ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/electrostaticMethodsPaper/electrostaticMethods.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/electrostaticMethodsPaper/electrostaticMethods.tex (file contents):
Revision 2624 by gezelter, Wed Mar 15 17:09:09 2006 UTC vs.
Revision 2639 by chrisfen, Mon Mar 20 02:00:26 2006 UTC

# Line 2 | Line 2
2   %\documentclass[aps,prb,preprint]{revtex4}
3   \documentclass[11pt]{article}
4   \usepackage{endfloat}
5 < \usepackage{amsmath}
5 > \usepackage{amsmath,bm}
6   \usepackage{amssymb}
7   \usepackage{epsf}
8   \usepackage{times}
# Line 77 | Line 77 | accurately incorporate their effect, and since the com
77   leading to an effect excluded from the pair interactions within a unit
78   box.  In large systems, excessively large cutoffs need to be used to
79   accurately incorporate their effect, and since the computational cost
80 < increases proportionally with the cutoff sphere, it quickly becomes an
81 < impractical task to perform these calculations.
80 > increases proportionally with the cutoff sphere, it quickly becomes
81 > very time-consuming to perform these calculations.
82  
83 + There have been many efforts to address this issue of both proper and
84 + practical handling of electrostatic interactions, and these have
85 + resulted in the availability of a variety of
86 + techniques.\cite{Roux99,Sagui99,Tobias01} These are typically
87 + classified as implicit methods (i.e., continuum dielectrics, static
88 + dipolar fields),\cite{Born20,Grossfield00} explicit methods (i.e.,
89 + Ewald summations, interaction shifting or
90 + trucation),\cite{Ewald21,Steinbach94} or a mixture of the two (i.e.,
91 + reaction field type methods, fast multipole
92 + methods).\cite{Onsager36,Rokhlin85} The explicit or mixed methods are
93 + often preferred because they incorporate dynamic solvent molecules in
94 + the system of interest, but these methods are sometimes difficult to
95 + utilize because of their high computational cost.\cite{Roux99} In
96 + addition to this cost, there has been some question of the inherent
97 + periodicity of the explicit Ewald summation artificially influencing
98 + systems dynamics.\cite{Tobias01}
99 +
100 + In this paper, we focus on the common mixed and explicit methods of
101 + reaction filed and smooth particle mesh
102 + Ewald\cite{Onsager36,Essmann99} and a new set of shifted methods
103 + devised by Wolf {\it et al.} which we further extend.\cite{Wolf99}
104 + These new methods for handling electrostatics are quite
105 + computationally efficient, since they involve only a simple
106 + modification to the direct pairwise sum, and they lack the added
107 + periodicity of the Ewald sum. Below, these methods are evaluated using
108 + a variety of model systems and comparison methodologies to establish
109 + their useability in molecular simulations.
110 +
111   \subsection{The Ewald Sum}
112 < blah blah blah Ewald Sum Important blah blah blah
112 > The complete accumulation electrostatic interactions in a system with
113 > periodic boundary conditions (PBC) requires the consideration of the
114 > effect of all charges within a simulation box, as well as those in the
115 > periodic replicas,
116 > \begin{equation}
117 > V_\textrm{elec} = \frac{1}{2} {\sum_{\mathbf{n}}}^\prime \left[ \sum_{i=1}^N\sum_{j=1}^N \phi\left( \mathbf{r}_{ij} + L\mathbf{n},\bm{\Omega}_i,\bm{\Omega}_j\right) \right],
118 > \label{eq:PBCSum}
119 > \end{equation}
120 > where the sum over $\mathbf{n}$ is a sum over all periodic box
121 > replicas with integer coordinates $\mathbf{n} = (l,m,n)$, and the
122 > prime indicates $i = j$ are neglected for $\mathbf{n} =
123 > 0$.\cite{deLeeuw80} Within the sum, $N$ is the number of electrostatic
124 > particles, $\mathbf{r}_{ij}$ is $\mathbf{r}_j - \mathbf{r}_i$, $L$ is
125 > the cell length, $\bm{\Omega}_{i,j}$ are the Euler angles for $i$ and
126 > $j$, and $\phi$ is Poisson's equation ($\phi(\mathbf{r}_{ij}) = q_i
127 > q_j |\mathbf{r}_{ij}|^{-1}$ for charge-charge interactions). In the
128 > case of monopole electrostatics, eq. (\ref{eq:PBCSum}) is
129 > conditionally convergent and is discontiuous for non-neutral systems.
130  
131 + This electrostatic summation problem was originally studied by Ewald
132 + for the case of an infinite crystal.\cite{Ewald21}. The approach he
133 + took was to convert this conditionally convergent sum into two
134 + absolutely convergent summations: a short-ranged real-space summation
135 + and a long-ranged reciprocal-space summation,
136 + \begin{equation}
137 + \begin{split}
138 + V_\textrm{elec} = \frac{1}{2}& \sum_{i=1}^N\sum_{j=1}^N \Biggr[ q_i q_j\Biggr( {\sum_{\mathbf{n}}}^\prime \frac{\textrm{erfc}\left( \alpha|\mathbf{r}_{ij}+\mathbf{n}|\right)}{|\mathbf{r}_{ij}+\mathbf{n}|} \\ &+ \frac{1}{\pi L^3}\sum_{\mathbf{k}\ne 0}\frac{4\pi^2}{|\mathbf{k}|^2} \exp{\left(-\frac{\pi^2|\mathbf{k}|^2}{\alpha^2}\right) \cos\left(\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}_{ij}\right)}\Biggr)\Biggr] \\ &- \frac{\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\sum_{i=1}^N q_i^2 + \frac{2\pi}{(2\epsilon_\textrm{S}+1)L^3}\left|\sum_{i=1}^N q_i\mathbf{r}_i\right|^2,
139 + \end{split}
140 + \label{eq:EwaldSum}
141 + \end{equation}
142 + where $\alpha$ is a damping parameter, or separation constant, with
143 + units of \AA$^{-1}$, $\mathbf{k}$ are the reciprocal vectors and equal
144 + $2\pi\mathbf{n}/L^2$, and $\epsilon_\textrm{S}$ is the dielectric
145 + constant of the encompassing medium. The final two terms of
146 + eq. (\ref{eq:EwaldSum}) are a particle-self term and a dipolar term
147 + for interacting with a surrounding dielectric.\cite{Allen87} This
148 + dipolar term was neglected in early applications in molecular
149 + simulations,\cite{Brush66,Woodcock71} until it was introduced by de
150 + Leeuw {\it et al.} to address situations where the unit cell has a
151 + dipole moment and this dipole moment gets magnified through
152 + replication of the periodic images.\cite{deLeeuw80,Smith81} If this
153 + term is taken to be zero, the system is using conducting boundary
154 + conditions, $\epsilon_{\rm S} = \infty$. Figure
155 + \ref{fig:ewaldTime} shows how the Ewald sum has been applied over
156 + time.  Initially, due to the small size of systems, the entire
157 + simulation box was replicated to convergence.  Currently, we balance a
158 + spherical real-space cutoff with the reciprocal sum and consider the
159 + surrounding dielectric.
160   \begin{figure}
161   \centering
162   \includegraphics[width = \linewidth]{./ewaldProgression.pdf}
# Line 96 | Line 170 | a surrounding dielectric term is included.}
170   \label{fig:ewaldTime}
171   \end{figure}
172  
173 + The Ewald summation in the straight-forward form is an
174 + $\mathscr{O}(N^2)$ algorithm.  The separation constant $(\alpha)$
175 + plays an important role in the computational cost balance between the
176 + direct and reciprocal-space portions of the summation.  The choice of
177 + the magnitude of this value allows one to select whether the
178 + real-space or reciprocal space portion of the summation is an
179 + $\mathscr{O}(N^2)$ calcualtion (with the other being
180 + $\mathscr{O}(N)$).\cite{Sagui99} With appropriate choice of $\alpha$
181 + and thoughtful algorithm development, this cost can be brought down to
182 + $\mathscr{O}(N^{3/2})$.\cite{Perram88} The typical route taken to
183 + reduce the cost of the Ewald summation further is to set $\alpha$ such
184 + that the real-space interactions decay rapidly, allowing for a short
185 + spherical cutoff, and then optimize the reciprocal space summation.
186 + These optimizations usually involve the utilization of the fast
187 + Fourier transform (FFT),\cite{Hockney81} leading to the
188 + particle-particle particle-mesh (P3M) and particle mesh Ewald (PME)
189 + methods.\cite{Shimada93,Luty94,Luty95,Darden93,Essmann95} In these
190 + methods, the cost of the reciprocal-space portion of the Ewald
191 + summation is from $\mathscr{O}(N^2)$ down to $\mathscr{O}(N \log N)$.
192 +
193 + These developments and optimizations have led the use of the Ewald
194 + summation to become routine in simulations with periodic boundary
195 + conditions. However, in certain systems the intrinsic three
196 + dimensional periodicity can prove to be problematic, such as two
197 + dimensional surfaces and membranes.  The Ewald sum has been
198 + reformulated to handle 2D
199 + systems,\cite{Parry75,Parry76,Heyes77,deLeeuw79,Rhee89}, but the new
200 + methods have been found to be computationally
201 + expensive.\cite{Spohr97,Yeh99} Inclusion of a correction term in the
202 + full Ewald summation is a possible direction for enabling the handling
203 + of 2D systems and the inclusion of the optimizations described
204 + previously.\cite{Yeh99}
205 +
206 + Several studies have recognized that the inherent periodicity in the
207 + Ewald sum can also have an effect on systems that have the same
208 + dimensionality.\cite{Roberts94,Roberts95,Luty96,Hunenberger99a,Hunenberger99b,Weber00}
209 + Good examples are solvated proteins kept at high relative
210 + concentration due to the periodicity of the electrostatics.  In these
211 + systems, the more compact folded states of a protein can be
212 + artificially stabilized by the periodic replicas introduced by the
213 + Ewald summation.\cite{Weber00} Thus, care ought to be taken when
214 + considering the use of the Ewald summation where the intrinsic
215 + perodicity may negatively affect the system dynamics.
216 +
217 +
218   \subsection{The Wolf and Zahn Methods}
219   In a recent paper by Wolf \textit{et al.}, a procedure was outlined
220   for the accurate accumulation of electrostatic interactions in an
221 < efficient pairwise fashion.\cite{Wolf99} Wolf \textit{et al.} observed
222 < that the electrostatic interaction is effectively short-ranged in
223 < condensed phase systems and that neutralization of the charge
224 < contained within the cutoff radius is crucial for potential
225 < stability. They devised a pairwise summation method that ensures
226 < charge neutrality and gives results similar to those obtained with
227 < the Ewald summation.  The resulting shifted Coulomb potential
228 < (Eq. \ref{eq:WolfPot}) includes image-charges subtracted out through
229 < placement on the cutoff sphere and a distance-dependent damping
230 < function (identical to that seen in the real-space portion of the
231 < Ewald sum) to aid convergence
221 > efficient pairwise fashion and lacks the inherent periodicity of the
222 > Ewald summation.\cite{Wolf99} Wolf \textit{et al.} observed that the
223 > electrostatic interaction is effectively short-ranged in condensed
224 > phase systems and that neutralization of the charge contained within
225 > the cutoff radius is crucial for potential stability. They devised a
226 > pairwise summation method that ensures charge neutrality and gives
227 > results similar to those obtained with the Ewald summation.  The
228 > resulting shifted Coulomb potential (Eq. \ref{eq:WolfPot}) includes
229 > image-charges subtracted out through placement on the cutoff sphere
230 > and a distance-dependent damping function (identical to that seen in
231 > the real-space portion of the Ewald sum) to aid convergence
232   \begin{equation}
233   V_{\textrm{Wolf}}(r_{ij})= \frac{q_iq_j \textrm{erfc}(\alpha r_{ij})}{r_{ij}}-\lim_{r_{ij}\rightarrow R_\textrm{c}}\left\{\frac{q_iq_j \textrm{erfc}(\alpha r_{ij})}{r_{ij}}\right\}.
234   \label{eq:WolfPot}
# Line 126 | Line 245 | procedure gives an expression for the forces,
245   derivative of this potential prior to evaluation of the limit.  This
246   procedure gives an expression for the forces,
247   \begin{equation}
248 < F_{\textrm{Wolf}}(r_{ij}) = q_i q_j\left\{-\left[\frac{\textrm{erfc}(\alpha r_{ij})}{r^2_{ij}}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{(-\alpha^2r_{ij}^2)}}{r_{ij}}\right]+\left[\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_{\textrm{c}}\right)}{R_{\textrm{c}}^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2R_{\textrm{c}}^2\right)}}{R_{\textrm{c}}}\right]\right\},
248 > F_{\textrm{Wolf}}(r_{ij}) = q_i q_j\left\{\left[\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r_{ij}\right)}{r^2_{ij}}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2r_{ij}^2\right)}}{r_{ij}}\right]-\left[\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_{\textrm{c}}\right)}{R_{\textrm{c}}^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2R_{\textrm{c}}^2\right)}}{R_{\textrm{c}}}\right]\right\},
249   \label{eq:WolfForces}
250   \end{equation}
251   that incorporates both image charges and damping of the electrostatic
# Line 206 | Line 325 | of the unshifted potential itself (when inside the cut
325   The forces associated with the shifted potential are simply the forces
326   of the unshifted potential itself (when inside the cutoff sphere),
327   \begin{equation}
328 < F_{\textrm{SP}} = \left( \frac{d v(r)}{dr} \right),
328 > f_{\textrm{SP}} = -\left( \frac{d v(r)}{dr} \right),
329   \end{equation}
330   and are zero outside.  Inside the cutoff sphere, the forces associated
331   with the shifted force form can be written,
332   \begin{equation}
333 < F_{\textrm{SF}} = \left( \frac{d v(r)}{dr} \right) - \left(\frac{d
333 > f_{\textrm{SF}} = -\left( \frac{d v(r)}{dr} \right) + \left(\frac{d
334   v(r)}{dr} \right)_{r=R_\textrm{c}}.
335   \end{equation}
336  
# Line 223 | Line 342 | al.}'s undamped prescription:
342   then the Shifted Potential ({\sc sp}) forms will give Wolf {\it et
343   al.}'s undamped prescription:
344   \begin{equation}
345 < V_\textrm{SP}(r) =
345 > v_\textrm{SP}(r) =
346   q_iq_j\left(\frac{1}{r}-\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}}\right) \quad
347   r\leqslant R_\textrm{c},
348 < \label{eq:WolfSP}
348 > \label{eq:SPPot}
349   \end{equation}
350   with associated forces,
351   \begin{equation}
352 < F_\textrm{SP}(r) = q_iq_j\left(-\frac{1}{r^2}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
353 < \label{eq:FWolfSP}
352 > f_\textrm{SP}(r) = q_iq_j\left(\frac{1}{r^2}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
353 > \label{eq:SPForces}
354   \end{equation}
355   These forces are identical to the forces of the standard Coulomb
356   interaction, and cutting these off at $R_c$ was addressed by Wolf
# Line 245 | Line 364 | will give,
364   The shifted force ({\sc sf}) form using the normal Coulomb potential
365   will give,
366   \begin{equation}
367 < V_\textrm{SF}(r) = q_iq_j\left[\frac{1}{r}-\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}}+\left(\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}^2}\right)(r-R_\textrm{c})\right] \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
367 > v_\textrm{SF}(r) = q_iq_j\left[\frac{1}{r}-\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}}+\left(\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}^2}\right)(r-R_\textrm{c})\right] \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
368   \label{eq:SFPot}
369   \end{equation}
370   with associated forces,
371   \begin{equation}
372 < F_\textrm{SF}(r =  q_iq_j\left(-\frac{1}{r^2}+\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}^2}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
372 > f_\textrm{SF}(r) =  q_iq_j\left(\frac{1}{r^2}-\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}^2}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
373   \label{eq:SFForces}
374   \end{equation}
375   This formulation has the benefits that there are no discontinuities at
# Line 264 | Line 383 | Wolf \textit{et al.} originally discussed the energeti
383   to gain functionality in dynamics simulations.
384  
385   Wolf \textit{et al.} originally discussed the energetics of the
386 < shifted Coulomb potential (Eq. \ref{eq:WolfSP}), and they found that
386 > shifted Coulomb potential (Eq. \ref{eq:SPPot}), and they found that
387   it was still insufficient for accurate determination of the energy
388   with reasonable cutoff distances.  The calculated Madelung energies
389   fluctuate around the expected value with increasing cutoff radius, but
# Line 279 | Line 398 | v(r) = \frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r},
398   v(r) = \frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r},
399   \label{eq:dampCoulomb}
400   \end{equation}
401 < the shifted potential (Eq. \ref{eq:WolfSP}) can be recovered
402 < \textit{via} equation \ref{eq:shiftingForm},
401 > the shifted potential (Eq. (\ref{eq:SPPot})) can be reacquired using
402 > eq. (\ref{eq:shiftingForm}),
403   \begin{equation}
404 < v_{\textrm{DSP}}(r) = q_iq_j\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}(\alpha r)}{r}-\frac{\textrm{erfc}(\alpha R_\textrm{c})}{R_\textrm{c}}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
404 > v_{\textrm{DSP}}(r) = q_iq_j\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r}-\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_\textrm{c}\right)}{R_\textrm{c}}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c},
405   \label{eq:DSPPot}
406 < \end{equation},
406 > \end{equation}
407   with associated forces,
408   \begin{equation}
409 < f_{\textrm{DSP}}(r) = q_iq_j\left(-\frac{\textrm{erfc}(\alpha r)}{r^2}-\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{(-\alpha^2r^2)}}{r}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
409 > f_{\textrm{DSP}}(r) = q_iq_j\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2r^2\right)}}{r}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
410   \label{eq:DSPForces}
411   \end{equation}
412   Again, this damped shifted potential suffers from a discontinuity and
413   a lack of the image charges in the forces.  To remedy these concerns,
414 < one may derive a Shifted-Force variant by including  the derivative
415 < term in equation \ref{eq:shiftingForm},
414 > one may derive a {\sc sf} variant by including  the derivative
415 > term in eq. (\ref{eq:shiftingForm}),
416   \begin{equation}
417   \begin{split}
418   v_\mathrm{DSF}(r) = q_iq_j\Biggr{[}&\frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r}-\frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_\mathrm{c}\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}} \\ &\left.+\left(\frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_\mathrm{c}\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp\left(-\alpha^2R_\mathrm{c}^2\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}}\right)\left(r-R_\mathrm{c}\right)\ \right] \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
419   \label{eq:DSFPot}
420   \end{split}
421   \end{equation}
422 < The derivative of the above potential gives the following forces,
422 > The derivative of the above potential will lead to the following forces,
423   \begin{equation}
424   \begin{split}
425 < f_\mathrm{DSF}(r) = q_iq_j\Biggr{[}&-\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}(\alpha r)}{r^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{(-\alpha^2r^2)}}{r}\right) \\ &\left.+\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}(\alpha R_{\textrm{c}})}{R_{\textrm{c}}^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2R_{\textrm{c}}^2\right)}}{R_{\textrm{c}}}\right)\right] \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
425 > f_\mathrm{DSF}(r) = q_iq_j\Biggr{[}&\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2r^2\right)}}{r}\right) \\ &\left.-\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_{\textrm{c}}\right)}{R_{\textrm{c}}^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2R_{\textrm{c}}^2\right)}}{R_{\textrm{c}}}\right)\right] \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
426   \label{eq:DSFForces}
427   \end{split}
428   \end{equation}
429 + If the damping parameter $(\alpha)$ is chosen to be zero, the undamped
430 + case, eqs. (\ref{eq:SPPot}-\ref{eq:SFForces}) are correctly recovered
431 + from eqs. (\ref{eq:DSPPot}-\ref{eq:DSFForces}).
432  
433 < This new Shifted-Force potential is similar to equation
434 < \ref{eq:ZahnPot} derived by Zahn \textit{et al.}; however, there are
435 < two important differences.\cite{Zahn02} First, the $v_\textrm{c}$ term
436 < from eq. (\ref{eq:shiftingForm}) is equal to
437 < eq. (\ref{eq:dampCoulomb}) with $r$ replaced by $R_\textrm{c}$.  This
438 < term is {\it not} present in the Zahn potential, resulting in a
439 < potential discontinuity as particles cross $R_\textrm{c}$.  Second,
440 < the sign of the derivative portion is different.  The missing
441 < $v_\textrm{c}$ term would not affect molecular dynamics simulations
442 < (although the computed energy would be expected to have sudden jumps
443 < as particle distances crossed $R_c$).  The sign problem would be a
444 < potential source of errors, however.  In fact, it introduces a
445 < discontinuity in the forces at the cutoff, because the force function
446 < is shifted in the wrong direction and doesn't cross zero at
325 < $R_\textrm{c}$.  
433 > This new {\sc sf} potential is similar to equation \ref{eq:ZahnPot}
434 > derived by Zahn \textit{et al.}; however, there are two important
435 > differences.\cite{Zahn02} First, the $v_\textrm{c}$ term from
436 > eq. (\ref{eq:shiftingForm}) is equal to eq. (\ref{eq:dampCoulomb})
437 > with $r$ replaced by $R_\textrm{c}$.  This term is {\it not} present
438 > in the Zahn potential, resulting in a potential discontinuity as
439 > particles cross $R_\textrm{c}$.  Second, the sign of the derivative
440 > portion is different.  The missing $v_\textrm{c}$ term would not
441 > affect molecular dynamics simulations (although the computed energy
442 > would be expected to have sudden jumps as particle distances crossed
443 > $R_c$).  The sign problem would be a potential source of errors,
444 > however.  In fact, it introduces a discontinuity in the forces at the
445 > cutoff, because the force function is shifted in the wrong direction
446 > and doesn't cross zero at $R_\textrm{c}$.
447  
448   Eqs. (\ref{eq:DSFPot}) and (\ref{eq:DSFForces}) result in an
449   electrostatic summation method that is continuous in both the
# Line 333 | Line 454 | performed by the Ewald sum.
454   performed by the Ewald sum.
455  
456   \subsection{Other alternatives}
457 <
458 < Reaction Field blah
459 <
460 < Group-based cutoff blah
457 > In addition to the methods described above, we will consider some
458 > other techniques that commonly get used in molecular simulations.  The
459 > simplest of these is group-based cutoffs.  Though of little use for
460 > non-neutral molecules, collecting atoms into neutral groups takes
461 > advantage of the observation that the electrostatic interactions decay
462 > faster than those for monopolar pairs.\cite{Steinbach94} When
463 > considering these molecules as groups, an orientational aspect is
464 > introduced to the interactions.  Consequently, as these molecular
465 > particles move through $R_\textrm{c}$, the energy will drift upward
466 > due to the anisotropy of the net molecular dipole
467 > interactions.\cite{Rahman71} To maintain good energy conservation,
468 > both the potential and derivative need to be smoothly switched to zero
469 > at $R_\textrm{c}$.\cite{Adams79} This is accomplished using a
470 > switching function,
471 > \begin{equation}
472 > S(r) = \begin{cases} 1 &\quad r\leqslant r_\textrm{sw} \\
473 > \frac{(R_\textrm{c}+2r-3r_\textrm{sw})(R_\textrm{c}-r)^2}{(R_\textrm{c}-r_\textrm{sw})^3} &\quad r_\textrm{sw}<r\leqslant R_\textrm{c} \\
474 > 0 &\quad r>R_\textrm{c}
475 > \end{cases},
476 > \end{equation}
477 > where the above form is for a cubic function.  If a smooth second
478 > derivative is desired, a fifth (or higher) order polynomial can be
479 > used.\cite{Andrea83}
480  
481 + Group-based cutoffs neglect the surroundings beyond $R_\textrm{c}$,
482 + and to incorporate their effect, a method like Reaction Field ({\sc
483 + rf}) can be used.  The original theory for {\sc rf} was originally
484 + developed by Onsager,\cite{Onsager36} and it was applied in
485 + simulations for the study of water by Barker and Watts.\cite{Barker73}
486 + In application, it is simply an extension of the group-based cutoff
487 + method where the net dipole within the cutoff sphere polarizes an
488 + external dielectric, which reacts back on the central dipole.  The
489 + same switching function considerations for group-based cutoffs need to
490 + made for {\sc rf}, with the additional pre-specification of a
491 + dielectric constant.
492  
493   \section{Methods}
494  
# Line 422 | Line 573 | between those computed from the particular method and
573   investigated through measurement of the angle ($\theta$) formed
574   between those computed from the particular method and those from SPME,
575   \begin{equation}
576 < \theta_f = \cos^{-1} \hat{f}_\textrm{SPME} \cdot \hat{f}_\textrm{Method},
576 > \theta_f = \cos^{-1} \left(\hat{f}_\textrm{SPME} \cdot \hat{f}_\textrm{Method}\right),
577   \end{equation}
578   where $\hat{f}_\textrm{M}$ is the unit vector pointing along the
579   force vector computed using method $M$.  
# Line 452 | Line 603 | when using the reference method (SPME).
603   when using the reference method (SPME).
604  
605   \subsection{Short-time Dynamics}
606 <
607 < \subsection{Long-Time and Collective Motion}\label{sec:LongTimeMethods}
457 < Evaluation of the long-time dynamics of charged systems was performed
458 < by considering the NaCl crystal system while using a subset of the
606 > Evaluation of the short-time dynamics of charged systems was performed
607 > by considering the 1000 K NaCl crystal system while using a subset of the
608   best performing pairwise methods.  The NaCl crystal was chosen to
609   avoid possible complications involving the propagation techniques of
610 < orientational motion in molecular systems.  To enhance the atomic
611 < motion, these crystals were equilibrated at 1000 K, near the
612 < experimental $T_m$ for NaCl.  Simulations were performed under the
613 < microcanonical ensemble, and velocity autocorrelation functions
614 < (Eq. \ref{eq:vCorr}) were computed for each of the trajectories,
610 > orientational motion in molecular systems.  All systems were started
611 > with the same initial positions and velocities.  Simulations were
612 > performed under the microcanonical ensemble, and velocity
613 > autocorrelation functions (Eq. \ref{eq:vCorr}) were computed for each
614 > of the trajectories,
615   \begin{equation}
616 < C_v(t) = \langle v_i(0)\cdot v_i(t)\rangle.
616 > C_v(t) = \frac{\langle v_i(0)\cdot v_i(t)\rangle}{\langle v_i(0)\cdot v_i(0)\rangle}.
617   \label{eq:vCorr}
618   \end{equation}
619 < Velocity autocorrelation functions require detailed short time data
620 < and long trajectories for good statistics, thus velocity information
621 < was saved every 5 fs over 100 ps trajectories.  The power spectrum
622 < ($I(\omega)$) is obtained via Fourier transform of the autocorrelation
623 < function
619 > Velocity autocorrelation functions require detailed short time data,
620 > thus velocity information was saved every 2 fs over 10 ps
621 > trajectories. Because the NaCl crystal is composed of two different
622 > atom types, the average of the two resulting velocity autocorrelation
623 > functions was used for comparisons.
624 >
625 > \subsection{Long-Time and Collective Motion}\label{sec:LongTimeMethods}
626 > Evaluation of the long-time dynamics of charged systems was performed
627 > by considering the NaCl crystal system, again while using a subset of
628 > the best performing pairwise methods.  To enhance the atomic motion,
629 > these crystals were equilibrated at 1000 K, near the experimental
630 > $T_m$ for NaCl.  Simulations were performed under the microcanonical
631 > ensemble, and velocity information was saved every 5 fs over 100 ps
632 > trajectories.  The power spectrum ($I(\omega)$) was obtained via
633 > Fourier transform of the velocity autocorrelation function
634   \begin{equation}
635   I(\omega) = \frac{1}{2\pi}\int^{\infty}_{-\infty}C_v(t)e^{-i\omega t}dt,
636   \label{eq:powerSpec}
637   \end{equation}
638 < where the frequency, $\omega=0,\ 1,\ ...,\ N-1$.
638 > where the frequency, $\omega=0,\ 1,\ ...,\ N-1$. Again, because the
639 > NaCl crystal is composed of two different atom types, the average of
640 > the two resulting power spectra was used for comparisons.
641  
642   \subsection{Representative Simulations}\label{sec:RepSims}
643   A variety of common and representative simulations were analyzed to
# Line 521 | Line 682 | Electrostatic summation method comparisons were perfor
682  
683   \subsection{Electrostatic Summation Methods}\label{sec:ESMethods}
684   Electrostatic summation method comparisons were performed using SPME,
685 < the Shifted-Potential and Shifted-Force methods - both with damping
685 > the {\sc sp} and {\sc sf} methods - both with damping
686   parameters ($\alpha$) of 0.0, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 \AA$^{-1}$ (no, weak,
687   moderate, and strong damping respectively), reaction field with an
688   infinite dielectric constant, and an unmodified cutoff.  Group-based
# Line 540 | Line 701 | tolerance (typically less than $1 \times 10^{-4}$ kcal
701   the energies and forces calculated.  Typical molecular mechanics
702   packages default this to a value dependent on the cutoff radius and a
703   tolerance (typically less than $1 \times 10^{-4}$ kcal/mol).  Smaller
704 < tolerances are typically associated with increased accuracy in the
705 < real-space portion of the summation.\cite{Essmann95} The default
706 < TINKER tolerance of $1 \times 10^{-8}$ kcal/mol was used in all SPME
704 > tolerances are typically associated with increased accuracy, but this
705 > usually means more time spent calculating the reciprocal-space portion
706 > of the summation.\cite{Perram88,Essmann95} The default TINKER
707 > tolerance of $1 \times 10^{-8}$ kcal/mol was used in all SPME
708   calculations, resulting in Ewald Coefficients of 0.4200, 0.3119, and
709   0.2476 \AA$^{-1}$ for cutoff radii of 9, 12, and 15 \AA\ respectively.
710  
# Line 584 | Line 746 | shown, but it has a detrimental effect on simulations
746   particularly with a cutoff radius greater than 12 \AA .  Use of a
747   larger damping parameter is more helpful for the shortest cutoff
748   shown, but it has a detrimental effect on simulations with larger
749 < cutoffs.  In the Shifted-Force sets, increasing damping results in
749 > cutoffs.  In the {\sc sf} sets, increasing damping results in
750   progressively poorer correlation.  Overall, the undamped case is the
751   best performing set, as the correlation and quality of fits are
752   consistently superior regardless of the cutoff distance.  This result
# Line 617 | Line 779 | a improvement much more significant than what was seen
779   in the previous $\Delta E$ section.  The unmodified cutoff results are
780   poor, but using group based cutoffs and a switching function provides
781   a improvement much more significant than what was seen with $\Delta
782 < E$.  Looking at the Shifted-Potential sets, the slope and $R^2$
782 > E$.  Looking at the {\sc sp} sets, the slope and $R^2$
783   improve with the use of damping to an optimal result of 0.2 \AA
784   $^{-1}$ for the 12 and 15 \AA\ cutoffs.  Further increases in damping,
785   while beneficial for simulations with a cutoff radius of 9 \AA\ , is
786   detrimental to simulations with larger cutoff radii.  The undamped
787 < Shifted-Force method gives forces in line with those obtained using
787 > {\sc sf} method gives forces in line with those obtained using
788   SPME, and use of a damping function results in minor improvement.  The
789   reaction field results are surprisingly good, considering the poor
790   quality of the fits for the $\Delta E$ results.  There is still a
# Line 645 | Line 807 | the improved behavior that comes with increasing the c
807   torque vector magnitude results in figure \ref{fig:trqMag} are still
808   similar to those seen for the forces; however, they more clearly show
809   the improved behavior that comes with increasing the cutoff radius.
810 < Moderate damping is beneficial to the Shifted-Potential and helpful
811 < yet possibly unnecessary with the Shifted-Force method, and they also
810 > Moderate damping is beneficial to the {\sc sp} and helpful
811 > yet possibly unnecessary with the {\sc sf} method, and they also
812   show that over-damping adversely effects all cutoff radii rather than
813   showing an improvement for systems with short cutoffs.  The reaction
814   field method performs well when calculating the torques, better than
# Line 675 | Line 837 | of the distribution widths, with a similar improvement
837   show the improvement afforded by choosing a longer simulation cutoff.
838   Increasing the cutoff from 9 to 12 \AA\ typically results in a halving
839   of the distribution widths, with a similar improvement going from 12
840 < to 15 \AA .  The undamped Shifted-Force, Group Based Cutoff, and
840 > to 15 \AA .  The undamped {\sc sf}, Group Based Cutoff, and
841   Reaction Field methods all do equivalently well at capturing the
842   direction of both the force and torque vectors.  Using damping
843 < improves the angular behavior significantly for the Shifted-Potential
844 < and moderately for the Shifted-Force methods.  Increasing the damping
843 > improves the angular behavior significantly for the {\sc sp}
844 > and moderately for the {\sc sf} methods.  Increasing the damping
845   too far is destructive for both methods, particularly to the torque
846   vectors.  Again it is important to recognize that the force vectors
847   cover all particles in the systems, while torque vectors are only
# Line 721 | Line 883 | Although not discussed previously, group based cutoffs
883   \end{table}
884  
885   Although not discussed previously, group based cutoffs can be applied
886 < to both the Shifted-Potential and Shifted-Force methods.  Use off a
886 > to both the {\sc sp} and {\sc sf} methods.  Use off a
887   switching function corrects for the discontinuities that arise when
888   atoms of a group exit the cutoff before the group's center of mass.
889   Though there are no significant benefit or drawbacks observed in
# Line 730 | Line 892 | results seen in figure \ref{fig:frcTrqAng} for compari
892   \ref{tab:groupAngle} shows the angular variance values obtained using
893   group based cutoffs and a switching function alongside the standard
894   results seen in figure \ref{fig:frcTrqAng} for comparison purposes.
895 < The Shifted-Potential shows much narrower angular distributions for
895 > The {\sc sp} shows much narrower angular distributions for
896   both the force and torque vectors when using an $\alpha$ of 0.2
897 < \AA$^{-1}$ or less, while Shifted-Force shows improvements in the
897 > \AA$^{-1}$ or less, while {\sc sf} shows improvements in the
898   undamped and lightly damped cases.  Thus, by calculating the
899   electrostatic interactions in terms of molecular pairs rather than
900   atomic pairs, the direction of the force and torque vectors are
901   determined more accurately.
902  
903   One additional trend to recognize in table \ref{tab:groupAngle} is
904 < that the $\sigma^2$ values for both Shifted-Potential and
905 < Shifted-Force converge as $\alpha$ increases, something that is easier
904 > that the $\sigma^2$ values for both {\sc sp} and
905 > {\sc sf} converge as $\alpha$ increases, something that is easier
906   to see when using group based cutoffs.  Looking back on figures
907   \ref{fig:delE}, \ref{fig:frcMag}, and \ref{fig:trqMag}, show this
908   behavior clearly at large $\alpha$ and cutoff values.  The reason for
# Line 759 | Line 921 | up to 0.2 \AA$^{-1}$ proves to be beneficial, but damp
921   high would introduce error in the molecular torques, particularly for
922   the shorter cutoffs.  Based on the above findings, empirical damping
923   up to 0.2 \AA$^{-1}$ proves to be beneficial, but damping is arguably
924 < unnecessary when using the Shifted-Force method.
924 > unnecessary when using the {\sc sf} method.
925  
926 < \subsection{Collective Motion: Power Spectra of NaCl Crystals}
926 > \subsection{Short-Time Dynamics: Velocity Autocorrelation Functions of NaCl Crystals}
927  
928 < In the previous studies using a Shifted-Force variant of the damped
928 > In the previous studies using a {\sc sf} variant of the damped
929   Wolf coulomb potential, the structure and dynamics of water were
930   investigated rather extensively.\cite{Zahn02,Kast03} Their results
931 < indicated that the damped Shifted-Force method results in properties
931 > indicated that the damped {\sc sf} method results in properties
932   very similar to those obtained when using the Ewald summation.
933   Considering the statistical results shown above, the good performance
934   of this method is not that surprising.  Rather than consider the same
# Line 776 | Line 938 | summation methods from the above results.
938  
939   \begin{figure}
940   \centering
941 + \includegraphics[width = \linewidth]{./vCorrPlot.pdf}
942 + \caption{Velocity auto-correlation functions of NaCl crystals at 1000 K while using SPME, {\sc sf} ($\alpha$ = 0.0, 0.1, \& 0.2), and {\sc sp} ($\alpha$ = 0.2). The inset is a magnification of the first trough. The times to first collision are nearly identical, but the differences can be seen in the peaks and troughs, where the undamped to weakly damped methods are stiffer than the moderately damped and SPME methods.}
943 + \label{fig:vCorrPlot}
944 + \end{figure}
945 +
946 + The short-time decays through the first collision are nearly identical
947 + in figure \ref{fig:vCorrPlot}, but the peaks and troughs of the
948 + functions show how the methods differ.  The undamped {\sc sf} method
949 + has deeper troughs (see inset in Fig. \ref{fig:vCorrPlot}) and higher
950 + peaks than any of the other methods.  As the damping function is
951 + increased, these peaks are smoothed out, and approach the SPME
952 + curve. The damping acts as a distance dependent Gaussian screening of
953 + the point charges for the pairwise summation methods; thus, the
954 + collisions are more elastic in the undamped {\sc sf} potental, and the
955 + stiffness of the potential is diminished as the electrostatic
956 + interactions are softened by the damping function.  With $\alpha$
957 + values of 0.2 \AA$^{-1}$, the {\sc sf} and {\sc sp} functions are
958 + nearly identical and track the SPME features quite well.  This is not
959 + too surprising in that the differences between the {\sc sf} and {\sc
960 + sp} potentials are mitigated with increased damping.  However, this
961 + appears to indicate that once damping is utilized, the form of the
962 + potential seems to play a lesser role in the crystal dynamics.
963 +
964 + \subsection{Collective Motion: Power Spectra of NaCl Crystals}
965 +
966 + The short time dynamics were extended to evaluate how the differences
967 + between the methods affect the collective long-time motion.  The same
968 + electrostatic summation methods were used as in the short time
969 + velocity autocorrelation function evaluation, but the trajectories
970 + were sampled over a much longer time. The power spectra of the
971 + resulting velocity autocorrelation functions were calculated and are
972 + displayed in figure \ref{fig:methodPS}.
973 +
974 + \begin{figure}
975 + \centering
976   \includegraphics[width = \linewidth]{./spectraSquare.pdf}
977 < \caption{Power spectra obtained from the velocity auto-correlation functions of NaCl crystals at 1000 K while using SPME, Shifted-Force ($\alpha$ = 0, 0.1, \& 0.2), and Shifted-Potential ($\alpha$ = 0.2).  Apodization of the correlation functions via a cubic switching function between 40 and 50 ps was used to clear up the spectral noise resulting from data truncation, and had no noticeable effect on peak location or magnitude.  The inset shows the frequency region below 100 cm$^{-1}$ to highlight where the spectra begin to differ.}
977 > \caption{Power spectra obtained from the velocity auto-correlation functions of NaCl crystals at 1000 K while using SPME, {\sc sf} ($\alpha$ = 0, 0.1, \& 0.2), and {\sc sp} ($\alpha$ = 0.2).  Apodization of the correlation functions via a cubic switching function between 40 and 50 ps was used to clear up the spectral noise resulting from data truncation, and had no noticeable effect on peak location or magnitude.  The inset shows the frequency region below 100 cm$^{-1}$ to highlight where the spectra begin to differ.}
978   \label{fig:methodPS}
979   \end{figure}
980  
981 < Figure \ref{fig:methodPS} shows the power spectra for the NaCl
982 < crystals (from averaged Na and Cl ion velocity autocorrelation
983 < functions) using the stated electrostatic summation methods.  While
984 < high frequency peaks of all the spectra overlap, showing the same
985 < general features, the low frequency region shows how the summation
986 < methods differ.  Considering the low-frequency inset (expanded in the
987 < upper frame of figure \ref{fig:dampInc}), at frequencies below 100
988 < cm$^{-1}$, the correlated motions are blue-shifted when using undamped
989 < or weakly damped Shifted-Force.  When using moderate damping ($\alpha
990 < = 0.2$ \AA$^{-1}$) both the Shifted-Force and Shifted-Potential
991 < methods give near identical correlated motion behavior as the Ewald
992 < method (which has a damping value of 0.3119).  The damping acts as a
993 < distance dependent Gaussian screening of the point charges for the
994 < pairwise summation methods.  This weakening of the electrostatic
995 < interaction with distance explains why the long-ranged correlated
799 < motions are at lower frequencies for the moderately damped methods
800 < than for undamped or weakly damped methods.  To see this effect more
801 < clearly, we show how damping strength affects a simple real-space
802 < electrostatic potential,
981 > While high frequency peaks of the spectra in this figure overlap,
982 > showing the same general features, the low frequency region shows how
983 > the summation methods differ.  Considering the low-frequency inset
984 > (expanded in the upper frame of figure \ref{fig:dampInc}), at
985 > frequencies below 100 cm$^{-1}$, the correlated motions are
986 > blue-shifted when using undamped or weakly damped {\sc sf}.  When
987 > using moderate damping ($\alpha = 0.2$ \AA$^{-1}$) both the {\sc sf}
988 > and {\sc sp} methods give near identical correlated motion behavior as
989 > the Ewald method (which has a damping value of 0.3119).  This
990 > weakening of the electrostatic interaction with increased damping
991 > explains why the long-ranged correlated motions are at lower
992 > frequencies for the moderately damped methods than for undamped or
993 > weakly damped methods.  To see this effect more clearly, we show how
994 > damping strength alone affects a simple real-space electrostatic
995 > potential,
996   \begin{equation}
997   V_\textrm{damped}=\sum^N_i\sum^N_{j\ne i}q_iq_j\left[\frac{\textrm{erfc}({\alpha r})}{r}\right]S(r),
998   \end{equation}
# Line 814 | Line 1007 | blue-shifted such that the lowest frequency peak resid
1007   shift to higher frequency in exponential fashion.  Though not shown,
1008   the spectrum for the simple undamped electrostatic potential is
1009   blue-shifted such that the lowest frequency peak resides near 325
1010 < cm$^{-1}$.  In light of these results, the undamped Shifted-Force
1011 < method producing low-lying motion peaks within 10 cm$^{-1}$ of SPME is
1012 < quite respectable; however, it appears as though moderate damping is
1013 < required for accurate reproduction of crystal dynamics.
1010 > cm$^{-1}$.  In light of these results, the undamped {\sc sf} method
1011 > producing low-lying motion peaks within 10 cm$^{-1}$ of SPME is quite
1012 > respectable and shows that the shifted force procedure accounts for
1013 > most of the effect afforded through use of the Ewald summation.
1014 > However, it appears as though moderate damping is required for
1015 > accurate reproduction of crystal dynamics.
1016   \begin{figure}
1017   \centering
1018   \includegraphics[width = \linewidth]{./comboSquare.pdf}
1019 < \caption{Upper: Zoomed inset from figure \ref{fig:methodPS}.  As the damping value for the Shifted-Force potential increases, the low-frequency peaks red-shift.  Lower: Low-frequency correlated motions for NaCl crystals at 1000 K when using SPME and a simple damped Coulombic sum with damping coefficients ($\alpha$) ranging from 0.15 to 0.3 \AA$^{-1}$.  As $\alpha$ increases, the peaks are red-shifted toward and eventually beyond the values given by SPME.  The larger $\alpha$ values weaken the real-space electrostatics, explaining this shift towards less strongly correlated motions in the crystal.}
1019 > \caption{Regions of spectra showing the low-frequency correlated motions for NaCl crystals at 1000 K using various electrostatic summation methods.  The upper plot is a zoomed inset from figure \ref{fig:methodPS}.  As the damping value for the {\sc sf} potential increases, the low-frequency peaks red-shift.  The lower plot is of spectra when using SPME and a simple damped Coulombic sum with damping coefficients ($\alpha$) ranging from 0.15 to 0.3 \AA$^{-1}$.  As $\alpha$ increases, the peaks are red-shifted toward and eventually beyond the values given by SPME.  The larger $\alpha$ values weaken the real-space electrostatics, explaining this shift towards less strongly correlated motions in the crystal.}
1020   \label{fig:dampInc}
1021   \end{figure}
1022  
# Line 832 | Line 1027 | Wolf \textit{et al.}\cite{Wolf99,Zahn02} In particular
1027   electrostatic summation techniques than the Ewald summation, chiefly
1028   methods derived from the damped Coulombic sum originally proposed by
1029   Wolf \textit{et al.}\cite{Wolf99,Zahn02} In particular, the
1030 < Shifted-Force method, reformulated above as equation \ref{eq:SFPot},
1030 > {\sc sf} method, reformulated above as eq. (\ref{eq:DSFPot}),
1031   shows a remarkable ability to reproduce the energetic and dynamic
1032   characteristics exhibited by simulations employing lattice summation
1033   techniques.  The cumulative energy difference results showed the
1034 < undamped Shifted-Force and moderately damped Shifted-Potential methods
1034 > undamped {\sc sf} and moderately damped {\sc sp} methods
1035   produced results nearly identical to SPME.  Similarly for the dynamic
1036 < features, the undamped or moderately damped Shifted-Force and
1037 < moderately damped Shifted-Potential methods produce force and torque
1036 > features, the undamped or moderately damped {\sc sf} and
1037 > moderately damped {\sc sp} methods produce force and torque
1038   vector magnitude and directions very similar to the expected values.
1039   These results translate into long-time dynamic behavior equivalent to
1040   that produced in simulations using SPME.
# Line 861 | Line 1056 | today, the Ewald summation may no longer be required t
1056   standard by which these simple pairwise sums are judged.  However,
1057   these results do suggest that in the typical simulations performed
1058   today, the Ewald summation may no longer be required to obtain the
1059 < level of accuracy most researcher have come to expect
1059 > level of accuracy most researchers have come to expect
1060  
1061   \section{Acknowledgments}
1062   \newpage

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines