsection{The Wolf and Zahn Methods}
220   In a recent paper by Wolf \textit{et al.}, a procedure was outlined
221   for the accurate accumulation of electrostatic interactions in an
222 < efficient pairwise fashion and lacks the inherent periodicity of the
223 < Ewald summation.\cite{Wolf99} Wolf \textit{et al.} observed that the
224 < electrostatic interaction is effectively short-ranged in condensed
225 < phase systems and that neutralization of the charge contained within
226 < the cutoff radius is crucial for potential stability. They devised a
227 < pairwise summation method that ensures charge neutrality and gives
228 < results similar to those obtained with the Ewald summation.  The
229 < resulting shifted Coulomb potential (Eq. \ref{eq:WolfPot}) includes
230 < image-charges subtracted out through placement on the cutoff sphere
231 < and a distance-dependent damping function (identical to that seen in
232 < the real-space portion of the Ewald sum) to aid convergence
222 > efficient pairwise fashion.  This procedure lacks the inherent
223 > periodicity of the Ewald summation.\cite{Wolf99} Wolf \textit{et al.}
224 > observed that the electrostatic interaction is effectively
225 > short-ranged in condensed phase systems and that neutralization of the
226 > charge contained within the cutoff radius is crucial for potential
227 > stability. They devised a pairwise summation method that ensures
228 > charge neutrality and gives results similar to those obtained with the
229 > Ewald summation.  The resulting shifted Coulomb potential
230 > (Eq. \ref{eq:WolfPot}) includes image-charges subtracted out through
231 > placement on the cutoff sphere and a distance-dependent damping
232 > function (identical to that seen in the real-space portion of the
233 > Ewald sum) to aid convergence
234   \begin{equation}
235 < V_{\textrm{Wolf}}(r_{ij})= \frac{q_iq_j \textrm{erfc}(\alpha r_{ij})}{r_{ij}}-\lim_{r_{ij}\rightarrow R_\textrm{c}}\left\{\frac{q_iq_j \textrm{erfc}(\alpha r_{ij})}{r_{ij}}\right\}.
235 > V_{\textrm{Wolf}}(r_{ij})= \frac{q_i q_j \textrm{erfc}(\alpha r_{ij})}{r_{ij}}-\lim_{r_{ij}\rightarrow R_\textrm{c}}\left\{\frac{q_iq_j \textrm{erfc}(\alpha r_{ij})}{r_{ij}}\right\}.
236   \label{eq:WolfPot}
237   \end{equation}
238   Eq. (\ref{eq:WolfPot}) is essentially the common form of a shifted
# Line 255 | Line 257 | the potential are not commensurate.  Attempts to use b
257   force expressions for use in simulations involving water.\cite{Zahn02}
258   In their work, they pointed out that the forces and derivative of
259   the potential are not commensurate.  Attempts to use both
260 < Eqs. (\ref{eq:WolfPot}) and (\ref{eq:WolfForces}) together will lead
260 > eqs. (\ref{eq:WolfPot}) and (\ref{eq:WolfForces}) together will lead
261   to poor energy conservation.  They correctly observed that taking the
262   limit shown in equation (\ref{eq:WolfPot}) {\it after} calculating the
263   derivatives gives forces for a different potential energy function
264 < than the one shown in Eq. (\ref{eq:WolfPot}).
264 > than the one shown in eq. (\ref{eq:WolfPot}).
265  
266 < Zahn \textit{et al.} proposed a modified form of this ``Wolf summation
267 < method'' as a way to use this technique in Molecular Dynamics
268 < simulations.  Taking the integral of the forces shown in equation
267 < \ref{eq:WolfForces}, they proposed a new damped Coulomb
268 < potential,
266 > Zahn \textit{et al.} introduced a modified form of this summation
267 > method as a way to use the technique in Molecular Dynamics
268 > simulations.  They proposed a new damped Coulomb potential,
269   \begin{equation}
270 < V_{\textrm{Zahn}}(r_{ij}) = q_iq_j\left\{\frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r_{ij}\right)}{r_{ij}}-\left[\frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_\mathrm{c}\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp\left(-\alpha^2R_\mathrm{c}^2\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}}\right]\left(r_{ij}-R_\mathrm{c}\right)\right\}.
270 > V_{\textrm{Zahn}}(r_{ij}) = q_iq_j\left\{\frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r_{ij}\right)}{r_{ij}}-\left[\frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_\mathrm{c}\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp\left(-\alpha^2R_\mathrm{c}^2\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}}\right]\left(r_{ij}-R_\mathrm{c}\right)\right\},
271   \label{eq:ZahnPot}
272   \end{equation}
273 < They showed that this potential does fairly well at capturing the
273 > and showed that this potential does fairly well at capturing the
274   structural and dynamic properties of water compared the same
275   properties obtained using the Ewald sum.
276  
# Line 301 | Line 301 | shifted potential,
301   \textit{et al.}  and Zahn \textit{et al.} by considering the standard
302   shifted potential,
303   \begin{equation}
304 < v_\textrm{SP}(r) =      \begin{cases}
304 > V_\textrm{SP}(r) =      \begin{cases}
305   v(r)-v_\textrm{c} &\quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c} \\ 0 &\quad r >
306   R_\textrm{c}  
307   \end{cases},
# Line 309 | Line 309 | and shifted force,
309   \end{equation}
310   and shifted force,
311   \begin{equation}
312 < v_\textrm{SF}(r) =      \begin{cases}
312 > V_\textrm{SF}(r) =      \begin{cases}
313   v(r)-v_\textrm{c}-\left(\frac{d v(r)}{d r}\right)_{r=R_\textrm{c}}(r-R_\textrm{c})
314   &\quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c} \\ 0 &\quad r > R_\textrm{c}
315                                                  \end{cases},
# Line 325 | Line 325 | of the unshifted potential itself (when inside the cut
325   The forces associated with the shifted potential are simply the forces
326   of the unshifted potential itself (when inside the cutoff sphere),
327   \begin{equation}
328 < f_{\textrm{SP}} = -\left( \frac{d v(r)}{dr} \right),
328 > F_{\textrm{SP}} = -\left( \frac{d v(r)}{dr} \right),
329   \end{equation}
330   and are zero outside.  Inside the cutoff sphere, the forces associated
331   with the shifted force form can be written,
332   \begin{equation}
333 < f_{\textrm{SF}} = -\left( \frac{d v(r)}{dr} \right) + \left(\frac{d
333 > F_{\textrm{SF}} = -\left( \frac{d v(r)}{dr} \right) + \left(\frac{d
334   v(r)}{dr} \right)_{r=R_\textrm{c}}.
335   \end{equation}
336  
337 < If the potential ($v(r)$) is taken to be the normal Coulomb potential,
337 > If the potential, $v(r)$, is taken to be the normal Coulomb potential,
338   \begin{equation}
339   v(r) = \frac{q_i q_j}{r},
340   \label{eq:Coulomb}
# Line 342 | Line 342 | al.}'s undamped prescription:
342   then the Shifted Potential ({\sc sp}) forms will give Wolf {\it et
343   al.}'s undamped prescription:
344   \begin{equation}
345 < v_\textrm{SP}(r) =
345 > V_\textrm{SP}(r) =
346   q_iq_j\left(\frac{1}{r}-\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}}\right) \quad
347   r\leqslant R_\textrm{c},
348   \label{eq:SPPot}
349   \end{equation}
350   with associated forces,
351   \begin{equation}
352 < f_\textrm{SP}(r) = q_iq_j\left(\frac{1}{r^2}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
352 > F_\textrm{SP}(r) = q_iq_j\left(\frac{1}{r^2}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
353   \label{eq:SPForces}
354   \end{equation}
355   These forces are identical to the forces of the standard Coulomb
# Line 364 | Line 364 | will give,
364   The shifted force ({\sc sf}) form using the normal Coulomb potential
365   will give,
366   \begin{equation}
367 < v_\textrm{SF}(r) = q_iq_j\left[\frac{1}{r}-\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}}+\left(\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}^2}\right)(r-R_\textrm{c})\right] \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
367 > V_\textrm{SF}(r) = q_iq_j\left[\frac{1}{r}-\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}}+\left(\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}^2}\right)(r-R_\textrm{c})\right] \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
368   \label{eq:SFPot}
369   \end{equation}
370   with associated forces,
371   \begin{equation}
372 < f_\textrm{SF}(r) =  q_iq_j\left(\frac{1}{r^2}-\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}^2}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
372 > F_\textrm{SF}(r) =  q_iq_j\left(\frac{1}{r^2}-\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}^2}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
373   \label{eq:SFForces}
374   \end{equation}
375   This formulation has the benefits that there are no discontinuities at
376 < the cutoff distance, while the neutralizing image charges are present
377 < in both the energy and force expressions.  It would be simple to add
378 < the self-neutralizing term back when computing the total energy of the
376 > the cutoff radius, while the neutralizing image charges are present in
377 > both the energy and force expressions.  It would be simple to add the
378 > self-neutralizing term back when computing the total energy of the
379   system, thereby maintaining the agreement with the Madelung energies.
380   A side effect of this treatment is the alteration in the shape of the
381   potential that comes from the derivative term.  Thus, a degree of
# Line 383 | Line 383 | Wolf \textit{et al.} originally discussed the energeti
383   to gain functionality in dynamics simulations.
384  
385   Wolf \textit{et al.} originally discussed the energetics of the
386 < shifted Coulomb potential (Eq. \ref{eq:SPPot}), and they found that
387 < it was still insufficient for accurate determination of the energy
388 < with reasonable cutoff distances.  The calculated Madelung energies
389 < fluctuate around the expected value with increasing cutoff radius, but
390 < the oscillations converge toward the correct value.\cite{Wolf99} A
386 > shifted Coulomb potential (Eq. \ref{eq:SPPot}) and found that it was
387 > insufficient for accurate determination of the energy with reasonable
388 > cutoff distances.  The calculated Madelung energies fluctuated around
389 > the expected value as the cutoff radius was increased, but the
390 > oscillations converged toward the correct value.\cite{Wolf99} A
391   damping function was incorporated to accelerate the convergence; and
392 < though alternative functional forms could be
392 > though alternative forms for the damping function could be
393   used,\cite{Jones56,Heyes81} the complimentary error function was
394   chosen to mirror the effective screening used in the Ewald summation.
395   Incorporating this error function damping into the simple Coulomb
# Line 398 | Line 398 | v(r) = \frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r},
398   v(r) = \frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r},
399   \label{eq:dampCoulomb}
400   \end{equation}
401 < the shifted potential (Eq. (\ref{eq:SPPot})) can be reacquired using
402 < eq. (\ref{eq:shiftingForm}),
401 > the shifted potential (eq. (\ref{eq:SPPot})) becomes
402   \begin{equation}
403 < v_{\textrm{DSP}}(r) = q_iq_j\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r}-\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_\textrm{c}\right)}{R_\textrm{c}}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c},
403 > V_{\textrm{DSP}}(r) = q_iq_j\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r}-\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_\textrm{c}\right)}{R_\textrm{c}}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c},
404   \label{eq:DSPPot}
405   \end{equation}
406   with associated forces,
407   \begin{equation}
408 < f_{\textrm{DSP}}(r) = q_iq_j\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2r^2\right)}}{r}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
408 > F_{\textrm{DSP}}(r) = q_iq_j\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2r^2\right)}}{r}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
409   \label{eq:DSPForces}
410   \end{equation}
411 < Again, this damped shifted potential suffers from a discontinuity and
412 < a lack of the image charges in the forces.  To remedy these concerns,
413 < one may derive a {\sc sf} variant by including  the derivative
414 < term in eq. (\ref{eq:shiftingForm}),
411 > Again, this damped shifted potential suffers from a
412 > force-discontinuity at the cutoff radius, and the image charges play
413 > no role in the forces.  To remedy these concerns, one may derive a
414 > {\sc sf} variant by including the derivative term in
415 > eq. (\ref{eq:shiftingForm}),
416   \begin{equation}
417   \begin{split}
418 < v_\mathrm{DSF}(r) = q_iq_j\Biggr{[}&\frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r}-\frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_\mathrm{c}\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}} \\ &\left.+\left(\frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_\mathrm{c}\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp\left(-\alpha^2R_\mathrm{c}^2\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}}\right)\left(r-R_\mathrm{c}\right)\ \right] \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
418 > V_\mathrm{DSF}(r) = q_iq_j\Biggr{[}&\frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r}-\frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_\mathrm{c}\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}} \\ &\left.+\left(\frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_\mathrm{c}\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp\left(-\alpha^2R_\mathrm{c}^2\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}}\right)\left(r-R_\mathrm{c}\right)\ \right] \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
419   \label{eq:DSFPot}
420   \end{split}
421   \end{equation}
422   The derivative of the above potential will lead to the following forces,
423   \begin{equation}
424   \begin{split}
425 < f_\mathrm{DSF}(r) = q_iq_j\Biggr{[}&\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2r^2\right)}}{r}\right) \\ &\left.-\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_{\textrm{c}}\right)}{R_{\textrm{c}}^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2R_{\textrm{c}}^2\right)}}{R_{\textrm{c}}}\right)\right] \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
425 > F_\mathrm{DSF}(r) = q_iq_j\Biggr{[}&\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2r^2\right)}}{r}\right) \\ &\left.-\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_{\textrm{c}}\right)}{R_{\textrm{c}}^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2R_{\textrm{c}}^2\right)}}{R_{\textrm{c}}}\right)\right] \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
426   \label{eq:DSFForces}
427   \end{split}
428   \end{equation}
429 < If the damping parameter $(\alpha)$ is chosen to be zero, the undamped
430 < case, eqs. (\ref{eq:SPPot}-\ref{eq:SFForces}) are correctly recovered
431 < from eqs. (\ref{eq:DSPPot}-\ref{eq:DSFForces}).
429 > If the damping parameter $(\alpha)$ is set to zero, the undamped case,
430 > eqs. (\ref{eq:SPPot} through \ref{eq:SFForces}) are correctly
431 > recovered from eqs. (\ref{eq:DSPPot} through \ref{eq:DSFForces}).
432  
433   This new {\sc sf} potential is similar to equation \ref{eq:ZahnPot}
434   derived by Zahn \textit{et al.}; however, there are two important
# Line 440 | Line 440 | would be expected to have sudden jumps as particle dis
440   portion is different.  The missing $v_\textrm{c}$ term would not
441   affect molecular dynamics simulations (although the computed energy
442   would be expected to have sudden jumps as particle distances crossed
443 < $R_c$).  The sign problem would be a potential source of errors,
444 < however.  In fact, it introduces a discontinuity in the forces at the
445 < cutoff, because the force function is shifted in the wrong direction
446 < and doesn't cross zero at $R_\textrm{c}$.
443 > $R_c$).  The sign problem is a potential source of errors, however.
444 > In fact, it introduces a discontinuity in the forces at the cutoff,
445 > because the force function is shifted in the wrong direction and
446 > doesn't cross zero at $R_\textrm{c}$.
447  
448   Eqs. (\ref{eq:DSFPot}) and (\ref{eq:DSFForces}) result in an
449 < electrostatic summation method that is continuous in both the
450 < potential and forces and which incorporates the damping function
451 < proposed by Wolf \textit{et al.}\cite{Wolf99} In the rest of this
452 < paper, we will evaluate exactly how good these methods ({\sc sp}, {\sc
453 < sf}, damping) are at reproducing the correct electrostatic summation
454 < performed by the Ewald sum.
449 > electrostatic summation method in which the potential and forces are
450 > continuous at the cutoff radius and which incorporates the damping
451 > function proposed by Wolf \textit{et al.}\cite{Wolf99} In the rest of
452 > this paper, we will evaluate exactly how good these methods ({\sc sp},
453 > {\sc sf}, damping) are at reproducing the correct electrostatic
454 > summation performed by the Ewald sum.
455  
456   \subsection{Other alternatives}
457 < In addition to the methods described above, we will consider some
458 < other techniques that commonly get used in molecular simulations.  The
457 > In addition to the methods described above, we considered some other
458 > techniques that are commonly used in molecular simulations.  The
459   simplest of these is group-based cutoffs.  Though of little use for
460 < non-neutral molecules, collecting atoms into neutral groups takes
460 > charged molecules, collecting atoms into neutral groups takes
461   advantage of the observation that the electrostatic interactions decay
462   faster than those for monopolar pairs.\cite{Steinbach94} When
463 < considering these molecules as groups, an orientational aspect is
464 < introduced to the interactions.  Consequently, as these molecular
465 < particles move through $R_\textrm{c}$, the energy will drift upward
466 < due to the anisotropy of the net molecular dipole
467 < interactions.\cite{Rahman71} To maintain good energy conservation,
468 < both the potential and derivative need to be smoothly switched to zero
469 < at $R_\textrm{c}$.\cite{Adams79} This is accomplished using a
470 < switching function,
471 < \begin{equation}
472 < S(r) = \begin{cases} 1 &\quad r\leqslant r_\textrm{sw} \\
473 < \frac{(R_\textrm{c}+2r-3r_\textrm{sw})(R_\textrm{c}-r)^2}{(R_\textrm{c}-r_\textrm{sw})^3} &\quad r_\textrm{sw}<r\leqslant R_\textrm{c} \\
474 < 0 &\quad r>R_\textrm{c}
475 < \end{cases},
476 < \end{equation}
477 < where the above form is for a cubic function.  If a smooth second
478 < derivative is desired, a fifth (or higher) order polynomial can be
479 < used.\cite{Andrea83}
463 > considering these molecules as neutral groups, the relative
464 > orientations of the molecules control the strength of the interactions
465 > at the cutoff radius.  Consequently, as these molecular particles move
466 > through $R_\textrm{c}$, the energy will drift upward due to the
467 > anisotropy of the net molecular dipole interactions.\cite{Rahman71} To
468 > maintain good energy conservation, both the potential and derivative
469 > need to be smoothly switched to zero at $R_\textrm{c}$.\cite{Adams79}
470 > This is accomplished using a standard switching function.  If a smooth
471 > second derivative is desired, a fifth (or higher) order polynomial can
472 > be used.\cite{Andrea83}
473  
474   Group-based cutoffs neglect the surroundings beyond $R_\textrm{c}$,
475 < and to incorporate their effect, a method like Reaction Field ({\sc
476 < rf}) can be used.  The original theory for {\sc rf} was originally
477 < developed by Onsager,\cite{Onsager36} and it was applied in
478 < simulations for the study of water by Barker and Watts.\cite{Barker73}
479 < In application, it is simply an extension of the group-based cutoff
480 < method where the net dipole within the cutoff sphere polarizes an
481 < external dielectric, which reacts back on the central dipole.  The
482 < same switching function considerations for group-based cutoffs need to
483 < made for {\sc rf}, with the additional pre-specification of a
484 < dielectric constant.
475 > and to incorporate the effects of the surroundings, a method like
476 > Reaction Field ({\sc rf}) can be used.  The original theory for {\sc
477 > rf} was originally developed by Onsager,\cite{Onsager36} and it was
478 > applied in simulations for the study of water by Barker and
479 > Watts.\cite{Barker73} In modern simulation codes, {\sc rf} is simply
480 > an extension of the group-based cutoff method where the net dipole
481 > within the cutoff sphere polarizes an external dielectric, which
482 > reacts back on the central dipole.  The same switching function
483 > considerations for group-based cutoffs need to made for {\sc rf}, with
484 > the additional pre-specification of a dielectric constant.
485  
486   \section{Methods}
487  
# Line 498 | Line 491 | particle sites, but they use these summations in diffe
491   techniques utilize pairwise summations of interactions between
492   particle sites, but they use these summations in different ways.
493  
494 < In MC, the potential energy difference between two subsequent
495 < configurations dictates the progression of MC sampling.  Going back to
496 < the origins of this method, the acceptance criterion for the canonical
497 < ensemble laid out by Metropolis \textit{et al.} states that a
498 < subsequent configuration is accepted if $\Delta E < 0$ or if $\xi <
499 < \exp(-\Delta E/kT)$, where $\xi$ is a random number between 0 and
500 < 1.\cite{Metropolis53} Maintaining the correct $\Delta E$ when using an
501 < alternate method for handling the long-range electrostatics will
502 < ensure proper sampling from the ensemble.
494 > In MC, the potential energy difference between configurations dictates
495 > the progression of MC sampling.  Going back to the origins of this
496 > method, the acceptance criterion for the canonical ensemble laid out
497 > by Metropolis \textit{et al.} states that a subsequent configuration
498 > is accepted if $\Delta E < 0$ or if $\xi < \exp(-\Delta E/kT)$, where
499 > $\xi$ is a random number between 0 and 1.\cite{Metropolis53}
500 > Maintaining the correct $\Delta E$ when using an alternate method for
501 > handling the long-range electrostatics will ensure proper sampling
502 > from the ensemble.
503  
504   In MD, the derivative of the potential governs how the system will
505   progress in time.  Consequently, the force and torque vectors on each
# Line 519 | Line 512 | vectors will diverge from each other more rapidly.
512   vectors will diverge from each other more rapidly.
513  
514   \subsection{Monte Carlo and the Energy Gap}\label{sec:MCMethods}
515 +
516   The pairwise summation techniques (outlined in section
517   \ref{sec:ESMethods}) were evaluated for use in MC simulations by
518   studying the energy differences between conformations.  We took the
519   SPME-computed energy difference between two conformations to be the
520   correct behavior. An ideal performance by an alternative method would
521 < reproduce these energy differences exactly.  Since none of the methods
522 < provide exact energy differences, we used linear least squares
523 < regressions of the $\Delta E$ values between configurations using SPME
524 < against $\Delta E$ values using tested methods provides a quantitative
525 < comparison of this agreement.  Unitary results for both the
526 < correlation and correlation coefficient for these regressions indicate
527 < equivalent energetic results between the method under consideration
528 < and electrostatics handled using SPME.  Sample correlation plots for
529 < two alternate methods are shown in Fig. \ref{fig:linearFit}.
521 > reproduce these energy differences exactly (even if the absolute
522 > energies calculated by the methods are different).  Since none of the
523 > methods provide exact energy differences, we used linear least squares
524 > regressions of energy gap data to evaluate how closely the methods
525 > mimicked the Ewald energy gaps.  Unitary results for both the
526 > correlation (slope) and correlation coefficient for these regressions
527 > indicate perfect agreement between the alternative method and SPME.
528 > Sample correlation plots for two alternate methods are shown in
529 > Fig. \ref{fig:linearFit}.
530  
531   \begin{figure}
532   \centering
533   \includegraphics[width = \linewidth]{./dualLinear.pdf}
534 < \caption{Example least squares regressions of the configuration energy differences for SPC/E water systems. The upper plot shows a data set with a poor correlation coefficient ($R^2$), while the lower plot shows a data set with a good correlation coefficient.}
535 < \label{fig:linearFit}
534 > \caption{Example least squares regressions of the configuration energy
535 > differences for SPC/E water systems. The upper plot shows a data set
536 > with a poor correlation coefficient ($R^2$), while the lower plot
537 > shows a data set with a good correlation coefficient.}
538 > \label{fig:linearFit}
539   \end{figure}
540  
541   Each system type (detailed in section \ref{sec:RepSims}) was
542   represented using 500 independent configurations.  Additionally, we
543 < used seven different system types, so each of the alternate
543 > used seven different system types, so each of the alternative
544   (non-Ewald) electrostatic summation methods was evaluated using
545   873,250 configurational energy differences.
546  
# Line 573 | Line 570 | between those computed from the particular method and
570   investigated through measurement of the angle ($\theta$) formed
571   between those computed from the particular method and those from SPME,
572   \begin{equation}
573 < \theta_f = \cos^{-1} \left(\hat{f}_\textrm{SPME} \cdot \hat{f}_\textrm{Method}\right),
573 > \theta_f = \cos^{-1} \left(\hat{F}_\textrm{SPME} \cdot \hat{F}_\textrm{M}\right),
574   \end{equation}
575 < where $\hat{f}_\textrm{M}$ is the unit vector pointing along the
576 < force vector computed using method $M$.  
577 <
578 < Each of these $\theta$ values was accumulated in a distribution
582 < function, weighted by the area on the unit sphere.  Non-linear
583 < Gaussian fits were used to measure the width of the resulting
584 < distributions.
585 <
586 < \begin{figure}
587 < \centering
588 < \includegraphics[width = \linewidth]{./gaussFit.pdf}
589 < \caption{Sample fit of the angular distribution of the force vectors over all of the studied systems.  Gaussian fits were used to obtain values for the variance in force and torque vectors used in the following figure.}
590 < \label{fig:gaussian}
591 < \end{figure}
592 <
593 < Figure \ref{fig:gaussian} shows an example distribution with applied
594 < non-linear fits.  The solid line is a Gaussian profile, while the
595 < dotted line is a Voigt profile, a convolution of a Gaussian and a
596 < Lorentzian.  Since this distribution is a measure of angular error
575 > where $\hat{f}_\textrm{M}$ is the unit vector pointing along the force
576 > vector computed using method M.  Each of these $\theta$ values was
577 > accumulated in a distribution function and weighted by the area on the
578 > unit sphere.  Since this distribution is a measure of angular error
579   between two different electrostatic summation methods, there is no
580 < {\it a priori} reason for the profile to adhere to any specific shape.
581 < Gaussian fits was used to compare all the tested methods.  The
582 < variance ($\sigma^2$) was extracted from each of these fits and was
583 < used to compare distribution widths.  Values of $\sigma^2$ near zero
584 < indicate vector directions indistinguishable from those calculated
585 < when using the reference method (SPME).
580 > {\it a priori} reason for the profile to adhere to any specific
581 > shape. Thus, gaussian fits were used to measure the width of the
582 > resulting distributions.
583 > %
584 > %\begin{figure}
585 > %\centering
586 > %\includegraphics[width = \linewidth]{./gaussFit.pdf}
587 > %\caption{Sample fit of the angular distribution of the force vectors
588 > %accumulated using all of the studied systems.  Gaussian fits were used
589 > %to obtain values for the variance in force and torque vectors.}
590 > %\label{fig:gaussian}
591 > %\end{figure}
592 > %
593 > %Figure \ref{fig:gaussian} shows an example distribution with applied
594 > %non-linear fits.  The solid line is a Gaussian profile, while the
595 > %dotted line is a Voigt profile, a convolution of a Gaussian and a
596 > %Lorentzian.  
597 > %Since this distribution is a measure of angular error between two
598 > %different electrostatic summation methods, there is no {\it a priori}
599 > %reason for the profile to adhere to any specific shape.
600 > %Gaussian fits was used to compare all the tested methods.  
601 > The variance ($\sigma^2$) was extracted from each of these fits and
602 > was used to compare distribution widths.  Values of $\sigma^2$ near
603 > zero indicate vector directions indistinguishable from those
604 > calculated when using the reference method (SPME).
605  
606   \subsection{Short-time Dynamics}
607 < Evaluation of the short-time dynamics of charged systems was performed
608 < by considering the 1000 K NaCl crystal system while using a subset of the
609 < best performing pairwise methods.  The NaCl crystal was chosen to
610 < avoid possible complications involving the propagation techniques of
611 < orientational motion in molecular systems.  All systems were started
612 < with the same initial positions and velocities.  Simulations were
613 < performed under the microcanonical ensemble, and velocity
607 >
608 > The effects of the alternative electrostatic summation methods on the
609 > short-time dynamics of charged systems were evaluated by considering a
610 > NaCl crystal at a temperature of 1000 K.  A subset of the best
611 > performing pairwise methods was used in this comparison.  The NaCl
612 > crystal was chosen to avoid possible complications from the treatment
613 > of orientational motion in molecular systems.  All systems were
614 > started with the same initial positions and velocities.  Simulations
615 > were performed under the microcanonical ensemble, and velocity
616   autocorrelation functions (Eq. \ref{eq:vCorr}) were computed for each
617   of the trajectories,
618   \begin{equation}
# Line 623 | Line 626 | functions was used for comparisons.
626   functions was used for comparisons.
627  
628   \subsection{Long-Time and Collective Motion}\label{sec:LongTimeMethods}
629 < Evaluation of the long-time dynamics of charged systems was performed
630 < by considering the NaCl crystal system, again while using a subset of
631 < the best performing pairwise methods.  To enhance the atomic motion,
632 < these crystals were equilibrated at 1000 K, near the experimental
633 < $T_m$ for NaCl.  Simulations were performed under the microcanonical
634 < ensemble, and velocity information was saved every 5 fs over 100 ps
635 < trajectories.  The power spectrum ($I(\omega)$) was obtained via
633 < Fourier transform of the velocity autocorrelation function
634 < \begin{equation}
635 < I(\omega) = \frac{1}{2\pi}\int^{\infty}_{-\infty}C_v(t)e^{-i\omega t}dt,
629 >
630 > The effects of the same subset of alternative electrostatic methods on
631 > the {\it long-time} dynamics of charged systems were evaluated using
632 > the same model system (NaCl crystals at 1000K).  The power spectrum
633 > ($I(\omega)$) was obtained via Fourier transform of the velocity
634 > autocorrelation function, \begin{equation} I(\omega) =
635 > \frac{1}{2\pi}\int^{\infty}_{-\infty}C_v(t)e^{-i\omega t}dt,
636   \label{eq:powerSpec}
637   \end{equation}
638   where the frequency, $\omega=0,\ 1,\ ...,\ N-1$. Again, because the
639   NaCl crystal is composed of two different atom types, the average of
640 < the two resulting power spectra was used for comparisons.
640 > the two resulting power spectra was used for comparisons. Simulations
641 > were performed under the microcanonical ensemble, and velocity
642 > information was saved every 5 fs over 100 ps trajectories.
643  
644   \subsection{Representative Simulations}\label{sec:RepSims}
645 < A variety of common and representative simulations were analyzed to
646 < determine the relative effectiveness of the pairwise summation
647 < techniques in reproducing the energetics and dynamics exhibited by
648 < SPME.  The studied systems were as follows:
645 > A variety of representative simulations were analyzed to determine the
646 > relative effectiveness of the pairwise summation techniques in
647 > reproducing the energetics and dynamics exhibited by SPME.  We wanted
648 > to span the space of modern simulations (i.e. from liquids of neutral
649 > molecules to ionic crystals), so the systems studied were:
650   \begin{enumerate}
651 < \item Liquid Water
652 < \item Crystalline Water (Ice I$_\textrm{c}$)
653 < \item NaCl Crystal
654 < \item NaCl Melt
655 < \item Low Ionic Strength Solution of NaCl in Water
656 < \item High Ionic Strength Solution of NaCl in Water
657 < \item 6 \AA\  Radius Sphere of Argon in Water
651 > \item liquid water (SPC/E),\cite{Berendsen87}
652 > \item crystalline water (Ice I$_\textrm{c}$ crystals of SPC/E),
653 > \item NaCl crystals,
654 > \item NaCl melts,
655 > \item a low ionic strength solution of NaCl in water (0.11 M),
656 > \item a high ionic strength solution of NaCl in water (1.1 M), and
657 > \item a 6 \AA\  radius sphere of Argon in water.
658   \end{enumerate}
659   By utilizing the pairwise techniques (outlined in section
660   \ref{sec:ESMethods}) in systems composed entirely of neutral groups,
661 < charged particles, and mixtures of the two, we can comment on possible
662 < system dependence and/or universal applicability of the techniques.
661 > charged particles, and mixtures of the two, we hope to discern under
662 > which conditions it will be possible to use one of the alternative
663 > summation methodologies instead of the Ewald sum.
664  
665 < Generation of the system configurations was dependent on the system
666 < type.  For the solid and liquid water configurations, configuration
667 < snapshots were taken at regular intervals from higher temperature 1000
668 < SPC/E water molecule trajectories and each equilibrated individually.
669 < The solid and liquid NaCl systems consisted of 500 Na+ and 500 Cl-
670 < ions and were selected and equilibrated in the same fashion as the
671 < water systems.  For the low and high ionic strength NaCl solutions, 4
672 < and 40 ions were first solvated in a 1000 water molecule boxes
673 < respectively.  Ion and water positions were then randomly swapped, and
665 > For the solid and liquid water configurations, configurations were
666 > taken at regular intervals from high temperature trajectories of 1000
667 > SPC/E water molecules.  Each configuration was equilibrated
668 > independently at a lower temperature (300~K for the liquid, 200~K for
669 > the crystal).  The solid and liquid NaCl systems consisted of 500
670 > $\textrm{Na}^{+}$ and 500 $\textrm{Cl}^{-}$ ions.  Configurations for
671 > these systems were selected and equilibrated in the same manner as the
672 > water systems.  The equilibrated temperatures were 1000~K for the NaCl
673 > crystal and 7000~K for the liquid. The ionic solutions were made by
674 > solvating 4 (or 40) ions in a periodic box containing 1000 SPC/E water
675 > molecules.  Ion and water positions were then randomly swapped, and
676   the resulting configurations were again equilibrated individually.
677 < Finally, for the Argon/Water "charge void" systems, the identities of
678 < all the SPC/E waters within 6 \AA\ of the center of the equilibrated
679 < water configurations were converted to argon
680 < (Fig. \ref{fig:argonSlice}).
677 > Finally, for the Argon / Water ``charge void'' systems, the identities
678 > of all the SPC/E waters within 6 \AA\ of the center of the
679 > equilibrated water configurations were converted to argon.
680 > %(Fig. \ref{fig:argonSlice}).
681  
682 < \begin{figure}
683 < \centering
684 < \includegraphics[width = \linewidth]{./slice.pdf}
685 < \caption{A slice from the center of a water box used in a charge void simulation.  The darkened region represents the boundary sphere within which the water molecules were converted to argon atoms.}
680 < \label{fig:argonSlice}
681 < \end{figure}
682 > These procedures guaranteed us a set of representative configurations
683 > from chemically-relevant systems sampled from appropriate
684 > ensembles. Force field parameters for the ions and Argon were taken
685 > from the force field utilized by {\sc oopse}.\cite{Meineke05}
686  
687 < \subsection{Electrostatic Summation Methods}\label{sec:ESMethods}
688 < Electrostatic summation method comparisons were performed using SPME,
689 < the {\sc sp} and {\sc sf} methods - both with damping
690 < parameters ($\alpha$) of 0.0, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 \AA$^{-1}$ (no, weak,
691 < moderate, and strong damping respectively), reaction field with an
692 < infinite dielectric constant, and an unmodified cutoff.  Group-based
693 < cutoffs with a fifth-order polynomial switching function were
694 < necessary for the reaction field simulations and were utilized in the
691 < SP, SF, and pure cutoff methods for comparison to the standard lack of
692 < group-based cutoffs with a hard truncation.  The SPME calculations
693 < were performed using the TINKER implementation of SPME,\cite{Ponder87}
694 < while all other method calculations were performed using the OOPSE
695 < molecular mechanics package.\cite{Meineke05}
687 > %\begin{figure}
688 > %\centering
689 > %\includegraphics[width = \linewidth]{./slice.pdf}
690 > %\caption{A slice from the center of a water box used in a charge void
691 > %simulation.  The darkened region represents the boundary sphere within
692 > %which the water molecules were converted to argon atoms.}
693 > %\label{fig:argonSlice}
694 > %\end{figure}
695  
696 < These methods were additionally evaluated with three different cutoff
697 < radii (9, 12, and 15 \AA) to investigate possible cutoff radius
698 < dependence.  It should be noted that the damping parameter chosen in
699 < SPME, or so called ``Ewald Coefficient", has a significant effect on
700 < the energies and forces calculated.  Typical molecular mechanics
701 < packages default this to a value dependent on the cutoff radius and a
702 < tolerance (typically less than $1 \times 10^{-4}$ kcal/mol).  Smaller
703 < tolerances are typically associated with increased accuracy, but this
704 < usually means more time spent calculating the reciprocal-space portion
705 < of the summation.\cite{Perram88,Essmann95} The default TINKER
706 < tolerance of $1 \times 10^{-8}$ kcal/mol was used in all SPME
707 < calculations, resulting in Ewald Coefficients of 0.4200, 0.3119, and
708 < 0.2476 \AA$^{-1}$ for cutoff radii of 9, 12, and 15 \AA\ respectively.
696 > \subsection{Comparison of Summation Methods}\label{sec:ESMethods}
697 > We compared the following alternative summation methods with results
698 > from the reference method (SPME):
699 > \begin{itemize}
700 > \item {\sc sp} with damping parameters ($\alpha$) of 0.0, 0.1, 0.2,
701 > and 0.3 \AA$^{-1}$,
702 > \item {\sc sf} with damping parameters ($\alpha$) of 0.0, 0.1, 0.2,
703 > and 0.3 \AA$^{-1}$,
704 > \item reaction field with an infinite dielectric constant, and
705 > \item an unmodified cutoff.
706 > \end{itemize}
707 > Group-based cutoffs with a fifth-order polynomial switching function
708 > were utilized for the reaction field simulations.  Additionally, we
709 > investigated the use of these cutoffs with the SP, SF, and pure
710 > cutoff.  The SPME electrostatics were performed using the TINKER
711 > implementation of SPME,\cite{Ponder87} while all other calculations
712 > were performed using the {\sc oopse} molecular mechanics
713 > package.\cite{Meineke05} All other portions of the energy calculation
714 > (i.e. Lennard-Jones interactions) were handled in exactly the same
715 > manner across all systems and configurations.
716  
717 + The althernative methods were also evaluated with three different
718 + cutoff radii (9, 12, and 15 \AA).  As noted previously, the
719 + convergence parameter ($\alpha$) plays a role in the balance of the
720 + real-space and reciprocal-space portions of the Ewald calculation.
721 + Typical molecular mechanics packages set this to a value dependent on
722 + the cutoff radius and a tolerance (typically less than $1 \times
723 + 10^{-4}$ kcal/mol).  Smaller tolerances are typically associated with
724 + increasing accuracy at the expense of computational time spent on the
725 + reciprocal-space portion of the summation.\cite{Perram88,Essmann95}
726 + The default TINKER tolerance of $1 \times 10^{-8}$ kcal/mol was used
727 + in all SPME calculations, resulting in Ewald coefficients of 0.4200,
728 + 0.3119, and 0.2476 \AA$^{-1}$ for cutoff radii of 9, 12, and 15 \AA\
729 + respectively.
730 +
731   \section{Results and Discussion}
732  
733   \subsection{Configuration Energy Differences}\label{sec:EnergyResults}
# Line 720 | Line 740 | figure \ref{fig:delE}.
740   \begin{figure}
741   \centering
742   \includegraphics[width=5.5in]{./delEplot.pdf}
743 < \caption{Statistical analysis of the quality of configurational energy differences for a given electrostatic method compared with the reference Ewald sum.  Results with a value equal to 1 (dashed line) indicate $\Delta E$ values indistinguishable from those obtained using SPME.  Different values of the cutoff radius are indicated with different symbols (9\AA\ = circles, 12\AA\ = squares, and 15\AA\ = inverted triangles).}
743 > \caption{Statistical analysis of the quality of configurational energy
744 > differences for a given electrostatic method compared with the
745 > reference Ewald sum.  Results with a value equal to 1 (dashed line)
746 > indicate $\Delta E$ values indistinguishable from those obtained using
747 > SPME.  Different values of the cutoff radius are indicated with
748 > different symbols (9\AA\ = circles, 12\AA\ = squares, and 15\AA\ =
749 > inverted triangles).}
750   \label{fig:delE}
751   \end{figure}
752  
753 < In this figure, it is apparent that it is unreasonable to expect
754 < realistic results using an unmodified cutoff.  This is not all that
755 < surprising since this results in large energy fluctuations as atoms
756 < move in and out of the cutoff radius.  These fluctuations can be
757 < alleviated to some degree by using group based cutoffs with a
758 < switching function.\cite{Steinbach94} The Group Switch Cutoff row
733 < doesn't show a significant improvement in this plot because the salt
734 < and salt solution systems contain non-neutral groups, see the
735 < accompanying supporting information for a comparison where all groups
736 < are neutral.
753 > The most striking feature of this plot is how well the Shifted Force
754 > ({\sc sf}) and Shifted Potential ({\sc sp}) methods capture the energy
755 > differences.  For the undamped {\sc sf} method, and the
756 > moderately-damped {\sc sp} methods, the results are nearly
757 > indistinguishable from the Ewald results.  The other common methods do
758 > significantly less well.  
759  
760 < Correcting the resulting charged cutoff sphere is one of the purposes
761 < of the damped Coulomb summation proposed by Wolf \textit{et
762 < al.},\cite{Wolf99} and this correction indeed improves the results as
763 < seen in the Shifted-Potental rows.  While the undamped case of this
764 < method is a significant improvement over the pure cutoff, it still
765 < doesn't correlate that well with SPME.  Inclusion of potential damping
766 < improves the results, and using an $\alpha$ of 0.2 \AA $^{-1}$ shows
767 < an excellent correlation and quality of fit with the SPME results,
768 < particularly with a cutoff radius greater than 12 \AA .  Use of a
769 < larger damping parameter is more helpful for the shortest cutoff
748 < shown, but it has a detrimental effect on simulations with larger
749 < cutoffs.  In the {\sc sf} sets, increasing damping results in
750 < progressively poorer correlation.  Overall, the undamped case is the
751 < best performing set, as the correlation and quality of fits are
752 < consistently superior regardless of the cutoff distance.  This result
753 < is beneficial in that the undamped case is less computationally
754 < prohibitive do to the lack of complimentary error function calculation
755 < when performing the electrostatic pair interaction.  The reaction
756 < field results illustrates some of that method's limitations, primarily
757 < that it was developed for use in homogenous systems; although it does
758 < provide results that are an improvement over those from an unmodified
759 < cutoff.
760 > The unmodified cutoff method is essentially unusable.  This is not
761 > surprising since hard cutoffs give large energy fluctuations as atoms
762 > or molecules move in and out of the cutoff
763 > radius.\cite{Rahman71,Adams79} These fluctuations can be alleviated to
764 > some degree by using group based cutoffs with a switching
765 > function.\cite{Adams79,Steinbach94,Leach01} However, we do not see
766 > significant improvement using the group-switched cutoff because the
767 > salt and salt solution systems contain non-neutral groups.  Interested
768 > readers can consult the accompanying supporting information for a
769 > comparison where all groups are neutral.
770  
771 + For the {\sc sp} method, inclusion of electrostatic damping improves
772 + the agreement with Ewald, and using an $\alpha$ of 0.2 \AA $^{-1}$
773 + shows an excellent correlation and quality of fit with the SPME
774 + results, particularly with a cutoff radius greater than 12
775 + \AA .  Use of a larger damping parameter is more helpful for the
776 + shortest cutoff shown, but it has a detrimental effect on simulations
777 + with larger cutoffs.  
778 +
779 + In the {\sc sf} sets, increasing damping results in progressively {\it
780 + worse} correlation with Ewald.  Overall, the undamped case is the best
781 + performing set, as the correlation and quality of fits are
782 + consistently superior regardless of the cutoff distance.  The undamped
783 + case is also less computationally demanding (because no evaluation of
784 + the complementary error function is required).
785 +
786 + The reaction field results illustrates some of that method's
787 + limitations, primarily that it was developed for use in homogenous
788 + systems; although it does provide results that are an improvement over
789 + those from an unmodified cutoff.
790 +
791   \subsection{Magnitudes of the Force and Torque Vectors}
792  
793   Evaluation of pairwise methods for use in Molecular Dynamics
794   simulations requires consideration of effects on the forces and
795 < torques.  Investigation of the force and torque vector magnitudes
796 < provides a measure of the strength of these values relative to SPME.
797 < Figures \ref{fig:frcMag} and \ref{fig:trqMag} respectively show the
798 < force and torque vector magnitude regression results for the
769 < accumulated analysis over all the system types.
795 > torques.  Figures \ref{fig:frcMag} and \ref{fig:trqMag} show the
796 > regression results for the force and torque vector magnitudes,
797 > respectively.  The data in these figures was generated from an
798 > accumulation of the statistics from all of the system types.
799  
800   \begin{figure}
801   \centering
802   \includegraphics[width=5.5in]{./frcMagplot.pdf}
803 < \caption{Statistical analysis of the quality of the force vector magnitudes for a given electrostatic method compared with the reference Ewald sum.  Results with a value equal to 1 (dashed line) indicate force magnitude values indistinguishable from those obtained using SPME.  Different values of the cutoff radius are indicated with different symbols (9\AA\ = circles, 12\AA\ = squares, and 15\AA\ = inverted triangles).}
803 > \caption{Statistical analysis of the quality of the force vector
804 > magnitudes for a given electrostatic method compared with the
805 > reference Ewald sum.  Results with a value equal to 1 (dashed line)
806 > indicate force magnitude values indistinguishable from those obtained
807 > using SPME.  Different values of the cutoff radius are indicated with
808 > different symbols (9\AA\ = circles, 12\AA\ = squares, and 15\AA\ =
809 > inverted triangles).}
810   \label{fig:frcMag}
811   \end{figure}
812  
813 + Again, it is striking how well the Shifted Potential and Shifted Force
814 + methods are doing at reproducing the SPME forces.  The undamped and
815 + weakly-damped {\sc sf} method gives the best agreement with Ewald.
816 + This is perhaps expected because this method explicitly incorporates a
817 + smooth transition in the forces at the cutoff radius as well as the
818 + neutralizing image charges.
819 +
820   Figure \ref{fig:frcMag}, for the most part, parallels the results seen
821   in the previous $\Delta E$ section.  The unmodified cutoff results are
822   poor, but using group based cutoffs and a switching function provides
823 < a improvement much more significant than what was seen with $\Delta
824 < E$.  Looking at the {\sc sp} sets, the slope and $R^2$
825 < improve with the use of damping to an optimal result of 0.2 \AA
826 < $^{-1}$ for the 12 and 15 \AA\ cutoffs.  Further increases in damping,
827 < while beneficial for simulations with a cutoff radius of 9 \AA\ , is
828 < detrimental to simulations with larger cutoff radii.  The undamped
829 < {\sc sf} method gives forces in line with those obtained using
830 < SPME, and use of a damping function results in minor improvement.  The
831 < reaction field results are surprisingly good, considering the poor
823 > an improvement much more significant than what was seen with $\Delta
824 > E$.
825 >
826 > With moderate damping and a large enough cutoff radius, the {\sc sp}
827 > method is generating usable forces.  Further increases in damping,
828 > while beneficial for simulations with a cutoff radius of 9 \AA\ , is
829 > detrimental to simulations with larger cutoff radii.
830 >
831 > The reaction field results are surprisingly good, considering the poor
832   quality of the fits for the $\Delta E$ results.  There is still a
833 < considerable degree of scatter in the data, but it correlates well in
834 < general.  To be fair, we again note that the reaction field
835 < calculations do not encompass NaCl crystal and melt systems, so these
833 > considerable degree of scatter in the data, but the forces correlate
834 > well with the Ewald forces in general.  We note that the reaction
835 > field calculations do not include the pure NaCl systems, so these
836   results are partly biased towards conditions in which the method
837   performs more favorably.
838  
839   \begin{figure}
840   \centering
841   \includegraphics[width=5.5in]{./trqMagplot.pdf}
842 < \caption{Statistical analysis of the quality of the torque vector magnitudes for a given electrostatic method compared with the reference Ewald sum.  Results with a value equal to 1 (dashed line) indicate torque magnitude values indistinguishable from those obtained using SPME.  Different values of the cutoff radius are indicated with different symbols (9\AA\ = circles, 12\AA\ = squares, and 15\AA\ = inverted triangles).}
842 > \caption{Statistical analysis of the quality of the torque vector
843 > magnitudes for a given electrostatic method compared with the
844 > reference Ewald sum.  Results with a value equal to 1 (dashed line)
845 > indicate torque magnitude values indistinguishable from those obtained
846 > using SPME.  Different values of the cutoff radius are indicated with
847 > different symbols (9\AA\ = circles, 12\AA\ = squares, and 15\AA\ =
848 > inverted triangles).}
849   \label{fig:trqMag}
850   \end{figure}
851  
852 < To evaluate the torque vector magnitudes, the data set from which
853 < values are drawn is limited to rigid molecules in the systems
854 < (i.e. water molecules).  In spite of this smaller sampling pool, the
807 < torque vector magnitude results in figure \ref{fig:trqMag} are still
808 < similar to those seen for the forces; however, they more clearly show
809 < the improved behavior that comes with increasing the cutoff radius.
810 < Moderate damping is beneficial to the {\sc sp} and helpful
811 < yet possibly unnecessary with the {\sc sf} method, and they also
812 < show that over-damping adversely effects all cutoff radii rather than
813 < showing an improvement for systems with short cutoffs.  The reaction
814 < field method performs well when calculating the torques, better than
815 < the Shifted Force method over this limited data set.
852 > Molecular torques were only available from the systems which contained
853 > rigid molecules (i.e. the systems containing water).  The data in
854 > fig. \ref{fig:trqMag} is taken from this smaller sampling pool.
855  
856 + Torques appear to be much more sensitive to charges at a longer
857 + distance.   The striking feature in comparing the new electrostatic
858 + methods with SPME is how much the agreement improves with increasing
859 + cutoff radius.  Again, the weakly damped and undamped {\sc sf} method
860 + appears to be reproducing the SPME torques most accurately.  
861 +
862 + Water molecules are dipolar, and the reaction field method reproduces
863 + the effect of the surrounding polarized medium on each of the
864 + molecular bodies. Therefore it is not surprising that reaction field
865 + performs best of all of the methods on molecular torques.
866 +
867   \subsection{Directionality of the Force and Torque Vectors}
868  
869 < Having force and torque vectors with magnitudes that are well
870 < correlated to SPME is good, but if they are not pointing in the proper
871 < direction the results will be incorrect.  These vector directions were
872 < investigated through measurement of the angle formed between them and
873 < those from SPME.  The results (Fig. \ref{fig:frcTrqAng}) are compared
874 < through the variance ($\sigma^2$) of the Gaussian fits of the angle
875 < error distributions of the combined set over all system types.
869 > It is clearly important that a new electrostatic method can reproduce
870 > the magnitudes of the force and torque vectors obtained via the Ewald
871 > sum. However, the {\it directionality} of these vectors will also be
872 > vital in calculating dynamical quantities accurately.  Force and
873 > torque directionalities were investigated by measuring the angles
874 > formed between these vectors and the same vectors calculated using
875 > SPME.  The results (Fig. \ref{fig:frcTrqAng}) are compared through the
876 > variance ($\sigma^2$) of the Gaussian fits of the angle error
877 > distributions of the combined set over all system types.
878  
879   \begin{figure}
880   \centering
881   \includegraphics[width=5.5in]{./frcTrqAngplot.pdf}
882 < \caption{Statistical analysis of the quality of the Gaussian fit of the force and torque vector angular distributions for a given electrostatic method compared with the reference Ewald sum.  Results with a variance ($\sigma^2$) equal to zero (dashed line) indicate force and torque directions indistinguishable from those obtained using SPME.  Different values of the cutoff radius are indicated with different symbols (9\AA\ = circles, 12\AA\ = squares, and 15\AA\ = inverted triangles).}
882 > \caption{Statistical analysis of the width of the angular distribution
883 > that the force and torque vectors from a given electrostatic method
884 > make with their counterparts obtained using the reference Ewald sum.
885 > Results with a variance ($\sigma^2$) equal to zero (dashed line)
886 > indicate force and torque directions indistinguishable from those
887 > obtained using SPME.  Different values of the cutoff radius are
888 > indicated with different symbols (9\AA\ = circles, 12\AA\ = squares,
889 > and 15\AA\ = inverted triangles).}
890   \label{fig:frcTrqAng}
891   \end{figure}
892  
893   Both the force and torque $\sigma^2$ results from the analysis of the
894   total accumulated system data are tabulated in figure
895 < \ref{fig:frcTrqAng}.  All of the sets, aside from the over-damped case
896 < show the improvement afforded by choosing a longer simulation cutoff.
897 < Increasing the cutoff from 9 to 12 \AA\ typically results in a halving
898 < of the distribution widths, with a similar improvement going from 12
899 < to 15 \AA .  The undamped {\sc sf}, Group Based Cutoff, and
900 < Reaction Field methods all do equivalently well at capturing the
901 < direction of both the force and torque vectors.  Using damping
902 < improves the angular behavior significantly for the {\sc sp}
903 < and moderately for the {\sc sf} methods.  Increasing the damping
904 < too far is destructive for both methods, particularly to the torque
905 < vectors.  Again it is important to recognize that the force vectors
906 < cover all particles in the systems, while torque vectors are only
907 < available for neutral molecular groups.  Damping appears to have a
908 < more beneficial effect on non-neutral bodies, and this observation is
909 < investigated further in the accompanying supporting information.
895 > \ref{fig:frcTrqAng}. Here it is clear that the Shifted Potential ({\sc
896 > sp}) method would be essentially unusable for molecular dynamics until
897 > the damping function is added.  The Shifted Force ({\sc sf}) method,
898 > however, is generating force and torque vectors which are within a few
899 > degrees of the Ewald results even with weak (or no) damping.
900 >
901 > All of the sets (aside from the over-damped case) show the improvement
902 > afforded by choosing a larger cutoff radius.  Increasing the cutoff
903 > from 9 to 12 \AA\ typically results in a halving of the width of the
904 > distribution, with a similar improvement going from 12 to 15
905 > \AA .
906 >
907 > The undamped {\sc sf}, group-based cutoff, and reaction field methods
908 > all do equivalently well at capturing the direction of both the force
909 > and torque vectors.  Using damping improves the angular behavior
910 > significantly for the {\sc sp} and moderately for the {\sc sf}
911 > methods.  Overdamping is detrimental to both methods.  Again it is
912 > important to recognize that the force vectors cover all particles in
913 > the systems, while torque vectors are only available for neutral
914 > molecular groups.  Damping appears to have a more beneficial effect on
915 > charged bodies, and this observation is investigated further in the
916 > accompanying supporting information.
917 >
918 > Although not discussed previously, group based cutoffs can be applied
919 > to both the {\sc sp} and {\sc sf} methods.  Use of a switching
920 > function corrects for the discontinuities that arise when atoms of the
921 > two groups exit the cutoff radius before the group centers leave each
922 > other's cutoff. Though there are no significant benefits or drawbacks
923 > observed in $\Delta E$ and vector magnitude results when doing this,
924 > there is a measurable improvement in the vector angle results.  Table
925 > \ref{tab:groupAngle} shows the angular variance values obtained using
926 > group based cutoffs and a switching function alongside the results
927 > seen in figure \ref{fig:frcTrqAng}.  The {\sc sp} shows much narrower
928 > angular distributions for both the force and torque vectors when using
929 > an $\alpha$ of 0.2 \AA$^{-1}$ or less, while {\sc sf} shows
930 > improvements in the undamped and lightly damped cases.  Thus, by
931 > calculating the electrostatic interactions in terms of molecular pairs
932 > rather than atomic pairs, the direction of the force and torque
933 > vectors can be determined more accurately.
934  
935   \begin{table}[htbp]
936     \centering
937 <   \caption{Variance ($\sigma^2$) of the force (top set) and torque (bottom set) vector angle difference distributions for the Shifted Potential and Shifted Force methods.  Calculations were performed both with (Y) and without (N) group based cutoffs and a switching function.  The $\alpha$ values have units of \AA$^{-1}$ and the variance values have units of degrees$^2$.}  
937 >   \caption{Variance ($\sigma^2$) of the force (top set) and torque
938 > (bottom set) vector angle difference distributions for the Shifted Potential and Shifted Force methods.  Calculations were performed both with (Y) and without (N) group based cutoffs and a switching function.  The $\alpha$ values have units of \AA$^{-1}$ and the variance values have units of degrees$^2$.}      
939     \begin{tabular}{@{} ccrrrrrrrr @{}}
940        \\
941        \toprule
# Line 882 | Line 966 | investigated further in the accompanying supporting in
966     \label{tab:groupAngle}
967   \end{table}
968  
885 Although not discussed previously, group based cutoffs can be applied
886 to both the {\sc sp} and {\sc sf} methods.  Use off a
887 switching function corrects for the discontinuities that arise when
888 atoms of a group exit the cutoff before the group's center of mass.
889 Though there are no significant benefit or drawbacks observed in
890 $\Delta E$ and vector magnitude results when doing this, there is a
891 measurable improvement in the vector angle results.  Table
892 \ref{tab:groupAngle} shows the angular variance values obtained using
893 group based cutoffs and a switching function alongside the standard
894 results seen in figure \ref{fig:frcTrqAng} for comparison purposes.
895 The {\sc sp} shows much narrower angular distributions for
896 both the force and torque vectors when using an $\alpha$ of 0.2
897 \AA$^{-1}$ or less, while {\sc sf} shows improvements in the
898 undamped and lightly damped cases.  Thus, by calculating the
899 electrostatic interactions in terms of molecular pairs rather than
900 atomic pairs, the direction of the force and torque vectors are
901 determined more accurately.
902
969   One additional trend to recognize in table \ref{tab:groupAngle} is
970 < that the $\sigma^2$ values for both {\sc sp} and
971 < {\sc sf} converge as $\alpha$ increases, something that is easier
972 < to see when using group based cutoffs.  Looking back on figures
973 < \ref{fig:delE}, \ref{fig:frcMag}, and \ref{fig:trqMag}, show this
974 < behavior clearly at large $\alpha$ and cutoff values.  The reason for
975 < this is that the complimentary error function inserted into the
976 < potential weakens the electrostatic interaction as $\alpha$ increases.
977 < Thus, at larger values of $\alpha$, both the summation method types
978 < progress toward non-interacting functions, so care is required in
979 < choosing large damping functions lest one generate an undesirable loss
980 < in the pair interaction.  Kast \textit{et al.}  developed a method for
981 < choosing appropriate $\alpha$ values for these types of electrostatic
982 < summation methods by fitting to $g(r)$ data, and their methods
983 < indicate optimal values of 0.34, 0.25, and 0.16 \AA$^{-1}$ for cutoff
984 < values of 9, 12, and 15 \AA\ respectively.\cite{Kast03} These appear
985 < to be reasonable choices to obtain proper MC behavior
986 < (Fig. \ref{fig:delE}); however, based on these findings, choices this
987 < high would introduce error in the molecular torques, particularly for
988 < the shorter cutoffs.  Based on the above findings, empirical damping
923 < up to 0.2 \AA$^{-1}$ proves to be beneficial, but damping is arguably
924 < unnecessary when using the {\sc sf} method.
970 > that the $\sigma^2$ values for both {\sc sp} and {\sc sf} converge as
971 > $\alpha$ increases, something that is easier to see when using group
972 > based cutoffs.  The reason for this is that the complimentary error
973 > function inserted into the potential weakens the electrostatic
974 > interaction as $\alpha$ increases.  Thus, at larger values of
975 > $\alpha$, both summation methods progress toward non-interacting
976 > functions, so care is required in choosing large damping functions
977 > lest one generate an undesirable loss in the pair interaction.  Kast
978 > \textit{et al.}  developed a method for choosing appropriate $\alpha$
979 > values for these types of electrostatic summation methods by fitting
980 > to $g(r)$ data, and their methods indicate optimal values of 0.34,
981 > 0.25, and 0.16 \AA$^{-1}$ for cutoff values of 9, 12, and 15 \AA\
982 > respectively.\cite{Kast03} These appear to be reasonable choices to
983 > obtain proper MC behavior (Fig. \ref{fig:delE}); however, based on
984 > these findings, choices this high would introduce error in the
985 > molecular torques, particularly for the shorter cutoffs.  Based on the
986 > above findings, empirical damping up to 0.2 \AA$^{-1}$ proves to be
987 > beneficial, but damping may be unnecessary when using the {\sc sf}
988 > method.
989  
990   \subsection{Short-Time Dynamics: Velocity Autocorrelation Functions of NaCl Crystals}
991  
992 < In the previous studies using a {\sc sf} variant of the damped
993 < Wolf coulomb potential, the structure and dynamics of water were
994 < investigated rather extensively.\cite{Zahn02,Kast03} Their results
995 < indicated that the damped {\sc sf} method results in properties
996 < very similar to those obtained when using the Ewald summation.
997 < Considering the statistical results shown above, the good performance
998 < of this method is not that surprising.  Rather than consider the same
999 < systems and simply recapitulate their results, we decided to look at
1000 < the solid state dynamical behavior obtained using the best performing
1001 < summation methods from the above results.
992 > Zahn {\it et al.} investigated the structure and dynamics of water
993 > using eqs. (\ref{eq:ZahnPot}) and
994 > (\ref{eq:WolfForces}).\cite{Zahn02,Kast03} Their results indicated
995 > that a method similar (but not identical with) the damped {\sc sf}
996 > method resulted in properties very similar to those obtained when
997 > using the Ewald summation.  The properties they studied (pair
998 > distribution functions, diffusion constants, and velocity and
999 > orientational correlation functions) may not be particularly sensitive
1000 > to the long-range and collective behavior that governs the
1001 > low-frequency behavior in crystalline systems.
1002  
1003 + We are using two separate measures to probe the effects of these
1004 + alternative electrostatic methods on the dynamics in crystalline
1005 + materials.  For short- and intermediate-time dynamics, we are
1006 + computing the velocity autocorrelation function, and for long-time
1007 + and large length-scale collective motions, we are looking at the
1008 + low-frequency portion of the power spectrum.
1009 +
1010   \begin{figure}
1011   \centering
1012   \includegraphics[width = \linewidth]{./vCorrPlot.pdf}
1013 < \caption{Velocity auto-correlation functions of NaCl crystals at 1000 K while using SPME, {\sc sf} ($\alpha$ = 0.0, 0.1, \& 0.2), and {\sc sp} ($\alpha$ = 0.2). The inset is a magnification of the first trough. The times to first collision are nearly identical, but the differences can be seen in the peaks and troughs, where the undamped to weakly damped methods are stiffer than the moderately damped and SPME methods.}
1013 > \caption{Velocity auto-correlation functions of NaCl crystals at
1014 > 1000 K using SPME, {\sc sf} ($\alpha$ = 0.0, 0.1, \& 0.2), and {\sc
1015 > sp} ($\alpha$ = 0.2). The inset is a magnification of the area around
1016 > the first minimum.  The times to first collision are nearly identical,
1017 > but differences can be seen in the peaks and troughs, where the
1018 > undamped and weakly damped methods are stiffer than the moderately
1019 > damped and SPME methods.}
1020   \label{fig:vCorrPlot}
1021   \end{figure}
1022  
# Line 951 | Line 1028 | the point charges for the pairwise summation methods;
1028   increased, these peaks are smoothed out, and approach the SPME
1029   curve. The damping acts as a distance dependent Gaussian screening of
1030   the point charges for the pairwise summation methods; thus, the
1031 < collisions are more elastic in the undamped {\sc sf} potental, and the
1031 > collisions are more elastic in the undamped {\sc sf} potential, and the
1032   stiffness of the potential is diminished as the electrostatic
1033   interactions are softened by the damping function.  With $\alpha$
1034   values of 0.2 \AA$^{-1}$, the {\sc sf} and {\sc sp} functions are
# Line 974 | Line 1051 | displayed in figure \ref{fig:methodPS}.
1051   \begin{figure}
1052   \centering
1053   \includegraphics[width = \linewidth]{./spectraSquare.pdf}
1054 < \caption{Power spectra obtained from the velocity auto-correlation functions of NaCl crystals at 1000 K while using SPME, {\sc sf} ($\alpha$ = 0, 0.1, \& 0.2), and {\sc sp} ($\alpha$ = 0.2).  Apodization of the correlation functions via a cubic switching function between 40 and 50 ps was used to clear up the spectral noise resulting from data truncation, and had no noticeable effect on peak location or magnitude.  The inset shows the frequency region below 100 cm$^{-1}$ to highlight where the spectra begin to differ.}
1054 > \caption{Power spectra obtained from the velocity auto-correlation
1055 > functions of NaCl crystals at 1000 K while using SPME, {\sc sf}
1056 > ($\alpha$ = 0, 0.1, \& 0.2), and {\sc sp} ($\alpha$ = 0.2).
1057 > Apodization of the correlation functions via a cubic switching
1058 > function between 40 and 50 ps was used to clear up the spectral noise
1059 > resulting from data truncation, and had no noticeable effect on peak
1060 > location or magnitude.  The inset shows the frequency region below 100
1061 > cm$^{-1}$ to highlight where the spectra begin to differ.}
1062   \label{fig:methodPS}
1063   \end{figure}
1064  
# Line 1016 | Line 1100 | accurate reproduction of crystal dynamics.
1100   \begin{figure}
1101   \centering
1102   \includegraphics[width = \linewidth]{./comboSquare.pdf}
1103 < \caption{Regions of spectra showing the low-frequency correlated motions for NaCl crystals at 1000 K using various electrostatic summation methods.  The upper plot is a zoomed inset from figure \ref{fig:methodPS}.  As the damping value for the {\sc sf} potential increases, the low-frequency peaks red-shift.  The lower plot is of spectra when using SPME and a simple damped Coulombic sum with damping coefficients ($\alpha$) ranging from 0.15 to 0.3 \AA$^{-1}$.  As $\alpha$ increases, the peaks are red-shifted toward and eventually beyond the values given by SPME.  The larger $\alpha$ values weaken the real-space electrostatics, explaining this shift towards less strongly correlated motions in the crystal.}
1103 > \caption{Regions of spectra showing the low-frequency correlated
1104 > motions for NaCl crystals at 1000 K using various electrostatic
1105 > summation methods.  The upper plot is a zoomed inset from figure
1106 > \ref{fig:methodPS}.  As the damping value for the {\sc sf} potential
1107 > increases, the low-frequency peaks red-shift.  The lower plot is of
1108 > spectra when using SPME and a simple damped Coulombic sum with damping
1109 > coefficients ($\alpha$) ranging from 0.15 to 0.3 \AA$^{-1}$.  As
1110 > $\alpha$ increases, the peaks are red-shifted toward and eventually
1111 > beyond the values given by SPME.  The larger $\alpha$ values weaken
1112 > the real-space electrostatics, explaining this shift towards less
1113 > strongly correlated motions in the crystal.}
1114   \label{fig:dampInc}
1115   \end{figure}
1116  

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines