ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/chrisDissertation/Ice.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/chrisDissertation/Ice.tex (file contents):
Revision 3028 by chrisfen, Tue Sep 26 23:15:24 2006 UTC vs.
Revision 3042 by chrisfen, Wed Oct 11 14:33:13 2006 UTC

# Line 83 | Line 83 | have calculated the absolute free energy of this cryst
83   considered energetic stabilization and neglected entropic
84   contributions to the overall free energy. To address this issue, we
85   have calculated the absolute free energy of this crystal using
86 < thermodynamic integration and compared to the free energies of ice
86 > thermodynamic integration and compared it to the free energies of ice
87   I$_\textrm{c}$ and ice I$_\textrm{h}$ (the common low-density ice
88   polymorphs) and ice B (a higher density, but very stable crystal
89   structure observed by B\'{a}ez and Clancy in free energy studies of
# Line 454 | Line 454 | TRED & -12.61(3) & -12.43(3) & -12.89(3) & -13.12(3) &
454   SPC/E & -12.99(3) & -13.00(3) & -13.03(3) & - & -12.99(3) \\
455   SSD/RF & -11.83(3) & -11.66(4) & -12.32(3) & -12.39(3) & - \\
456   TRED & -12.61(3) & -12.43(3) & -12.89(3) & -13.12(3) & - \\
457 + \bottomrule
458   \end{tabular}
459   \label{tab:dampedFreeEnergy}
460   \end{table}
# Line 511 | Line 512 | studied water models.
512   Ice-$i$ was still observed to be a stable polymorph for all of the
513   studied water models.
514  
515 < So what is the preferred solid polymorph for simulated water?  As
516 < indicated above, the answer appears to be dependent both on the
517 < conditions and the model used.  In the case of short cutoffs without a
518 < long-range interaction correction, Ice-$i$ and Ice-$i^\prime$ have
519 < the lowest free energy of the studied polymorphs with all the models.
520 < Ideally, crystallization of each model under constant pressure
521 < conditions, as was done with SSD/E, would aid in the identification of
522 < their respective preferred structures.  This work, however, helps
523 < illustrate how studies involving one specific model can lead to
523 < insight about important behavior of others.
515 > So what is the preferred solid polymorph for simulated water?  The
516 > answer appears to be dependent both on the conditions and the model
517 > used.  In the case of short cutoffs without a long-range interaction
518 > correction, Ice-$i$ and Ice-$i^\prime$ have the lowest free energy of
519 > the studied polymorphs with all the models.  Ideally, crystallization
520 > of each model under constant pressure conditions, as was done with
521 > SSD/E, would aid in identifying their respective preferred structures.
522 > This work, however, helps illustrate how studies involving one
523 > specific model can lead to insight about important behavior of others.
524  
525   We also note that none of the water models used in this study are
526   polarizable or flexible models. It is entirely possible that the
# Line 534 | Line 534 | is an issue.
534   computational cost increase that comes with including polarizability
535   is an issue.
536  
537 < Finally, due to the stability of Ice-$i$ in the investigated
538 < simulation conditions, a question arises as to possible experimental
539 < observation of this polymorph.  The rather extensive past and current
540 < experimental investigation of water in the low pressure regime makes
541 < us hesitant to ascribe any relevance to this work outside of the
542 < simulation community.  It is for this reason that we chose a name for
543 < this polymorph which involves an imaginary quantity.  That said, there
544 < are certain experimental conditions that would provide the most ideal
545 < situation for possible observation. These include the negative
546 < pressure or stretched solid regime, small clusters in vacuum
547 < deposition environments, and in clathrate structures involving small
548 < non-polar molecules.  For the purpose of comparison with experimental
549 < results, we have calculated the oxygen-oxygen pair correlation
550 < function, $g_\textrm{OO}(r)$, and the structure factor, $S(\vec{q})$
551 < for the two Ice-$i$ variants (along with example ice I$_\textrm{h}$
552 < and I$_\textrm{c}$ plots) at 77~K, and they are shown in figures
553 < \ref{fig:gofr} and \ref{fig:sofq}.  It is interesting to note that the
554 < structure factors for Ice-$i^\prime$ and ice I$_\textrm{c}$ are quite
555 < similar.  The primary differences are small peaks at 1.125, 2.29, and
556 < 2.53~\AA$^{-1}$, so particular attention to these regions would be
557 < needed to distinguish Ice-$i^\prime$ from ice I$_\textrm{c}$.
537 > Finally, the stability of Ice-$i$ in these simulations raises the
538 > possibility of experimental observation.  The extensive body of
539 > research on water in the low pressure regime makes us hesitant to
540 > ascribe any relevance to this work outside the simulation community.
541 > It is for this reason that we chose a name for this polymorph
542 > involving an imaginary quantity.  That said, there are certain
543 > conditions that would be ideal for experimental observation of
544 > Ice-$i$.  These include the negative pressure or stretched solid
545 > regime, clusters deposited in vacuum environments, and clathrate
546 > structures involving small non-polar molecules.  For the purpose of
547 > comparison with future experimental results, we calculated the
548 > oxygen-oxygen pair correlation function, $g_\textrm{OO}(r)$, and the
549 > structure factor, $S(\vec{q})$ for the two Ice-$i$ variants (along
550 > with ice I$_\textrm{h}$ and I$_\textrm{c}$) at 77~K (figures
551 > \ref{fig:gofr} and \ref{fig:sofq}).  It is interesting to note that
552 > the structure factors for Ice-$i^\prime$ and ice I$_\textrm{c}$ are
553 > quite similar.  The primary differences are small peaks at 1.125,
554 > 2.29, and 2.53~\AA$^{-1}$, so particular attention to these regions
555 > would be needed to distinguish Ice-$i^\prime$ from ice I$_\textrm{c}$.
556  
557   \begin{figure}
558   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/iceGofr.pdf}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines