ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/chrisDissertation/Ice.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/chrisDissertation/Ice.tex (file contents):
Revision 3019 by chrisfen, Fri Sep 22 13:45:24 2006 UTC vs.
Revision 3028 by chrisfen, Tue Sep 26 23:15:24 2006 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1   \chapter{\label{chap:ice}PHASE BEHAVIOR OF WATER IN COMPUTER \\ SIMULATIONS}
2  
3 < As discussed in the previous chapter, water has proven to be a
3 > As mentioned in the previous chapter, water has proven to be a
4   challenging substance to depict in simulations, and a variety of
5   models have been developed to describe its behavior under varying
6   simulation
# Line 11 | Line 11 | each.\cite{Jorgensen83,Jorgensen98b,Baez94,Mahoney01}
11   available, it is only natural to compare them under interesting
12   thermodynamic conditions in an attempt to clarify the limitations of
13   each.\cite{Jorgensen83,Jorgensen98b,Baez94,Mahoney01} Two important
14 < property to quantify are the Gibbs and Helmholtz free energies,
14 > properties to quantify are the Gibbs and Helmholtz free energies,
15   particularly for the solid forms of water, as these predict the
16   thermodynamic stability of the various phases. Water has a
17 < particularly rich phase diagram and takes on a number of different and
17 > particularly rich phase diagram and takes on a number of different
18   stable crystalline structures as the temperature and pressure are
19   varied. This complexity makes it a challenging task to investigate the
20   entire free energy landscape.\cite{Sanz04} Ideally, research is
# Line 22 | Line 22 | temperatures and pressures for the model.
22   point, because these phases will dictate the relevant transition
23   temperatures and pressures for the model.
24  
25 < The high-pressure phases of water (ice II-ice X as well as ice XII)
25 > The high-pressure phases of water (ice II-ice X as well as ice XII-ice XIV)
26   have been studied extensively both experimentally and
27   computationally. In this chapter, standard reference state methods
28   were applied in the {\it low} pressure regime to evaluate the free
# Line 39 | Line 39 | any previously observed ice polymorphs in experiment o
39   interesting in and of themselves;\cite{Matsumoto02,Yamada02} however,
40   the crystal structure extracted from these systems is different from
41   any previously observed ice polymorphs in experiment or
42 < simulation.\cite{Fennell04} We have named this structure Ice-{\it i}
43 < to indicate its origin in computational simulation. The unit cell of
44 < Ice-$i$ and an axially elongated variant named Ice-$i^\prime$ both
45 < consist of eight water molecules that stack in rows of interlocking
46 < water tetramers as illustrated in figure \ref{fig:iceiCell}A,B. These
47 < tetramers form a crystal structure similar in appearance to a recent
48 < two-dimensional surface tessellation simulated on silica.\cite{Yang04}
49 < As expected in an ice crystal constructed of water tetramers, the
50 < hydrogen bonds are not as linear as those observed in ice
51 < I$_\textrm{h}$; however, the interlocking of these subunits appears to
52 < provide significant stabilization to the overall crystal. The
53 < arrangement of these tetramers results in open octagonal cavities that
54 < are typically greater than 6.3~\AA\ in diameter (see figure
42 > simulation.\cite{Fennell04} We have named this structure ``imaginary
43 > ice'' (Ice-$i$) to indicate its origin in computer simulations. The
44 > unit cell of Ice-$i$ and an axially elongated variant named
45 > Ice-$i^\prime$ both consist of eight water molecules that stack in
46 > rows of interlocking water tetramers as illustrated in figure
47 > \ref{fig:iceiCell}. These tetramers form a crystal structure
48 > similar in appearance to a recently simulated two-dimensional surface
49 > tessellation of water on silica.\cite{Yang04} As expected in an ice
50 > crystal constructed of water tetramers, the hydrogen bonds are not as
51 > linear as those present in ice I$_\textrm{h}$; however, the
52 > interlocking of these subunits appears to provide significant
53 > stabilization to the overall crystal. The arrangement of these
54 > tetramers results in open octagonal cavities that are typically
55 > greater than 6.3~\AA\ in diameter (see figure
56   \ref{fig:protOrder}). This open structure leads to crystals that are
57   typically 0.07~g/cm$^3$ less dense than ice I$_\textrm{h}$.
58  
59   \begin{figure}
60   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/unitCell.pdf}
61 < \caption{Unit cells for (A) Ice-{\it i} and (B) Ice-$i^\prime$, the
62 < elongated variant of Ice-{\it i}.  For Ice-{\it i}, the $a$ to $c$
61 > \caption{Unit cells for (A) Ice-$i$ and (B) Ice-$i^\prime$, the
62 > elongated variant of Ice-$i$.  For Ice-$i$, the $a$ to $c$
63   relation is given by $a = 2.1214c$, while for Ice-$i^\prime$, $a =
64   1.7850c$.}
65   \label{fig:iceiCell}
# Line 67 | Line 68 | relation is given by $a = 2.1214c$, while for Ice-$i^\
68   \begin{figure}
69   \centering
70   \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{./figures/orderedIcei.pdf}
71 < \caption{Image of a proton ordered crystal of Ice-{\it i} looking
71 > \caption{Image of a proton ordered crystal of Ice-$i$ looking
72   down the (001) crystal face. The rows of water tetramers surrounded by
73   octagonal pores leads to a crystal structure that is significantly
74   less dense than ice I$_\textrm{h}$.}
75   \label{fig:protOrder}
76   \end{figure}
77  
78 < Results from our initial studies indicated that Ice-{\it i} is the
78 > Results from our initial studies indicated that Ice-$i$ is the
79   minimum energy crystal structure for the single point water models
80   investigated (for discussions on these single point dipole models, see
81 < the previous work and related
81 > the previous chapter and related
82   articles\cite{Fennell04,Liu96,Bratko85}). These earlier results only
83   considered energetic stabilization and neglected entropic
84   contributions to the overall free energy. To address this issue, we
# Line 87 | Line 88 | SPC/E).\cite{Baez95b} This work includes results for t
88   polymorphs) and ice B (a higher density, but very stable crystal
89   structure observed by B\'{a}ez and Clancy in free energy studies of
90   SPC/E).\cite{Baez95b} This work includes results for the water model
91 < from which Ice-{\it i} was crystallized (SSD/E) in addition to several
91 > from which Ice-$i$ was crystallized (SSD/E) in addition to several
92   common water models (TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P, and SPC/E) and a reaction
93   field parametrized single point dipole water model (SSD/RF). The
94   axially elongated variant, Ice-$i^\prime$, was used in calculations
# Line 96 | Line 97 | distortion depends on the water model used but is sign
97   95 degree angles. Under SPC/E, TIP4P, and TIP5P, this geometry is
98   better at forming favorable hydrogen bonds. The degree of rhomboid
99   distortion depends on the water model used but is significant enough
100 < to split the peak in the radial distribution function which corresponds
101 < to diagonal sites in the tetramers.
100 > to split the peak in the radial distribution function which
101 > corresponds to diagonal sites in the tetramers.
102  
103   \section{Methods and Thermodynamic Integration}
104  
105 < Canonical ensemble ({\it NVT}) molecular dynamics calculations were
106 < performed using the OOPSE molecular mechanics package.\cite{Meineke05}
107 < The densities chosen for the simulations were taken from
108 < isobaric-isothermal ({\it NPT}) simulations performed at 1 atm and
109 < 200~K. Each model (and each crystal structure) was allowed to relax for
110 < 300~ps in the {\it NPT} ensemble before averaging the density to obtain
111 < the volumes for the {\it NVT} simulations.All molecules were treated
112 < as rigid bodies, with orientational motion propagated using the
113 < symplectic DLM integration method described in section
105 > Canonical ensemble ($NVT$) molecular dynamics calculations were
106 > performed using the {\sc oopse} molecular mechanics
107 > package.\cite{Meineke05} The densities chosen for the simulations were
108 > taken from isobaric-isothermal ($NPT$) simulations performed at 1~atm
109 > and 200~K. Each model (and each crystal structure) was allowed to
110 > relax for 300~ps in the $NPT$ ensemble before averaging the density to
111 > obtain the volumes for the $NVT$ simulations. All molecules were
112 > treated as rigid bodies, with orientational motion propagated using
113 > the symplectic {\sc dlm} integration method described in section
114   \ref{sec:IntroIntegrate}.
115  
116  
# Line 119 | Line 120 | materials.\cite{Frenkel84,Hermens88,Meijer90,Baez95a,V
120   been used extensively in the calculation of free energies for
121   condensed phases of
122   materials.\cite{Frenkel84,Hermens88,Meijer90,Baez95a,Vlot99}.  This
123 < method uses a sequence of simulations over which the system of
123 > method uses a sequence of simulations during which the system of
124   interest is converted into a reference system for which the free
125   energy is known analytically ($A_0$).  The difference in potential
126   energy between the reference system and the system of interest
# Line 156 | Line 157 | the spring constants restraining translational motion
157   \end{equation}
158   where $K_\mathrm{v}$, $K_\mathrm{\theta}$, and $K_\mathrm{\omega}$ are
159   the spring constants restraining translational motion and deflection
160 < of and rotation around the principle axis of the molecule
161 < respectively.  These spring constants are typically calculated from
162 < the mean-square displacements of water molecules in an unrestrained
163 < ice crystal at 200~K.  For these studies, $K_\mathrm{v} =
164 < 4.29$~kcal~mol$^{-1}$~\AA$^{-2}$, $K_\theta\ =
160 > of and rotation around the principle axis of the molecule respectively
161 > (see figure \ref{fig:waterSpring}). These spring constants are
162 > typically calculated from the mean-square displacements of water
163 > molecules in an unrestrained ice crystal at 200~K.  For these studies,
164 > $K_\mathrm{v} = 4.29$~kcal~mol$^{-1}$~\AA$^{-2}$, $K_\theta\ =
165   13.88$~kcal~mol$^{-1}$~rad$^{-2}$, and $K_\omega\ =
166 < 17.75$~kcal~mol$^{-1}$~rad$^{-2}$.  It is clear from
167 < Fig. \ref{fig:waterSpring} that the values of $\theta$ range from $0$
168 < to $\pi$, while $\omega$ ranges from $-\pi$ to $\pi$.  The partition
166 > 17.75$~kcal~mol$^{-1}$~rad$^{-2}$.  It is clear from figure
167 > \ref{fig:waterSpring} that the values of $\theta$ range from $0$ to
168 > $\pi$, while $\omega$ ranges from $-\pi$ to $\pi$.  The partition
169   function for a molecular crystal restrained in this fashion can be
170   evaluated analytically, and the Helmholtz Free Energy ({\it A}) is
171   given by
# Line 184 | Line 185 | where $2\pi\nu = (K_\mathrm{v}/m)^{1/2}$, and $E_m$ is
185   \label{eq:ecFreeEnergy}
186   \end{equation}
187   where $2\pi\nu = (K_\mathrm{v}/m)^{1/2}$, and $E_m$ is the minimum
188 < potential energy of the ideal crystal.\cite{Baez95a} The choice of an
189 < Einstein crystal reference state is somewhat arbitrary. Any ideal
190 < system for which the partition function is known exactly could be used
191 < as a reference point as long as the system does not undergo a phase
192 < transition during the integration path between the real and ideal
193 < systems.  Nada and van der Eerden have shown that the use of different
194 < force constants in the Einstein crystal does not affect the total
195 < free energy, and Gao {\it et al.} have shown that free energies
196 < computed with the Debye crystal reference state differ from the
197 < Einstein crystal by only a few tenths of a
188 > potential energy of the ideal crystal.\cite{Baez95a}
189 >
190 > The choice of an Einstein crystal reference state is somewhat
191 > arbitrary. Any ideal system for which the partition function is known
192 > exactly could be used as a reference point, as long as the system does
193 > not undergo a phase transition during the integration path between the
194 > real and ideal systems.  Nada and van der Eerden have shown that the
195 > use of different force constants in the Einstein crystal does not
196 > affect the total free energy, and Gao {\it et al.} have shown that
197 > free energies computed with the Debye crystal reference state differ
198 > from the Einstein crystal by only a few tenths of a
199   kJ~mol$^{-1}$.\cite{Nada03,Gao00} These free energy differences can
200   lead to some uncertainty in the computed melting point of the solids.
201   \begin{figure}
# Line 217 | Line 219 | interaction parameters are scaled equally by this tran
219   molecules.  In this study, we applied one of the most convenient
220   methods and integrated over the $\lambda^4$ path, where all
221   interaction parameters are scaled equally by this transformation
222 < parameter.  This method has been shown to be reversible and provide
223 < results in excellent agreement with other established
222 < methods.\cite{Baez95b}
222 > parameter.  This method is reversible and provides results in excellent
223 > agreement with other established methods.\cite{Baez95b}
224  
225   The Helmholtz free energy error was determined in the same manner in
226 < both the solid and the liquid free energy calculations . At each point
226 > both the solid and the liquid free energy calculations. At each point
227   along the integration path, we calculated the standard deviation of
228   the potential energy difference. Addition or subtraction of these
229 < values to each of their respective points and integrating the curve
230 < again provides the upper and lower bounds of the uncertainty in the
231 < Helmholtz free energy.
229 > deviations to each of their respective points and integrating the
230 > curve again provides the upper and lower bounds of the uncertainty in
231 > the Helmholtz free energy.
232  
233   Near the cutoff radius ($0.85 * r_{cut}$), charge, dipole, and
234   Lennard-Jones interactions were gradually reduced by a cubic switching
# Line 242 | Line 243 | the Ewald summation were estimated for TIP3P and SPC/E
243   performed with longer cutoffs of 10.5, 12, 13.5, and 15~\AA\ to
244   compare with the 9~\AA\ cutoff results.  Finally, the effects of using
245   the Ewald summation were estimated for TIP3P and SPC/E by performing
246 < single configuration Particle-Mesh Ewald (PME) calculations for each
247 < of the ice polymorphs.\cite{Ponder87} The calculated energy difference
248 < in the presence and absence of PME was applied to the previous results
249 < in order to predict changes to the free energy landscape.
246 > single configuration smooth particle-mesh Ewald ({\sc spme})
247 > calculations for each of the ice polymorphs.\cite{Ponder87} The
248 > calculated energy difference in the presence and absence of {\sc spme}
249 > was applied to the previous results in order to predict changes to the
250 > free energy landscape.
251  
252   In addition to the above procedures, we also tested how the inclusion
253   of the Lennard-Jones long-range correction affects the free energy
254 < results. The correction for the Lennard-Jones trucation was included
254 > results. The correction for the Lennard-Jones truncation was included
255   by integration of the equation discussed in section
256   \ref{sec:LJCorrections}. Rather than discuss its affect alongside the
257   free energy results, we will just mention that while the correction
258   does lower the free energy of the higher density states more than the
259   lower density states, the effect is so small that it is entirely
260 < overwelmed by the error in the free energy calculation. Since its
260 > overwhelmed by the error in the free energy calculation. Since its
261   inclusion does not influence the results, the Lennard-Jones correction
262   was omitted from all the calculations below.
263  
264   \section{Initial Free Energy Results}
265  
264 The calculated free energies of proton-ordered variants of three low
265 density polymorphs (I$_\textrm{h}$, I$_\textrm{c}$, and Ice-{\it i} or
266 Ice-$i^\prime$) and the stable higher density ice B are listed in
267 table \ref{tab:freeEnergy}.  Ice B was included because it has been
268 shown to be a minimum free energy structure for SPC/E at ambient
269 conditions.\cite{Baez95b} In addition to the free energies, the
270 relevant transition temperatures at standard pressure are also
271 displayed in table \ref{tab:freeEnergy}.  These free energy values
272 indicate that Ice-{\it i} is the most stable state for all of the
273 investigated water models.  With the free energy at these state
274 points, the Gibbs-Helmholtz equation was used to project to other
275 state points and to build phase diagrams.  Figures
276 \ref{fig:tp3PhaseDia} and \ref{fig:ssdrfPhaseDia} are example diagrams
277 built from the results for the TIP3P and SSD/RF water models.  All
278 other models have similar structure, although the crossing points
279 between the phases move to different temperatures and pressures as
280 indicated from the transition temperatures in table
281 \ref{tab:freeEnergy}.  It is interesting to note that ice
282 I$_\textrm{h}$ (and ice I$_\textrm{c}$ for that matter) do not appear
283 in any of the phase diagrams for any of the models.  For purposes of
284 this study, ice B is representative of the dense ice polymorphs.  A
285 recent study by Sanz {\it et al.} provides details on the phase
286 diagrams for SPC/E and TIP4P at higher pressures than those studied
287 here.\cite{Sanz04}
266   \begin{table}
267   \centering
268   \caption{HELMHOLTZ FREE ENERGIES AND TRANSITION TEMPERATURES AT 1
# Line 294 | Line 272 | ATMOSPHERE FOR SEVERAL WATER MODELS}
272   \begin{tabular}{lccccccc}
273   \toprule
274   \toprule
275 < Water Model & I$_\textrm{h}$ & I$_\textrm{c}$ & B & Ice-{\it i} & Ice-$i^\prime$ & $T_\textrm{m}$ (*$T_\textrm{s}$) & $T_\textrm{b}$\\
275 > Water Model & I$_\textrm{h}$ & I$_\textrm{c}$ & B & Ice-$i$ & Ice-$i^\prime$ & $T_\textrm{m}$ (*$T_\textrm{s}$) & $T_\textrm{b}$\\
276   \cmidrule(lr){2-6}
277   \cmidrule(l){7-8}
278   & \multicolumn{5}{c}{(kcal mol$^{-1}$)} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{(K)}\\
# Line 309 | Line 287 | SSD/RF & -11.96(2) & -11.60(2) & -12.53(3) & -12.79(2)
287   \end{tabular}
288   \label{tab:freeEnergy}
289   \end{table}
290 <
290 > The calculated free energies of proton-ordered variants of three low
291 > density polymorphs (I$_\textrm{h}$, I$_\textrm{c}$, and Ice-$i$ or
292 > Ice-$i^\prime$) and the stable higher density ice B are listed in
293 > table \ref{tab:freeEnergy}.  Ice B was included because it has been
294 > shown to be a minimum free energy structure for SPC/E at ambient
295 > conditions.\cite{Baez95b} In addition to the free energies, the
296 > relevant transition temperatures at standard pressure are also
297 > displayed in table \ref{tab:freeEnergy}.  These free energy values
298 > indicate that Ice-$i$ is the thermodynamically preferred state for
299 > all of the investigated water models under the chosen simulation
300 > conditions.  With the free energy at these state points, the
301 > Gibbs-Helmholtz equation was used to project to other state points and
302 > to build phase diagrams.  Figures \ref{fig:tp3PhaseDia} and
303 > \ref{fig:ssdrfPhaseDia} are example phase diagrams built from the
304 > results for the TIP3P and SSD/RF water models.  All other models have
305 > similar structure, although the crossing points between the phases
306 > move to different temperatures and pressures as indicated from the
307 > transition temperatures in table
308 > \ref{tab:freeEnergy}.  It is interesting to note that ice
309 > I$_\textrm{h}$ (and ice I$_\textrm{c}$ for that matter) do not appear
310 > in any of the phase diagrams for any of the models.  For purposes of
311 > this study, ice B is representative of the dense ice polymorphs.  A
312 > recent study by Sanz {\it et al.} provides details on the phase
313 > diagrams for SPC/E and TIP4P at higher pressures than those studied
314 > here.\cite{Sanz04}
315   \begin{figure}
316   \centering
317   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/tp3PhaseDia.pdf}
318   \caption{Phase diagram for the TIP3P water model in the low pressure
319   regime. The displayed $T_m$ and $T_b$ values are good predictions of
320   the experimental values; however, the solid phases shown are not the
321 < experimentally observed forms. Both cubic and hexagonal ice $I$ are
321 > experimentally observed forms. Both cubic and hexagonal ice I are
322   higher in energy and don't appear in the phase diagram.}
323   \label{fig:tp3PhaseDia}
324   \end{figure}
323
325   \begin{figure}
326   \centering
327   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/ssdrfPhaseDia.pdf}
# Line 350 | Line 351 | aspect of this result is that this phase change occurs
351   Most of the water models have melting points that compare quite
352   favorably with the experimental value of 273~K.  The unfortunate
353   aspect of this result is that this phase change occurs between
354 < Ice-{\it i} and the liquid state rather than ice I$_h$ and the liquid
354 > Ice-$i$ and the liquid state rather than ice I$_\textrm{h}$ and the liquid
355   state.  These results do not contradict other studies.  Studies of ice
356 < I$_h$ using TIP4P predict a $T_m$ ranging from 191 to 238~K
356 > I$_\textrm{h}$ using TIP4P predict a $T_m$ ranging from 191 to 238~K
357   (differences being attributed to choice of interaction truncation and
358   different ordered and disordered molecular
359   arrangements).\cite{Nada03,Vlot99,Gao00,Sanz04} If the presence of ice
360 < B and Ice-{\it i} were omitted, a $T_\textrm{m}$ value around 200~K
360 > B and Ice-$i$ were omitted, a $T_\textrm{m}$ value around 200~K
361   would be predicted from this work.  However, the $T_\textrm{m}$ from
362 < Ice-{\it i} is calculated to be 262~K, indicating that these
363 < simulation based structures ought to be included in studies probing
362 > Ice-$i$ is calculated to be 262~K, indicating that these
363 > simulation-based structures ought to be included in studies probing
364   phase transitions with this model.  Also of interest in these results
365   is that SSD/E does not exhibit a melting point at 1 atm but does
366   sublime at 355~K.  This is due to the significant stability of
367 < Ice-{\it i} over all other polymorphs for this particular model under
367 > Ice-$i$ over all other polymorphs for this particular model under
368   these conditions.  While troubling, this behavior resulted in the
369 < spontaneous crystallization of Ice-{\it i} which led us to investigate
369 > spontaneous crystallization of Ice-$i$ which led us to investigate
370   this structure.  These observations provide a warning that simulations
371   of SSD/E as a ``liquid'' near 300~K are actually metastable and run
372   the risk of spontaneous crystallization.  However, when a longer
# Line 375 | Line 376 | temperature and pressure.
376   \section{Effects of Potential Truncation}
377  
378   \begin{figure}
379 + \centering
380   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/cutoffChange.pdf}
381   \caption{Free energy as a function of cutoff radius for SSD/E, TIP3P,
382   SPC/E, SSD/RF with a reaction field, and the TIP3P and SPC/E models
# Line 383 | Line 385 | prone to distortion and melting at 200~K.  Ice-$i^\pri
385   \ref{tab:freeEnergy}). Data for ice I$_\textrm{c}$ with TIP3P using
386   both 12 and 13.5~\AA\ cutoffs were omitted because the crystal was
387   prone to distortion and melting at 200~K.  Ice-$i^\prime$ is the
388 < form of Ice-{\it i} used in the SPC/E simulations.}
388 > form of Ice-$i$ used in the SPC/E simulations.}
389   \label{fig:incCutoff}
390   \end{figure}
389
391   For the more computationally efficient water models, we have also
392   investigated the effect of potential truncation on the computed free
393 < energies as a function of the cutoff radius.  As seen in
394 < Fig. \ref{fig:incCutoff}, the free energies of the ice polymorphs with
393 > energies as a function of the cutoff radius.  As seen in figure
394 > \ref{fig:incCutoff}, the free energies of the ice polymorphs with
395   water models lacking a long-range correction show significant cutoff
396 < dependence.  In general, there is a narrowing of the free energy
397 < differences while moving to greater cutoff radii.  As the free
396 > radius dependence.  In general, there is a narrowing of the free
397 > energy differences while moving to greater cutoff radii.  As the free
398   energies for the polymorphs converge, the stability advantage that
399 < Ice-{\it i} exhibits is reduced.  Adjacent to each of these plots are
399 > Ice-$i$ exhibits is reduced.  Adjacent to each of these plots are
400   results for systems with applied or estimated long-range corrections.
401   SSD/RF was parametrized for use with a reaction field, and the benefit
402   provided by this computationally inexpensive correction is apparent.
# Line 403 | Line 404 | calculations quite well under SSD/RF.
404   field cavity in this model, so small cutoff radii mimic bulk
405   calculations quite well under SSD/RF.
406  
407 < Although TIP3P was parametrized for use without the Ewald summation,
408 < we have estimated the effect of this method for computing long-range
409 < electrostatics for both TIP3P and SPC/E.  This was accomplished by
410 < calculating the potential energy of identical crystals both with and
411 < without particle mesh Ewald (PME).  Similar behavior to that observed
412 < with reaction field is seen for both of these models.  The free
413 < energies show reduced dependence on cutoff radius and span a narrower
414 < range for the various polymorphs.  Like the dipolar water models,
415 < TIP3P displays a relatively constant preference for the Ice-{\it i}
416 < polymorph.  Crystal preference is much more difficult to determine for
417 < SPC/E.  Without a long-range correction, each of the polymorphs
418 < studied assumes the role of the preferred polymorph under different
419 < cutoff radii.  The inclusion of the Ewald correction flattens and
420 < narrows the gap in free energies such that the polymorphs are
421 < isoenergetic within statistical uncertainty.  This suggests that other
422 < conditions, such as the density in fixed-volume simulations, can
423 < influence the polymorph expressed upon crystallization.
407 > Although the point-charge models investigated here were parametrized
408 > for use without the Ewald summation, we have estimated the effect of
409 > this method for computing long-range electrostatics for both TIP3P and
410 > SPC/E.  This was accomplished by calculating the potential energy of
411 > identical crystals both with and without {\sc spme}.  Similar behavior
412 > to that observed with reaction field is seen for both of these models.
413 > The free energies show reduced dependence on cutoff radius and span a
414 > narrower range for the various polymorphs.  Like the dipolar water
415 > models, TIP3P displays a relatively constant preference for the
416 > Ice-$i$ polymorph. The crystal preference is much more difficult to
417 > determine for SPC/E.  Without a long-range correction, each of the
418 > polymorphs studied assumes the role of the thermodynamically preferred
419 > state under different cutoff radii.  The inclusion of the Ewald
420 > correction flattens and narrows the gap in free energies such that the
421 > polymorphs are isoenergetic within statistical uncertainty.  This
422 > suggests that other conditions, such as the density in fixed-volume
423 > simulations, can influence the polymorph expressed upon
424 > crystallization.
425  
426   \section{Expanded Results Using Damped Shifted Force Electrostatics}
427  
# Line 458 | Line 460 | show similar behavior to the Ewald results in figure
460   The results of these calculations in table \ref{tab:dampedFreeEnergy}
461   show similar behavior to the Ewald results in figure
462   \ref{fig:incCutoff}, at least for SSD/RF and SPC/E which are present
463 < in both. The ice polymorph Helmholtz free energies for SSD/RF order in
464 < the same fashion; however Ice-$i$ and ice B are quite a bit closer in
465 < free energy (nearly isoenergetic). The free energy differences between
466 < ice polymorphs for TRED water parallel SSD/RF, with the exception that
467 < ice B is destabilized such that it is not very close to Ice-$i$. The
468 < SPC/E results really show the near isoenergetic behavior when using
469 < the electrostatics correction. Ice B has the lowest Helmholtz free
470 < energy; however, all the polymorph results overlap within error.
463 > in both. The Helmholtz free energies of the ice polymorphs for SSD/RF
464 > order in the same fashion; however, Ice-$i$ and ice B are quite a bit
465 > closer in free energy (nearly isoenergetic). The free energy
466 > differences between ice polymorphs for TRED water parallel SSD/RF,
467 > with the exception that ice B is destabilized such that the free
468 > energy is not very close to Ice-$i$. The SPC/E results really show the
469 > near isoenergetic behavior when using the electrostatic
470 > correction. Ice B has the lowest Helmholtz free energy; however, all
471 > the polymorph results overlap within error.
472  
473   The most interesting results from these calculations come from the
474   more expensive TIP4P-Ew and TIP5P-E results. Both of these models were
# Line 482 | Line 485 | I$_\textrm{h}$) is the preferred form with ice I$_\tex
485   geometry is more physically valid.\cite{Vega05} With the TIP4P-Ew
486   water model, the experimentally observed polymorph (ice
487   I$_\textrm{h}$) is the preferred form with ice I$_\textrm{c}$ slightly
488 < higher in energy, though overlapping within error, and the less
489 < realistic ice B and Ice-$i^\prime$ are destabilized relative to these
490 < polymorphs. TIP5P-E shows similar behavior to SPC/E, where there is no
491 < real free energy distinction between the various polymorphs because
492 < many overlap within error. While ice B is close in free energy to the
493 < other polymorphs, these results fail to support the findings of other
494 < researchers indicating the preferred form of TIP5P at 1~atm is a
495 < structure similar to ice B.\cite{Yamada02,Vega05,Abascal05} It should
496 < be noted that we are looking at TIP5P-E rather than TIP5P, and the
497 < differences in the Lennard-Jones parameters could be a reason for this
498 < dissimilarity.  Overall, these results indicate that TIP4P-Ew is a
499 < better mimic of real water than these other models when studying
500 < crystallization and solid forms of water.
488 > higher in energy, though overlapping within error. Additionally, the
489 > less realistic ice B and Ice-$i^\prime$ structures are destabilized
490 > relative to these polymorphs. TIP5P-E shows similar behavior to SPC/E,
491 > where there is no real free energy distinction between the various
492 > polymorphs, because many overlap within error. While ice B is close in
493 > free energy to the other polymorphs, these results fail to support the
494 > findings of other researchers indicating the preferred form of TIP5P
495 > at 1~atm is a structure similar to ice
496 > B.\cite{Yamada02,Vega05,Abascal05} It should be noted that we are
497 > looking at TIP5P-E rather than TIP5P, and the differences in the
498 > Lennard-Jones parameters could be a reason for this dissimilarity.
499 > Overall, these results indicate that TIP4P-Ew is a better mimic of
500 > real water than these other models when studying crystallization and
501 > solid forms of water.
502  
503   \section{Conclusions}
504  
505   In this work, thermodynamic integration was used to determine the
506   absolute free energies of several ice polymorphs.  The new polymorph,
507 < Ice-$i$ was observed to be the stable crystalline state for {\it
508 < all} the water models when using a 9.0~\AA\ cutoff.  However, the free
509 < energy partially depends on simulation conditions (particularly on the
510 < choice of long range correction method). Regardless, Ice-$i$ was
511 < still observed to be a stable polymorph for all of the studied water
512 < models.
507 > Ice-$i$ was observed to be the stable crystalline state for {\it all}
508 > the water models when using a 9.0~\AA\ cutoff. Additional work showed
509 > that the free energy depends in part on simulation conditions - in
510 > particular, the choice of long-range correction method. Regardless,
511 > Ice-$i$ was still observed to be a stable polymorph for all of the
512 > studied water models.
513  
514   So what is the preferred solid polymorph for simulated water?  As
515   indicated above, the answer appears to be dependent both on the
# Line 520 | Line 524 | polarizable or flexible models. It is entirely possibl
524  
525   We also note that none of the water models used in this study are
526   polarizable or flexible models. It is entirely possible that the
527 < polarizability of real water makes Ice-$i$ substantially less stable
528 < than ice I$_\textrm{h}$. The dipole moment of the water molecules
529 < increases as the system becomes more condensed, and the increasing
530 < dipole moment should destabilize the tetramer structures in
527 > polarizability of real water makes the Ice-$i$ structure substantially
528 > less stable than ice I$_\textrm{h}$. The dipole moment of the water
529 > molecules increases as the system becomes more condensed, and the
530 > increasing dipole moment should destabilize the tetramer structures in
531   Ice-$i$. Right now, using TIP4P-Ew with an electrostatic correction
532   gives the proper thermodynamically preferred state, and we recommend
533   this arrangement for study of crystallization processes if the
# Line 531 | Line 535 | Finally, due to the stability of Ice-$i$ in the invest
535   is an issue.
536  
537   Finally, due to the stability of Ice-$i$ in the investigated
538 < simulation conditions, the question arises as to possible experimental
538 > simulation conditions, a question arises as to possible experimental
539   observation of this polymorph.  The rather extensive past and current
540   experimental investigation of water in the low pressure regime makes
541   us hesitant to ascribe any relevance to this work outside of the
# Line 544 | Line 548 | function, $g_\textrm{OO}(r)$, and the structure factor
548   non-polar molecules.  For the purpose of comparison with experimental
549   results, we have calculated the oxygen-oxygen pair correlation
550   function, $g_\textrm{OO}(r)$, and the structure factor, $S(\vec{q})$
551 < for the two Ice-{\it i} variants (along with example ice
552 < I$_\textrm{h}$ and I$_\textrm{c}$ plots) at 77~K, and they are shown in
553 < figures \ref{fig:gofr} and \ref{fig:sofq} respectively.  It is
554 < interesting to note that the structure factors for Ice-$i^\prime$ and
555 < Ice-I$_c$ are quite similar.  The primary differences are small peaks
556 < at 1.125, 2.29, and 2.53~\AA$^{-1}$, so particular attention to these
557 < regions would be needed to identify the new $i^\prime$ variant from
554 < the I$_\textrm{c}$ polymorph.
551 > for the two Ice-$i$ variants (along with example ice I$_\textrm{h}$
552 > and I$_\textrm{c}$ plots) at 77~K, and they are shown in figures
553 > \ref{fig:gofr} and \ref{fig:sofq}.  It is interesting to note that the
554 > structure factors for Ice-$i^\prime$ and ice I$_\textrm{c}$ are quite
555 > similar.  The primary differences are small peaks at 1.125, 2.29, and
556 > 2.53~\AA$^{-1}$, so particular attention to these regions would be
557 > needed to distinguish Ice-$i^\prime$ from ice I$_\textrm{c}$.
558  
556
559   \begin{figure}
560   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/iceGofr.pdf}
561 < \caption{Radial distribution functions of Ice-{\it i} and ice
561 > \caption{Radial distribution functions of Ice-$i$ and ice
562   I$_\textrm{c}$ calculated from from simulations of the SSD/RF water
563   model at 77~K.}
564   \label{fig:gofr}
# Line 564 | Line 566 | model at 77~K.}
566  
567   \begin{figure}
568   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/sofq.pdf}
569 < \caption{Predicted structure factors for Ice-{\it i} and ice
569 > \caption{Predicted structure factors for Ice-$i$ and ice
570   I$_\textrm{c}$ at 77~K.  The raw structure factors have been
571 < convoluted with a gaussian instrument function (0.075~\AA$^{-1}$
571 > convoluted with a Gaussian instrument function (0.075~\AA$^{-1}$
572   width) to compensate for the truncation effects in our finite size
573 < simulations. The labeled peaks compared favorably with ``spurious''
572 < peaks observed in experimental studies of amorphous solid
573 < water.\cite{Bizid87}}
573 > simulations.}
574   \label{fig:sofq}
575   \end{figure}
576  

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines