| 1 |
\documentclass[12pt]{ndthesis} |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
% some packages for things like equations and graphics |
| 4 |
\usepackage[tbtags]{amsmath} |
| 5 |
\usepackage{amsmath,bm} |
| 6 |
\usepackage{amssymb} |
| 7 |
\usepackage{mathrsfs} |
| 8 |
\usepackage{tabularx} |
| 9 |
\usepackage{graphicx} |
| 10 |
\usepackage{booktabs} |
| 11 |
\usepackage{cite} |
| 12 |
\usepackage{enumitem} |
| 13 |
\renewcommand{\appendixname}{APPENDIX} |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
\begin{document} |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
\frontmatter |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
\title{DEVELOPMENT OF MOLECULAR DYNAMICS TECHNIQUES FOR THE |
| 20 |
STUDY OF WATER AND BIOCHEMICAL SYSTEMS} |
| 21 |
\author{Christopher Joseph Fennell} |
| 22 |
\work{Dissertation} |
| 23 |
\degprior{B.Sc.} |
| 24 |
\degaward{Doctor of Philosophy} |
| 25 |
\advisor{J. Daniel Gezelter} |
| 26 |
\department{Chemistry and Biochemistry} |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
\maketitle |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
\begin{abstract} |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
This dissertation comprises a body of research in the field of |
| 33 |
classical molecular simulations, with particular emphasis placed on |
| 34 |
the proper depiction of water. This work is arranged such that the |
| 35 |
techniques and models used within are first developed and tested |
| 36 |
before being applied and compared with experimental results. With this |
| 37 |
organization in mind, it is appropriate that the first chapter deals |
| 38 |
primarily the technique of molecular dynamics and technical |
| 39 |
considerations needed to correctly perform molecular simulations. |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
Building on this framework, the second chapter discusses correction |
| 42 |
techniques for handling the long-ranged electrostatic interactions |
| 43 |
common in molecular simulations. Particular focus is placed on a |
| 44 |
shifted-force ({\sc sf}) modification of the damped shifted Coulombic |
| 45 |
summation method. In this work, {\sc sf} is shown to be nearly |
| 46 |
equivalent to the more commonly utilized Ewald summation in |
| 47 |
simulations of condensed phases. Since the {\sc sf} technique is |
| 48 |
pairwise, it scales as $\mathcal{O}(N)$ and lacks periodicity |
| 49 |
artifacts introduced through heavy reliance on the reciprocal-space |
| 50 |
portion of the Ewald sum. The electrostatic damping technique used |
| 51 |
with {\sc sf} is then extended beyond simple charge-charge |
| 52 |
interactions to include point-multipoles. Optimal damping parameter |
| 53 |
settings are also determined to ensure proper depiction of the |
| 54 |
dielectric behavior of molecular systems. Presenting this technique |
| 55 |
early enables its application in the systems discussed in the later |
| 56 |
chapters and shows how it can improve the quality of various molecular |
| 57 |
simulations. |
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
The third chapter applies the above techniques and focuses on water |
| 60 |
model development, specifically the single-point soft sticky dipole |
| 61 |
(SSD) model. In order to better depict water with SSD in computer |
| 62 |
simulations, it needed to be reparametrized. This work results in the |
| 63 |
development of SSD/RF and SSD/E, new variants of the SSD model |
| 64 |
optimized for simulations with and without a reaction field |
| 65 |
correction. These new single-point models are more efficient than the |
| 66 |
common multi-point partial charge models and better capture the |
| 67 |
dynamic properties of water. SSD/RF can be successfully used with |
| 68 |
damped {\sc sf} through the multipolar extension of the technique |
| 69 |
described in the previous chapter. Discussion on the development of |
| 70 |
the two-point tetrahedrally restructured elongated dipole (TRED) water |
| 71 |
model is also presented, and this model is optimized for use with the |
| 72 |
damped {\sc sf} technique. Though there remain some algorithmic |
| 73 |
complexities that need to be addressed (logic for neglecting |
| 74 |
charge-quadrupole interactions between other TRED molecules) to use |
| 75 |
this model in general simulations, it is approximately twice as |
| 76 |
efficient as the commonly used three-point water models (i.e. TIP3P |
| 77 |
and SPC/E). |
| 78 |
|
| 79 |
Continuing in the direction of model applications, the final chapter |
| 80 |
deals with a unique polymorph of ice that was discovered while |
| 81 |
performing water simulations with the fast simple water models |
| 82 |
discussed in the previous chapter. This form of ice, called |
| 83 |
``imaginary ice'' (Ice-$i$), has a low-density structure which is |
| 84 |
different from any known polymorph observed in either experiment or |
| 85 |
computer simulation studies. The free energy analysis discussed here |
| 86 |
shows that this structure is in fact the thermodynamically preferred |
| 87 |
form of ice for both the single-point and commonly used multi-point |
| 88 |
water models under the chosen simulation conditions. It is shown that |
| 89 |
inclusion of electrostatic corrections is necessary to obtain more |
| 90 |
realistic results; however, the free energies of the various |
| 91 |
polymorphs (both imaginary and real) in many of these models is shown |
| 92 |
to be so similar that choice of system properties, like the volume in |
| 93 |
$NVT$ simulations, can directly influence the ice polymorph expressed. |
| 94 |
|
| 95 |
\end{abstract} |
| 96 |
|
| 97 |
\begin{dedication} |
| 98 |
To my wife, for her understanding and support throughout this work. |
| 99 |
\end{dedication} |
| 100 |
|
| 101 |
\tableofcontents |
| 102 |
\listoffigures |
| 103 |
\listoftables |
| 104 |
|
| 105 |
\begin{acknowledge} |
| 106 |
I would to thank my advisor, J. Daniel Gezelter, for the guidance, |
| 107 |
perspective, and direction he provided during this work. He is a great |
| 108 |
teacher and helped fuel my desire to learn. I would also like to thank |
| 109 |
my fellow group members - Dr.~Matthew A.~Meineke, Dr.~Teng Lin, |
| 110 |
Charles F.~Vardeman~II, Kyle Daily, Xiuquan Sun, Yang Zheng, Kyle |
| 111 |
S.~Haygarth, Patrick Conforti, Megan Sprague, and Dan Combest for |
| 112 |
helpful comments and suggestions along the way. I would also like to |
| 113 |
thank Christopher Harrison and Dr. Steven Corcelli for additional |
| 114 |
discussions and comments. Finally, I would like to thank my parents, |
| 115 |
Edward P.~Fennell and Rosalie M.~Fennell, for providing the |
| 116 |
opportunities and encouragement that allowed me to pursue my |
| 117 |
interests, and I would like to thank my wife, Kelley, for her |
| 118 |
unwavering support. |
| 119 |
\end{acknowledge} |
| 120 |
|
| 121 |
\mainmatter |
| 122 |
|
| 123 |
\input{Introduction} |
| 124 |
|
| 125 |
\input{Electrostatics} |
| 126 |
|
| 127 |
\input{Water} |
| 128 |
|
| 129 |
\input{Ice} |
| 130 |
|
| 131 |
\input{Conclusion} |
| 132 |
|
| 133 |
\appendix |
| 134 |
|
| 135 |
\input{IndividualSystems} |
| 136 |
|
| 137 |
%\input{SHAMS} |
| 138 |
|
| 139 |
\backmatter |
| 140 |
|
| 141 |
\bibliographystyle{ndthesis} |
| 142 |
\bibliography{dissertation} |
| 143 |
|
| 144 |
\end{document} |
| 145 |
|
| 146 |
|
| 147 |
\endinput |