ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/electrostaticMethodsPaper/electrostaticMethods.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/electrostaticMethodsPaper/electrostaticMethods.tex (file contents):
Revision 2624 by gezelter, Wed Mar 15 17:09:09 2006 UTC vs.
Revision 2637 by chrisfen, Sun Mar 19 02:48:19 2006 UTC

# Line 2 | Line 2
2   %\documentclass[aps,prb,preprint]{revtex4}
3   \documentclass[11pt]{article}
4   \usepackage{endfloat}
5 < \usepackage{amsmath}
5 > \usepackage{amsmath,bm}
6   \usepackage{amssymb}
7   \usepackage{epsf}
8   \usepackage{times}
# Line 81 | Line 81 | impractical task to perform these calculations.
81   impractical task to perform these calculations.
82  
83   \subsection{The Ewald Sum}
84 < blah blah blah Ewald Sum Important blah blah blah
84 > The complete accumulation electrostatic interactions in a system with periodic boundary conditions (PBC) requires the consideration of the effect of all charges within a simulation box, as well as those in the periodic replicas,
85 > \begin{equation}
86 > V_\textrm{elec} = \frac{1}{2} {\sum_{\mathbf{n}}}^\prime \left[ \sum_{i=1}^N\sum_{j=1}^N \phi\left( \mathbf{r}_{ij} + L\mathbf{n},\bm{\Omega}_i,\bm{\Omega}_j\right) \right],
87 > \label{eq:PBCSum}
88 > \end{equation}
89 > where the sum over $\mathbf{n}$ is a sum over all periodic box replicas
90 > with integer coordinates $\mathbf{n} = (l,m,n)$, and the prime indicates
91 > $i = j$ are neglected for $\mathbf{n} = 0$.\cite{deLeeuw80} Within the
92 > sum, $N$ is the number of electrostatic particles, $\mathbf{r}_{ij}$ is
93 > $\mathbf{r}_j - \mathbf{r}_i$, $L$ is the cell length, $\bm{\Omega}_{i,j}$ are
94 > the Euler angles for $i$ and $j$, and $\phi$ is Poisson's equation
95 > ($\phi(\mathbf{r}_{ij}) = q_i q_j |\mathbf{r}_{ij}|^{-1}$ for charge-charge
96 > interactions). In the case of monopole electrostatics,
97 > eq. (\ref{eq:PBCSum}) is conditionally convergent and is discontiuous
98 > for non-neutral systems.
99  
100 + This electrostatic summation problem was originally studied by Ewald
101 + for the case of an infinite crystal.\cite{Ewald21}. The approach he
102 + took was to convert this conditionally convergent sum into two
103 + absolutely convergent summations: a short-ranged real-space summation
104 + and a long-ranged reciprocal-space summation,
105 + \begin{equation}
106 + \begin{split}
107 + V_\textrm{elec} = \frac{1}{2}& \sum_{i=1}^N\sum_{j=1}^N \Biggr[ q_i q_j\Biggr( {\sum_{\mathbf{n}}}^\prime \frac{\textrm{erfc}\left( \alpha|\mathbf{r}_{ij}+\mathbf{n}|\right)}{|\mathbf{r}_{ij}+\mathbf{n}|} \\ &+ \frac{1}{\pi L^3}\sum_{\mathbf{k}\ne 0}\frac{4\pi^2}{|\mathbf{k}|^2} \exp{\left(-\frac{\pi^2|\mathbf{k}|^2}{\alpha^2}\right) \cos\left(\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}_{ij}\right)}\Biggr)\Biggr] \\ &- \frac{\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\sum_{i=1}^N q_i^2 + \frac{2\pi}{(2\epsilon_\textrm{S}+1)L^3}\left|\sum_{i=1}^N q_i\mathbf{r}_i\right|^2,
108 + \end{split}
109 + \label{eq:EwaldSum}
110 + \end{equation}
111 + where $\alpha$ is a damping parameter, or separation constant, with
112 + units of \AA$^{-1}$, $\mathbf{k}$ are the reciprocal vectors and equal
113 + $2\pi\mathbf{n}/L^2$, and $\epsilon_\textrm{S}$ is the dielectric
114 + constant of the encompassing medium. The final two terms of
115 + eq. (\ref{eq:EwaldSum}) are a particle-self term and a dipolar term
116 + for interacting with a surrounding dielectric.\cite{Allen87} This
117 + dipolar term was neglected in early applications in molecular
118 + simulations,\cite{Brush66,Woodcock71} until it was introduced by de
119 + Leeuw {\it et al.} to address situations where the unit cell has a
120 + dipole moment and this dipole moment gets magnified through
121 + replication of the periodic images.\cite{deLeeuw80,Smith81} If this
122 + term is taken to be zero, the system is using conducting boundary
123 + conditions, $\epsilon_{\rm S} = \infty$. Figure
124 + \ref{fig:ewaldTime} shows how the Ewald sum has been applied over
125 + time.  Initially, due to the small size of systems, the entire
126 + simulation box was replicated to convergence.  Currently, we balance a
127 + spherical real-space cutoff with the reciprocal sum and consider the
128 + surrounding dielectric.
129   \begin{figure}
130   \centering
131   \includegraphics[width = \linewidth]{./ewaldProgression.pdf}
# Line 95 | Line 138 | a surrounding dielectric term is included.}
138   a surrounding dielectric term is included.}
139   \label{fig:ewaldTime}
140   \end{figure}
141 +
142 + The Ewald summation in the straight-forward form is an
143 + $\mathscr{O}(N^2)$ algorithm.  The separation constant $(\alpha)$
144 + plays an important role in the computational cost balance between the
145 + direct and reciprocal-space portions of the summation.  The choice of
146 + the magnitude of this value allows one to select whether the
147 + real-space or reciprocal space portion of the summation is an
148 + $\mathscr{O}(N^2)$ calcualtion (with the other being
149 + $\mathscr{O}(N)$).\cite{Sagui99} With appropriate choice of $\alpha$
150 + and thoughtful algorithm development, this cost can be brought down to
151 + $\mathscr{O}(N^{3/2})$.\cite{Perram88} The typical route taken to
152 + reduce the cost of the Ewald summation further is to set $\alpha$ such
153 + that the real-space interactions decay rapidly, allowing for a short
154 + spherical cutoff, and then optimize the reciprocal space summation.
155 + These optimizations usually involve the utilization of the fast
156 + Fourier transform (FFT),\cite{Hockney81} leading to the
157 + particle-particle particle-mesh (P3M) and particle mesh Ewald (PME)
158 + methods.\cite{Shimada93,Luty94,Luty95,Darden93,Essmann95} In these
159 + methods, the cost of the reciprocal-space portion of the Ewald
160 + summation is from $\mathscr{O}(N^2)$ down to $\mathscr{O}(N \log N)$.
161 +
162 + These developments and optimizations have led the use of the Ewald
163 + summation to become routine in simulations with periodic boundary
164 + conditions. However, in certain systems the intrinsic three
165 + dimensional periodicity can prove to be problematic, such as two
166 + dimensional surfaces and membranes.  The Ewald sum has been
167 + reformulated to handle 2D
168 + systems,\cite{Parry75,Parry76,Heyes77,deLeeuw79,Rhee89}, but the new
169 + methods have been found to be computationally
170 + expensive.\cite{Spohr97,Yeh99} Inclusion of a correction term in the
171 + full Ewald summation is a possible direction for enabling the handling
172 + of 2D systems and the inclusion of the optimizations described
173 + previously.\cite{Yeh99}
174  
175 + Several studies have recognized that the inherent periodicity in the
176 + Ewald sum can also have an effect on systems that have the same
177 + dimensionality.\cite{Roberts94,Roberts95,Luty96,Hunenberger99a,Hunenberger99b,Weber00}
178 + Good examples are solvated proteins kept at high relative
179 + concentration due to the periodicity of the electrostatics.  In these
180 + systems, the more compact folded states of a protein can be
181 + artificially stabilized by the periodic replicas introduced by the
182 + Ewald summation.\cite{Weber00} Thus, care ought to be taken when
183 + considering the use of the Ewald summation where the intrinsic
184 + perodicity may negatively affect the system dynamics.
185 +
186 +
187   \subsection{The Wolf and Zahn Methods}
188   In a recent paper by Wolf \textit{et al.}, a procedure was outlined
189   for the accurate accumulation of electrostatic interactions in an
190 < efficient pairwise fashion.\cite{Wolf99} Wolf \textit{et al.} observed
191 < that the electrostatic interaction is effectively short-ranged in
192 < condensed phase systems and that neutralization of the charge
193 < contained within the cutoff radius is crucial for potential
194 < stability. They devised a pairwise summation method that ensures
195 < charge neutrality and gives results similar to those obtained with
196 < the Ewald summation.  The resulting shifted Coulomb potential
197 < (Eq. \ref{eq:WolfPot}) includes image-charges subtracted out through
198 < placement on the cutoff sphere and a distance-dependent damping
199 < function (identical to that seen in the real-space portion of the
200 < Ewald sum) to aid convergence
190 > efficient pairwise fashion and lacks the inherent periodicity of the
191 > Ewald summation.\cite{Wolf99} Wolf \textit{et al.} observed that the
192 > electrostatic interaction is effectively short-ranged in condensed
193 > phase systems and that neutralization of the charge contained within
194 > the cutoff radius is crucial for potential stability. They devised a
195 > pairwise summation method that ensures charge neutrality and gives
196 > results similar to those obtained with the Ewald summation.  The
197 > resulting shifted Coulomb potential (Eq. \ref{eq:WolfPot}) includes
198 > image-charges subtracted out through placement on the cutoff sphere
199 > and a distance-dependent damping function (identical to that seen in
200 > the real-space portion of the Ewald sum) to aid convergence
201   \begin{equation}
202   V_{\textrm{Wolf}}(r_{ij})= \frac{q_iq_j \textrm{erfc}(\alpha r_{ij})}{r_{ij}}-\lim_{r_{ij}\rightarrow R_\textrm{c}}\left\{\frac{q_iq_j \textrm{erfc}(\alpha r_{ij})}{r_{ij}}\right\}.
203   \label{eq:WolfPot}
# Line 126 | Line 214 | procedure gives an expression for the forces,
214   derivative of this potential prior to evaluation of the limit.  This
215   procedure gives an expression for the forces,
216   \begin{equation}
217 < F_{\textrm{Wolf}}(r_{ij}) = q_i q_j\left\{-\left[\frac{\textrm{erfc}(\alpha r_{ij})}{r^2_{ij}}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{(-\alpha^2r_{ij}^2)}}{r_{ij}}\right]+\left[\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_{\textrm{c}}\right)}{R_{\textrm{c}}^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2R_{\textrm{c}}^2\right)}}{R_{\textrm{c}}}\right]\right\},
217 > F_{\textrm{Wolf}}(r_{ij}) = q_i q_j\left\{\left[\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r_{ij}\right)}{r^2_{ij}}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2r_{ij}^2\right)}}{r_{ij}}\right]-\left[\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_{\textrm{c}}\right)}{R_{\textrm{c}}^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2R_{\textrm{c}}^2\right)}}{R_{\textrm{c}}}\right]\right\},
218   \label{eq:WolfForces}
219   \end{equation}
220   that incorporates both image charges and damping of the electrostatic
# Line 206 | Line 294 | of the unshifted potential itself (when inside the cut
294   The forces associated with the shifted potential are simply the forces
295   of the unshifted potential itself (when inside the cutoff sphere),
296   \begin{equation}
297 < F_{\textrm{SP}} = \left( \frac{d v(r)}{dr} \right),
297 > f_{\textrm{SP}} = -\left( \frac{d v(r)}{dr} \right),
298   \end{equation}
299   and are zero outside.  Inside the cutoff sphere, the forces associated
300   with the shifted force form can be written,
301   \begin{equation}
302 < F_{\textrm{SF}} = \left( \frac{d v(r)}{dr} \right) - \left(\frac{d
302 > f_{\textrm{SF}} = -\left( \frac{d v(r)}{dr} \right) + \left(\frac{d
303   v(r)}{dr} \right)_{r=R_\textrm{c}}.
304   \end{equation}
305  
# Line 223 | Line 311 | al.}'s undamped prescription:
311   then the Shifted Potential ({\sc sp}) forms will give Wolf {\it et
312   al.}'s undamped prescription:
313   \begin{equation}
314 < V_\textrm{SP}(r) =
314 > v_\textrm{SP}(r) =
315   q_iq_j\left(\frac{1}{r}-\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}}\right) \quad
316   r\leqslant R_\textrm{c},
317 < \label{eq:WolfSP}
317 > \label{eq:SPPot}
318   \end{equation}
319   with associated forces,
320   \begin{equation}
321 < F_\textrm{SP}(r) = q_iq_j\left(-\frac{1}{r^2}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
322 < \label{eq:FWolfSP}
321 > f_\textrm{SP}(r) = q_iq_j\left(\frac{1}{r^2}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
322 > \label{eq:SPForces}
323   \end{equation}
324   These forces are identical to the forces of the standard Coulomb
325   interaction, and cutting these off at $R_c$ was addressed by Wolf
# Line 245 | Line 333 | will give,
333   The shifted force ({\sc sf}) form using the normal Coulomb potential
334   will give,
335   \begin{equation}
336 < V_\textrm{SF}(r) = q_iq_j\left[\frac{1}{r}-\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}}+\left(\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}^2}\right)(r-R_\textrm{c})\right] \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
336 > v_\textrm{SF}(r) = q_iq_j\left[\frac{1}{r}-\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}}+\left(\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}^2}\right)(r-R_\textrm{c})\right] \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
337   \label{eq:SFPot}
338   \end{equation}
339   with associated forces,
340   \begin{equation}
341 < F_\textrm{SF}(r =  q_iq_j\left(-\frac{1}{r^2}+\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}^2}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
341 > f_\textrm{SF}(r) =  q_iq_j\left(\frac{1}{r^2}-\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}^2}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
342   \label{eq:SFForces}
343   \end{equation}
344   This formulation has the benefits that there are no discontinuities at
# Line 264 | Line 352 | Wolf \textit{et al.} originally discussed the energeti
352   to gain functionality in dynamics simulations.
353  
354   Wolf \textit{et al.} originally discussed the energetics of the
355 < shifted Coulomb potential (Eq. \ref{eq:WolfSP}), and they found that
355 > shifted Coulomb potential (Eq. \ref{eq:SPPot}), and they found that
356   it was still insufficient for accurate determination of the energy
357   with reasonable cutoff distances.  The calculated Madelung energies
358   fluctuate around the expected value with increasing cutoff radius, but
# Line 279 | Line 367 | v(r) = \frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r},
367   v(r) = \frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r},
368   \label{eq:dampCoulomb}
369   \end{equation}
370 < the shifted potential (Eq. \ref{eq:WolfSP}) can be recovered
371 < \textit{via} equation \ref{eq:shiftingForm},
370 > the shifted potential (Eq. (\ref{eq:SPPot})) can be reacquired using
371 > eq. (\ref{eq:shiftingForm}),
372   \begin{equation}
373 < v_{\textrm{DSP}}(r) = q_iq_j\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}(\alpha r)}{r}-\frac{\textrm{erfc}(\alpha R_\textrm{c})}{R_\textrm{c}}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
373 > v_{\textrm{DSP}}(r) = q_iq_j\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r}-\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_\textrm{c}\right)}{R_\textrm{c}}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c},
374   \label{eq:DSPPot}
375 < \end{equation},
375 > \end{equation}
376   with associated forces,
377   \begin{equation}
378 < f_{\textrm{DSP}}(r) = q_iq_j\left(-\frac{\textrm{erfc}(\alpha r)}{r^2}-\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{(-\alpha^2r^2)}}{r}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
378 > f_{\textrm{DSP}}(r) = q_iq_j\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2r^2\right)}}{r}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
379   \label{eq:DSPForces}
380   \end{equation}
381   Again, this damped shifted potential suffers from a discontinuity and
382   a lack of the image charges in the forces.  To remedy these concerns,
383 < one may derive a Shifted-Force variant by including  the derivative
384 < term in equation \ref{eq:shiftingForm},
383 > one may derive a {\sc sf} variant by including  the derivative
384 > term in eq. (\ref{eq:shiftingForm}),
385   \begin{equation}
386   \begin{split}
387   v_\mathrm{DSF}(r) = q_iq_j\Biggr{[}&\frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r}-\frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_\mathrm{c}\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}} \\ &\left.+\left(\frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_\mathrm{c}\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp\left(-\alpha^2R_\mathrm{c}^2\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}}\right)\left(r-R_\mathrm{c}\right)\ \right] \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
388   \label{eq:DSFPot}
389   \end{split}
390   \end{equation}
391 < The derivative of the above potential gives the following forces,
391 > The derivative of the above potential will lead to the following forces,
392   \begin{equation}
393   \begin{split}
394 < f_\mathrm{DSF}(r) = q_iq_j\Biggr{[}&-\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}(\alpha r)}{r^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{(-\alpha^2r^2)}}{r}\right) \\ &\left.+\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}(\alpha R_{\textrm{c}})}{R_{\textrm{c}}^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2R_{\textrm{c}}^2\right)}}{R_{\textrm{c}}}\right)\right] \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
394 > f_\mathrm{DSF}(r) = q_iq_j\Biggr{[}&\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2r^2\right)}}{r}\right) \\ &\left.-\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_{\textrm{c}}\right)}{R_{\textrm{c}}^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2R_{\textrm{c}}^2\right)}}{R_{\textrm{c}}}\right)\right] \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
395   \label{eq:DSFForces}
396   \end{split}
397   \end{equation}
398 + If the damping parameter $(\alpha)$ is chosen to be zero, the undamped
399 + case, eqs. (\ref{eq:SPPot}-\ref{eq:SFForces}) are correctly recovered
400 + from eqs. (\ref{eq:DSPPot}-\ref{eq:DSFForces}).
401  
402 < This new Shifted-Force potential is similar to equation
403 < \ref{eq:ZahnPot} derived by Zahn \textit{et al.}; however, there are
404 < two important differences.\cite{Zahn02} First, the $v_\textrm{c}$ term
405 < from eq. (\ref{eq:shiftingForm}) is equal to
406 < eq. (\ref{eq:dampCoulomb}) with $r$ replaced by $R_\textrm{c}$.  This
407 < term is {\it not} present in the Zahn potential, resulting in a
408 < potential discontinuity as particles cross $R_\textrm{c}$.  Second,
409 < the sign of the derivative portion is different.  The missing
410 < $v_\textrm{c}$ term would not affect molecular dynamics simulations
411 < (although the computed energy would be expected to have sudden jumps
412 < as particle distances crossed $R_c$).  The sign problem would be a
413 < potential source of errors, however.  In fact, it introduces a
414 < discontinuity in the forces at the cutoff, because the force function
415 < is shifted in the wrong direction and doesn't cross zero at
325 < $R_\textrm{c}$.  
402 > This new {\sc sf} potential is similar to equation \ref{eq:ZahnPot}
403 > derived by Zahn \textit{et al.}; however, there are two important
404 > differences.\cite{Zahn02} First, the $v_\textrm{c}$ term from
405 > eq. (\ref{eq:shiftingForm}) is equal to eq. (\ref{eq:dampCoulomb})
406 > with $r$ replaced by $R_\textrm{c}$.  This term is {\it not} present
407 > in the Zahn potential, resulting in a potential discontinuity as
408 > particles cross $R_\textrm{c}$.  Second, the sign of the derivative
409 > portion is different.  The missing $v_\textrm{c}$ term would not
410 > affect molecular dynamics simulations (although the computed energy
411 > would be expected to have sudden jumps as particle distances crossed
412 > $R_c$).  The sign problem would be a potential source of errors,
413 > however.  In fact, it introduces a discontinuity in the forces at the
414 > cutoff, because the force function is shifted in the wrong direction
415 > and doesn't cross zero at $R_\textrm{c}$.
416  
417   Eqs. (\ref{eq:DSFPot}) and (\ref{eq:DSFForces}) result in an
418   electrostatic summation method that is continuous in both the
# Line 333 | Line 423 | performed by the Ewald sum.
423   performed by the Ewald sum.
424  
425   \subsection{Other alternatives}
426 + In addition to the methods described above, we will consider some
427 + other techniques that commonly get used in molecular simulations.  The
428 + simplest of these is group-based cutoffs.  Though of little use for
429 + non-neutral molecules, collecting atoms into neutral groups takes
430 + advantage of the observation that the electrostatic interactions decay
431 + faster than those for monopolar pairs.\cite{Steinbach94} When
432 + considering these molecules as groups, an orientational aspect is
433 + introduced to the interactions.  Consequently, as these molecular
434 + particles move through $R_\textrm{c}$, the energy will drift upward
435 + due to the anisotropy of the net molecular dipole
436 + interactions.\cite{Rahman71} To maintain good energy conservation,
437 + both the potential and derivative need to be smoothly switched to zero
438 + at $R_\textrm{c}$.\cite{Adams79} This is accomplished using a
439 + switching function,
440 + \begin{equation}
441 + S(r) = \begin{cases} 1 &\quad r\leqslant r_\textrm{sw} \\
442 + \frac{(R_\textrm{c}+2r-3r_\textrm{sw})(R_\textrm{c}-r)^2}{(R_\textrm{c}-r_\textrm{sw})^3} &\quad r_\textrm{sw}<r\leqslant R_\textrm{c} \\
443 + 0 &\quad r>R_\textrm{c}
444 + \end{cases},
445 + \end{equation}
446 + where the above form is for a cubic function.  If a smooth second
447 + derivative is desired, a fifth (or higher) order polynomial can be
448 + used.\cite{Andrea83}
449  
450 < Reaction Field blah
451 <
452 < Group-based cutoff blah
453 <
450 > Group-based cutoffs neglect the surroundings beyond $R_\textrm{c}$,
451 > and to incorporate their effect, a method like Reaction Field ({\sc
452 > rf}) can be used.  The original theory for {\sc rf} was originally
453 > developed by Onsager,\cite{Onsager36} and it was applied in
454 > simulations for the study of water by Barker and Watts.\cite{Barker73}
455 > In application, it is simply an extension of the group-based cutoff
456 > method where the net dipole within the cutoff sphere polarizes an
457 > external dielectric, which reacts back on the central dipole.  The
458 > same switching function considerations for group-based cutoffs need to
459 > made for {\sc rf}, with the additional pre-specification of a
460 > dielectric constant.
461  
462   \section{Methods}
463  
# Line 521 | Line 641 | Electrostatic summation method comparisons were perfor
641  
642   \subsection{Electrostatic Summation Methods}\label{sec:ESMethods}
643   Electrostatic summation method comparisons were performed using SPME,
644 < the Shifted-Potential and Shifted-Force methods - both with damping
644 > the {\sc sp} and {\sc sf} methods - both with damping
645   parameters ($\alpha$) of 0.0, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 \AA$^{-1}$ (no, weak,
646   moderate, and strong damping respectively), reaction field with an
647   infinite dielectric constant, and an unmodified cutoff.  Group-based
# Line 540 | Line 660 | tolerance (typically less than $1 \times 10^{-4}$ kcal
660   the energies and forces calculated.  Typical molecular mechanics
661   packages default this to a value dependent on the cutoff radius and a
662   tolerance (typically less than $1 \times 10^{-4}$ kcal/mol).  Smaller
663 < tolerances are typically associated with increased accuracy in the
664 < real-space portion of the summation.\cite{Essmann95} The default
665 < TINKER tolerance of $1 \times 10^{-8}$ kcal/mol was used in all SPME
663 > tolerances are typically associated with increased accuracy, but this
664 > usually means more time spent calculating the reciprocal-space portion
665 > of the summation.\cite{Perram88,Essmann95} The default TINKER
666 > tolerance of $1 \times 10^{-8}$ kcal/mol was used in all SPME
667   calculations, resulting in Ewald Coefficients of 0.4200, 0.3119, and
668   0.2476 \AA$^{-1}$ for cutoff radii of 9, 12, and 15 \AA\ respectively.
669  
# Line 584 | Line 705 | shown, but it has a detrimental effect on simulations
705   particularly with a cutoff radius greater than 12 \AA .  Use of a
706   larger damping parameter is more helpful for the shortest cutoff
707   shown, but it has a detrimental effect on simulations with larger
708 < cutoffs.  In the Shifted-Force sets, increasing damping results in
708 > cutoffs.  In the {\sc sf} sets, increasing damping results in
709   progressively poorer correlation.  Overall, the undamped case is the
710   best performing set, as the correlation and quality of fits are
711   consistently superior regardless of the cutoff distance.  This result
# Line 617 | Line 738 | a improvement much more significant than what was seen
738   in the previous $\Delta E$ section.  The unmodified cutoff results are
739   poor, but using group based cutoffs and a switching function provides
740   a improvement much more significant than what was seen with $\Delta
741 < E$.  Looking at the Shifted-Potential sets, the slope and $R^2$
741 > E$.  Looking at the {\sc sp} sets, the slope and $R^2$
742   improve with the use of damping to an optimal result of 0.2 \AA
743   $^{-1}$ for the 12 and 15 \AA\ cutoffs.  Further increases in damping,
744   while beneficial for simulations with a cutoff radius of 9 \AA\ , is
745   detrimental to simulations with larger cutoff radii.  The undamped
746 < Shifted-Force method gives forces in line with those obtained using
746 > {\sc sf} method gives forces in line with those obtained using
747   SPME, and use of a damping function results in minor improvement.  The
748   reaction field results are surprisingly good, considering the poor
749   quality of the fits for the $\Delta E$ results.  There is still a
# Line 645 | Line 766 | the improved behavior that comes with increasing the c
766   torque vector magnitude results in figure \ref{fig:trqMag} are still
767   similar to those seen for the forces; however, they more clearly show
768   the improved behavior that comes with increasing the cutoff radius.
769 < Moderate damping is beneficial to the Shifted-Potential and helpful
770 < yet possibly unnecessary with the Shifted-Force method, and they also
769 > Moderate damping is beneficial to the {\sc sp} and helpful
770 > yet possibly unnecessary with the {\sc sf} method, and they also
771   show that over-damping adversely effects all cutoff radii rather than
772   showing an improvement for systems with short cutoffs.  The reaction
773   field method performs well when calculating the torques, better than
# Line 675 | Line 796 | of the distribution widths, with a similar improvement
796   show the improvement afforded by choosing a longer simulation cutoff.
797   Increasing the cutoff from 9 to 12 \AA\ typically results in a halving
798   of the distribution widths, with a similar improvement going from 12
799 < to 15 \AA .  The undamped Shifted-Force, Group Based Cutoff, and
799 > to 15 \AA .  The undamped {\sc sf}, Group Based Cutoff, and
800   Reaction Field methods all do equivalently well at capturing the
801   direction of both the force and torque vectors.  Using damping
802 < improves the angular behavior significantly for the Shifted-Potential
803 < and moderately for the Shifted-Force methods.  Increasing the damping
802 > improves the angular behavior significantly for the {\sc sp}
803 > and moderately for the {\sc sf} methods.  Increasing the damping
804   too far is destructive for both methods, particularly to the torque
805   vectors.  Again it is important to recognize that the force vectors
806   cover all particles in the systems, while torque vectors are only
# Line 721 | Line 842 | Although not discussed previously, group based cutoffs
842   \end{table}
843  
844   Although not discussed previously, group based cutoffs can be applied
845 < to both the Shifted-Potential and Shifted-Force methods.  Use off a
845 > to both the {\sc sp} and {\sc sf} methods.  Use off a
846   switching function corrects for the discontinuities that arise when
847   atoms of a group exit the cutoff before the group's center of mass.
848   Though there are no significant benefit or drawbacks observed in
# Line 730 | Line 851 | results seen in figure \ref{fig:frcTrqAng} for compari
851   \ref{tab:groupAngle} shows the angular variance values obtained using
852   group based cutoffs and a switching function alongside the standard
853   results seen in figure \ref{fig:frcTrqAng} for comparison purposes.
854 < The Shifted-Potential shows much narrower angular distributions for
854 > The {\sc sp} shows much narrower angular distributions for
855   both the force and torque vectors when using an $\alpha$ of 0.2
856 < \AA$^{-1}$ or less, while Shifted-Force shows improvements in the
856 > \AA$^{-1}$ or less, while {\sc sf} shows improvements in the
857   undamped and lightly damped cases.  Thus, by calculating the
858   electrostatic interactions in terms of molecular pairs rather than
859   atomic pairs, the direction of the force and torque vectors are
860   determined more accurately.
861  
862   One additional trend to recognize in table \ref{tab:groupAngle} is
863 < that the $\sigma^2$ values for both Shifted-Potential and
864 < Shifted-Force converge as $\alpha$ increases, something that is easier
863 > that the $\sigma^2$ values for both {\sc sp} and
864 > {\sc sf} converge as $\alpha$ increases, something that is easier
865   to see when using group based cutoffs.  Looking back on figures
866   \ref{fig:delE}, \ref{fig:frcMag}, and \ref{fig:trqMag}, show this
867   behavior clearly at large $\alpha$ and cutoff values.  The reason for
# Line 759 | Line 880 | up to 0.2 \AA$^{-1}$ proves to be beneficial, but damp
880   high would introduce error in the molecular torques, particularly for
881   the shorter cutoffs.  Based on the above findings, empirical damping
882   up to 0.2 \AA$^{-1}$ proves to be beneficial, but damping is arguably
883 < unnecessary when using the Shifted-Force method.
883 > unnecessary when using the {\sc sf} method.
884  
885   \subsection{Collective Motion: Power Spectra of NaCl Crystals}
886  
887 < In the previous studies using a Shifted-Force variant of the damped
887 > In the previous studies using a {\sc sf} variant of the damped
888   Wolf coulomb potential, the structure and dynamics of water were
889   investigated rather extensively.\cite{Zahn02,Kast03} Their results
890 < indicated that the damped Shifted-Force method results in properties
890 > indicated that the damped {\sc sf} method results in properties
891   very similar to those obtained when using the Ewald summation.
892   Considering the statistical results shown above, the good performance
893   of this method is not that surprising.  Rather than consider the same
# Line 777 | Line 898 | summation methods from the above results.
898   \begin{figure}
899   \centering
900   \includegraphics[width = \linewidth]{./spectraSquare.pdf}
901 < \caption{Power spectra obtained from the velocity auto-correlation functions of NaCl crystals at 1000 K while using SPME, Shifted-Force ($\alpha$ = 0, 0.1, \& 0.2), and Shifted-Potential ($\alpha$ = 0.2).  Apodization of the correlation functions via a cubic switching function between 40 and 50 ps was used to clear up the spectral noise resulting from data truncation, and had no noticeable effect on peak location or magnitude.  The inset shows the frequency region below 100 cm$^{-1}$ to highlight where the spectra begin to differ.}
901 > \caption{Power spectra obtained from the velocity auto-correlation functions of NaCl crystals at 1000 K while using SPME, {\sc sf} ($\alpha$ = 0, 0.1, \& 0.2), and {\sc sp} ($\alpha$ = 0.2).  Apodization of the correlation functions via a cubic switching function between 40 and 50 ps was used to clear up the spectral noise resulting from data truncation, and had no noticeable effect on peak location or magnitude.  The inset shows the frequency region below 100 cm$^{-1}$ to highlight where the spectra begin to differ.}
902   \label{fig:methodPS}
903   \end{figure}
904  
# Line 789 | Line 910 | cm$^{-1}$, the correlated motions are blue-shifted whe
910   methods differ.  Considering the low-frequency inset (expanded in the
911   upper frame of figure \ref{fig:dampInc}), at frequencies below 100
912   cm$^{-1}$, the correlated motions are blue-shifted when using undamped
913 < or weakly damped Shifted-Force.  When using moderate damping ($\alpha
914 < = 0.2$ \AA$^{-1}$) both the Shifted-Force and Shifted-Potential
913 > or weakly damped {\sc sf}.  When using moderate damping ($\alpha
914 > = 0.2$ \AA$^{-1}$) both the {\sc sf} and {\sc sp}
915   methods give near identical correlated motion behavior as the Ewald
916   method (which has a damping value of 0.3119).  The damping acts as a
917   distance dependent Gaussian screening of the point charges for the
# Line 814 | Line 935 | blue-shifted such that the lowest frequency peak resid
935   shift to higher frequency in exponential fashion.  Though not shown,
936   the spectrum for the simple undamped electrostatic potential is
937   blue-shifted such that the lowest frequency peak resides near 325
938 < cm$^{-1}$.  In light of these results, the undamped Shifted-Force
938 > cm$^{-1}$.  In light of these results, the undamped {\sc sf}
939   method producing low-lying motion peaks within 10 cm$^{-1}$ of SPME is
940   quite respectable; however, it appears as though moderate damping is
941   required for accurate reproduction of crystal dynamics.
942   \begin{figure}
943   \centering
944   \includegraphics[width = \linewidth]{./comboSquare.pdf}
945 < \caption{Upper: Zoomed inset from figure \ref{fig:methodPS}.  As the damping value for the Shifted-Force potential increases, the low-frequency peaks red-shift.  Lower: Low-frequency correlated motions for NaCl crystals at 1000 K when using SPME and a simple damped Coulombic sum with damping coefficients ($\alpha$) ranging from 0.15 to 0.3 \AA$^{-1}$.  As $\alpha$ increases, the peaks are red-shifted toward and eventually beyond the values given by SPME.  The larger $\alpha$ values weaken the real-space electrostatics, explaining this shift towards less strongly correlated motions in the crystal.}
945 > \caption{Regions of spectra showing the low-frequency correlated motions for NaCl crystals at 1000 K using various electrostatic summation methods.  The upper plot is a zoomed inset from figure \ref{fig:methodPS}.  As the damping value for the {\sc sf} potential increases, the low-frequency peaks red-shift.  The lower plot is of spectra when using SPME and a simple damped Coulombic sum with damping coefficients ($\alpha$) ranging from 0.15 to 0.3 \AA$^{-1}$.  As $\alpha$ increases, the peaks are red-shifted toward and eventually beyond the values given by SPME.  The larger $\alpha$ values weaken the real-space electrostatics, explaining this shift towards less strongly correlated motions in the crystal.}
946   \label{fig:dampInc}
947   \end{figure}
948  
# Line 832 | Line 953 | Wolf \textit{et al.}\cite{Wolf99,Zahn02} In particular
953   electrostatic summation techniques than the Ewald summation, chiefly
954   methods derived from the damped Coulombic sum originally proposed by
955   Wolf \textit{et al.}\cite{Wolf99,Zahn02} In particular, the
956 < Shifted-Force method, reformulated above as equation \ref{eq:SFPot},
956 > {\sc sf} method, reformulated above as eq. (\ref{eq:DSFPot}),
957   shows a remarkable ability to reproduce the energetic and dynamic
958   characteristics exhibited by simulations employing lattice summation
959   techniques.  The cumulative energy difference results showed the
960 < undamped Shifted-Force and moderately damped Shifted-Potential methods
960 > undamped {\sc sf} and moderately damped {\sc sp} methods
961   produced results nearly identical to SPME.  Similarly for the dynamic
962 < features, the undamped or moderately damped Shifted-Force and
963 < moderately damped Shifted-Potential methods produce force and torque
962 > features, the undamped or moderately damped {\sc sf} and
963 > moderately damped {\sc sp} methods produce force and torque
964   vector magnitude and directions very similar to the expected values.
965   These results translate into long-time dynamic behavior equivalent to
966   that produced in simulations using SPME.

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines